Negotiating asymmetric borders in an emerging soft region

References

• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2009. “Soft Spaces, Fuzzy Boundaries, and Metagovernance: The New Spatial Planning in the Thames Gateway.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 41 (3): 617–633. doi:10.1068/a40208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anell, A., and O. Mattisson. 2009. Samverkan i kommuner och landsting – en kunskapsöversikt (Cooperation in Municipalities and County Councils: An Overview). Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, É. 1998. “The Borders of Europe.” In Cosmopolitics: Thinking and Feeling Beyond the Nation, edited by P. Cheah, and B. Robbins, 216–229. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beauregard, R. A. 2015. Planning Matter: Acting with Things. London: The University of Chicago Press, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K. 2012. ““Because We’ve got History Here”: Nuclear Waste, Cooperative Siting, and the Relational Geography of a Complex Issue.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44: 2611–2628. doi:10.1068/a44583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blücher, G. 2006. “1900-talet – det kommunala planmonopolets århundrade (The 20th Century: Era of Sweden’s Municipal Planning Monopoly).” In Planering med nya förutsättningar: Ny lagstiftning, nya värderingar, edited by G. Blücher, and G. Graninger, 133–155. Vadstena: Stiftelsen Vadstena Forum för Samhällsbyggande.
   Google Scholar
• Boverket. 2008–2019. Summaries of planning and building questionnaire surveys for the years 2008–2010 and 2012–2019. Reports for the years 2013–2019 are available at https://www.boverket.se/sv/om-boverket/publicerat-av-boverket/oppna-data/plan–och-byggenkaten/ (accessed 22 June 2020). Earlier reports were received directly from an employee at Boverket
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla, C. 2015. “Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept.” Geopolitics 20 (1): 14–34. doi:10.1080/14650045.2014.884561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., D. J. Madden, and D. Wachsmuth. 2011. “Assemblage Urbanism and the Challenges of Critical Urban Theory.” City 15: 225–240. doi:10.1080/13604813.2011.568717
   Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, G. Ó., J. Ödalen, and E. Wångmar. 2015. “Understanding Large-Scale Institutional Change.” Scandinavian Journal of History 40 (2): 195–214. doi:10.1080/03468755.2015.1016551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossas, M. 2006. Kommunal samverkan och statlig nätverksstyrning (Municipal cooperation and state network governance), Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and N. Thrift. 2007. “Out of Order: Understanding Repair and Maintenance.” Theory, Culture & Society 24: 1–25. doi:10.1177/0263276407075954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallsbergs kommun. 2008. Samrådshandling Översiktsplan Hallsbergs kommun (Comprehensive plan, consultation proposal), Strategiutskottet.
   Google Scholar
• Hallsbergs kommun. 2010. Samrådsredogörelse Översiktsplan (Comprehensive plan, consultation report), Kommunstyrelsens Strategiutskott.
   Google Scholar
• Hallsbergs kommun. 2011. ÖP Hallsbergs kommun 2010-2020 (Comprehensive plan), antagen av kommunfullmäktige 2011-05-16.
   Google Scholar
• Hallsbergs kommun. 2012. Detaljplan för Rala industriområde etapp 3 (Detailed plan), antagen av kommunfullmäktige 2012-12-17. Available at https://www.hallsberg.se/download/18.5a322074160e4121cd3cec6a/1516720117552/rala_industriomrade_etapp_3_planbeskrivning.pdf (accessed 24 August 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Hallsbergs kommun. 2014. Detaljplan för område norr om Tälleleden (Detailed plan), antagen av kommunfullmäktige 2014-04-28. Available at https://www.hallsberg.se/download/18.5a322074160e4121cd3cde6d/1516715987784/norr_talleleden_plankarta.pdf (accessed 24 August 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Hallsbergs kommun. 2016. Översiktsplan för Hallsbergs kommun (Comprehensive plan), antagen av kommunfullmäktige 2016-11-28. Available at https://www.hallsberg.se/download/18.2812fcf2160e442bbb4e3d92/1516810562345/%C3%96versiktsplan%20f%C3%B6r%20Hallsbergs%20kommun.pdf (accessed 24 August 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Hallsbergs kommun. 2020. Kommunens organisation (The municipal organization), web information. https://www.hallsberg.se/organisation-och-styrning/kommunens-organisation.html (accessed 24 April 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Haselsberger, B. 2014. “Decoding Borders. Appreciating Border Impacts on Space and People.” Planning Theory & Practice 15 (4): 505–526. doi:10.1080/14649357.2014.963652
   Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., P. Allmendiger, D. Counsell, and G. Vigar. 2010. The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2007. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heley, J. 2013. “Soft Spaces, Fuzzy Boundaries and Spatial Governance in Post-Devolution Wales.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 1325–1348. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01149.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., and A. Van Montfort. 2007. “Inter-Municipal Cooperation: A Widespread Phenomenon.” In Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe, edited by R. Hulst, and A. Van Montfort, 1–21. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., and A. Van Montfort. 2012. “Institutional Features of Inter-Municipal Cooperation: Cooperative Arrangements and Their National Contexts.” Public Policy and Administration 27 (2): 121–144. doi:10.1177/0952076711403026
   Google Scholar
• Kumla kommun. 2011a. Kumla 25 000 Översiktsplan för Kumla kommun Del 2 – Planeringsförutsättningar och riktlinjer (Comprehensive plan, part 2), adopted by the municipal council 2011-02-14.
   Google Scholar
• Kumla kommun. 2011b. Kumla 25 000 Översiktsplan för Kumla kommun Del 3 – Kartbilagor (Comprehensive plan, part 3), adopted by the municipal council 2011-02-14.
   Google Scholar
• Kumla kommun. 2011c. Markbyten och fastighetsköp berörande Hallsbergs kommun och Kumla kommun (Land exchanges and property purchases concerning the municipality of Hallsberg and the municipality of Kumla), rapport, kommunledningskontoret, 2011-11-01.
   Google Scholar
• Kumla kommun. 2020. Bolag och kommunalförbund (Companies and municipal cooperations), web information. Available at https://www.kumla.se/kommun-och-politik/kommunens-organisation/bolag-och-kommunalforbund.html (accessed 24 April 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S. 2009. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun (The Qualitative Research Interview). Lund: Studentlitteratur AB.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why has Critique run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. doi:10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. 2002. “Objects and Spaces.” Theory, Culture and Society 19: 91–105.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A. 2011. “From Relations to Dissociations in Spatial Thinking: Sámi ‘Geographs’ and the Promise of Concentric Geographies.” Fennia 189 (2): 14–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstenz, B. 2008. Samspel: regionalt och mellankommunalt samarbete i Stockholms län under ett drygt kvartssekel (Interaction: Regional and Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Stockholm County for Just over a Quarter of a Century). Stockholm: Libris.
   Google Scholar
• LST. 2011. Minnesanteckningar från möte gällande gränsjustering mellan Hallsbergs och Kumla kommun (Minutes from meeting regarding border adjustment between the municipalities of Hallsberg and Kumla). Länsstyrelsen Örebro (Örebro County Administrative Board), Camilla Johansson, 2011-03-04.
   Google Scholar
• Malpas, J. 2012. “Putting Space in Place: Philosophical Topography and Relational Geography.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30: 226–242. doi:10.1068/d20810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, J. 2013. “Raising the Regional Leviathan: A Relational-Materialist Conceptualization of Regions-in-Becoming as Publics-in-Stabilization.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37: 1368–1395. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, J. 2006. Post-structuralist Geography: a Guide to Relational Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2006. “The Lines That Continue to Separate us: Borders in our ‘Borderless’ World.” Progress in Human Geography 30 (2): 143–161. doi:10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2009. “Bounded Spaces in a ‘Borderless World’: Border Studies, Power and the Anatomy of Territory.” Journal of Power 2 (2): 213–234. doi:10.1080/17540290903064275
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A., and K. Zimmerbauer. 2016. “Penumbral Borders and Planning Paradoxes: Relational Thinking and the Question of Borders in Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 48: 75–93. doi:10.1177/0308518X15594805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qviström, M. 2010. “Shadows of Planning: on Landscape/Planning History and Inherited Landscape Ambiguities at the Urban Fringe’.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 92 (3): 219–235. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2010.00349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qviström, M. 2018. “Farming Ruins: a Landscape Study of Incremental Urbanisation.” Landscape Research 43 (5): 575–586. doi:10.1080/01426397.2017.1353959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rader Olsson, A., and G. Cars. 2011. “Polycentric Spatial Development: Institutional Challenges to Intermunicipal Cooperation.” Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 31: 155–171. doi:10.1007/s10037-011-0054-x
   Google Scholar
• Region Örebro. 2011. Regional Översiktlig Planering - rumsligt perspektiv på Utvecklingsstrategi för Örebroregionen (Regional Comprehensive Planning – a spatial perspective on Development Strategy for the Region Örebro County). Available at https://www.regionorebrolan.se/PageFiles/1204663/Regional_%c3%b6versiktlig_planering_R%c3%96P.pdf?epslanguage=sv (accessed 27 April 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Region Örebro. 2018. Tillväxt och hållbar utveckling i Örebro län - Regional utvecklingsstrategi 2018–2030 (Growth and sustainable development in the county of Örebro - Regional development strategy 2018–2030). Available at https://www.regionorebrolan.se/Files-sv/%c3%96rebro%20l%c3%a4ns%20landsting/Regional%20utveckling/Regional%20utvecklingsstrategi/Dokument/2018/RUS%20f%c3%b6r%20webb.pdf (accessed 27 April 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Rumford, C. 2012. “Towards a Multiperspectival Study of Borders.” Geopolitics 17 (4): 887–902. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.660584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruming, K., and D. Houston. 2013. “Enacting Planning Borders: Consolidation and Resistance in Ku-Ring-gai, Sydney.” Australian Planner 50 (2): 123–129. doi:10.1080/07293682.2013.776985
   Google Scholar
• SCB. 2020a. Population and land area within localities, by locality. Every fifth year 1960–2019, Statistiska centralbyrån, SCB (Statistics Sweden). Available at http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/en/ssd/START__MI__MI0810__MI0810A/LandarealTatortN/ (accessed 20 May 2020)
   Google Scholar
• SCB. 2020b. Kommuner i siffror (Municipalities in figures), Statistiska centralbyrån, SCB (Statistics Sweden). Available at https://www.scb.se/hitta-statistik/sverige-i-siffror/kommuner-i-siffror/#?region1=1861&region2=1881 (accessed 20 May 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. W., and C. Sohn. 2019. “Place-making and the Bordering of Urban Space: Interpreting the Emergence of new Neighbourhoods in Berlin and Budapest.” European Urban and Regional Studies 26 (3): 297–313. doi:10.1177/0969776418764577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SFS (The Swedish Code of Statutes). 2010:900. Plan- och bygglag (Planning and Building Act), Finansdepartementet (Swedish Ministry of Finance). Available at https://www.riksdagen.se/sv/dokument-lagar/dokument/svensk-forfattningssamling/plan–och-bygglag-2010900_sfs-2010-900 (accessed 20 December 2019)
   Google Scholar
• SOU (Swedish Govt. Official Report). 2005:77. Får jag lov? Om planering och byggande (Shall we dance? About planning and Building), Näringsdepartementet (Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation) 2005. Available at https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2005/09/sou-200577/ (accessed 14 January 2020)
   Google Scholar
• SOU (Swedish Govt. Official Report). 2018:46. En utvecklad översiktsplanering (A Comprehensive Planning Further Developed), Näringsdepartementet (Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation) 2018. Available at https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/statens-offentliga-utredningar/2018/05/sou-201846/ (accessed 14 January 2020)
   Google Scholar
• Steele, W., T. Alizadeh, and L. Eslami-Andargoli. 2013. “Planning Across Borders.” Australian Planner 50 (2): 96–102. doi:10.1080/07293682.2013.776977
   Google Scholar
• Thrift, N. 2006. “Space.” Theory, Culture & Society 23 (2-3): 139–146. doi:10.1177/0263276406063780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valverde, M. 2009. “Jurisdiction and Scale: Legal ‘Technicalities’ as Resources for Theory.” Social and Legal Studies 18 (2): 139–157. doi:10.1177/0964663909103622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K., and A. Paasi. 2020. “Hard Work with Soft Spaces (and Vice Versa): Problematizing the Transforming Planning Spaces.” European Planning Studies 28 (4): 771–789. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1653827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar