Innovation districts as strategic urban projects: the emergence of strategic spatial planning for urban innovation

References

• Adu-McVie, R., T. Yigitcanlar, I. Erol, and B. Xia. 2021. “Classifying Innovation Districts: Delphi Validation of a Multidimensional Framework.” Land Use Policy 111: 105779. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2006. “Bridge the Gap: From Spatial Planning to Strategic Projects.” European Planning Studies 14 (10): 1487–1500. doi:10.1080/09654310600852464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2010. “More of the Same is not Enough! How Could Strategic Spatial Planning be Instrumental in Dealing with the Challenges Ahead?” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 37: 1115–1127. doi:10.1068/b36068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2015. “Ingredients for a More Radical Strategic Spatial Planning.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 42: 510–525. doi:10.1068/b130104p.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., and A. Balducci. 2013. “Practicing Strategic Planning: In Search of Critical Features to Explain the Strategic Character of Plans.” disP – The Planning Review 49 (3): 16–27. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avoindata.fi. 2022. Turun kaupungin pienaluetilastoja [Areal Statistics of the City of Turku]. Accessed 18 March 2022. https://www.avoindata.fi/data/fi/dataset/turun-kaupungin-pienaluetilastoja [in Finnish]
   Google Scholar
• Ayres, S. 2014. “Place-based Leadership: Reflections on Scale, Agency and Theory.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 1 (1): 21–24. doi:10.1080/21681376.2013.869424.
   Google Scholar
• Baily, M., and N. Montalbano. 2018. Clusters and Innovation Districts: Lessons from the United States Experience. The Brookings Institution, Economic Studies. Accessed 15 June 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/es_20180508_bailyclustersandinnovation.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A., and R. Mäntysalo, Eds. 2013. Urban Planning as a Trading Zone. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Battaglia, A., and D. Tremblay. 2011. “22@ and the Innovation District in Barcelona and Montreal: A Process of Clustering Development Between Urban Regeneration and Economic Competitiveness.” Urban Studies Research, doi:10.1155/2011/568159.
   Google Scholar
• Block, T., K. Steyvers, S. Oosterlynck, H. Reynaert, and F. De Rynck. 2012. “When Strategic Plans Fail to Lead. A Complexity Acknowledging Perspective on Decision-Making in Urban Development Projects – The Case of Kortrijk (Belgium).” European Planning Studies 20 (6): 981–997. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.673561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, J., N. Odendaal, and A. Todes. 2004. “Integrated Area Development Projects: Working Towards Innovation and Sustainability.” Urban Forum 15 (4): 311–339. doi:10.1007/s12132-004-0012-6.
   Google Scholar
• City of Turku. 2017. “Turku Science Park Masterplan 2050.” Presenting the Future Image of Turku Science Park (pdf). Accessed 27 November 2018. https://www.turuntiedepuisto.fi/en/turku-science-park-spearhead-project
   Google Scholar
• City of Turku. 2021. Turku Science Park Spearhead Project. Accessed 5 August 2021. https://www.turuntiedepuisto.fi/en/turku-science-park-spearhead-project
   Google Scholar
• City of Turku. 2022. Turun Tiedepuisto – Turku Science Park. Accessed 14 March 2022. https://www.turku.fi/en/turun-tiedepuisto-turku-science-park
   Google Scholar
• Duvivier, C., M. Polèse, and P. Apparicio. 2018. “The Location of Information Technology-led New Economy Jobs in Cities: Office Parks or Cool Neighbourhoods?” Regional Studies 52 (6): 756–767. doi:10.1080/00343404.2017.1322686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., T. Yigitcanlar, and M. Guaralda. 2018a. “Place Quality in Innovation Clusters: An Empirical Analysis of Global Best Practices from Singapore, Helsinki, New York, and Sydney.” Cities 74: 156–168. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., T. Yigitcanlar, M. Guaralda, and Md. Kamruzzaman. 2018b. “Evaluating Place Quality in Innovation Districts: A Delphic Hierarchy Process Approach.” Land Use Policy 76: 471–486. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeilpoorarabi, N., T. Yigitcanlar, Md. Kamruzzaman, and M. Guaralda. 2020. “Conceptual Frameworks of Innovation District Place Quality: An Opinion Paper.” Land Use Policy 90: 104166. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez, L., and P. Oinas. 2022. “Traveling Planning Concepts Revisited: How They Land and why it Matters.” Urban Geography, doi:10.1080/02723638.2022.2127267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., H. Mattila, R. Mäntysalo, A. Hirvensalo, S. Teerikangas, and H. Kalliomäki. 2021. “Multiple Dimensions of Strategic Spatial Planning: Local Authorities Navigating Between Rationalities in Competitive and Collaborative Settings.” Planning Theory & Practice 22 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1080/14649357.2021.1904148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. “The Revival of Strategic Spatial Planning in Europe.” In Making Strategic Spatial Plans, edited by P. Healey, A. Khakee, A. Motte, and B. Needham, 3–19. London: U.C.L. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2006. Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A., E. Oliveira, S. Pagliarin, G. Palka, P. Verburg, J. Bolliger, and S. Grădinaru. 2018. “Urban Land-use Change: The Role of Strategic Spatial Planning.” Global Environmental Change 51: 32–42. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höyssä, M., H. Bruun, and J. Hukkinen. 2004. “The co-Evolution of Social and Physical Infrastructure for Biotechnology Innovation in Turku, Finland.” Research Policy 33: 769–785. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalliomäki, H. 2015. “Reframing Strategic Spatial Planning as a Trading Zone Between State-led and Place-Based Interests: Reflections from Maryland and Finland.” Land Use Policy 42: 113–123. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, B., and J. Wagner. 2014, May. The Rise of Innovation Districts: A new Geography of Innovation in America. Brookings: Metropolitan Policy Program. https://www.brookings.edu
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, J., and R. A. Whitney. 2022. “What is Progressive City Building? Global Expertise and Local Entanglements in Latin America.” Urban Geography. doi:10.1080/02723638.2022.2125668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundén, J. 2017. 50 Vuotta Turkua Rakentamassa [50 Years of Building Turku]. Turku: Juhani Lundén. [in Finnish].
   Google Scholar
• Massey, D., and D. Wield. 1992. High-Tech Fantasies. Science Parks in Society, Science and Space. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., J. Kangasoja, and V. Kanninen. 2015. “The Paradox of Strategic Spatial Planning: A Theoretical Outline with a View on Finland.” Planning Theory & Practice 16 (2): 169–183. doi:10.1080/14649357.2015.1016548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., and V. Kanninen. 2018. “Kaupunkiseutujen Integroiva Suunnittelu ja Hallinta [Integrated Planning and Governance in City Regions].” Yhdyskuntasuunnittelu 3 (56), [in Finnish].
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment. 2023. Land Use, Housing and Transport Agreements. Retrieved 2 March 2023. https://ym.fi/en/agreements-on-land-use-housing-and-transport
   Google Scholar
• Morawska, I., K. Anielska, J. Gądecki, and Ł Afeltowicz. 2021. “Changes in Urban Fabric – a Cause or a Result of an Innovation District?” Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, doi:10.1080/17549175.2021.2005118.
   Google Scholar
• Moultrie, J., M. Nilsson, M. Dissel, U. Haner, S. Janssen, and R. Van der Lugt. 2007. “Innovation Spaces: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Role of the Physical Environment in Innovation.” Creativity and Innovation Management 16 (1): 53–65. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V. 2007. “The Emergence of the Spatial Planning Approach in England.” Planning Practice and Research 22 (1): 43–62. doi:10.1080/02697450701455934.
   Google Scholar
• Nadin, V., D. Stead, M. Dąbrowski, and A. Fernandez-Maldonado. 2021. “Integrated, Adaptive and Participatory Spatial Planning: Trends Across Europe.” Regional Studies 55 (5): 791–803. doi:10.1080/00343404.2020.1817363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E. 2015. “Place Branding as a Strategic Spatial Planning Instrument.” Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 11 (1): 18–33. doi:10.1057/pb.2014.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterlynck, S., L. Albrechts, and J. Van den Broeck. 2011. “Strategic Spatial Planning Through Strategic Projects.” In Strategic Spatial Projects. Catalysts for Change, edited by S. Oosterlynck, J. Van den Broeck, L. Albrechts, F. Moulaert, and A. Verhetsel, 1–14. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliarin, S., A. Hersperger, and B. Rihoux. 2020. “Implementation Pathways of Large-Scale Urban Development Projects (lsUDPs) in Western Europe: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA).” European Planning Studies 28 (6): 1242–1263. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1681942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancholi, S., T. Yigitcanlar, and M. Guaralda. 2018. “Societal Integration That Matters: Place Making Experience of Macquarie Park Innovation District, Sydney.” City, Culture and Society 13: 13–21. doi:10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.004.
   Google Scholar
• Sotarauta, M., A. Beer, and J. Gibney. 2017. “Making Sense of Leadership in Urban and Regional Development.” Regional Studies 51 (2): 187–193. doi:10.1080/00343404.2016.1267340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D., and E. Meijers. 2009. “Spatial Planning and Policy Integration: Concepts, Facilitators and Inhibitors.” Planning Theory & Practice 10 (3): 317–332. doi:10.1080/14649350903229752.
   Google Scholar
• Turku Business Region. 2019. Turku Business Region. Accessed 17 October 2019. https://turkubusinessregion.com/en/
   Google Scholar
• Turku Science Park. 2022. Turku Partnership Project. Accessed 5 December 2022. https://www.turuntiedepuisto.fi/en/kupittaa-partnership-project
   Google Scholar
• Turku Technology Properties. 2022a. Key Figures. Accessed 14 March 2022. https://www.teknolog iakiinteistot.fi/en/company/key-figures
   Google Scholar
• Turku Technology Properties. 2022b. From the Textile Industry to Technology Companies. Accessed 23 December 2022. https://www.teknologiakiinteistot.fi/en/science-park/history
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., and N. Djanibekov. 2012. “Spatial Planning as Policy Integration: The Need for an Evolutionary Perspective. Lessons from Uzbekistan.” Land Use Policy 29: 179–186. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, J., B. Katz, and T. Osha. 2019. The Evolution of Innovation Districts. The New Geography of Global Innovation. The Global Institute on Innovation Districts. Accessed 7 June 2019. https://www.giid.org/the-evolution-of-innovation-districts/#subscribe-for-download-file
   Google Scholar
• Wolff-Powers, L. 2022. University City. History, Race, and Community in the era of the Innovation District. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., R. Adu-McVie, and I. Erol. 2020. “How Can Contemporary Innovation Districts be Classified? A Systematic Review of the Literature.” Land Use Policy 95: 104595. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., and T. Inkinen. 2019. Geographies of Disruption: Place Making for Innovation in the Age of Knowledge Economy. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yigitcanlar, T., and S. Teriman. 2015. “Rethinking Sustainable Urban Development: Towards an Integrated Planning and Development Process.” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 12: 341–352. doi:10.1007/s13762-013-0491-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A. 2015. “Reflections on the Three Schools of Thought on Strategic Spatial Planning.” Journal of Planning Literature 30 (2): 132–148. doi:10.1177/0885412214562428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziafati Bafarasat, A., and E. Oliveira. 2021. “Disentangling Three Decades of Strategic Spatial Planning in England Through Participation, Project Promotion and Policy Integration.” European Planning Studies 29 (8): 1375–1392. doi:10.1080/09654313.2020.1863920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukin, S. 2020. The Innovation Complex. Cities, Tech and the new Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar