What’s next? Some priorities for young planning scholars to tackle tomorrow’s complex challenges

References

• Abernethy, B., Baker, J. and Côté, J. 2005. “Transfer of Pattern Recall Skills May Contribute to the Development of Sport Expertise.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, 705–718. doi:10.1002/acp.1102
   Google Scholar
• Bear, A., and D. Skorton. 2019. “The World Needs Students with Interdisciplinary Education.” Issues in Science and Technology 35 (2): 60–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biesbroek, G., R. Swart, and W. Van der Knaap. 2009. “The Mitigation–Adaptation Dichotomy and the Role of Spatial Planning.” Habitat International 33 (3): 230–237. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bore, A., and N. Wright. 2009. “The Wicked and Complex in Education: Developing a Transdisciplinary Perspective for Policy Formulation, Implementation and Professional Practice.” Journal of Education for Teaching 35 (3): 241–256. doi:10.1080/02607470903091286
   Google Scholar
• Boyer, S., and B. Bishop. 2004. “Young Adolescent Voices: Students’ Perceptions of Interdisciplinary Teaming.” RMLE 1. doi:10.1080/19404476.2004.11658176
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2012. “What is Critical Urban Theory?” In Cities for People, not for Profit, edited by Neil Brenner, Peter Marcuse, and Margit Mayer, 11–23. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., T. Daamen, E. Heurkens, and W. Verheul. 2019. “Interdisciplinary and Experiential Learning in Urban Development Management Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 30: 919–936. doi:10.1007/s10798-019-09541-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coyne, R. 2005. “Wicked Problems Revisited.” Design Studies 26: 5–17. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2004.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., J. Crawford, and A. Mehmood, eds. 2009. Planning for Climate Change: Strategies for Mitigation and Adaptation for Spatial Planners. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• del Cerro Santamaría, G. 2020. “Complexity and Transdisciplinarity: The Case of Iconic Urban Megaprojects.” Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 11. doi:10.22545/2020/0131
   Google Scholar
• Després, C., G. Vachon, and A. Fortin. 2011. “Implementing Transdisciplinarity: Architecture and Urban Planning at Work.” Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production in Architecture and Urbanism: Towards Hybrid Modes of Inquiry, 33–49. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0104-5_3
   Google Scholar
• Duerr, Laura. 2008. “Interdisciplinary Instruction, Educational Horizons.” http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/3e/0c/3a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eraydın, A. 2021. “Searching for Alternatives: What is a Way Out of the Impasse in Planning and Planning Practice?” Megaron 16: 4. doi:10.14744/MEGARON.2021.15807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A. 2022. “Learning to Learn Collaboratively.” Planning Practice and Research 37 (4): 484–488. doi:10.1080/02697459.2022.2076795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, A., and C. Silver. 2018. Urban Planning Education Beginnings, Global Movement and Future Prospects. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Galan, J., and D. Kotze. 2022. “Pedagogy of Planning Studios for Multidisciplinary, Research-Oriented.” Personalized, and Intensive Learning. Journal of Planning Education and Research. doi:10.1177/0739456X221082502.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowonty, S. Shwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Stockholm: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gurrutxaga, M. 2020. “Incorporating the Life-Course Approach Into Shrinking Cities Assessment: The Uneven Geographies of Urban Population Decline.” European Planning Studies 28 (4): 732–748. doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1634007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, G. S. 1904. “Adolescence: Its psychology and its relation to physiology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion & education.” New York: D. Appleton & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Hamrouni, I. 2013. The Shifting Role of Planners with and Through Development Aid Corporations in MENA Region Context. Cairo: IUSD.
   Google Scholar
• Hersperger, A., C. Thurnheer-Wittenwiler, S. Tobias, S. Folvig, and C. Fertner. 2022. “Digitalization in Land-use Planning: Effects of Digital Plan Data on Efficiency, Transparency and Innovation.” European Planning Studies 30 (12): 2537–2553. doi:10.1080/09654313.2021.2016640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston, D., J. Hillier, D. MacCallum, W. Steele, and J. Byrne. 2018. “Make Kin, not Cities! Multispecies Entanglements and ‘Becoming-World’ in Planning Theory.” Planning Theory 17 (2): 190–212. doi:10.1177/1473095216688042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J., and D. Booher. 2016. “Collaborative Rationality as a Strategy for Working with Wicked Problems.” Landscape and Urban Planning 154: 8–10. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensenius, A. 2012. “Disciplinarities: Intra, Cross, Multi, Inter, Trans.” Message posted to http://www.arj.no/2012/03/12/disciplinarities-2/
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C. 2010. “Interdisciplinary Approach-Advantages, Disadvantages, and the Future Benefits of Interdisciplinary Studies.” Essai 7 (1): 26.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. 2016. “Crisis and Urban Planning?” A Commentary. European Planning Studies 24 (7): 1313–1318. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1168787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, T., and G. Vodicka. 2021. “Education for 21st Century Urban and Spatial Planning: Critical Postmodern Pedagogies.” Teaching Urban and Regional Planning, 20–38. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, R. 2010. “Deciphering Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Contributions.” Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 1. doi:10.22545/2010/0003
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, C., N. Le Bot, O. Soulard, P. Detavernier, A. Heil Selimanovski, F. Tedeschi, Ph. Bihouix, and A. Papay. 2021. La Ville Low-Tech. Paris: ADEME, Institut Paris Region, AREP.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, P. 2011. “The Three Historic Currents of City Planning.” In The New Blackwell Companion to the City, edited by Gary Bridge, Sophie Watson, 643–655. Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, C., C. Belingardi, G. Papparaldo, and M. Hendawy, eds. 2021. Special Issue: Planning Practices and Theories from the Global South. Conversations in Planning Theory and Practice Booklet Project. Dortmund: Association of European School of Planning, Young Academic Network.
   Google Scholar
• Najjar, R. 2019. “Planning, Power, and Politics (3P): Critical Review of the Hidden Role of Spatial Planning in Conflict Areas.” In Land Use: Assessing the Past, Envisioning the Future, edited by Luis Loures, 217–239. London: IntechOpen.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M., and T. Sanchez. “Alternative Planning Futures: Planning the Next Century.” Accessed December 10, 2022. https://journals.sagepub.com/pb-assets/cmscontent/JPL/JPLCFPPlanningintheNextCentury-1662047505867.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pallagst, K., R. Fleschurz, S. Nothof, and T. Uemura. 2021. “Shrinking Cities: Implications for Planning Cultures?” Urban Studies 58 (1): 164–181. doi:10.1177/0042098019885549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, Z., N. Marrengane, W. Smit, and P. Anderson, 2020. “Knowledge Co-Production in Sub-Saharan African Cities: Building Capacity for the Urban Age.” In Sustainability Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa II. Science for Sustainable Societies, edited by H. T. Andersen, and H. Nolmark, et al., 189–214. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-5358-5_8.
   Google Scholar
• Patorniti, N., N. Stevens, and P. Salmon. 2018. “A Sociotechnical Systems Approach to Understand Complex Urban Systems: A Global Transdisciplinary Perspective.” Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries 28 (6): 281–296. doi:10.1002/hfm.20742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinson, D. 2004. “Urban Planning: An ‘Undisciplined’discipline?” Futures 36 (4): 503–513. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, C., and G. Hadorn. 2007. Principles for Designing Transdisciplinary Research. Munich: Oekom.
   Google Scholar
• Polk, M. 2014. “Achieving the Promise of Transdisciplinarity: A Critical Exploration of the Relationship Between Transdisciplinary Research and Societal Problem Solving.” Sustainability Science 9 (4): 439–451. doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0247-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees, W. 2018. ““Planning in the Anthropocene”.” In 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory, edited by M. Gunder, A. Madanipour, and V. Watson, 41–52. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H., and M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–169. doi:10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salaj, A., A. Fošner, J. Jurca, I. Karčnik, I. Razpotnik, and L. Žvegla. 2010. “Knowledge, Skills and Competence in Spatial Planning.” Urbani Izziv 21 (1): 61–69. doi:10.5379/urbani-izziv-2010-21-01-006
   Google Scholar
• Salet, W. 2014. “The Authenticity of Spatial Planning Knowledge.” European Planning Studies 22 (2): 293–305. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.741567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savini, F., A. Ferreira, and K. von Schönfeld, eds. 2022. Post-growth Planning: Cities Beyond the Market Economy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., and P. Jenkins. 2015. “Trans-disciplinary Research and Strategic Urban Expansion Planning in a Context of Weak Institutional Capacity: Case Study of Huambo, Angola.” Habitat International 46: 244–251. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, S., and P. Pinho. 2015. “Planning for Shrinkage: Paradox or Paradigm.” European Planning Studies 23 (1): 12–32. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.820082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stember, M. 1991. “Advancing the social sciences through the interdisciplinary enterprise.” The Social Sciences Journal 28(1): 1–14. doi:10.1016/0362-3319(91)90040-B
   Google Scholar
• Staples, Hilary, 2005. “The Integration of Biomimicry as a Solution-Oriented Approach to the Environmental Science Curriculum for High School Students.” http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/1b/c2/3d.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stauffacher, M., T. Flüeler, P. Krütli, and R. Scholz. 2008. “Analytic and Dynamic Approach to Collaboration: A Transdisciplinary Case Study on Sustainable Landscape Development in a Swiss Prealpine Region.” Systemic Practice and Action Research 21 (6): 409–422. doi:10.1007/s11213-008-9107-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taşan-Kok, T., and M. Oranje. 2018. From Student to Urban Planner: Young Practitioners’ Reflections on Contemporary Ethical Challenges. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, J., S. Jokela, M. Laine, J. Rajaniemi, P. Jokinen, L. Häikiö, and A. Lönnqvist. 2021. “Learning and Teaching Interdisciplinary Skills in Sustainable Urban Development—The Case of Tampere University, Finland.” Sustainability 13 (3): 1180. doi:10.3390/su13031180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tötzer, T., S. Sedlacek, and M. Knoflacher. 2011. “Designing the Future – A Reflection of a Transdisciplinary Case Study in Austria.” Futures 43 (8): 840–852. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2011.05.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, A., and R. Scholz. 2007. “Critical Success Conditions of Collabora- Tive Methods: A Comparative Evaluation of Transport Planning Projects.” Transportation 34 (2): 195–212. doi:10.1007/s11116-006-9000-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamsler, C. 2017. “Stakeholder Involvement in Strategic Adaptation Planning: Transdisciplinarity and co-Production at Stake?” Environmental Science & Policy 75: 148–157. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2002. “Do we Learn from Planning Practice? The Contribution of the “Practice Movement” to Planning Theory.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 22 (2): 178–187. doi:10.1177/0739456X02238446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A. 2010. Knowledge Power: Interdisciplinary Education for a Complex World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Youngblood, Dawn. 2007. “Interdisciplinary Studies and the Bridging Disciplines: A Matter of Process.” Journal of Research Practice 3 (2). http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno = EJ800366
   Google Scholar