‘Soft’ privatization of public space: autonomization of outdoor retail markets in the Netherlands

References

• Banerjee, T. 2001. “The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places.” Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (1): 9–24. doi:10.1080/01944360108976352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, A. 1982. Quangos in Britain. London: MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaans, G., R. Franssen, and E. Kusters. 2015. “Onderzoek naar het proces van verzelfstandiging van de warenmarkt in Wageningen” [Study of the autonomization of the retail market in Wageningen]. https://adoc.pub/hierbij-bieden-wij-u-de-bestuurlijke-nota-aan-van-het-onderz.html
   Google Scholar
• Binnenlands Bestuur. 2019. “Gemeenten geven markt uit handen” [Municipalities autonomize markets]. Binnenlands Bestuur, March 8.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., and N. Theodore. 2002. “Cities and Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”.” Antipode 34 (3): 349–379. doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmona, M. 2010. “Contemporary Public Space: Critique and Classification, Part One: Critique.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (1): 123–148. doi:10.1080/13574800903435651.
   Google Scholar
• CBS. 2017. “Werknemers- en ondernemerskenmerken markthandel” [Characteristics of employees and employers in market trade]. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/maatwerk/2017/48/maatwerk-brancheverenigingen-cvah-rapport-december-2017
   Google Scholar
• Clough, N., and R. Vanderbeck. 2006. “Managing Politics and Consumption in Business Improvement Districts: The Geographies of Political Activism on Burlington, Vermont’s Church Street Marketplace.” Urban Studies 43 (12): 2261–2284. doi:10.1080/00420980600936517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D66. 2020. “Help de Markt Met Minder Regels!” [Help the Market with Less Rules!]. https://amsterdam.d66.nl/opinie-help-de-markt-met-minder-regels/
   Google Scholar
• De Gelderlander. 2019. “Politiek ‘voorzichtig’ bezorgd over kemphanen op de Arnhemse market” [Political Worries About Doves on the Market in Arnhem]. De Gelderlander, May 5. https://www.gelderlander.nl/arnhem/politiek-voorzichtig-bezorgd-over-kemphanen-op-arnhemse-markt~abc6c1bd/?cb=52eb351c9c21afb1eb728fe116e34696&auth_rd = 1
   Google Scholar
• De Magalhães, C. 2010. “Public Space and the Contracting-Out of Publicness: A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 559–574. doi:10.1080/13574809.2010.502347.
   Google Scholar
• Degen, M. 2003. “Fighting for the Global Catwalk: Formalizing Public Life in Castlefield (Manchester) and Diluting Public Life in el Raval (Barcelona).” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 27: 867–880. doi:10.1111/j.0309-1317.2003.00488.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dovey, K. 2016. Urban Design Thinking: A Conceptual Toolkit. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• DTNP. 2018. “Proeven & Ontmoeten: Cijfers en achtergronden ambulante handel” [Taste & Meet: Numbers and Background Characteristics of Ambulant Trade]. https://www.retailinsiders.nl/docs/1ec0fd29-7de9-4802-8180-c858e2469ce4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E., G. Hanssen, and I. Saglie. 2010. “Challenges to Democracy in Market-Oriented Urban Planning in Norway.” European Planning Studies 18 (5): 737–753. doi:10.1080/096543110036077729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. 2006. “Partnership and the Limits to Local Governance in England: Institutionalist Analysis and Neoliberalism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (1): 76–97. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00645.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, S. 2020. “Contested Marketplaces: Retail Spaces at the Global Urban Margins.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (5): 877–897. doi:10.1177/0309132519859444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães, P. 2018. “The Transformation of Retail Markets in Lisbon: An Analysis Through the Lens of Retail Gentrification.” European Planning Studies 26 (7): 1450–1470. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1474177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HBD. 2007. “De markt heeft toekomst: Trends en toekomstbeelden van de warenmarkt in 2015" [The Market Has a Future: Trends and Future Scenarios of Retail Markets in 2015]. https://docplayer.nl/132236-De-markt-heeft-toekomst.html
   Google Scholar
• HBD. 2010. “De Markt van Morgen: Werkboek voor een vernieuwde of nieuwe markt” [The Market of Tomorrow: Workbook for a Renewed or New Market]. https://irpcdn.multiscreensite.com/df23a9fe/files/uploaded/Werkboek_oprichtingsproces_nieuwe_markt_november_2010_compleet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, F., and P. Tops. 2003. “Local Public Management Reforms in the Netherlands: Fads, Fashions and Winds of Change.” Public Administration 81 (2): 301–323. doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Het Parool. 2010. “Corruptie op alle markten in Amsterdam” [Corruption on all markets in Amsterdam]. Het Parool, December 2.
   Google Scholar
• Heurkens, E., and F. Hobma. 2014. “Private Sector-led Urban Development Projects: Comparative Insights from Planning Practices in the Netherlands and the UK.” Planning Practice and Research 29 (4): 350–369. doi:10.1080/02697459.2014.932196.
   Google Scholar
• Kizildere, D., and F. Chiodelli. 2018. “Discrete Emergence of Neoliberal Policies on Public Space: An Informal Business Improvement District in Istanbul, Turkey.” Urban Geography 39 (5): 783–802. doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1395611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclercq, E., and D. Pojani. 2021. “Public Space Privatisation: Are Users Concerned?” Journal of Urbanism 0 (00): 1–18. doi:10.1080/17549175.2021.1933572.
   Google Scholar
• Leclercq, E., D. Pojani, and E. van Bueren. 2020. “Is Public Space Privatization Always Bad for the Public? Mixed Evidence from the United Kingdom.” Cities 100: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughran, K. 2014. “Parks for Profit: The High Line, Growth Machines, and the Uneven Development of Urban Public Space.” City & Community 13: 49–68. doi:10.1111/cico.12050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S., and N. Smith. 2006. The Politics of Public Space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E., and K. Ward. 2013. “A Multi-Disciplinary Approach to Policy Transfer Research: Geographies, Assemblages, Mobilities and Mutations.” Policy Studies 34 (1): 2–18. doi:10.1080/01442872.2012.748563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miraftab, F. 2004. “Public-Private Partnerships: The Trojan Horse of Neoliberal Development?” Journal of Planning Education and Research 24: 89–101. doi:10.1177/0739456X04267173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörçol, G., A. Vollmer, and D. Mallinson. 2022. “Business Improvement District Enabling Laws in the United States and Germany: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Learning.” Urban Affairs Review 58 (4): 1096–1123. doi:10.1177/10780874211025551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Municipality of Amsterdam. 2014. “Markten op afstand” [Autonomized markets]. https://adoc.pub/gemeente-amsterdam-1.html
   Google Scholar
• Municipality of Valkenswaard. 2014. “Samenwerkingsovereenkomst Weekmarkt Valkenswaard” [Cooperation agreement Market Valkenswaard]. https://docplayer.nl/36275502-Samenwerkingsovereenkomst-weekmarkt-valkenswaard.html
   Google Scholar
• Peyroux, E. 2012. “Legitimating Business Improvement Districts in Johannesburg: A Discursive Perspective on Urban Regeneration and Policy Transfer.” European Urban and Regional Studies 19 (2): 181–194. doi:10.1177/0969776411420034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorkin, M. 1992. Variations on a Theme Park: The New American City and the End of Public Space. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, C., B. Michel, G. Glasze, and R. Pütz. 2017. ““Learning from Failed Policy Mobilities: Contradictions, Resistances and Unintended Outcomes in the Transfer of “Business Improvement Districts” to Germany.” European Urban and Regional Studies 24 (1): 35–49. doi:10.1177/0969776415596797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tartari, M., S. Pedrini, and P. Sacco. 2021. “Urban ‘Beautification’ and its Discontents: The Erosion of Urban Commons in Milan.” European Planning Studies 0: 00. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.1990215.
   Google Scholar
• Uitermark, J., and J. Duyvendak. 2008. “Citizen Participation in a Mediated Age: Neighbourhood Governance in The Netherlands.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (1): 114–134. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00743.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, E. 2021. ““That Market has No Quality”: Performative Place Frames, Racialisation, and Affective Re-inscriptions in an Outdoor Retail Market in Amsterdam.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 47 (2): 547–561. doi:10.1111/tran.12515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, E., R. van Melik, and J. Schapendonk. 2020. “Marketplaces as Public Spaces in Times of the Covid-19 Coronavirus Outbreak: First Reflections.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 111 (3): 373–386. doi:10.1111/tesg.12431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eck, E., R. van Melik, and J. Schapendonk. 2023. “The Multi-Scalar Nature of Policy im/Mobilities: Regulating ‘Local’ Markets in the Netherlands.” In Marketplaces: Movements, Representations and Practices, edited by C. Sezer and R. van Melik, 150–160. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003197058-13.
   Google Scholar
• Van Melik, R., I. van Aalst, and J. van Weesep. 2009. “The Private Sector and Public Space in Dutch City Centers.” Cities 26: 202–209. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2009.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Melik, R., and E. van der Krabben. 2016. “Co-production of Public Space: Policy Translations from New York City to the Netherlands.” Town Planning Review 87 (2): 139–158. doi:10.3828/tpr.2016.12.
   Google Scholar
• Van Thiel, S. 2004. “Quangos in Dutch Government.” In Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trend to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualism, edited by C. Pollitt and C. Talbot, 167–183. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, S. 2009. “The Magic of the Marketplace: Sociality in a Neglected Public Space.” Urban Studies 46 (8): 1577–1591. doi:10.1177/0042098009105506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamanifard, H., T. Alizadeh, and C. Bosman. 2018. “Towards a Framework of Public Space Governance.” Cities 78: 155–165. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar