City-regions in Central Eastern Europe: emerging metropolitan territorialities in post-socialist planning systems

References

• Allmendinger, P., and G. Haughton. 2009. “Soft Spaces, Fuzzy Boundaries, and Metagovernance: The New Spatial Planning in the Thames Gateway.” Environment and Planning A 41: 617–633. doi:10.1068/a40208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouzarovski, S., L. Sýkora, and R. Matoušek. 2017. “Locked-in Post-Socialism. Rolling Path Dependencies in Liberec’s District Heating System.” Eurasian Geography and Economics 57 (4/5): 624–642. doi:10.1080/15387216.2016.1250224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2004. New State Spaces: Urban Governance and the Rescaling of Statehood. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buček, J. 2016. “Urban Development Policy Challenges in East-Central Europe: Governance, City Regions and Financialisation.” Quaestiones Geographicae 35 (2): 7–26. doi:10.1515/quageo-2016-0012.
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., and E. Meijers. 2016. “Contrasts Between First-Tier and Second-Tier Cities in Europe: A Functional Perspective.” European Planning Studies 24 (5): 996–1015. doi:10.1080/09654313.2015.1120708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardoso, R., and E. Meijers. 2021. “Metropolisation: The Winding Road Toward the Citification of the Region.” Urban Geography 42 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/02723638.2020.1828558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, A., and A. Cambell. 2006. “Into the Mainstream: Local Democracy in Central and Eastern Europe.” Local Government Studies 5: 543–562. doi:10.1080/03003930600896129.
   Google Scholar
• Crouch, C., and P. Le Galès. 2012. “Cities as National Champions?” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (3): 405–419. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.640795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dąbrowski, M., and K. Piskorek. 2018. “The Development of Strategic Spatial Planning in Central and Eastern Europe: Between Path Dependence, European Influence, and Domestic Politics.” Planning Perspectives 33 (4): 571–589. doi:10.1080/02665433.2018.1513373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demazière, Ch. 2020. “The Multiple Agencies of Metropolitan Institutions: Is There Convergence?” In Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance, edited by K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, and J. Harrison, 41–58. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Desjardins, X., and A. Geppert. 2020. “Governance Rescaling and Regional Planning in France. Is Big Really Beautiful?” In Shaping Regional Futures: Designing and Visioning in Governance Rescaling, edited by V. Lingua, and V. Balz, 121–132. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23573-4_9.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A. 2010. “Beyond Lisbon: Soft European Spatial Planning.” DISP 182 (3): 14–24. doi:10.1080/02513625.2010.10557098.
   Google Scholar
• Fedeli, V. 2017. “Metropolitan Governance and Metropolitan Cities in Italy: Outdated Solutions for Processes of Urban Regionalisation?” Raumforschung und Raumordnung 75 (3): 265–274. doi:10.1007/s13147-016-0430-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finka, M., and M. Husár. 2021. “Multilevel Polycentric Governance in Urban Development Policies – National Urban Policy Structure in Slovakia.” In A Modern Guide to National Urban Policies in Europe, edited by K. Zimmermann, and V. Fedeli, 245–267. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Galland, D., and J. Harrison. 2020. “Conceptualising Metropolitan Regions: How Institutions, Policies, Spatial Imaginaries and Planning are Influencing Metropolitan Development.” In Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance, edited by K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, and J. Harrison, 1–21. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Geppert, A. 2017. “Vae Victis! Spatial Planning in the Rescaled Metropolitan Governance in France.” Raumforschung und Raumordnung 75 (3): 225–241. doi:10.1007/s13147-017-0492-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., A. Humer, and R. Mäntysalo. 2021. “Tensions in City Regional Spatial Planning: The Challenge of Interpreting Layered Institutional Rules.” Regional Studies 55 (5): 844–856. doi:10.1080/00343404.2019.1707791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., D. Galland, and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 2021. “Regional Planning is Dead: Long Live Planning Regional Futures.” Regional Studies 55 (1): 6–18. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1750580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J., and A. Growe. 2014. “From Places to Flows? Planning for the new ‘Regional World’ in Germany.” European Urban and Regional Studies 21 (1): 21–41. doi:10.1177/0969776412441191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., and P. Allmendinger. 2015. “Fluid Spatial Imaginaries: Evolving Estuarial City-Regional Spaces.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 39 (5): 857–873. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton, G., P. Allmendinger, D. Counsell, and G. Vigar. 2010. The New Spatial Planning. Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries. Oxon: Routledge. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.
   Google Scholar
• Havlík, V. 2018. “Competing Discourses of Territorial Development: Tensions Between Cities and Regions as a Result of the new Regionalism.” European Planning Studies 26 (10): 1999–2014. doi:10.1080/09654313.2018.1504894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirt, S. 2007. “Suburbanizing Sofia: Characteristics of Post-Socialist Peri-Urban Change.” Urban Geography 28 (8): 755–780. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.28.8.755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoole, C., and S. Hincks. 2020. “Performing the City-Region: Imagineering, Devolution and the Search for Legitimacy.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52 (8): 1583–1601. doi:10.1177/0308518X20921207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illner, M. 2003. “The Czech Republic 1990–2001: Successful Reform at the Municipal Level and a Difficult Birth of the Intermediary Government.” In Local Democracy in Post-Communist Europe, edited by H. Baldersheim, M. Illner, and H. Wollmann, 61–90. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, D. 2022. “Understanding Drivers of Support for English City-Region Devolution: A Case Study of the Liverpool City Region.” British Politics. doi:10.1057/s41293-021-00199-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, T. 2018. “Soft Planning for Soft Spaces. Concept of Poznań Metropolitan Area Development – A Case Study.” Miscellanea Geographica 22 (4): 181–186. doi:10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarek, T., and A. Ryder. 2015. “Top-down and Bottom-up Metropolitan Integration in Poland.” In Governance in Transition, edited by J. Buček, and A. Ryder, 19–39. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kostelecký, T., M. Illner, and J. Vobecká. 2007. “Metropolitan Governance in the Czech Republic.” In Governing Metropolises: Profiles of Issues and Experiments on Four Continents, edited by J.-P. Collin, and M. Robertson, 235–258. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l’Université Laval.
   Google Scholar
• Lackowska, M., and Ł Mikuła. 2018. “How Metropolitan Can You Go? Citizenship in Polish City-Regions.” Journal of Urban Affairs 40 (1): 47–62. doi:10.1111/juaf.12260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackowska, M., and D. Norris. 2017. “Metropolitan Governance (or Not!) in Poland and the United States.” Miscellanea Geographica 21 (3): 114–123. doi:10.1515/mgrsd-2017-0021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. 2013. “Citizens in the City-Regions: Political Orientations Across Municipal Borders.” Urban Affairs Review 49 (2): 282–306. doi:10.1177/1078087412457549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingua, V., and V. Balz. eds. 2020. Shaping Regional Futures – Designing and Visioning in Governance Rescaling. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, J., and H. Sirviö. 2019. “The Politics of Depoliticization and the Constitution of City-Regionalism as a Dominant Spatial-Political Imaginary in Finland.” Political Geography 73: 17–27. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lysek, J. 2021. “Local Identity or Economic Benefits? The Municipal Splits in the Czech Republic. Miscellanea Geographica.” Regional Studies on Development 25 (1): 18–27. doi:10.2478/mgrsd-2020-0042.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., and P. Schmitt. 2012. “When Soft Spaces Harden: The EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region.” Environment and Planning A 44 (2): 263–280. doi:10.1068/a44188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikuła, Ł. 2020. “Metropolitan Planning and Governance in the New Urban Agenda: A Post-Socialist Perspective in Central and Eastern Europe.” In Local Governance in the New Urban Agenda, edited by C. Silva, and A. Trono, 111–134. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mikuła, Ł. 2023. “Creating Planning Visions for Fragmented Postsocialist City-Regions.” Regional Studies 57 (4): 670–684. doi:10.1080/00343404.2022.2051469.
   Google Scholar
• Mikuła, Ł, and T. Kaczmarek. 2017. “Metropolitan Integration in Poland: The Case of Poznań Metropolis.” International Planning Studies 22 (1): 30–43. doi:10.1080/13563475.2016.1256191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. and D. Stead. 2008. “European Spatial Planning Systems, Social Models and Learning.” disP 44 (172): 35–47. doi:10.1080/02513625.2008.10557001.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, M., A.-I. Petrisor, A. Mitrea, K. F. Kovács, G. Lukstina, E. Jürgenson, Z. Ladzianska, V. Simeonova, R. Lozyskyy, V. Rezac, et al. 2022. “The Role of Spatial Plans Adopted at the Local Level in the Spatial Planning Systems of Central and Eastern European Countries.” Land 11: 1599. doi:10.3390/land11091599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuissl, H., and D. Rink. 2005. “The “Production” of Urban Sprawl in Eastern Germany as a Phenomenon of Post-Socialist Transformation.” Cities 22: 123–134. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2005.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. 2012. “Soft Spaces as Vehicles for Neoliberal Transformations of Strategic Spatial Planning?” Environment and Planning C 30: 910–923. doi:10.1068/c11241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ott, T. 2001. “From Concentration to Deconcentration - Migration Patterns in the Postsocialist City.” Cities 18: 403–412. doi:10.1016/S0264-2751(01)00032-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouředníček, M. 2007. “Differential Suburban Development in the Prague Urban Region.” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 89: 111–126. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00243.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F., and H. Frisk. 2016. “Soft Space Regional Planning as an Approach for Integrated Transport and Land Use Planning in Sweden – Challenges and Ways Forward.” Urban Planning and Transport Research 4 (1): 64–82. doi:10.1080/21650020.2016.1156020.
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., and K. Granqvist. 2021. “Soft Spaces as a Traveling Planning Idea: Uncovering the Origin and Development of an Academic Concept on the Rise.” Journal of Planning Literature 36 (3): 312–327. doi:10.1177/0885412221992287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., and A. Humer. 2019. “City-regional Policies in the Planning Systems of Finland and Austria: National Initiatives and European Opportunities.” Belgeo 2019 (2): 1–17. doi:10.4000/belgeo.32122.
   Google Scholar
• Smas, L., and P. Schmitt. 2021. “Positioning Regional Planning Across Europe.” Regional Studies 55 (5): 778–790. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1782879.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanilov, K., and L. Sýkora. 2014. “Managing Suburbanization in Postsocialist Europe.” In Confronting Suburbanization: Urban Decentralization in Postsocialist Central and Eastern Europe, edited by K. Stanilov, and L. Sýkora, 296–320. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stănuș, C., D. Pop, and D. Dragoman. 2021. “Changing Urban System, Changing Urban Policy: Romania Since 1989.” In A Modern Guide to National Urban Policies in Europe, edited by K. Zimmermann, and V. Fedeli, 195–215. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stead, D. 2014. “European Integration and Spatial Rescaling in the Baltic Region: Soft Spaces, Soft Planning and Soft Security.” European Planning Studies 22 (4): 680–693. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.772731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomàs, M. 2020. “Metropolitan Revolution or Metropolitan Evolution? The (dis)Continuities in Metropolitan Institutional Reforms.” In Metropolitan Regions, Planning and Governance, edited by K. Zimmermann, D. Galland, and J. Harrison, 25–39. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Vinci, I. 2019. “Governing the Metropolitan Dimension: A Critical Perspective on Institutional Reshaping and Planning Innovation in Italy.” European Journal of Spatial Development 70: 1–21. doi:10.30689/EJSD2018:70.1650-9544.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K., and A. Paasi. 2020. “Hard Work with Soft Spaces (and Vice Versa): Problematizing the Transforming Planning Spaces.” European Planning Studies 28 (4): 771–789. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1653827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K. 2017. “Re-scaling of Metropolitan Governance in Germany.” Raumforschung und Raumordnung 75 (3): 253–263. doi:10.1007/s13147-017-0480-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, K., and P. Feiertag. 2022. Governance and City Regions. Policy and Planning in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Żuber, P., K. Szmigiel-Rawska, and J. Krukowska. 2021. “Boosting National Urban Policies by European Integration. The Case of Poland.” In A Modern Guide to National Urban Policies in Europe, edited by K. Zimmermann, and V. Fedeli, 149–175. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Key planning documents
   Google Scholar
• Integrovaná strategie rozvoje Brněnské metropolitní oblasti 2021+ (2022).
   Google Scholar
• Integrovaná strategie rozvoje Brněnské metropolitní oblasti pro uplatnění nástroje ITI (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Koncepcja kierunków rozwoju przestrzennego Metropolii Poznań (2016).
   Google Scholar
• Plan Zrównoważonej Mobilności dla Miejskiego Obszaru Funkcjonalnego Wrocławia (SUMP) (2022).
   Google Scholar
• Regionálna integrovaná územná stratégia Bratislavského kraja na roky 2014 – 2020 (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Strategia Integrată de Dezvoltare Urbană pentru Polul De Creștere Cluj-Napoca, pentru perioada de programare 2014-2020 (2017, update).
   Google Scholar
• Strategia Integrată de Dezvoltare Urbană 2021 - 2030 (2021, draft).
   Google Scholar
• Strategia rozwoju Aglomeracji Poznańskiej. Metropolia Poznań 2020 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Strategia rozwoju ponadlokalnego Metropolii Krakowskiej (2022).
   Google Scholar
• Strategia Zintegrowanych Inwestycji Terytorialnych dla Krakowskiego Obszaru Funkcjonalnego (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Strategia Zintegrowanych Inwestycji Terytorialnych w Miejskim Obszarze Funkcjonalnym Poznania (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Strategia Zintegrowanych Inwestycji Terytorialnych Wrocławskiego Obszaru Funkcjonalnego (2015).
   Google Scholar
• Studium spójności funkcjonalnej we Wrocławskim Obszarze Funkcjonalnym (2015).
   Google Scholar