How rule directions influence actors to achieve collective action: an analysis of Dutch collective infrastructure decision-making

References

• Alexander, E. 2005. “Institutional Transformation and Planning: From Institutionalization Theory to Institutional Design.” Planning Theory 4: 209–223. doi:10.1177/1473095205058494
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. 2013. The Practice of Social Research. 13th ed. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Brodbeck, F., R. Kerschreiter, A. Mojzisch, and S. Schulz-Hardt. 2007. “Group Decision Making Under Conditions of Distributed Knowledge: The Information Asymmetries Model.” AMR 32: 459–479. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.24351441
   Google Scholar
• Buitelaar, E., and A. Bregman. 2016. “Dutch Land Development Institutions in the Face of Crisis: Trembling Pillars in the Planner’s Paradise.” European Planning Studies 24: 1281–1297. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1168785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushouse, BK. 2011. “Governance Structures: Using IAD to Understand Variation in Service Delivery for Club Goods with Information Asymmetry.” Policy Studies Journal 39: 105–119. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00398.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. S., S. Mestelman, R. Moir, and R. A. Muller. 1999. “Heterogeneity and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods.” Experimental Economics 2: 5–30.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. H., and M. D. McGinnis. 2018. Elinor Ostrom and the Bloomington School of Political Economy - Volume 2, ResourceGovernance [Eds]. Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, L. 2012. “Confronting Deep Uncertainties in Risk Analysis.” Risk Analysis 32: 1607–1629. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01792.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, S., and E. Ostrom. 1995. “A Grammar of Institutions.” American Political Science Review 89: 582–600. doi:10.2307/2082975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz, C., and R. Marques. 2013. “Flexible Contracts to Cope with Uncertainty in Public–Private Partnerships.” International Journal of Project Management 31: 473–483. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijne, M., and M. Van Eeten. 2007. “Systems That Should Have Failed: Critical Infrastructure Protection in an Institutionally Fragmented Environment.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 15: 18–29. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5973.2007.00501.x
   Google Scholar
• de Gooyert, V. 2020. “Long Term Investments in Critical Infrastructure Under Environmental Turbulence; Dilemmas of Infrastructure Responsiveness.” Sustainable Futures 2. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• De Roo, G. 2003. Environmental Planning in the Netherlands: Too Good to be True: From Command-and-Control Planning to Shared Governance. London: Avebury, Ashgate, Aldershot.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R.C. 2009. “Metropolitan Governance and Institutional Collective Action.” Urban Affairs Review. 44 (3): 356–377.
   Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. 2013. “The Institutional Collective Action Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 41: 397–425. doi:10.1111/psj.12023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R., R. Krause, and C. Hawkins. 2017. “The Impact of Administrative Structure on the Ability of City Governments to Overcome Functional Collective Action Dilemmas: A Climate and Energy Perspective.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 27: 615–628. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraidin, S. 2004. “When is one Head Better Than two? Interdependent Information in Group Decision Making.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 93: 102–113. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E., and C. Gibson. 2009. “Balancing Regionalism and Localism: How Institutions and Incentives Shape American Transportation Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 53: 633–648. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00391.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, E., A. Henry, and M. Lubell. 2013. “Political Homophily and Collaboration in Regional Planning Networks.” American Journal of Political Science 57: 598–610. doi:10.1111/ajps.12011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigone, D., and R. Hastie. 1993. “The Common Knowledge Effect: Information Sharing and Group Judgment.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65: 959–974. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graddy, E., and B. Chen. 2006. “Influences on the Size and Scope of Networks for Social Service Delivery.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16: 533–552. doi:10.1093/jopart/muj005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and R. Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44: 936–957. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons.” Science 162: 1243–1248. doi:10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. 2010. “Competition and Cooperation: Local Government Joint Ventures for Economic Development.” Journal of Urban Affairs 32: 253–275. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2009.00492.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C., Q. Hu, and R. Feiock. 2016. “Self-Organizing Governance of Local Economic Development: Informal Policy Networks And Regional Institutions.” Journal of Urban Affairs 38: 1–18. doi:10.1111/juaf.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeres, N., T. Tillema, and J. Arts. 2016. “Dealing with Interrelatedness and Fragmentation in Road Infrastructure Planning: An Analysis of Integrated Approaches Throughout the Planning Process in the Netherlands.” Planning Theory & Practice 17: 421–443. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1193888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herzberg, R., and V. Ostrom. 1991. “Votes and Vetoes.” In The Public Sector: Challenge for Coordination and Learning, edited by F. Kaufman, 441-450. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Hiteva, R., and J. Watson. 2019. “Governance of Interactions Between Infrastructure Sectors: The Making of Smart Grids in the UK. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.” How History Matters for the Governance of Sociotechnical Transitions 32: 140–152.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. 2006. “What Are Institutions?” Journal of Economic Issues 40: 1–25. doi:10.1080/00213624.2006.11506879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2003. “Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance.” American Political Science Review 97: 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keast, R., and M. Mandell. 2013. “Network Performance: A Complex Interplay Of Form And Action.” International Review of Public Administration 18: 27–45. doi:10.1080/12294659.2013.10805251
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E., and J. Koppenjan. 2016. Governance Networks in the Public Sector. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Laughlin, P., and A. Ellis. 1986. “Demonstrability and Social Combination Processes on Mathematical Intellective Tasks.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22: 177–189. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90022-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, J., and B. Nalebuff. 1995. “An Introduction to Vote-Counting Schemes.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 9: 3–26. doi:10.1257/jep.9.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwell, G., and R. Ames. 1979. “Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods. I. Resources, Interest, Group Size, and the Free-Rider Problem.” American Journal of Sociology 84: 1335–1360. doi:10.1086/226937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinnis, M. 2011. “An Introduction to IAD and the Language of the Ostrom Workshop: A Simple Guide to a Complex Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 39: 169–183. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00401.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, H., and K. Provan. 2000. “Governing the Hollow State.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10: 359–380. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273
   Google Scholar
• Minkoff, S. 2013. “From Competition to Cooperation: A Dyadic Approach to Interlocal Developmental Agreements.” American Politics Research 41: 261–297. doi:10.1177/1532673X12451310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullin, M., and D. Daley. 2010. “Working with the State: Exploring Interagency Collaboration Within a Federalist System.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20: 757–778. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neef, R., S. Verweij, T. Busscher, and J. Arts. 2020. “A Common Ground? Constructing and Exploring Scenarios for Infrastructure Network-of-Networks.” Futures 124: 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2020.102649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. 1991. “Institutions.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 97–112. doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.97
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, P. 1980. “Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives for Collective Action: Theoretical Investigations.” American Journal of Sociology 85: 1356–1375. doi:10.1086/227168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, J. 2009. “Change and Continuity: An Institutional Approach to Institutions of Democratic Government.” European Political Science Review 1: 3–32. doi:10.1017/S1755773909000022
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 1999. “Institutional Rational Choice: An Assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by P. Sabatier, and C. O. Boulder, 35–72. New York: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2011. “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework.” Policy Studies Journal 39: 7–27. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pojabi, D., and D. Stead. 2014. “Going Dutch? The Export of Sustainable Land-use and Transport Planning Concepts from the Netherlands.” Urban Studies 4: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Poteete, A., and E. Ostrom. 2004. “Heterogeneity, Group Size, and Collective Action: The Role of Institutions in Forest Management.” Development and Change 35: 435–461. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2004.00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K., and P. Kenis. 2008. “Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18: 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raven, R., F. Sengers, P. Spaeth, L. Xie, A. Cheshmehzangi, and M. De Jong. 2019. “Urban Experimentation and Institutional Arrangements.” European Planning Studies 27: 258–281. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, A., A. Samuel, and S. Guikema. 2015. ““Gaming the System”: Decision Making by Interdependent Critical Infrastructure.” Decision Analysis 12: 155–172. doi:10.1287/deca.2015.0318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salet, W. 2018. Public Norms and Aspirations: The Turn to Institutions in Action. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, T. 2004. Global Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 1977. Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schittekatte, M., and A. Van Hiel. 1996. “Effects of Partially Shared Information and Awareness of Unshared Information on Information Sampling.” Small Group Research 27: 431–449. doi:10.1177/1046496496273006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shadmehr, M., and D. Bernhardt. 2011. “Collective Action with Uncertain Payoffs: Coordination, Public Signals, and Punishment Dilemmas.” American Political Science Review 105: 829–851. doi:10.1017/S0003055411000359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., A. Platten, and X. Deng. 2006. “Role of Public Private Partnerships to Manage Risks in Public Sector Projects in Hong Kong.” International Journal of Project Management, Governance Issues in Public Private Partnerships 24: 587–594.
   Google Scholar
• Shrestha, M., R. Berardo, and R. Feiock. 2014. “Solving Institutional Collective Action Problems in Multiplex Networks.” Complexity, Governance & Networks 1: 49–60. doi:10.7564/14-CGN72
   Google Scholar
• Spijkerboer, R., C. Zuidema, T. Busscher, and J. Arts. 2019. “Institutional Harmonization for Spatial Integration of Renewable Energy: Developing an Analytical Approach.” Journal of Cleaner Production 209: 1593–1603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasser, G., W. Titus, and B. College. 1985. “Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48: 1467–1478. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straffin, P. 1977. “Majority Rule and General Decision Rules.” Theor Decis 8: 351–360. doi:10.1007/BF00141532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennekes, J., A. Harbers, and E. Buitelaar. 2013. “Institutional Arrangements and the Morphology of Residential Development in the Netherlands, Flanders and North Rhine-Westphalia.” European Planning Studies 23: 2165–2183. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1018437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theesfeld, I. 2004. “Constraints on Collective Action in a Transitional Economy: The Case of Bulgaria’s Irrigation Sector.” World Development, Part Special Issue: Island Studies 32: 251–271.
   Google Scholar
• van Karnenbeek, L., and L. Janssen-Jansen. 2018. “Playing by the Rules? Analysing Incremental Urban Developments.” Land Use Policy 72: 402–409. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varughese, G., and E. Ostrom. 2001. “The Contested Role of Heterogeneity in Collective Action: Some Evidence from Community Forestry in Nepal.” World Development 29: 747–765. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00012-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenma, K. 2021. Ruimte Voor Onzekerheid: Interactie Tussen Actoren in de Dynamiek van Infrastuctuurplanning. Groningen: University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• World Economic Forum, 2022. Global Competitiveness Index. https://www.imd.org/centers/world-competitiveness-center/rankings/world-competitiveness/ Accessed on 07th April 2022.
   Google Scholar
• WRR. 2008. New Perspectives on Investment in Infrastructures. Den Haag: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar