Reading EUropean borderlands under the perspective of legal geography and spatial justice

References

• Barca, F. 2019. “Place-Based Policy and Politics.” Renewal: A Journal of Labor Politics 27 (1): 84–95. https://www.dowjones.com/products/factiva/.
   Google Scholar
• Belkacem, R., and I. Pigeron-Piroth. 2020. Borders and Cross-border Labor Markets: Opportunities and Challenges, UniGR-CBS Thematic issue 3. https://ubt.opus.hbz-nrw.de/opus45-ubtr/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/1390/file/UniGR-CBS_Borders+in+Perspective_thematic+issue+Vol.+3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L., and A. Layard. 2015. “Legal Geography: Becoming Spatial Detectives.” Geography Compass 9 (7): 406–422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bialasiewicz, L., and E. Maessen. 2018. “Scaling Rights: The ‘Turkey Deal’ and the Divided Geographies of European Responsibility.” Patterns of Prejudice 52 (2–3): 210–230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0031322X.2018.1433009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blandy, S., and D. Sibley. 2010. “Law, Boundaries and the Production of Space.” Social and Legal Studies 19 (3): 275–284. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663910372178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomley, N. 2010. “The Right to Pass Freely: Circulation, Begging, and The Bounded Self.” Social & Legal Studies 19 (3): 331–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663910372183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, C., and E. Evrard. 2019. “Territorial Development + Local Autonomy = Spatial (in)Justice?” [« Développement territorial + autonomie locale = (in)justice spatiale »], Justice spatiale/Spatial Justice, 13. http://www.jssj.org.
   Google Scholar
• Braverman, I., N. Blomley, D. Delaney, and A. Kedar. 2014. “Introduction.” In The Expanding Spaces of Law: A Timely Legal Geography (Legal studies, 1–29). doi:https://doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804787185.003.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, R. 1995. “Border Crossings: NAFTA, Regulatory Restructuring, and the Politics of Place.” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 2 (2): 371–394.
   Google Scholar
• Casteigts, M. 2013. “Les paradoxes de l’équité territoriale.” In Ali Sedjari: Droits humain et développement des territoires: vers un nouveau modèle de gouvernance. L’Harmattan. halshs-01529778.
   Google Scholar
• Chambon, M. 2015. “L’espace et le territoire : le droit public à l’épreuve de l’extranéité.” Civitas Europa 2 (2): 95–121. doi:https://doi.org/10.3917/civit.035.0095.
   Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., E. Evrard, and C. Schulz. 2012. “On the Territoriality of Cross-Border Cooperation: “Institutional Mapping” in a Multi-Level Context.” European Planning Studies 20 (6): 961–980. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.673563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, J., and A. Jones. 2008. “The Spatialities of Europeanisation: Territory, Government and Power in “EUrope.”” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (3): 300–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoE (Council of Europe). 2019. “Fair Distribution of Taxes in Transfrontier Areas - Potential Conflicts and Possibilities for Compromise.” Recommendation 438 (2019), https://rm.coe.int/fair-distribution-of-taxes-in-transfrontier-areas-potential-conflicts-/168097f09d.
   Google Scholar
• Committee of the Regions, Spatial Foresight, t33, ÖIR. 2019. EGTC monitoring report 2018-2019. cor.europa.eu; doi:https://doi.org/10.2863/430409.
   Google Scholar
• De Boe, P., C. Grasland, and A. Healy. 1999. “Spatial Integration.” Workgroup 1.4. Study Programme on European Spatial Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. 2004. Difference and Repetition. Translated by P. Patton. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F., C. Lamour, N. Raimbault, A. Malherbe, M. Grandjean, A. Leclercq, A. Nihoul, et al. 2018. Schéma de Développement Territorial de la Grande Région, Cahier thématique n°3 Développement économique. https://amenagement-territoire.public.lu/dam-assets/fr/affaires_transfrontalières/Cahier-Thematique-n-3-FR-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, J. 1992. “Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’, trans. M. Quaintance.” In Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice, edited by D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld and D. Gray Carlson. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Engl, A., and E. Evrard. 2019. “Agenda-setting Dynamics in the Post-2020 Cohesion Policy Reform: The Pathway towards the European Cross-Border Mechanism as Possible Policy Change.” Journal of European Integration, (7): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1689969.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON & University of Luxembourg. 2010. METROBORDER Project – Cross-border polycentric metropolitan regions, Final Report, at www.espon.eu.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017a. “Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions.” (SWD(2017) 307 final), Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2017b. Commission Staff Working Document. Accompanying the Document “Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions.” COM (2017) 534 final. SWD (2017) 307 final. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docoffic/2014/boosting_growth/swd_boosting_border_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2018. “Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a mechanism to Resolve Legal and Administrative Obstacles in a Cross-Border Context.” 29.05.2018 (COM(2018) 373 final). https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/regional-development-and-cohesion_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Council and European Parliament. 2006. “Regulation No. 1082/2006 on a European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC).” Official Journal of the European Union L 210, 19.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E. 2016. “The European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): Towards a Supraregional Scale of Governance in the Greater Region SaarLorLux?” Geopolitics. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2015.1104667.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E. 2017. La Grande Région SaarLorLux: Vers une suprarégionalisation transfrontalière? Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E. 2019. The EPA Alzette-Belval. A National Tool to Address Spatial Disparities at the Lorraine-Luxembourg Border. RELOCAL Case Study No. 18/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E. 2020. “How Does European Law Shift Borders? The Proposal for a Regulation to Resolve Legal and Administrative Obstacles in a Cross-Border Context.” Annales de Géographie 733–734 (3-4): 46–66.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E., and A. Engl. 2018. “Taking Stock of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): From Policy Formulation to Policy Implementation.” In European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe, edited by E. Medeiros, 209–227. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E., B. Nienaber, and A. Sommaribas. 2018. “The Temporary Reintroduction of Border Controls Inside the Schengen Area: Towards a Spatial Perspective.” Journal of Borderlands Studies. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1415164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottmann, J. 1951. La politique des États et leur géographie. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Haselsberger, B. 2014. “Decoding Borders. Appreciating Border Impacts on Space and People.” Planning Theory & Practice 15 (4): 505–526. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2014.963652.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. 2013. “On Borrowed Size, Flawed Urbanisation and Emerging Enclave Spaces: The Exceptional Urbanism of Luxembourg, Luxembourg.” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (4): 612–627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414528723.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. 2016. “On Borrowed Size, Flawed Urbanisation and Emerging Enclave Spaces: The Exceptional Urbanism of Luxembourg, Luxembourg.” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (4): 612–627. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414528723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISIG. 2013. Manual on Removing Obstacles to Cross-Border Cooperation, Etude conduite pour le Conseil de l’Europe. http://isig.it/en/manual-on-removing-obstacles-to-cbc-2014/.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C., R. Jones, A. Paasi, L. Amoore, A. Mountz, M. Salter, and C. Rumford. 2011. “Interventions on Rethinking ‘the Border’ in Border Studies.” Political Geography 30 (2): 61–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, R., B. Goodwin-Hawkins, and M. Woods. 2020. “From Territorial Cohesion to Regional Spatial Justice: The Well-Being of Future Generations Act in Wales.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 44: 894–912. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, T., and F. Görmar. 2019. “Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation - Re-Thinking Spatial Policies in Europe.” In Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation (New Geogra). doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1190-1.
   Google Scholar
• Lejeune, Y. 2004. “Vers un Droit Européen de la Coopération Transfrontalière.” Annales de Droit de Louvain, Idées et Perspectives 64 (3): 353–364.
   Google Scholar
• Levrat, N. 2005. L’Europe et ses collectivités territoriales: réflexions sur l’organisation et l’exercice du pouvoir territorial dans un monde globalisé. Bruxelles: PIE.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A., M. Shucksmith, and H. Talbot. 2017. Locality and Spatial Justice: A Conceptual Framework. RELOCAL Working Paper Series (1). RELOCAL - Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Development.
   Google Scholar
• Madanipour, A., M. Shucksmith, H. Talbot, J. Crawford, and E. Brooks. 2020. Revised conceptual framework for the project. RELOCAL - Resituating the Local in Cohesion and Territorial Development.
   Google Scholar
• Maillet, P., A. Mountz, and K. Williams. 2018. “Exclusion through Imperio: Entanglements of Law and Geography in the Waiting Zone, Excised Territory and Search and Rescue Region.” Social and Legal Studies 27 (2): 142–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663917746487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage publications. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.04.019.
   Google Scholar
• Morange, M., and A. Quentin. 2018. “Spatial Justice, Critical Thinking and Normativity in the Social Sciences.” Justice Spatial / Spatial Justice 8: 1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/20440243.2018.1431755
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2003. “On Borders and Power: A Theoretical Framework.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 18 (1): 13–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2003.9695598.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2006. “The Lines That Continue to Separate Us: Borders in Our ‘Borderless’ World.” Progress in Human Geography 30 (2): 143–161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, L. 2001. “Analysing Europe’s Borders.” Boundary and Security Bulletin 9 (2): 67–79. www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/publications/view/?id=189.
   Google Scholar
• O’Dowd, L. 2010. “From a ‘Borderless World’ to a ‘World of Borders’: ‘Bringing History Back in’.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 28 (1): 1031–1050. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/d2009.
   Google Scholar
• OIE. 2019. Situation du marché de l’emploi dans la Grande Région. https://www.iba-oie.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/Berichte/11._IBA-Bericht_2019/IBA_2019_Frontaliers_FR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 1986. “The Institutionalization of Regions: A Theoretical Framework for Understanding the Emergence of Regions and the Constitution of Regional Identity.” Fennia 164 (1): 105–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.11143/9052.
   Google Scholar
• Perrier, B., and N. Levrat. 2015. “Melting Law: Learning from Practice in Transboundary Mountain Regions.” Environmental Science & Policy 49: 32–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2018. “And For Law: Why Space cannot be Understood without Law.” Law, Culture and the Humanities. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872118765708.
   Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2010. “Spatial Justice: Law and the Geography of Withdrawal.” International Journal of Law in Context 6 (3): 201–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S174455231000011X.
   Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2011. “Law’s Spatial Turn: Geography, Justice and a Certain Fear of Space.” Law, Culture and the Humanities 7 (2): 187–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1743872109355578.
   Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2013. “Spatial Justice in the Lawscape.” In Urban Interstices: The Aesthetics and the Politics of the In-Between, edited by A. Brighenti, 88–102. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315548807-4.
   Google Scholar
• Philippopoulos-Mihalopoulos, A. 2015. “Spatial Justice: Body, Lawscape, Atmosphere.” In Spatial Justice. doi:https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315780528.
   Google Scholar
• Piras, S., M. Currie, D. Duckett, A. Copus, P. Tobiasz-Lis, and K. Dmochowska-Dudek. 2020. Trajectories of Spatial Justice and Actions to Achieve It across Europe. Deliverable D8.3 – Report on alternative scenarios for case study regions, University of Eastern Finland, www.relocal.eu
   Google Scholar
• Pullano, T. 2009. The Evolving Category of Territory: From the Modern State to the European Union. (March), 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. “Commentary: The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (and What to Do About It).” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. 2020. “Introduction to a Research Agenda for Border Studies.” In A Research Agenda for Border Studies, edited by J. Scott, 3–24. Elgar Research Agendas
   Google Scholar
• Shadian, J. 2018. “Navigating Political Borders Old and New: The Territoriality of Indigenous Inuit Governance.” Journal of Borderlands Studies 33 (2): 273–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1300781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Social Inclusion. 2020. Cohesion in the Local Context: Reconciling the Territorial, Economic and Social Dimensions. Edited by A. Jørgensen, M. Arp Fallov, R. Skovgaard Nielsen, H. T. Andersen, and M. De Neergaard, https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C. 2014. “Modelling Cross-Border Integration: The Role of Borders as a Resource.” Geopolitics 19 (3): 587–608. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.913029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, E. 2010. Seeking Spatial Justice. London: Minnesota University Press, series: Globalization and Community.
   Google Scholar
• Tambou, O. 2019. “L’affirmation d’un droit administratif européen de la coopération transfrontalière.” In Le futur du droit administratif, edited by J. B. Auby Paris: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Wille, C., R. Reckinger, S. Kmec, and M. Hesse, eds. 2016. Spaces and Identities in Border Regions. Politics – Media – Subjects. transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Woehrling, J. 2001. “Les Aspects Juridiques de la Coopération Transfrontalière entre Collectivités et Autorités Locales – Vrais et Faux Problèmes.” Revue d’Allemagne et des pays de langue allemande 33 (2-3): 141–151.
   Google Scholar