‘Transitory urbanism’ for the creative industries in a top-down regeneration process (Nantes, France)

References

• Adams, D., C. DeSousa, and S. Tiesdell. 2010. “Brownfield Development: A Comparison of North American and British Approaches.” Urban Studies 47 (1): 75–104. doi:10.1177/0042098009346868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, L. 2013. “Differential Spaces, Power Hierarchy and Collaborative Planning: A Critique of the Role of Temporary Uses in Shaping and Making Places.” Urban Studies 50 (4): 779–775. doi:10.1177/0042098012455719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andres, L., and B. Grésillon. 2013. “Cultural Brownfields in European Cities: A New Mainstream Object for Cultural and Urban Policies.” International Journal of Cultural Policy 19 (1): 40–62. doi:10.1080/10286632.2011.625416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baillargeon, B., and J. Diaz. 2020. “L’urbanisme Transitoire à Montréal: Entre Innovation et Préservation.” Revue Organisations & Territoires 29 (2): 25–39. doi:10.1522/revueot.v29n2.1148
   Google Scholar
• Bonneville, M. 2005. “Les Ambiguïtés du Renouvellement Urbain en France: Effets D’annonce, Continuité ou Rupture?” Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine 97: 7–16. doi:10.3406/aru.2004.2571
   Google Scholar
• Bosák, V., O. Slach, A. Nováček, and L. Krtička. 2020. “Temporary Use and Brownfield Regeneration in Post-Socialist Context: From Bottom-up Governance to Artists Exploitation.” European Planning Studies 28 (3): 604–626. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1642853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottero, M., F. Bragaglia, N. Caruso, G. Datola, and F. Dell’Anna. 2020. “Experimenting Community Impact Evaluation (CIE) for Assessing Urban Regeneration Programmes: The Case Study of the Area 22@ Barcelona.” Cities 99: 102464. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.102464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. 2016. “The Planner’s Triangle Revisited: Sustainability and the Evolution of a Planning Ideal That Can’t Stand Still.” Journal of the American Planning Association 82 (4): 388–397. doi:10.1080/01944363.2016.1214080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caro, O. 2012. “Nantes le Grand “Mix”.” In La Ville des Créateurs, edited by J. J. Terrin, 134–157. Paris, France: Editions Parentheses.
   Google Scholar
• Darchen, S. 2019. “Contextual and External Factors Enabling Planning Innovations in a Regeneration Context: The Lyon Confluence Project (France).” International Planning Studies. 25 (4): 340–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darchen, S., and D. Tremblay. 2013. “The Local Governance of Culture-led Regeneration Projects: A Comparison Between Montreal and Toronto.” Urban Research & Practice 6 (2): 140–157. doi:10.1080/17535069.2013.808433
   Google Scholar
• Demay, C. 2019. Pourquoi Nantes Est La Ville La Plus Attractive et Dynamique de France. https://actu.fr/pays-de-la-loire/nantes_44109/pourquoi-nantes-est-ville-plus-attractive-dynamique-france_29206111.html
   Google Scholar
• Devisme, L. 2009. Nantes, Petite et Grande Fabrique Urbaine. Paris: éditions Parenthèses.
   Google Scholar
• Eidelman, G. 2016. “Failure When Fragmented: Public Land Ownership and Waterfront Redevelopment in Chicago, Vancouver and Toronto.” Urban Affairs Review 54 (4): 697–731. doi:10.1177/1078087416671429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G. 2005. “Measure for Measure: Evaluating the Evidence of Culture’s Contribution to Regeneration.” Urban Studies 42 (5/6): 959–983. doi:10.1080/00420980500107102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodach, C. 2013. “Cultural Economy Planning in Creative Cities: Discourse and Practice.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (5): 1747–1765. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2012.01165.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groth, J., and E. Corijn. 2005. “Reclaiming Urbanity: Indeterminate Spaces, Informal Actors and Urban Agenda Setting.” Urban Studies 42 (3): 503–526. doi:10.1080/00420980500035436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ile de Nantes. 2020. “Un Projet Urbain Piloté Par la SAMOA”. https://www.iledenantes.com/le-projet-de-lile/les-acteurs-du-projet-urbain/. Accessed on 2 July 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J. 2003. Governing as Governance. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kullman, K. 2013. “Geographies of Experiment/Experimental Geographies: A Rough Guide.” Geography Compass 7 (12): 879–894. doi:10.1111/gec3.12087
   Google Scholar
• Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Masson, P., M. Cartier, M-C. Rémy, R. le Saout, J-N. Retière, and M. Suteau. 2013. Sociologie de Nantes. Paris: La Découverte. 126.
   Google Scholar
• Pignot, L. 2004. “Le « Quartier de la Création »: Un Cluster en émergence, Entretien Avec Jean-Louis Bonnin, Olivier Caro, Propos Recueillis par Lisa Pignot Observatoire des Politiques Culturelles.” L'Observatoire 2010/36: 63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., and H. Sykes. 2012. Urban Regeneration: A Handbook. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W., and E. Gualini. 2007. Framing Strategic Urban Projects: Learning from Current Experiences in European Urban Regions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• SAMOA. 2021. ‘L’équipe’. Accessed on 18 August 2021. https://www.creativefactory.info/equipe/
   Google Scholar
• Stern, M., and S. Seifert. 2010. “Cultural Clusters: The Implications of Cultural Assets Agglomeration for Neighbourhood Revitalization.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 29 (3): 262–279. doi:10.1177/0739456X09358555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ternon, A. 2020. From temporary densification to transitory urbanism. In: Bernard Declève, Geoffrey Grulois, Roselyne de Lestrange, Andrea Bortolotti, Designing Brussels Ecosystems, Declève, Grulois, de Lestrange, Bortolotti eds (OOstkamp), p. 43–52. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/239089
   Google Scholar
• Violeau, J.-L. 2011. Nantes: L’invention D’une île. Le Mook. Paris: Éditions Autrement.
   Google Scholar