Navigating swift and slow planning: planners’ balancing act in the design of participatory processes

References

• Abrahamsson, H. 2012. “Cities as Nodes for Global Governance or Battlefields for Social Conflicts? The Role of Dialogue in Social Sustainability.” In IFHP 56th World Congress: Inclusive Cities in a Global World Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., J. Coaffee, and G. Sherriff. 2007. “Achieving Successful Participation in the New UK Spatial Planning System.” Planning Practice & Research 22: 79–93. doi:10.1080/02697450601173371.
   Google Scholar
• Boverket. 2021. Medborgardialog [Online]. Accessed 10 December 2021. https://www.boverket.se/sv/PBL-kunskapsbanken/teman/medborgardialog/.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, R., and F. Gaffikin. 2007. “Collaborative Planning in an Uncollaborative World.” Planning Theory 6: 282–313. doi:10.1177/1473095207082036.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S., and T. Richardson. 2004. “Exclusion: The Necessary Difference Between Ideal and Practical Consensus.” Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 47: 3–17. doi:10.1080/0964056042000189772.
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E., G. Hanssen, and I. Saglie. 2010. “Challenges to Democracy in Market-oriented Urban Planning in Norway.” European Planning Studies 18: 737–753. doi:10.1080/09654311003607729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falleth, E., and I.-L. Saglie. 2011. “Democracy or Efficiency: Contradictory National Guidelines in Urban Planning in Norway.” Urban Research & Practice 4: 58–71. doi:10.1080/17535069.2011.550541.
   Google Scholar
• Fiskaa, H. 2005. “Past and Future for Public Participation in Norwegian Physical Planning.” European Planning Studies 13: 157–174. doi:10.1080/0965431042000312451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., and T. Richardson. 2002. “Planning and Foucault: In Search of the Dark Side of Planning Theory.” In Planning Futures: New Directions for Planning Theory, edited by P. Allmendinger and M. Tewdwr-Jones, 44–62. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 2013. “On the Theory and Practice of Critical Pragmatism: Deliberative Practice and Creative Negotiations.” Planning Theory 12: 5–22. doi:10.1177/1473095212448750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 2017. On the Evolution of a Critical Pragmatism. Encounters in Planning Thought, 16 Autobiographical Essays from Key Thinkers in Spatial Planning. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grange, K. 2017. “Planners – A Silenced Profession? The Politicisation of Planning and the Need for Fearless Speech.” Planning Theory 16: 275–295. doi:10.1177/1473095215626465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2003. “Collaborative Planning in Perspective.” Planning Theory 2: 101–123. doi:10.1177/14730952030022002.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2005. Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Gordonsville: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J. 2004. “Consensus Building: Clarifications for the Critics.” Planning Theory 3: 5–20. doi:10.1177/1473095204042315.
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., and D. Booher. 2015. “A Turning Point for Planning Theory? Overcoming Dividing Discourses.” Planning Theory 14: 195–213. doi:10.1177/1473095213519356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J., and D. Booher. 2016. “Collaborative Rationality as a Strategy for Working with Wicked Problems.” Landscape and Urban Planning 154: 8–10. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, M. 2020. “Agonistic Planning Theory Revisited: The Planner’s Role in Dealing with Conflict.” Planning Theory 20: 143–156. doi:10.1177/1473095220953201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, H. 2020. “Habermas Revisited: Resurrecting the Contested Roots of Communicative Planning Theory.” Progress in Planning 141: 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., K. Jarenko, K. Nilsson, and I.-L. Saglie. 2015. “Legitimacy of Informal Strategic Urban Planning: Observations from Finland, Sweden and Norway.” European Planning Studies 23: 349–366. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.861808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., and I.-L. Saglie. 2010. “Private Influence Preceding Public Involvement: Strategies for Legitimizing Preliminary Partnership Arrangements in Urban Housing Planning in Norway and Finland.” Planning Theory & Practice 11: 317–338. doi:10.1080/14649357.2010.500123.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., I.-L. Saglie, and G. Cars. 2011. “Between Input Legitimacy and Output Efficiency: Defensive Routines and Agonistic Reflectivity in Nordic Land-Use Planning.” European Planning Studies 19: 2109–2126. doi:10.1080/09654313.2011.632906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellanplatsprojektet. 2013. Framtiden är redan här: hur invånare kan bli medskapare i stadens utveckling [Online]. Accessed December 2017. http://www.mellanplats.se/.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., I.-M. Eriksson, K. Grange, M. Håkansson, and K. Nilsson. 2016. “Riskabelt när alla ropar på snabbt byggande.” Svenska Dagbladet, April 23. Accessed December 10, 2020. https://www.svd.se/a/RxGna/riskabelt-nar-alla-ropar-pa-snabbt-byggande.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., L. Soneryd, and S. Linke. 2017. “The Legitimization of Concern: A Flexible Framework for Investigating the Enactment of Stakeholders in Environmental Planning and Governance Processes.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49: 2517–2535. doi:10.1177/0308518X17727284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, A. 2012. “Following from the Front: Theorizing Deliberative Facilitation.” Critical Policy Studies 6: 146–162. doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.689735.
   Google Scholar
• Niitamo, A. 2021. “Planning in No One’s Backyard: Municipal Planners’ Discourses of Participation in Brownfield Projects in Helsinki, Amsterdam and Copenhagen.” European Planning Studies 29: 844–861. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1792842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., and J. Mansbridge. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puustinen, S., R. Mäntysalo, J. Hytönen, and K. Jarenko. 2017. “The ‘Deliberative Bureaucrat’: Deliberative Democracy and Institutional Trust in the Jurisdiction of the Finnish Planner.” Planning Theory & Practice 18: 71–88. doi:10.1080/14649357.2016.1245437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2009. “Planners’ Role: Torn Between Dialogical Ideals and Neo-Liberal Realities.” European Planning Studies 17: 65–84. doi:10.1080/09654310802513948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salar. 2011. Medborgardialog som del i styrprocessen. Stockholm: SALAR. Swedish Association for Local Authorities and regions.
   Google Scholar
• Salar. 2016. Planläggning och tidsåtsgång 2016. SALAR, Swedish Association for Local Authorities and Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Salar. 2019. Medborgardialog i styrning: för ett stärkt demokratiskt samhälle. SALAR, Swedish Association for Local Authorities and Regions.
   Google Scholar
• Stenberg, J., and L. Fryk. 2012. “Urban Empowerment Through Community Outreach in Teaching and Design.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46: 3284–3289. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.052.
   Google Scholar
• Tahvilzadeh, N. 2015. “Understanding Participatory Governance Arrangements in Urban Politics: Idealist and Cynical Perspectives on the Politics of Citizen Dialogues in Göteborg, Sweden.” Urban Research & Practice 8: 238–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppsala Municipality. 2015. Programme Plan for Gottsunda with Focus on Social Sustainability. KSN-2015-0654. Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Uppsala Municipality. 2019a. Citizen Dialogue on Security in Gottsunda [Online]. Accessed 31 January 2022. https://www.uppsala.se/kommun-och-politik/publikationer/dialoger/medborgardialog-om-trygghet-i-gottsunda/.
   Google Scholar
• Uppsala Municipality. 2019b. Results Citizen Dialogue – Programme plan Gottsunda. Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Westin, M. 2022. “The Framing of Power in Communicative Planning Theory: Analysing the Work of John Forester, Patsy Healey and Judith Innes.” Planning Theory 21 (2): 132–154. doi:10.1177/14730952211043219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westin, M., A. Mutter, C. Calderon, and A. Hellquist. 2021. “‘Let us be led by the Residents’: Swedish Dialogue Experts’ Stories about Power, Justification and Ambivalence.” Nordic Journal of Urban Studies 1: 113–130. doi:10.18261/issn.2703-8866-2021-02-02.
   Google Scholar