Co-evolutionary heritage reuse: a European multiple case study perspective

References

• Ahmad, Y. 2006. “The Scope and Definitions of Heritage: From Tangible to Intangible.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 12 (3): 292–300. doi:10.1080/13527250600604639
   Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. 2007. “Evolutionary Urban Transportation Planning: An Exploration.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 39 (8): 1998–2019. doi:10.1068/a38350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertolini, L. 2010. “Coping with the Irreducible Uncertainties of Planning: An Evolutionary Approach.” In The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory: Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning, edited by P. Healey and J. Hillier, 413–424. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, L., and G. de Roo. 2016. “Planning of Undefined Becoming: First Encounters of Planners Beyond the Plan.” Planning Theory 15 (1): 42–67. doi:10.1177/1473095214542631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullen, P., and P. Love. 2009. “Residential Regeneration and Adaptive Reuse: Learning from the Experiences of Los Angeles.” Structural Survey 27 (5): 351–360. doi:10.1108/02630800911002611
   Google Scholar
• Bullen, P., and P. Love. 2011. “Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings.” Structural Survey 29 (5): 411–421. doi:10.1108/02630801111182439
   Google Scholar
• Conejos, S., C. Langston, and J. Smith. 2011. “Improving the Implementation of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Historic Buildings.” SAVE HERITAGE: Safeguard of Architectural, Visual, Environmental Heritage., Naples. Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Conejos, S., C. Langston, and J. Smith. 2013. “AdaptSTAR Model: A Climate-Friendly Strategy to Promote Built Environment Sustainability.” Habitat International 37: 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2011.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crabtree, B., and W. Miller. 1999. Doing Qualitative Research. London: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2009. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 3th ed. Los Angles: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, N., and R. Robin. 2016. “Conservation of Traditional Agriculture as Living Knowledge Systems, not Cultural Relics.” Journal of Resources and Ecology 7 (3): 231–236. doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.03.012
   Google Scholar
• de Roo, G., and L. Boelens. 2016. Spatial Planning in a Complex Unpredictable World of Change: Towards a Proactive Co-evolutionary Type of Planning Within the Eurodelta. Groningen: InPlanning.
   Google Scholar
• Della Torre, S. 2019. “A Coevolutionary Approach to the Reuse of Built Cultural Heritage IL Patrimonio Culturale in mutamento.” Le sfide dell'uso, Bressanone.
   Google Scholar
• Della Torre, S. 2020. “A Coevolutionary Approach as the Theoretical Foundation of Planned Conservation of Built Cultural Heritage.” In Preventive Conservation-from Climate and Damage Monitoring to a Systemic and Integrated Approach, edited by A. Vandesande, E. Verstrynge, and K. van Balen, 11–18. Leiden: CRC Press/Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, J. 2006. Building Adaptation. London: Butterworth Heinemann Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Duineveld, M., K. van Assche, and R. Beunen. 2015. Evolutionary Governance Theory: Theory and Applications. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research.” Academy of Management Review 14 (4): 532–550. doi:10.2307/258557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fairclough, G. 2008. “New Heritage, an Introductory Essay – People, Landscape and Change.” In The Heritage Reader, edited by G. Fairclough, R. Harrison, J. Shofield, and J. Jameson, 297–312. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L. 2008. “The Gentle Art of Coevolution: A Complexity Theory Perspective on Decision Making Over Estuaries in Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands.”
   Google Scholar
• Gerrits, L., and G. Teisman. 2012. “Coevolutionary Planning Processes.” In Complexity and Planning: Systems, Assemblages and Simulations, edited by G. De Roo, J. Hillier, and J. van Wezemael, 199–219. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, B., G. Ashworth, and J. Tunbridge. 2000. A Geography of Heritage: Power, Culture and Economy. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., and P. Healey. 1999. “Relational Concepts of Space and Place: Issues for Planning Theory and Practice.” European Planning Studies 7 (5): 623–646. doi:10.1080/09654319908720542
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2001. “Heritage Pasts and Heritage Presents: Temporality, Meaning and the Scope of Heritage Studies.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 7 (4): 319–338. doi:10.1080/13581650120105534
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2015. “Heritage and Scale: Settings, Boundaries and Relations.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 21 (6): 577–593. doi:10.1080/13527258.2014.955812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, P., and G. Ashworth. 1999. European Heritage, Planning and Management. Exeter: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., E. Luiten, H. Renes, and E. Stegmeijer. 2017. “Heritage as Sector, Factor and Vector: Conceptualizing the Shifting Relationship Between Heritage Management and Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 25 (9): 1654–1672. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1329410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallis, G. 2007. “When is it Coevolution?” Ecological Economics 62 (1): 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.12.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosunen, H., I. Atkova, and S. Hirvonen-Kantola. 2020. “Co-evolutionary Urban Planning of a Finnish City for its Low Growth Neighborhoods.” Planning Theory & Practice 21 (4): 552–569. doi:10.1080/14649357.2020.1806342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1970. Soziologische aufklärung. Frankfurt: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2005. For Space. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Misirlisoy, D., and K. Günçe. 2016. “Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Heritage Buildings: A Holistic Approach.” Sustainable Cities and Society 26: 91–98. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2016.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OpenHeritage. 2019. Deliverable 2.2 Individual Report on the Observatory Cases. https://openheritage.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/D2.2_Observatory_Cases_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OpenHeritage. 2020. Deliverable 1.3 Typology of Current Adaptive Heritage Re-use Policies. https://openheritage.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Typology-of-current-adaptive-resue-policies.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Perkin, C. 2010. “Beyond the Rhetoric: Negotiating the Politics and Realising the Potential of Community-Driven Heritage Engagement.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 16 (1–2): 107–122. doi:10.1080/13527250903441812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plevoets, B., and J. Sowińska-Heim. 2018. “Community Initiatives as a Catalyst for Regeneration of Heritage Sites: Vernacular Transformation and its Influence on the Formal Adaptive Reuse Practice.” Cities 78: 128–139. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plevoets, B., and K. Van Cleempoel. 2011. “Adaptive Reuse as a Strategy Towards Conservation of Cultural Heritage: A Literature Review.” Structural Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XII 118 (12): 155–163. doi: 10.2495/STR110131
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2010. Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G., A. van Buuren, and L. Gerrits. 2009. Managing Complex Governance Systems. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, K., B. Boonstra, and L. Boelens. 2021. “Communities, Heritage and Planning: Towards a Co-evolutionary Heritage Approach.” Planning Theory & Practice, 1–17. doi:10.1080/14649357.2021.1998584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecco, M. 2010. “A Definition of Cultural Heritage: From the Tangible to the Intangible.” Journal of Cultural Heritage 11 (3): 321–324. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H., and Z. Zeng. 2010. “A Multi-Objective Decision-Making Process for Reuse Selection of Historic Buildings.” Expert Systems with Applications 37 (2): 1241–1249. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., and S. Watson. 2010. “Heritage and Community Engagement.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 16 (1-2): 1–3. doi:10.1080/13527250903441671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterton, E., and S. Watson. 2013. “Framing Theory: Towards a Critical Imagination in Heritage Studies.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 19 (6): 546–561. doi:10.1080/13527258.2013.779295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Yung, E., E. Chan, and Y. Xu. 2014. “Community-Initiated Adaptive Reuse of Historic Buildings and Sustainable Development in the Inner City of Shanghai.” Journal of Urban Planning and Development 140: 3. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yung, E., Q. Zhang, and E. Chan. 2017. “Underlying Social Factors for Evaluating Heritage Conservation in Urban Renewal Districts.” Habitat International 66: 135–148. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar