Are current road investments exacerbating spatial inequalities inside European peripheral regions?

References

• Abdi, H., and L. Williams. 2010. “Principal Component Analysis.” WIRES Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Statistics 2 (4): 433–459.
   Google Scholar
• Abrahams, G. 2014. “What “is” Territorial Cohesion? What Does it “Do”? Essentialist Versus Pragmatic Approaches to Using Concepts.” European Planning Studies 22 (10): 2134–2155. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.819838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albalate, D., G. Bel, and X. Fageda. 2015. “When Supply Travels far Beyond Demand: Causes of Oversupply in Spain’s Transport Infrastructure.” Transport Policy 41: 80–89. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astel, A., S. Tsakovski, P. Barbieri, and V. Simeonov. 2007. “Comparison of Self-Organizing Maps Classification Approach with Cluster and Principal Components Analysis for Large Environmental Data Sets.” Water Research 41 (9): 4566–4578. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2007.06.030.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bannister, D., and J. Berechman. 2000. Transportation Investment and Economic Development. London: University College London Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barca, F., P. McCann, and A. Rodríguez-Pose. 2012. “The Case for Regional Development Intervention: Place-Based Versus Place-Neutral Approaches.” Journal of Regional Science 52 (1): 134–152. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudelle, G., and C. Guy. 2004. “The Peripheral Areas of Western Europe and EU Regional Policy: Prospective Scenarios.” Regional Studies Association Conference Europe at the Margins: EU Regional Policy, Peripherality and Rurality (p. 10), April 15–16, Angers.
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L., F. Le Clercq, and L. Kapoen. 2005. “Sustainable Accessibility: A Conceptual Framework to Integrate Transport and Land Use Plan-Making. Two Test-Applications in the Netherlands and a Reflection on the Way Forward.” Transport Policy 12 (3): 207–220. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, D. 1991. “The Role of Infrastructure in Regional Development.” In Infrastructure and Regional Development, edited by R. Vickerman, 9–35. London: Pion.
   Google Scholar
• BOPA. 1991. Decreto 11/1991, de 24 de enero, por el que se aprueban las Directrices Regionales de Ordenación del Territorio de Asturias. Boletín Oficial del Principado de Asturias (BOPA), n. 45, p. 1169. http://www.asturias.es/bopa/1991/02/23/19910223.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bosworth, G., and V. Venhorst. 2018. “Economic Linkages Between Urban and Rural Regions – What’s in it for the Rural?” Regional Studies 52 (8): 1075–1085. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1339868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrad, M., N. Ghazzali, V. Boiteau, and A. Niknafs. 2014. “NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set.” Journal of Statistical Software 61 (6): 1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v061.i06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copus, A., D. Psaltopoulos, D. Skuras, I. Terluin, and P. Weingarten. 2008. “Approaches to Rural Typology in the European Union.” In: Handan Giray, F., Ratinger, T. (Eds.), JRC-Scientific and Technological Report (EUR23634EN). European Commission, IPTS. Seville – Spain, 134p.
   Google Scholar
• Cörvers, F., M. Hensen, and D. Bongaerts. 2009. “Delimitation and Coherence of Functional and Administrative Regions.” Regional Studies 43 (1): 19–31. doi:10.1080/00343400701654103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dall’erba, S., and G. Hewings. 2003. European Regional Development Policies: The Trade-off Between Efficiency-Equity Revisited. REAL 03-T-2. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., E. Garcilazo, and P. McCann. 2015. “The Effects of the Global Financial Crisis on European Regions and Cities.” Journal of Economic Geography 15 (5): 935–949. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbv032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, L., H. Poelman, and P. Veneri. 2019. The EU-OECD Definition of a Functional Urban Area. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2019/11. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/d58cb34d-en
   Google Scholar
• DOG. 1997. Decreto 65/1997, de 20 de febrero, por el que se aprueba definitivamente el mapa comarcal de Galicia. Diario Oficial de Galicia (DOG), n. 63, p. 3005. http://www.xunta.es/dog/Publicados/1997/19970403/Anuncio4D32_es.html
   Google Scholar
• EC. 1999. ESDP – European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the European Union. Luxembourg: European Commission – Office for Official Publications of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2007. Fourth Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. Growing Regions, Growing Europe. Luxembourg: European Commission - Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2014. Sixth Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. Investment for Jobs and Growth – Promoting Development and Good Governance in EU Regions and Cities. Luxembourg: European Commission – Office for Official Publications of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2017. Seventh Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion. My Region, My Europe, Our Future. Luxembourg: European Commission – Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2020. Corine Land Cover 2018. https://sdi.eea.europa.eu/catalogue/srv/api/records/53ef1493-e7a1-4216-b043-87a7c2a5a68d
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2005. ESPON Project 2.1.1. Territorial Impacts of EU Transport and TEN Policies. Final Report. European Spatial Planning Observation Network.
   Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2015. TRACC – Transport Accessibility at Regional/Local Scale and Patterns in Europe. Final Report.
   Google Scholar
• EU. 2007. Territorial Agenda of the European Union – Towards a More Competitive and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions (Agreed on the occasion of the Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development and Territorial Cohesion in Leipzig on 24/25 May 2007).
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2016a. Statistics Explained: Territorial Typologies. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Territorial_typologies
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2016b. Commission Regulation (EU) 2016/2066 of 21 November 2016 Amending the Annexes to Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Establishment of a Common Classification of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS) C/2016/7380).
   Google Scholar
• Fariña, J., F. Lamiquiz, and J. Pozueta. 2000. Efectos territoriales de las infraestructuras de transporte de acceso controlado. Madrid: Cuadernos de Investigación Urbanística. Escuela Técnica Superior de Arquitectura de Madrid, 97p. ISBN 84-95365-34-0.
   Google Scholar
• Farole, T., A. Rodríguez-Pose, and M. Storper. 2011. “Cohesion Policy in the European Union: Growth, Geography, Institutions.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (5): 1089–1111. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02161.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A., J. Miles, and Z. Field. 2012. Discovering Statistics Using R. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Forslund, U., and B. Johansson. 1995. “Assessing Road Investments – Accessibility Changes, Cost-Benefit and Production Effects.” Annals of Regional Science 29 (2): 155–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fratesi, U., and F. Wishlade. 2017. “The Impact of European Cohesion Policy in Different Contexts.” Regional Studies 51 (6): 817–821. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1326673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A. Venables. 1999. The Spatial Economy. Cities, Regions and International Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fujita, M., and J. Thisse. 2002. Economics of Agglomeration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagliardi, L., and M. Percoco. 2017. “The Impact of European Cohesion Policy in Urban and Rural Regions.” Regional Studies 51 (6): 857–868. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1179384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobierno de Cantabria. 2017. Avance del Plan Regional de Ordenación del Territorio (PROT). Gobierno de Cantabria (Cantabria Government), Santander (in Spanish).
   Google Scholar
• González-González, E., and S. Nogués. 2019. “Long-Term Differential Effects of Transport Infrastructure Investment in Rural Areas.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 125: 234–247. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gren, J. 2003. “Reaching the Peripheral Regional Growth Centres. Centre-Periphery Convergence Through the Structural Funds’ Transport Infrastructure Actions and the Evolution of the Centre-Periphery Paradigm.” European Journal of Spatial Development 3 (1): 2–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, J. 2001. “Location, Economic Potential and Daily Accessibility: An Analysis of the Accessibility Impact of the High-Speed Line Madrid-Barcelona-French Border.” Journal of Transport Geography 9 (4): 229–242. doi:10.1016/S0966-6923(01)00017-5.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson. 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis. Essex: Pearson New International Edition. 768p.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, J., and S. Deller. 1997. “Public Infrastructure in Economic Development and Growth: Evidence from Rural Manufacturers.” Journal of Community Development Society 28 (2): 149–169. doi:10.1080/15575339709489780.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, W. 1959. “How Accessibility Shapes Land Use.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 25: 17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, N. 1965. “Unbalanced Growth and Regional Development.” Western Economic Journal 4: 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, T. 1993. “Transport Investment and Disadvantaged Regions: UK and European Policies Since the 1950s.” Urban Studies 30 (2): 417–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2000. Spaces of Hope. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heidenreich, M. 2003. “Regional Inequalities in the Enlarged Europe.” Journal of European Social Policy 13 (4): 313–333. doi:10.1177/09589287030134001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl, A. 2004a. “Manufacturing Location and Impacts of Road Transport Infrastructure: Empirical Evidence from Spain.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 34: 341–363. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(03)00059-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl, A. 2004b. “Transport Infrastructure, Agglomeration Economies and Firm Birth: Empirical Evidence from Portugal.” Journal of Regional Science 44 (4): 693–712. doi:10.1111/j.0022-4146.2004.00354.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holl, A. 2007. “Twenty Years of Accessibility Improvements. The Case of the Spanish Motorway Building Programme.” Journal of Transport Geography 15: 286–297. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICANE. 2018. Distribución Municipal de la Renta Bruta Estimada y per Cápita Estimada. Santander, Spain: Instituto Cántabro de Estadística (ICANE) – Cantabrian Statistical Institute. https://www.icane.es/economy/economic-accounts#municipal-data-municipal-income-estimated
   Google Scholar
• IGE. 2018. Renda Municipal dos Fogares. Santiago de Compostela, Spain: Instituto Galego de Estatística (IGE) – Galizian Statistical Institute. https://www.ige.eu/web/mostrar_actividade_estatistica.jsp?idioma=es&codigo=0307007004
   Google Scholar
• IGN. 2018a. CORINE Land Cover 1990, 2000, 2006, 2012, 2018; CORINE Land Cover Changes 1990–2000, 2000–2006, 2006–2012, 2012–2018, in Shapefile Format. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Geográfico Nacional (IGN) – Spanish National Geographic Institute. https://www.ign.es/web/ign/portal/copernicus/productos-a-descargar
   Google Scholar
• IGN. 2018b. National Topographic Map at 1:100,000 in Shapefile Format. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Geográfico Nacional (IGN) – Spanish National Geographic Institute. https://www.ign.es/web/ign/portal/cbg-area-cartografia
   Google Scholar
• INE. 2004. Contabilidad Regional de España Base 1995. Cuentas de Renta de los Hogares. Notas de Prensa. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) – Spanish National Statistical Institute. https://www.ine.es/prensa/np353.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• INE. 2018. Municipal Population Census 1991, 2000, 2005, 2015. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) – Spanish National Statistic Institute. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/categoria.htm?c=Estadistica_P&cid=1254735572981
   Google Scholar
• INE. 2019. Contabilidad Regional de España Base 2010. Cuentas de Renta de los Hogares. Notas de Prensa. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Nacional de Estadística (INE) – Spanish National Statistical Institute. http://econet.carm.es/inicio/-/crem/sicrem/PU39/pdf/sec26.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jonard, F., M. Lambotte, F. Ramos, J. Terres, and C. Bamps. 2009. Delimitations of Rural Areas in Europe Using Criteria of Population Density, Remoteness and Land Cover (JRC Scientific and Technical Reports EUR23757). Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Joint Research Center, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Juillard, E. 1962. “The Region: An Essay of Definition.” Annales de Geographie 40: 429–450.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, L., and P. J. Rousseeuw, eds. 1990. Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780471878766.
   Google Scholar
• Le Clerq, F., and L. Bertolini. 2003. “Achieving Sustainable Accessibility: An Evaluation of Policy Measures in the Amsterdam Area.” Built Environment 29 (1): 36–47. doi:10.2148/benv.29.1.36.53949.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, R. 2005. “Cohesion and Regional Policies in the European Union.” In Cohesion Policy in the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230503861_1
   Google Scholar
• Linneker, B. 1997. Transport Infrastructure and Regional Economic Development in Europe: A Review of Theoretical and Methodological Approaches, TRP 133. Sheffield: Department of Town and Regional Planning.
   Google Scholar
• López, E., J. Gutiérrez, and G. Gómez. 2008. “Measuring Regional Cohesion Effects of Large-Scale Transport Infrastructure Investments: An Accessibility Approach.” European Planning Studies 16 (2): 277–301. doi:10.1080/09654310701814629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2017. “European Union Cohesion Policy and Spain: A Territorial Impact Assessment.” Regional Studies 51 (8): 125–1269. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1187719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., and D. Rauhut. 2020. “Territorial Cohesion Cities: A Policy Recipe for Achieving Territorial Cohesion?” Regional Studies 54 (1): 120–128. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1548764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, E., J. Hoekstra, M. Leijten, E. Louw, and M. Spaans. 2012. “Connecting the Periphery: Distributive Effects of New Infrastructure.” Journal of Transport Geography 22: 187–198. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MF. 2015a. Anuario estadístico 2015. Capítulo 7 carreteras. Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento (MF) – Ministry of Public Works.
   Google Scholar
• MF. 2015b. Mapa oficial de carreteras 2015. Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento (MF) – Ministry of Public Works.
   Google Scholar
• Monzón, A., E. López, and E. Ortega. 2019. “Has HSR Improved Territorial Cohesion in Spain? An Accessibility Analysis of the First 25 Years: 1990–2015.” European Planning Studies 27 (3): 513–532. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1562656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, K., C. Steinmeier, and M. Küchler. 2010. “Urban Growth Along Motorways in Switzerland.” Landscape and Urban Planning 98: 3–12. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCGE. 1994. Geography for Life: National Geography Standards. Washington, DC: The National Council for Geographic Education (NCGE).
   Google Scholar
• Nogués, S., and E. González-González. 2014. “Multi-Criteria Impacts Assessment for Ranking Highway Projects in Northwest Spain.” Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice 65: 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nosek, S. 2017. “Territorial Cohesion Storylines in 2014–2020 Cohesion Policy.” European Planning Studies 25 (12): 2157–2174. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1349079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2002. Redefining Territories – The Functional Regions. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and user Guide. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. Promoting Growth in all Regions. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Persyn, D., J. Díaz-Lanchas, and J. Barbero. 2020. “Estimating Road Transport Costs Between and Within European Union Regions.” Transport Policy. in press. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proost, S., and J. Thisse. 2015. Skilled Cities, Regional Disparities and Efficient Transport: The State of the Art and a Research Agenda. CEPR N° 10790.
   Google Scholar
• Rietveld, P., and F. Bruinsma. 1998. Is Transport Infrastructure Effective? Transport Infrastructure and Accessibility: Impacts on the Space Economy. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2015. Challenges for Regional Development and Regional Policies. GRINCOH (Growth – Innovation – Competitiveness: Fostering Cohesion in Central and Eastern Europe) Final Conference, 26–27 February. Warsaw: University of Warsaw, Centre for European Regional and Local Studies (EUROREG).
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., R. Crescenzi, and M. Di Cataldo. 2018. “Institutions and the Thirst for ‘Prestige’ Transport Infrastructure.” In Knowledge and Institutions. Knowledge and Space, edited by J. Glückler, R. Suddaby, and R. Lenz, 227–246. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A., and U. Fratesi. 2004. “Between Development and Social Policies: The Impact of European Structural Funds in Objective 1 Regions.” Regional Studies 38: 97–113. doi:10.1080/00343400310001632226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokicki, B., and M. Stepniak. 2018. “Major Transport Infrastructure Investment and Regional Economic Development – An Accessibility-Based Approach.” Journal of Transport Geography 72: 36–49. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romano, S., M. Cozzi, M. Viccaro, and G. Persiani. 2016. “A Geostatistical Multicriteria Approach to Rural Area Classification: From the European Perspective to the Local Implementation.” Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 8: 499–508. doi:10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.055.
   Google Scholar
• Rosik, P., M. Stępniak, and T. Komornicki. 2015. “The Decade of the Big Push to Roads in Poland: Impact on Improvement in Accessibility and Territorial Cohesion from a Policy Perspective.” Transport Policy 37: 134–146. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SADEI. 2018. Renta de los hogares. Renta familiar por habitante según concejos. Oviedo, Spain: Sociedad Asturiana de Estudios Económicos e Industriales (SADEI) – Asturian Society of Economic and Industrial Studies. https://www.sadei.es/sadei/cuentas-regionales-de-asturias/renta-de-los-hogares_269_1_ap.html?f=04__02__08__08$$0402080814.px
   Google Scholar
• Salas-Olmedo, H., S. Nogués, and E. González-González. 2009. Land Use Changes Associated to Highways. In: Wang, D. y Li, S-M. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 14th HKSTS International Conference. Transportation and Geography, 971–980. ISBN. 978-988-98847-7-2.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Zamora, P., and R. Gallardo-Cobos. 2020. “Territorial Cohesion in Rural Areas: an Analysis of Determinants in the Post-Economic Crisis Context.” Sustainability 12: 3816. doi:10.3390/su12093816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiekermann, K., and J. Neubauer. 2002. European Accessibility and Peripherality: Concepts, Models and Indicators. Stockholm: Nordregio Working Paper 2002:9.
   Google Scholar
• Stelder, D. 2014. “Regional Accessibility Trends in Europe: Road Infrastructure, 1957–2012.” Regional Studies 50 (6): 983–995. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.952721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepniak, M., and P. Rosik. 2013. “Accessibility Improvement, Territorial Cohesion and Spillovers: A Multidimensional Evaluation of Two Motorway Sections in Poland.” Journal of Transport Geography 31: 154–163. doi:10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickerman, R. 1995. “Location, Accessibility and Regional Development: The Appraisal of Trans-European Networks.” Transport Policy 2 (4): 225–234. doi:10.1016/S0967-070X(95)00013-G.
   Google Scholar
• Zaucha, J., and K. Böhme. 2020. “Measuring Territorial Cohesion is Not a Mission Impossible.” European Planning Studies 28 (3): 627–649. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1607827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar