A drop in the sea or catalyst for change: diverse effects of the place-based approach in Europe

References

• Andreotti, A., and E. Mingione. 2016. “Local Welfare Systems in Europe and the Economic Crisis.” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (3): 252–266. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414557191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdikos, V., and A. Chardas. 2016. “European Union Cohesion Policy Post 2014: More (Place-Based and Conditional) Growth – Less Redistribution and Cohesion, Territory, Politics.” Governance 4 (1): 97–117. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2014.992460.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., C. Mendez, and H. Oraže. 2013. “From Conditionality to Europeanization in Central and Eastern Europe: Administrative Performance and Capacity in Cohesion Policy.” European Planning Studies, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.772744.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F. 2009. An Agenda for Reformed Cohesion Policy -A Place-Based Approach to Meeting European Union Challenges and Expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/archive/policy/future/pdf/report_barca_v0306.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., P. McCann, and A. Rodriguez-Pose. 2012. “The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-Based Versus Place-Neutral Approaches.” Journal of Regional Science 52 (1): 134–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bădiță, C., and E. Vincze. 2019. The Pata Cluj Project. Residential Desegregation of the Landfill Area of Cluj-Napoca, Romania. RELOCAL Case Study N° 25/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, A., F. McKenzie, J. Blazek, M. Sotarauta, and S. Ayres. 2020. “Requirements and Challenges of Place-Based Policy.” Regional Studies Policy Impact Boks 2 (1): 39–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/2578711X.2020.1783899
   Google Scholar
• Bentley, G., and L. Pugalis. 2014. “Shifting Paradigms: People-Centred Models, Active Regional Development, Space-Blind Policies and Place-Based Approaches.” Local Economy 29 (4–5): 283–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094214541355
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 1999. “Globalisation As Reterritorialisation: The Re-Scaling of Urban Governance in the European Union.” Urban Studies 36: 431–451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruszt. 2007. Evolving Regional Governance Regimes: Challenges for Institution Building in the CEE countries. Report prepared for the cluster workshop, manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M. 2014. “Towards Place-Based Regional and Local Development Strategies in Central and Eastern Europe?” EU Cohesion Policy and Strategic Planning Capacity at the Subnational Level Local Economy 29 (4–5): 378–393.
   Google Scholar
• Dol, K., J. Hoekstra, and R. Kleinhans. 2019. National Program Rotterdam South. Neighbourhood Development in a Large Deprived Urban Area, Netherlands. RELOCAL Case Study N° 20/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Dol, C., and R. Kleinhans. 2012. “Going Too far in the Battle Against Concentration? On the Balance Between Supply and Demand of Social Housing in Dutch Cities.” Urban Research & Practice 5 (2): 273–283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2012.691623
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2015. Territorial Agenda 2020 put in practice: Enhancing efficiency and effectiveness of Cohesion Policy by a place-based approach. Vol. I – Synthesis Report. https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/policy/what/territorial-cohesion/territorial_agenda_2020_practice_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P. 2004. “Development as Institutional Change: the Pitfalls of Monocropping and the Potentials of Deliberation.” Studies in Comparative International Development 4: 30–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686327
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., and E. O. Wright, eds. 2003. Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gertler, M. S. 2010. “Rules of the Game: The Place of Institutions in Regional Economic Change.” Regional Studies 44: 1–15. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903389979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, N. 1989. The Enabling State: Modern Welfare Capitalism in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hadjimichalis, Costis, and Ray Hudson. 2014. “Contemporary Crisis Across Europe and the Crisis of Regional Development Theories.” Regional Studies 48 (1): 208–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.834044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2001. Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham: Rowland and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Horlings, L., D. Roep, and W. Wellbrock. 2018. “The Role of Leadership in Place-Based Development and Building Institutional Arrangements.” Local Economy 33 (3): 245–268. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094218763050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelinek, Cs., J. Keller, and K. Kovács. 2019. National Report: Hungary. RELOCAL Deliverable 6.2. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Jelinek, Cs., and T. Virág. 2019. György-telep. Ten Years of Urban Regeneration in a Poor Neighbourhood, Hungary. RELOCAL Case Study N° 14/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J., and T. Virág. 2019. Give Kids a Chance: Spatial Injustice of Child Welfare at the Peripheries. The Case of Encs, Hungary. RELOCAL Case Study N° 13/33. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhans, R. 2019. National Report: the Netherlands. RELOCAL Deliverable 6.2. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., N. Keuffer, and H. Baldersheim. 2016. “Self-Rule Index for Local Communities. Final Report. European Commission, Directorate General for Urban and Regional Policy.” Luxembourg. doi: https://doi.org/10.2776/432291.
   Google Scholar
• Paraskevopoulos, C. 2001. Interpreting Convergence in the European Union: Patterns of Collective Action, Social Learning and Europeanization, Houndsmills. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pálné Kovács, I. 2020. “Governance Without Power? The Fight of the Hungarian Counties for Survival.” In Contemporary Trends in Local and Regional Governance, edited by N. C. Silva, 45–65. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2010. The Theory of Multi-Level Governance: Conceptual, Theoretical, and Normative Challenges. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. 2014. “Can Urban Regimes Travel in Time and Space? Urban Regime Theory, Urban Governance Theory, and Comparative Urban Politics.” Urban Affairs Review 50 (6): 864–889. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413518175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike, A., A. Rodríguez-Pose, and J. Tomaney. 2007. “What Kind of Local and Regional Development and for Whom?” Regional Studies 41 (9): 1253–1269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701543355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2013. “Do Institutions Matter for Regional Development?” Regional Studies 47 (7): 1034–1047. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2012.748978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. “The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (and What to do About it).” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. 1999. Development as Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. 1999. “Institutions for Higy-Quality Growth: What Are They and How to Acquire Them.” Paper presented at IMF conference on Second-Generation Reforms, Washington D.C., 8-9 November.
   Google Scholar
• Soja, E. 2009. “The city and spatial justice” [«La ville et la justice spatiale», traduction: Sophie Didier, Frédéric Dufaux], justice spatiale |spatial justice | n° 01 septembre | september 2009 (http://www.jssj.org)
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 1998. “Governance as Theory: Five Propositions.” International Social Science Journal 50: 17-28. doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.00106
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., and K. Thelen. 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Surubaru Neculai-Cristian. 2016. “Administrative Capacity or Quality of Political Governance? EU Cohesion Policy in the new Europe, 2007–13.” Regional Studies, doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2016.1246798.
   Google Scholar
• Telle, S., M. Špaček, and D. Crăciun. 2019. “Divergent Paths to Cohesion: The (Unintended) Consequences of a Place-Based Cohesion Policy.” In Regional and Local Development in Times of Polarisation, edited by Tilo Lang és Franziska Görmar, 149–172. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tersteeg, A., G. Bolt, and R. van Kempen. 2015. Fieldwork Inhabitants, Rotterdam (The Netherland). Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., B. Peters, J. Pierre, and E. Sörensen. 2012. Interactive Governance: Advancing the Paradigm. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trigilia, C. 2001. “Social Capital and Local Development.” European Journal of Social Theory 4 (4): 427–442. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310122225244
   Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Williams, D. 2014. Why the European Social Model is still Relevant, International Labour Organisation Comment.
   Google Scholar
• Vincze, E. 2019. National Report: Romania. RELOCAL Deliverable 6.2. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Weck, S., and V. Kamuf. 2020. Comparative Case Study Research in RELOCAL: An Overview on the Methodology. Part of RELOCAL Deliverable 6.4. Dortmund: ILS – Research Institute for Regional and Urban Development/Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Wozniakowski, P., S. Frank, and M. Matlak. 2018. “Europeanization Revisited: An Introduction.” In Europeanization Revisited: Central and Eastern Europe in the European Union, edited by Michal Matlak, Schimmelfennig Frank, and Wozniakowski P. Tomasz, 6–18. Florence: European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies.
   Google Scholar