Digital social innovation and civic participation: toward responsible and inclusive transport planning

References

• Abdullah, H., and H. Sahharon. 2020. “Emerging Digital Social Innovation in Youth Work Practice.” In Youth Work in a Digital Society, edited by Z. Zaremohzzabieh, S. Ahrari, S. E. Krauss, A. Abu Samah, and S. Z. Omar, 62–81. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-2956-0.ch004
   Google Scholar
• Adli, S., and S. Donovan. 2018. “Right to the City: Applying Justice Tests to Public Transport Investments.” Transport Policy 66: 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, R., and G. Cândido. 2015. “Tecnologia social e inovação social: interação indutora do desenvolvimento sustentável nos territórios rurais (Social Technology and Social Innovation: Inductor Interaction of Sustainable Development in Rural Territories).” Revista ESPACIOS 36 (13), http://www.revistaespacios.com/a15v36n13/15361301.html.
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council. 2017a. Light Rail. https://at.govt.nz/projects-roadworks/light-rail/ Accessed on 18 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Auckland Council. 2017b. New directors for Auckland Transport board. http://ourauckland.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz/articles/news/2017/04/three-new-directors-appointed-to-auckland-transport-board/
   Google Scholar
• Ayob, N., S. Teasdale, and K. Fagan. 2016. “How Social Innovation ‘Came to be’: Tracing the Evolution of a Contested Concept.” Journal of Social Policy 45 (4): 635–653. doi:10.1017/S004727941600009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banister, D. 2001. “Transport Planning.” Handbook of Transport Systems and Traffic Control 3: 9–19. doi:10.1108/9781615832460-002
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., R. Tolley, and G. Walker. 2002. “Transport Planning and Participation: the Rhetoric and Realities of Public Involvement.” Journal of Transport Geography 10 (1): 1061–1073. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00027-8
   Google Scholar
• Bonina, C., D. López-Berzosa, and M. Scarlata. 2020. “Social, Commercial, or Both? An Exploratory Study of the Identity Orientation of Digital Social Innovations.” Information Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12290
   Google Scholar
• Brette, O. 2003. “Thorstein Veblen's Theory of Institutional Change: Beyond Technological Determinism.” European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 10 (3): 455–477. doi:10.1080/0967256032000106698
   Google Scholar
• CRL. 2020. City Rail Link – Key Facts, https://www.cityraillink.co.nz/key-facts Accessed on 12 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, C. 2008. “Planning for Sustainable Accessibility: the Implementation Challenge.” Transport Policy 15 (2): 104–112. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., M. Nyssens, et al. 2013. “Social Innovation, Social Economy and Social Enterprise: What Can the European Debate Tell us?” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation, edited by F. Moulaert, 40–53. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Eckhardt, J., C. Kaletka, and B. Pelka. 2017. “Inclusion Through Digital Social Innovations: Modelling an Ecosystem of Drivers and Barriers.” International Conference on Universal access in Human-Computer interaction (pp. 67–84). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Fouracre, P., M. Sohail, and S. Cavill. 2006. “A Participatory Approach to Urban Transport Planning in Developing Countries.” Transportation Planning & Technology 29 (4): 313–330. doi:10.1080/03081060600905665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GA. 2017a. About Greater Auckland, https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/about-greater-auckland/ Accessed on 12 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• GA. 2017b. Congestion Free Network 2. https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/congestion-free-network-2/ Accessed on 12 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• GA. 2017c. Regional Rapid Rail. https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/regional-rapid-rail/ Accesed on 12 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2015. Innovation Contested: The Idea of Innovation Over the Centuries (Vol. 98). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, V., and M. Khan. 2017. “Monetising Blogs: Enterprising Behaviour, co-Creation of Opportunities and Social Media Entrepreneurship.” Journal of Business Venturing Insights 7: 26–31. doi:10.1016/j.jbvi.2017.01.002
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., and S. Shannon. 2005. “Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis.” Qualitative Heath Research 15: 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubert, A. 2010. Empowering People, Driving Change: Social Innovation in the European Union. Bureau of European Policy Advisors (BEPA). https://ec.europa.eu/migrant-integration/librarydoc/empowering-people-driving-change-social-innovation-in-the-european-union Accessed on 18 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Imran, M. 2017. Civic Leadership in Transport Planning in Auckland. Paper presented at the 8th State of Australian Cities Conference, 28-30 November. Adelaide. Australian Cities Network.
   Google Scholar
• Imran, M., and J. Pearce. 2015. “Auckland’s First Spatial Plan: Ambitious Aspirations or Furthering the Status quo?” Cities 45: 18–28. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2015.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, T., and B. Kaye. 2004. “Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs Among Blog Users.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 81 (3): 622–642. doi:10.1177/107769900408100310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowrie, M. 2020. Is CRL Still Value for Money? https://www.greaterauckland.org.nz/2020/05/12/is-crl-still-value-for-money/ Accessed on 14 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. 2006. “Providing Transport for Social Inclusion Within a Framework for Environmental Justice in the UK.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 40 (10): 801–809. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas, K. 2012. “Transport and Social Exclusion: Where Are We Now?” Transport Policy 20: 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G. 2015. “Transport’s Digital Age Transition.” Journal of Transport and Land Use 8 (2): 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McArthur, J. 2018. “The Production and Politics of Urban Knowledge: Contesting Transport in Auckland, New Zealand.” Urban Policy and Research 37 (1): 45–61. doi:10.1080/08111146.2018.1476229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mees, P., and J. Dodson. 2007. “Backtracking Auckland?: Technical and Communicative Reason in Metropolitan Transport Planning.” International Planning Studies 12 (1): 35–53. doi:10.1080/13563470701346568
   Google Scholar
• Mehmood, A. 2016. “Of Resilient Places: Planning for Urban Resilience.” European Planning Studies 24 (2): 407–419. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1082980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood, A., T. Marsden, A. Taherzadeh, L. Axinte, and C. Rebelo. 2020. “Transformative Roles of People and Places: Learning, Experiencing, and Regenerative Action Through Social Innovation.” Sustainability Science 15 (2): 455–466. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00740-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood, A., F. Moulaert, et al. 2013. “Holistic Research Methodology and Pragmatic Collective Action.” In The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, edited by F. Moulaert, 442–452. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Misuraca, G., and G. Pasi. 2019. “Landscaping Digital Social Innovation in the EU: Structuring the Evidence and Nurturing the Science and Policy Debate Towards a Renewed Agenda for Social Change.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (3): 592–600. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., and A. Mehmood. 2020. “Towards a Social Innovation (SI) Based Epistemology in Local Development Analysis: Lessons from Twenty Years of EU Research.” European Planning Studies 28 (3): 434–453. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1639401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., A. Mehmood, D. MacCallum, and B. Leubolt. 2017. Social Innovation as a Trigger for Transformations-The Role of Research. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/policy_reviews/social_innovation_trigger_for_transformations.pdf Accessed on 18 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J., M. Becker, F. Grey, and R. Mondardini. 2018. “Citizen Engagement and Collective Intelligence for Participatory Digital Social Innovation.” In Citizen Science: Innovation in Open Science, Society and Policy, edited by S. Hecker, M. Haklay, A. Bowser, Z. Makuch, J. Vogel, and A. Bonn. London: UCL Press. Chap. 9, pp. 124–145.
   Google Scholar
• NZTA. 2017. Auckland Light Rail 2018-2028. https://www.nzta.govt.nz/roads-and-rail/rapid-transit/auckland-light-rail/ Accessed on 18 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S. 2019. “Social Innovation in Cities.” In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies, edited by A. M. Orum, M. García, D. R. Judd, C. P. Pow, and B. R. Roberts, 1907–1911. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. DOI:10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0299
   Google Scholar
• Ormston, R., L. Spencer, M. Barnard, and D. Snape. 2013. “The Foundations of Qualitative Research.” In Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, edited by J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, I. McNaughton, and R. Ormston, 2–26. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pol, E., and S. Ville. 2009. “Social Innovation: Buzz Word or Enduring Term?” The Journal of Socio-Economics 38 (6): 878–885. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2009.02.011
   Google Scholar
• Powers, B., and M. McLuhan. 1989. The Global Village: Transformations in World Life and Media in the 21st Century. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigo, L., M. Fernández, and I. Marcos. 2019. “Digital Social Innovation: Analysis of the Conceptualization Process and Definition pro-Posal.” Dirección y organización: Revista de dirección, organización y administración de empresas 67: 59–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., and M. Pennington. 2000. “Public Participation and Local Environmental Planning: The Collective Action Problem and the Potential of Social Capital.” Local Environment 5 (2): 153–169. doi:10.1080/13549830050009328
   Google Scholar
• Salmon, F. 2011. How Blogs Have Changed Journalism. Reuters. 16 March, http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2011/03/16/how-blogs-have-changed-journalism/ Accessed on 14 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, J., and J. Genter. 2020. Greens Push for Large Intercity Rail Infrastructure to Ensure Sustainable post-COVID-19 rebuild. https://www.greens.org.nz/greens_push_for_large_intercity_rail_infrastructure_to_ensure_sustainable_post_covid_19_rebuild Accessed on 18 May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Shockley, G. 2015. ‘Book Review: The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research, edited by F. Moulaert, D. MacCallum, A. Mehmood, and A. Hamdouch. 2013. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar’ Journal of Regional Science 55 (1), 152–154.
   Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., and N. Stott. 2017. “Social Innovation: A Window on Alternative Ways of Organizing and Innovating.” Innovation 19 (1): 51–60. doi:10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, P., A. Mehmood, A. Paidakaki, and C. Parra, eds. 2019. Social Innovation as Political Transformation: Thoughts for a Better World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Veblen, T. 1919. The Place of Science in Modern Civilisation and Other Essays. New York: B.W. Huebsch.
   Google Scholar
• Ward, D. 2001. “Stakeholder Involvement in Transport Planning: Participation and Power.” Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19 (2): 119–130. doi:10.3152/147154601781767131
   Google Scholar
• Willson, R. 2001. “Assessing Communicative Rationality as a Transportation Planning Paradigm.” Transportation 28: 1–31. doi:10.1023/A:1005247430522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, S. 2008. “Technological Determinism is Dead; Long Live Technological Determinism.” The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 3: 165–180.
   Google Scholar