Circular Economy in the building industry European policy and local practices

References

• Abrahamsson, H. 2015. Göteborg i världen, Stadens historia förklarar nuet och hållbarheten. Ett kunskapsunderlag om tillväxtens och välfärdens framtida förutsättningar framtaget för projekt KAIROS, juni 2015. Gothenburg: Mistra Urban Futures Report.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, K., M. Osmani, T. Thorpe, J. Thornback. 2017. “Circular Economy in Construction: Current Awareness, Challenges and Enablers.” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management 170: 15–24. https://doi.org/doi:10.1680/jwarm.16.00011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajayi, S., and L. Oyedele. 2018. “Waste-efficient Materials Procurement for Construction Projects: A Structural Equation Modelling of Critical Success Factors.” Waste Management 75: 60–69. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.01.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akanbi, L., L. Oyedele, O. Akinade, A. Ajayi, M. Davila Delgado, M. Bilal, and S. Bello. 2018. “Salvaging Building Materials in a Circular Economy: A BIM-Based Whole-Life Performance Estimator.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 129: 175–186. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinade, O., and L. Oyedele. 2019. “Integrating Construction Supply Chains Within a Circular Economy: An ANFIS-Based Waste Analytics System (A-WAS).” Journal of Cleaner Production 229: 863–873. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allegrezza, S., M. Hildgen, M. Jentgen, L. Putz, G. Spalletti, P. Thielen, and C. Peroni. 2018. Competitiveness Report 2018: Holding up in a Turbulent Time. Luxembourg: Ministère de l’Économie, Observatoire de la compétitivité.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, S. 2014. “Practicing the Cultural Green Economy: Where Now for Environmental Social Science?” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 96: 231–243. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/geob.12048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., and J. Glückler. 2014. “Institutional Change in Economic Geography.” Progress in Human Geography 38: 340–363. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0309132513507823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolger, K., and A. Doyon. 2019. “Circular Cities: Exploring Local Government Strategies to Facilitate a Circular Economy.” European Planning Studies 27: 2184–2205. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1642854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorström, S. 2015. “Strategizing Sustainability: The Case of River City, Gothenburg.” Cities 42: 25–30. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.cities.2014.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiappetta Jabbour, C., J. Sarkis, A. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour, D. Scott Renwick, S. Singh, O. Grebinevych, I. Kruglianskas, and M. Filho. 2019. “Who is in Charge? A Review and a Research Agenda on the ‘Human Side’ of the Circular Economy.” Journal of Cleaner Production 222: 793–801. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellen MacArthur Foundation. 2013. Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Cowes: The Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• EPEA. 2014. Luxembourg. The Knowledge Capital of the Circular Economy. A National Roadmap: Tradition, Transition, Transformation. Study Highlights. Hamburg: EPEA Internationale Umweltforschung GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Erden, Z., A. Schneider, and G. von Krogh. 2014. “The Multifaceted Nature of Social Practices: A Review of the Perspectives on Practice-Based theory Building about Organizations.” European Management Journal 32: 712–722. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.emj.2014.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esa, M., A. Halog, and L. Rigamonti. 2017. “Developing Strategies for Managing Construction and Demolition Wastes in Malaysia Based on the Concept of Circular Economy.” Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 19: 1144–1154. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s10163-016-0516-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. “Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe.” COM (2011).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2014. “Towards a Circular Economy: A Zero Waste Programme for Europe, (COM(2014)398), 2/7/2014”.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. “Closing the Loop-an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy COM(2015) 614 final”.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. “European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 final 11.12.2019.” Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. “A New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and more Competitive Europe COM(2020) 98 final.” Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2015. Archive: Construction Statistics – NACE Rev. 2. Eurostat, Luxembourg. Accessed March 19, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Archive:Construction_statistics_-_NACE_Rev._2.
   Google Scholar
• Everts, J., and S. Schäfer. 2019. “Praktiken und Raum.” In Handbuch Praktiken und Raum Humangeographie Nach dem Practice Turn, edited by S. Schäfer, and J. Everts, 7–19. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Faller, F. 2016. Energetisches Regionalisieren Transformationspraktiken der Energiewende am Beispiel der Biogaserzeugung. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang AG.
   Google Scholar
• GDL. 2018. “Competitiveness Report 2018: Holding up in a Turbulent Time.” Luxembourg: Observatory for Competitiveness.
   Google Scholar
• Geilinger, N., S. Haefliger, G. von Krogh, and L. Rechsteiner. 2016. “What Makes a Social Practice? Being, Knowing, Doing and Leading.” European Management Journal 34: 319–327. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.emj.2016.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gencel, O., C. Ozel, F. Koksal, E. Erdogmus, G. Martínez-Barrera, and W. Brostow. 2012. “Properties of Concrete Paving Blocks Made with Waste Marble.” Journal of Cleaner Production 21: 62–70. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geng, Y., J. Fu, J. Sarkis, and B. Xue. 2012. “Towards a National Circular Economy Indicator System in China: An Evaluation and Critical Analysis.” Journal of Cleaner Production 23: 216–224. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherardi, S. 2019. How to Conduct a Practice-Based Study: Problems and Methods. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ghisellini, P., M. Ripa, and S. Ulgiati. 2018. “Exploring Environmental and Economic Costs and Benefits of a Circular Economy Approach to the Construction and Demolition Sector. A Literature Review.” Journal of Cleaner Production 178: 618–643. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D., and K. O’Neill. 2014. “The Green Economy, Sustainability Transitions and Transition Regions: A Case Study of Boston.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 96: 201–216. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/geob.12046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glückler, J., and R. Lenz. 2016. “How Institutions Moderate the Effectiveness of Regional Policy: A Framework and Research Agenda.” Journal of Regional Research 36, 255–277. https://investigacionesregionales.org/en/revista/monografico-2016-new-frontiers-of-regional-and-urban-analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Göteborgs Stad. 2019. “Göteborgs Stads Årsredovisning 2018”.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, K., D. Mulhall, and M. Zils. 2014. Luxembourg as a Knowledge Capital and Testing Ground for the Circular Economy. National Roadmap for Positive Impacts. Tradition, Transition, Transformation. Luxembourg: EPEA Internationale Umweltforschung GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, T. 2011. “Practice-ing Behaviour Change: Applying Social Practice theory to Pro-Environmental Behaviour Change.” Journal of Consumer Culture 11: 79–99. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/1469540510390500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermelin, B., and H. Rämö. 2016. “Intermediary Activities and Agendas of Regional Cleantech Networks in Sweden.” Environment and Planning C 35: 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16644256.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, K. 2016. “Closing the Loop or Squaring the Circle? Locating Generative Spaces for the Circular Economy.” Progress in Human Geography 40: 88–104. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0309132514566342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne, R., and S. Moloney. 2019. “Urban Low Carbon Transitions: Institution-Building and Prospects for Interventions in Social Practice.” European Planning Studies 27: 336–354. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1472745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P., and D. Wilson. 2002. “Top Teams and Strategy in a UK University.” Journal of Management Studies 39: 355–381. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsen, I., A. Berlina, G. Lindberg, N. Mikkola, L. Smed Olsen, and J. Teräs. 2015. “The Potential of Industrial Symbiosis as a Key Driver of Green Growth in Nordic Regions.” Nordregio Report 2015-1.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and J. Murphy. 2010a. “Practice and Economic Geography.” Geography Compass 4: 303–319. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00315.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and J. Murphy. 2010b. “Theorizing Practice in Economic Geography: Foundations, Challenges, and Possibilities.” Progress in Human Geography 35: 366–392. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0309132510375585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmykova, Y., M. Sadagopan, and L. Rosado. 2018. “Circular Economy – from Review of Theories and Practices to Development of Implementation Tools.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 135: 190–201. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.10.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanters, J. 2020. “Circular Building Design: An Analysis of Barriers and Drivers for a Circular Building Sector.” Buildings 10: 77. https://doi.org/doi:10.3390/buildings10040077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchherr, J., D. Reike, and M. Hekkert. 2017. “Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221–232. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuckartz, U., and S. Rädiker. 2019. Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lenz, R., and J. Glückler. 2020. “Same Same but Different: Regional Coherence between Institutions and Policies in Family Firm Succession.” European Planning Studies 29(3): 536–555. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1757041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieder, M., and A. Rashid. 2016. “Towards Circular Economy Implementation: A Comprehensive Review in Context of Manufacturing Industry.” Journal of Cleaner Production 115: 36–51. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. 2009. “Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections.” Organization Studies 30: 1391–1418. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0170840609349875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. 2012. Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., and P. Monteiro. 2016. “The Practice Approach: For a Praxeology of Organisational and Management Studies.” In The SAGE Handbook of Process Organization Studies, edited by Ann Langley, and Haridimos Tsoukas, 110–126. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• North, D 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Preller, B. 2018. “Luxembourg: A Policy-Led Approach Caught Between Green Growth and Affordable Housing.” In Green Building Transitions - Regional Trajectories of Innovation in Europe, Canada and Australia, edited by J. Affolderbach, and C. Schulz, 159–188. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Radwan, L., and S. Kinder. 2013. “Practising the Diffusion of Organizational Routines.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45: 2442–2458. https://doi.org/doi:10.1068/a45290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reckwitz, A. 2002. “Toward a Theory of Social Practices.” European Journal of Social Theory 5: 243–263. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/13684310222225432.
   Google Scholar
• Rosado, L., Y. Kalmykova, and J. Patrício. 2016. “Urban Metabolism Profiles. An Empirical Analysis of the Material Flow Characteristics of Three Metropolitan Areas in Sweden.” Journal of Cleaner Production 126: 206–217. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2005. “Peripheral Vision.” Organization Studies 26: 465–484. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/0170840605050876
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. 2010. The Timespace of Human Activity: On Performance, Society, and History as Indeterminate Teleological Events. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T., K. Knorr Cetina, and E. Savigny. 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London/New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, C., R. Hjaltadottir, and P. Hild. 2019. “Practising Circles: Studying Institutional Change and Circular Economy Practices.” Journal of Cleaner Production 237. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117749
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, C., and B. Preller. 2016. “Keeping Up with the Pace of Green Building: Service Provision in a Highly Dynamic Sector.” In Services and the Green Economy, edited by A. Jones, P. Ström, B. Hermelin, and G. Rusten, 269–296. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2014. “Putting Practice Into Policy: Reconfiguring Questions of Consumption and Climate Change.” Contemporary Social Science 9: 415–429. https://doi.org/doi:10.1080/21582041.2012.692484
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. 2015. “Linking Low Carbon Policy and Social Practice.” In Social Practices, Intervention and Sustainability: Beyond Behaviour Change, edited by Y. Strengers, and C. Maller, 31–44. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., M. Pantzar, and M. Watson. 2012. The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2010. “Governing Transitions in the Sustainability of Everyday Life.” Research Policy 39: 471–476. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soust-Verdaguer, B., C. Llatas, and A. García-Martínez. 2017. “Critical Review of Bim-based LCA Method to Buildings.” Energy and Buildings 136: 110–120. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steel, J., R. Drogemuller, and B. Toth. 2012. “Model Interoperability in Building Information Modelling.” Software & Systems Modeling 11: 99–109. https://doi.org/doi:10.1007/s10270-010-0178-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thews, B., P. Höjding, and B. Jansson. 2017. Swedish Environmental Law. An Introduction to the Swedish Legal System for Environmental Protection. Stockholm: Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• TIR. 2016. The 3rd Industrial Revolution Strategy Study for the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Final TIR Strategy Study, 14 November 2016. Luxembourg: The TIR Consulting Group.
   Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., and R. Whittington. 2012. “Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously.” Academy of Management Annals 6: 285–336. https://doi.org/doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.672039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, D. 2016. “Social Practices and Behaviour Change.” In Beyond Behaviour Change, edited by F. Spotswood, 237–255. Bristol: Bristol University Press, Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemann, J., S. Schäfer, and F. Faller. 2019. “Praxistheorien in der Wirtschaftsgeographie.” In Handbuch Praktiken und Raum: Humangeographie nach dem Practice Turn, edited by S. Schäfer, and J. Everts, 299–316. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Los Angeles: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, Z., J. Bi, and Y. Moriguichi. 2006. “The Circular Economy: A New Development Strategy in China.” Journal of Industrial Ecology 10: 4–8. https://doi.org/doi:10.1162/108819806775545321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar