Change agency and path development in peripheral regions: from pulp production towards eco-industry in Lapland

References

• Audretsch, D., I. Grilo, and A. Roy Thurik. 2011. “Globalization, Entrepreneurship, and the Region.” In Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, edited by M. Fritsch, 11–32. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Augsdorfer, P. 2005. “Bootlegging and Path Dependency.” Research Policy 34 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bækkelund, N. 2021. “Change Agency and Reproductive Agency in the Course of Industrial Path Evolution.” Regional Studies, doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1893291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., B. Leca, and E. Boxenbaum. 2009. “How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship.” The Academy of Management Annals 3: 65–107. doi:10.5465/19416520903053598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartinger-Seiringer, S., L. Fuenfschilling, J. Miörner, and M. Trippl. 2020. “Reconsidering Structural Conditions: Institutional Infrastructure for Innovation-Based Industrial Path Renewal.” PEGIS – Papers in Economic Geography and Innovation Studies 2020/01. Accessed December 27, 2021. http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/sre-disc/geo-disc-2021_09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, A. 2018. “The Closure of the Australian car Manufacturing Industry: Redundancy, Policy and Community Impacts.” Australian Geographer 49 (3): 419–438. doi:10.1080/00049182.2017.1402452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A., S. Ayres, T. Clower, F. Faller, A. Sancino, and M. Sotarauta. 2019. “Place Leadership and Regional Economic Development: A Framework for Cross-Regional Analysis.” Regional Studies 53 (2): 171–182. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1447662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A., T. Barnes, and S. Horne. 2021. “Place-based Industrial Strategy and Economic Trajectory: Advancing Agency-Based Approaches.” Regional Studies, doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1947485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer, A., and T. Clower. 2014. “Mobilising Leadership in Cities and Regions.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 1 (1): 10–34.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, A., F. McKenzie, J. Blažek, M. Sotarauta, and S. Ayres. 2020. Every Place Matters: Towards Effective Place-Based Policy. Regional Studies Policy Impact Books; Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, A., S. Weller, T. Barnes, I. Onur, J. Ratcliffe, D. Bailey, and M. Sotarauta. 2019. “The Urban and Regional Impacts of Plant Closures: New Methods and Perspectives.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 6 (1): 380–394. doi:10.1080/21681376.2019.1622440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellandi, M., M. Plechero, and E. Santini. 2021. “Forms of Place Leadership in Local Productive Systems: From Endogenous Rerouting to Deliberate Resistance to Change.” Regional Studies 55 (7): 1327–1336. doi:10.1080/00343404.2021.1896696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, M. 2021. “Revisiting Path-as-process: A Railroad Track Model of Path Development, Transformation, and Agency.” PEGIS – Papers in Economic Geography and Innovation Studies. Accessed December 27, 2021. http://www-sre.wu.ac.at/sre-disc/geo-disc-2021_09.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., R. Pinheiro, and J. Karlsen. 2017. “Strategic Agency and Institutional Change: Investigating the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Systems (RISs).” Regional Studies 51 (2): 235–248. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1215599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binz, C., B. Truffer, and L. Coenen. 2016. “Path Creation as a Process of Resource Alignment and Anchoring – Industry Formation for Onsite Water Recycling in Beijing.” Economic Geography 92 (2): 172–200. doi:10.1080/00130095.2015.1103177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blažek, J., V. Květoň, S. Baumgartinger-Seiringer, and M. Trippl. 2020. “The Dark Side of Regional Industrial Path Development: Towards a Typology of Trajectories of Decline.” European Planning Studies 28 (8): 1455–1473. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1685466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, L., and M. Vale. 2018. “Biotech by Bricolage? Agency, Institutional Relatedness and new Path Development in Peripheral Regions.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (2): 275–295. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsy009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., and R. Hassink. 2020. “Multi-scalar Knowledge Bases for New Regional Industrial Path Development: Toward a Typology.” European Planning Studies 28 (12): 2489–2507. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1724265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N., and D. Jordhus-Lier. 2011. “Constrained Agency? Re-Evaluating the Geographies of Labour.” Progress in Human Geography 35: 211–233. doi:10.1177/0309132510366746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coe, N., and H. Yeung. 2015. Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collinge, C., and J. Gibney. 2010. “Connecting Place, Policy and Leadership.” Policy Studies 31 (4): 379–391. doi:10.1080/01442871003723259
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Content, J., and K. Frenken. 2016. “Related Variety and Economic Development: A Literature Review.” European Planning Studies 24 (12): 1–16. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1246517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 1998. “The New Wave of Regional Innovation Networks: Analysis, Characteristics and Strategy.” Small Business Economics 8: 159–171. doi:10.1007/BF00394424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S. 2014. “Creating New Paths? Offshore Wind, Policy Activism, and Peripheral Region Development.” Economic Geography 90 (1): 91–112. doi:10.1111/ecge.12028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawley, S., D. MacKinnon, A. Cumbers, and A. Pike. 2015. “Policy Activism and Regional Path Creation: The Promotion of Offshore Wind in North East England and Scotland.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8 (2): 257–272. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsu036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. “What is Agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103: 962–1023. doi:10.1086/231294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, M. 2014. “The Character of Innovative Places: Entrepreneurial Strategy, Economic Development, and Prosperity.” Small Business Economics 43: 9–20. doi:10.1007/s11187-014-9574-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Forest Centre – information on Finnish Forests. 2021. https://www.metsakeskus.fi/en
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. 2006. “Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 12 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, D., P. David, and B. Hall. 2009. “Smart Specialisation: The Concept.” Knowledge Economists Policy Brief 9: 100.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, C., and N. Phelps. 2018. “Revisiting the Multinational Enterprise in Global Production Networks.” Journal of Economic Geography 18: 139–161. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galster, G. 2018. “Why Shrinking Cities Are Not Mirror Images of Growing Cities: A Research Agenda of Six Testable Propositions.” Urban Affairs Review 55 (1): 355–372. doi:10.1177/1078087417720543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garud, R., and P. Karnoe. 2001. “Path Creation as a Process of Mindful Deviation.” In Path Dependence and Creation, edited by R. Garud and P. Karnøe, 1–39. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., A. Kumaraswamy, and P. Karnøe. 2010. “Path Dependence or Path Creation?” Journal of Management Studies 47: 760–774. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibney, J., and A. Nicholds. 2021. “Re-imagining Place Leadership as a Social Purpose.” In Handbook on City and Regional Leadership, edited by M. Sotarauta and A. Beer, 71–90. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory, D., R. Johnston, G. Pratt, M. Watts, and S. Wathmore. 2009. The Dictionary of Human Geography. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and B. Asheim. 2018. “Place-based Innovation Policy for Industrial Diversification in Regions.” European Planning Studies 26 (8): 1638–1662. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1484892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., B. Asheim, and H. Nielsen. 2022. “Temporality of Agency in Regional Development.” European Urban and Regional Studies 29 (1): 107–125. doi:10.1177/09697764211028884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., M. Martynovich, R. Fitjar, and S. Haus-Reve. 2021. “The Black Box of Regional Growth.” Journal of Geographical Systems 23 (3): 425–464. doi:10.1007/s10109-020-00341-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., J. Rekers, and M. Sotarauta. 2021. “Investigating Agency: Methodological and Empirical Challenges.” In Handbook on City and Regional Leadership, edited by M. Sotarauta and A. Beer, 302–323. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., and M. Sotarauta. 2020. “Trinity of Change Agency, Regional Development Paths and Opportunity Spaces.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 704–723. doi:10.1177/0309132519853870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillitsch, M., M. Sotarauta, B. Asheim, R. Fitjar, S. Haus-Reve, J. Kolehmainen, H. Kurikka, et al. (forthcoming). “Agency and Economic Change in Regions: Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to Identify Routes to New Path Development.” A paper under review for a journal.
   Google Scholar
• Halonen, M. 2019. Booming, Busting – Turning, Surviving? Socio-Economic Evolution and Resilience of a Forested Resource Periphery in Finland. Publications of the University of Eastern Finland, Dissertations in Social Sciences and Business Studies No 205. Joensuu: University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. 2015. Leading the Inclusive City. Place-Based Innovation for a Bounded Planet. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassink, R., A. Isaksen, and M. Trippl. 2019. “Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of new Regional Industrial Path Development.” Regional Studies 53 (11): 1636–1645. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1566704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hautala, E. 2020. Keitele Groupin Kemijärven saha on suurin sahapuun käyttöpiste Lapissa. Koti-Lappi, 2020-09-17.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, M., E. Stam, and R. Wenting. 2013. Path dependence research in regional economic development: Cacophony or knowledge accumulation?. Regional Studies 47 (8) 1348–1362.
   Google Scholar
• Hidle, K., and R. Normann. 2013. “Who Can Govern? Comparing Network Governance Leadership in two Norwegian City Regions.” European Planning Studies 21 (2): 115–130. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honkapohja, S., and E. Koskela. 1999. “The Economic Crisis of the 1990s in Finland.” Economic Policy 14: 400–436. doi:10.1111/1468-0327.00054
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., and P. Thompson. 2019. “The Behavioural Foundations of Urban and Regional Development: Culture, Psychology and Agency.” Journal of Economic Geography 19 (1): 121–146. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huggins, R., and P. Thompson. 2020. “Human Agency, Entrepreneurship, and Regional Development: A Behavioural Perspective on Economic Evolution and Innovative Transformation.” Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 32 (7): 573–589. doi:10.1080/08985626.2019.1687758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A. 2015. “Industrial Development in Thin Regions: Trapped in Path Extension?” Journal of Economic Geography 15 (3): 585–600. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbu026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., S. Jakobsen, R. Njös, and R. Norman. 2019. “Regional Industrial Restructuring Resulting from Individual and System Agency.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 32 (1): 48–65. doi:10.1080/13511610.2018.1496322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and J. Karlsen. 2016. “Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation.” In Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation, edited by R. Shearmur, C. Carrincazeaux, and D. Doloreux, 277–291. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and M. Trippl. 2017. “Exogenously led and Policy-Supported new Path Development in Peripheral Regions: Analytical and Synthetic Routes.” Economic Geography 93 (5): 436–457. doi:10.1080/00130095.2016.1154443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. 2001. “Institutional Re(turns) and the Strategic-Relational Approach.” Environment and Planning A 33: 1213–1235. doi:10.1068/a32183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolly, S., M. Grillitsch, and T. Hansen. 2020. “Agency and Actors in Regional Industrial Path Development: A Framework and Longitudinal Analysis.” Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 111 (4): 176–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kasurinen, S. 2021. Rahoittajilla vankka luottamus Kemijärven sellutehdashankkeeseen. Koti-Lappi. 15 May 2021. https://www.kotilappi.fi/artikkeli/rahoittajilla-vankka-luottamus-kemijarven-sellutehdashankkeeseen-199833279/
   Google Scholar
• Kemijärven sellutehdashanke hyytyi, kun läntiset sijoittajat eivät halunneet pääosakkaaksi Kiinan valtionyhtiötä. YLE News, 3 February. 2021. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11771090
   Google Scholar
• Klenke, K. 2008. Qualitative Research in the Study of Leadership. Bingley: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Krehl, A., and S. Weck. 2020. “Doing Comparative Case Study Research in Urban and Regional Studies: What Can be Learnt from Practice?” European Planning Studies 28 (9): 1858–1876. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1699909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurikka, H., and M. Grillitsch. 2021. “Resilience in the Periphery: What an Agency Perspective Can Bring to the Table.” In Economic Resilience in Regions and Organisations, edited by R. Wink, 147–171. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kurikka, H., J. Kolehmainen, M. Sotarauta, H. Nielsen, and M. Nilsson. (Forthcoming). Perceiving regional opportunity spaces – Observations from Nordic regions. A paper under review for a journal.
   Google Scholar
• Kurikka, K., M. Sotarauta, and Jari Kolehmainen. 2021. “Eastern Lapland sub-Region.” In Toimijuus ja mahdollisuuksien tilat aluekehityksessä: Miten kehittyä vastoin kaikkia oletuksia? Sente-julkaisuja 35/2021, edited by M. Sotarauta, H. Kurikka, J. Kolehmainen, and S. Sopanen, 147–171. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A. 2007. “The Accident of the Region: A Strategic Relational Perspective on the Construction of the Region’s Significance.” Regional Studies 41 (9): 1193–1207. doi:10.1080/00343400701675579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., S. Dawley, A. Pike, and A. Cumbers. 2019. “Rethinking Path Creation: A Geographical Political Economy Approach.” Economic Geography 95: 113–135. doi:10.1080/00130095.2018.1498294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. and P. Sunley. 2010. The place of path dependence in an evolutionary perspective on the economic landscape. In The handbook of evolutionary economic geography, edited by R. Boschma, and R. Martin, 62–92. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. 2000. “Path Dependence in Historical Sociology.” Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548. doi:10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Männistö, J. 2002. Voluntaristinen alueellinen innovaatiojärjestelmä: Tapaustutkimus Oulun ICT-klusterista. Acta universitatis lappoensis 46. Rovaniemi.
   Google Scholar
• Miörner, J. 2020. “Contextualizing Agency in new Path Development: How System Selectivity Shapes Regional Reconfiguration Capacity.” Regional Studies, 1–13. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1854713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, K. 1997. “The Regional Animateur: Taking Stock of the Welsh Development Agency.” Regional & Federal Studies 7 (2): 70–94. doi:10.1080/13597569708421006
   Google Scholar
• Moulaert, F., B. Jessop, and A. Mehmood. 2016. “Agency, Structure, Institutions, Discourse (ASID) in Urban and Regional Development.” International Journal of Urban Sciences 20 (2): 167–187. doi:10.1080/12265934.2016.1182054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mønnesland, J. 1994. Regional Policy in the Nordic Countries. Nordrefo 4/1994. Holstebro: Nordfefo.
   Google Scholar
• Neil, D., and M. Tykkyläinen. 1998. Local Economic Development: A Geographical Comparison of Rural Community Restructuring. Tokyo: United Nations U.P.
   Google Scholar
• Nenonen, M. 2018. “Alueiden Suomi 1500-2000.” In Suomen rakennehistoria: Näkökulmia muutokseen ja jatkuvuuteen (1400-2000), edited by P. Haapala, 67–91. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N., M. Atienza, and M. Arias. 2018. “An Invitation to the Dark Side of Economic Geography.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 50 (1): 236–244. doi:10.1177/0308518X17739007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phelps, N., and C. Fuller. 2016. “Inertia and Change in Multinational Enterprise Subsidiary Capabilities: An Evolutionary Economic Geography Framework.” Journal of Economic Geography 16: 109–130. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbv002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potluka, O. 2021. “Roles of Formal and Informal Leadership: Civil Society Leadership Interaction with Political Leadership on Local Development.” In Handbook on City and Regional Leadership, edited by M. Sotarauta and A. Beer, 91–107. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. 2018. “The Revenge of the Places That Don’t Matter (and What to Do About It).” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 11 (1): 189–209. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutten, R. 2021. “Uncertainty, Possibility, and Causal Power in QCA.” Sociological Methods & Research, Online First, 1–30. doi:10.1177/00491241211031268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutzou, T., and D. Elder-Vass. 2019. “On Assemblages and Things: Fluidity, Stability, Causation Stories, and Formation Stories.” Sociological Theory 37 (4): 401–424. doi:10.1177/0735275119888250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salcomp. 2021. History. Accessed 29 October 2021. https://salcomp.com/history/.
   Google Scholar
• Sancino, A., L. Budd, and M. Pagani. 2021. “Place Leadership, Policy-Making and Politics.” In Handbook on City and Regional Leadership, edited by M. Sotarauta and A. Beer, 57–70. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Shane, S., and S. Venkataraman. 2000. “The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research.” The Academy of Management Review 25: 217–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearmur, R. 2015. “Far from the Madding Crowd: Slow Innovators, Information Value, and the Geography of Innovation.” Growth and Change 46 (3): 424–442. doi:10.1111/grow.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. 2012. Policy Learning and the ‘Cluster Flavoured Innovation Policy’ in Finland. Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy 30 (5), 780–795.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M. 2016. Leadership and the City: Power, Strategy and Networks in the Making of Knowledge Cities. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and A. Beer. 2021. “Introduction to City and Regional Leadership.” In Handbook on City and Regional Leadership, edited by M. Sotarauta and A. Beer, 2–18. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and M. Grillitsch. Forthcoming. “Path Tracing in the Study of Agency and Structures: Methodological Considerations.” A paper under review for a journal.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and N. Mustikkamäki. 2015. “Institutional Entrepreneurship, Power, and Knowledge in Innovation Systems: Institutionalization of Regenerative Medicine in Tampere, Finland.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (2): 342–357. doi:10.1068/c12297r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and R. Pulkkinen. 2011. “Institutional Entrepreneurship for Knowledge Regions: In Search of a Fresh Set of Questions for Regional Innovation Studies.” Environment & Planning C: Government and Policy 29 (1): 96–112. doi:10.1068/c1066r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., and N. Suvinen. 2019. “Place Leadership and the Challenge of Transformation: Policy Platforms and Innovation Ecosystems in Promotion of Green Growth.” European Planning Studies 27 (9): 1748–1767. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1634006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., N. Suvinen, S. Jolly, and T. Hansen. 2021. “The Many Roles of Change Agency in the Game of Green Path Development in the North.” European Urban and Regional Studies 28 (2): 92–110. doi:10.1177/0969776420944995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StatFin. 2021. Väestötilastot (population statistics). https://pxnet2.stat.fi/PXWeb/pxweb/fi/StatFin/.
   Google Scholar
• Steen, M. 2016. “Reconsidering Path Creation in Economic Geography: Aspects of Agency, Temporality and Methods.” European Planning Studies 24 (9): 1605–1622. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1204427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, M., and G. Hansen. 2018. “Barriers to Path Creation: The Case of Offshore Wind Power in Norway.” Economic Geography 94 (2): 188–210. doi:10.1080/00130095.2017.1416953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tervo, H. 2005. “Regional Policy Lessons from Finland.” In Regional Disparities in Small Countries, edited by D. B. Portnov Felsenstein, 267–282. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaney, J., A. Pike, and J. Cornford. 1999. “Plant Closure and the Local Economy: The Case of Swan Hunter on Tyneside.” Regional Studies 33 (5): 401–411. doi:10.1080/00343409950081257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2005. “One Size Fits All? Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach.” Research Policy 34: 1203–1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vale, M., and L. Carvalho. 2013. “Knowledge Networks and Processes of Anchoring in Portuguese Biotechnology.” Regional Studies 47 (7): 1018–1033. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.644237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willet, J., and T. Lang. 2017. “Peripheralisation: A Politics of Place, Affect, Perception and Representation.” Sociologias Ruralis 58: 2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2016. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar