Start-ups formation in Italy: the role of regional innovation systems

References

• Ahmad, N., and A. Hoffmann. 2008. “A Framework for Addressing and Measuring Entrepreneurship.” In OECD Statistics Working Paper No. 2. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/a-framework-for-addressing-and-measuring-entrepreneurship_243160627270.
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad, N., and R. Seymour. 2011. “Defining Entrepreneurial Activity: Definitions Supporting Frameworks for Data Collection.” SSRN Electronic Journal (January): 1–18. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1090372.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M., and M. Aldred. 2011. “Varieties of Capitalism, Governance, and High-Tech Export Performance.” Employee Relations 33 (4): 334–355. doi:10.1108/01425451111140622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvedalen, J., and R. Boschma. 2017. “A Critical Review of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems Research: Towards a Future Research Agenda.” European Planning Studies 25 (6): 887–903. doi:10.1080/09654313.2017.1299694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amable, B. 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/019926113X.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B. 2007. “Differentiated Knowledge Bases and Varieties of Regional Innovation Systems.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 20 (3): 223–241. doi:10.1080/13511610701722846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., M. Grillitsch, and M. Trippl. 2016. “Regional Innovation Systems: Past – Present – Future.” In Handbook on the Geographies of Innovation, edited by Shearmu, Richard Carrincazeaux, Christophe Doloreux, David, 45–62. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781784710774.00010.
   Google Scholar
• Asheim, B., and A. Isaksen. 1997. “Location, Agglomeration and Innovation: Towards Regional Innovation Systems in Norway?” European Planning Studies 5 (3): 299–330. doi:10.1080/09654319708720402.
   Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D. 2019. “Have We Oversold the Silicon Valley Model of Entrepreneurship?” Small Business Economics 56 (2): 849–856. doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00272-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audretsch, D., M. Keilbach, and L. Erik. 2005. “The Knowledge Spillover Theory of Entrepreneurship and Technological Diffusion.” In University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer, edited by G. D. Libecap, 69–91.Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. doi:10.1016/S1048-4736(05)16003-2.
   Google Scholar
• Autio, E. 1998. “Evaluation of RTD in Regional Systems of Innovation.” European Planning Studies 6 (2): 131–140. doi:10.1080/09654319808720451.
   Google Scholar
• Barra, C., and N. Ruggiero. 2022. “How do Dimensions of Institutional Quality Improve Italian Regional Innovation System Efficiency? The Knowledge Production Function Using SFA.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 32 (2): 591–642. doi:10.1007/s00191-022-00765-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bathelt, H., A. Malmberg, and P. Maskell. 2004. “Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz, Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation.” Progress in Human Geography 28 (1): 31–56. doi:10.1191/0309132504ph469oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, S. 2010. “What’s A Startup? First Principles.” Accessed 15, 2020. https://steveblank.com/2010/01/25/whats-a-startup-first-principles/.
   Google Scholar
• Borrás, S., and C. Edquist. 2019. Holistic Innovation Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198809807.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 1998. “The Industrial Rise of the Third Italy: Open Windows of Locational Opportunity?” In 38th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: “Europe Quo Vadis? – Regional Questions at the Turn of the Century”. Vienna: European Regional Science Association (ERSA).
   Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2005. “Proximity and Innovation: A Critical Assessment.” Regional Studies 39 (1): 61–74. doi:10.1080/0034340052000320887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caloffi, A., and M. Mariani. 2018. “Regional Policy Mixes for Enterprise and Innovation: A Fuzzy-set Clustering Approach.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 36 (1): 28–46. doi:10.1177/2399654417691515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casper, S., and H. Kettler. 2001. “National Institutional Frameworks and the Hybridization of Entrepreneurial Business Models: The German and UK Biotechnology Sectors.” Industry and Innovation 8 (1): 5–30. doi:10.1080/13662710120034383.
   Google Scholar
• Casson, M. 2010. Entrepreneurship: Theory, Networks, History. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Chaminade, C., & Edquist, C. (2009). From theory to practice: the use of systems of innovation approach in innovation policy. In J. Hage & M. Meeus (Eds.), Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change. A Research Handbook (p. 592). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. 2006. “Wither Core Competency for the Large Corporation in an Open Innovation World.” In Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm, edited by H. W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, 35–61. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ciriaci, D. 2014. “Does University Quality Influence the Interregional Mobility of Students and Graduates? The Case of Italy.” Regional Studies 48 (10): 1592–1608. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.821569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombelli, A. 2016. “The Impact of Local Knowledge Bases on the Creation of Innovative Start-ups in Italy.” Small Business Economics 47 (2): 383–396. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9722-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2004. "Integrating Global Knowledge Flows for Generative Growth in Scotland: Life Sciences as Knowledge Economy Exemplar. In Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED). Global Knowledge Flows and Economic Development, 195. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264107687-en.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P. 2005. “Regional Knowledge Capabilities and Open Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems and Clusters in the Asymmetric Knowledge Economy.” In Clusters, Networks, and Innovation, edited by S. Breschi and F. Malerba, 80–109. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., M. Gomez Uranga, and G. Etxebarria. 1997. “Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organisational Dimensions.” Research Policy 26 (4–5): 475–491. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, P., M. Uranga, and G. Etxebarria. 1998. “Regional Systems of Innovation: An Evolutionary Perspective.” Environment and Planning A 30 (9): 1563–1584. doi:10.1068/a301563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coviello, N., and M. Jones. 2004. “Methodological Issues in International Entrepreneurship Research.” Journal of Business Venturing 19 (4): 485–508. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J., and V. Plano Clark. 2017. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publishing. doi:10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.x.
   Google Scholar
• Criscuolo, P., N. Nicolaou, and A. Salter. 2012. “The Elixir (or Burden) of Youth? Exploring Differences in Innovation Between Start-Ups and Established Firms.” Research Policy 41 (2): 319–333. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan, J., M. Solheim, S. Jakobsen, and A. Isaksen. 2022. “One Coast, Two Systems: Regional Innovation Systems and Entrepreneurial Discovery in Western Norway.” Growth and Change 53 (2): 490–514. doi:10.1111/grow.12595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doloreux, D., and S. Parto. 2004. “Regional Innovation Systems: A Critical Synthesis.” UNUINTECH Discussion Papers, 2004–17 (August), 1–38. http://ideas.repec.org/p/dgr/unuint/200417.html.
   Google Scholar
• Etzo, I. 2011. “The Determinants of the Recent Interregional Migration Flows in Italy: A Panel Data Analysis.” Journal of Regional Science 51 (5): 948–966. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9787.2011.00730.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. “Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2019 Methodology Report.” doi:10.2769/55659.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020a. “An SME Strategy for a Sustainable and Digital Europe.” European Commission 110 (9): 1689–1699. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2020%3A103%3AFIN.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020b. “Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU 2020.” In Science, Research and Innovation Performance of the EU 2020. Brussels: European Commission Publications Office. doi:10.2777/890488.
   Google Scholar
• Fini, R., R. Grimaldi, and M. Sobrero. 2009. “Factors Fostering Academics to Start up New Ventures: An Assessment of Italian Founders’ Incentives.” Journal of Technology Transfer 34 (4): 380–402. doi:10.1007/s10961-008-9093-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M. 2002. “Measuring the Quality of Regional Innovation Systems: A Knowledge Production Function Approach.” International Regional Science Review 25 (1): 86–101. doi:10.1177/016001702762039394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and R. Aamoucke. 2013. “Regional Public Research, Higher Education, and Innovative Start-ups: An Empirical Investigation.” Small Business Economics 41 (4): 865–885. doi:10.1007/s11187-013-9510-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and C. Schwirten. 1999. “Enterprise-University Co-Operation and the Role of Public Research Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems.” Industry and Innovation 6 (1): 69–83. doi:10.1080/13662719900000005.
   Google Scholar
• Fritsch, M., and D. Storey. 2014. “Entrepreneurship in a Regional Context: Historical Roots, Recent Developments and Future Challenges.” Regional Studies 48 (6): 939–954. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.892574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galindo-Rueda, F., and F. Verger. 2016. OECD Taxonomy of Economic Activities Based on R&D Intensity (No. 2016/04). doi:10.1787/5jlv73sqqp8r-en.
   Google Scholar
• Gans, J., and S. Stern. 2003. “The Product Market and the Market for ‘Ideas’: Commercialization Strategies for Technology Entrepreneurs.” Research Policy 32 (2): 333–350. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00103-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEM. n.d. “How GEM Defines Entrepreneurship.” Global Entrepreneurship Monitor knowledge base website. https://www.gemconsortium.org/wiki/1149.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P., and D. Soskice. 2001. “Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage.” http://www.amazon.com/Varieties-Capitalism-Institutional-Foundations-Comparative/dp/0199247757.
   Google Scholar
• Hekkert, M., R. Suurs, S. Negro, S. Kuhlmann, and R. Smits. 2007. “Functions of Innovation Systems: A new Approach for Analysing Technological Change.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74 (4): 413–432. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2006.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollanders, H., N. Es-Sadki, and I. Merkelbach. 2019. Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2019. doi:10.2873/89165.
   Google Scholar
• Howells, J. 2002. “Tacit Knowledge, Innovation and Economic Geography.” Urban Studies 39 (5–6): 871–884. doi:10.1080/00420980220128354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaksen, A., and M. Trippl. 2017. “Innovation in Space: The Mosaic of Regional Innovation Patterns.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1): 122–140. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grw035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Italian Ministry of Economic Development. 2019. The Italian Startup Act. Italy’s Policy Framework to Support Innovative Startups. Executive Summary.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., and A. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.” Educational Researcher 33 (7): 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189X033007014.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson, C., and M. Backman. 2008. “Human Capital and New Firm Formation.” Centre for Innovation Systems, Entrepreneurship and Growth, Jönköping International Business School, CISEG Working Papers Series.
   Google Scholar
• Kashani, E., and S. Roshani. 2019. “Evolution of Innovation System Literature: Intellectual Bases and Emerging Trends.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 146 (June 2018): 68–80. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.010.
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, R. 1995. “Regional Development in Italy: Social Capital and the Mezzogiorno.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 11 (2): 165–179. doi:10.1093/oxrep/11.2.165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mark, S., P. Lewis, and A. Thornhill. 2019. Research Methods for Business Students (8th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Marsan, G., and K. Maguire. 2011. “Categorisation of OECD Regions Using Innovation-Related Variables.” OECD Regional Development Working Papers 50. doi:10.1787/5kg8bf42qv7k-en.
   Google Scholar
• Moodysson, J., and E. Zukauskaite. 2014. “Institutional Conditions and Innovation Systems: On the Impact of Regional Policy on Firms in Different Sectors.” Regional Studies 48 (1): 127–138. doi:10.1080/00343404.2011.649004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nifo, A., and G. Vecchione. 2014. “Do Institutions Play a Role in Skilled Migration? The Case of Italy.” Regional Studies 48 (10): 1628–1649. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.835799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808678
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Frascati Manual 2015. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/frascati-manual.htm, visitado em 16/08/2021.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2019. Regions and Cities at a Glance 2018 – Italy. https://www.oecd.org/regional/AUSTRALIA-Regions-and-Cities-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. 2018. “Oslo Manual 2018.” Handbook of Innovation Indicators and Measurement. doi:10.1787/9789264304604-en.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R. Nanetti. 1993. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. http://press.princeton.edu/titles/5105.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ries, E. 2011. The Lean Startup: How Today’s Entrepreneurs Use Continuous Innovation to Create Radically Successful Business. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, C., and K. McCartan. 2016. Real World Research: A Resource for Users of Social Research Methods in Applied Settings (4th ed.). Nashville: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rypestøl, J., and J. Aarstad. 2018. “Entrepreneurial Innovativeness and Growth Ambitions in Thick vs. Thin Regional Innovation Systems.” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 30: 639–661. doi:10.1080/08985626.2018.1444104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamzadeh, A., and D. Kirby. 2017. “New Venture Creation: How Start-ups Grow?” AD-minister (30): 9–29. doi:10.17230/ad-minister.30.1.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, M., and P. Davidsson. 2009. “Does Venture Opportunity Variation Matter? Investigating Systematic Process Differences Between Innovative and Imitative New Ventures.” Small Business Economics 33 (2): 229–255. doi:10.1007/s11187-007-9093-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. 2001. “Technology Regimes and New Firm Formation.” Management Science 47 (9): 1173–1190. doi:10.1287/mnsc.47.9.1173.9785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shane, S. 2009. “Why Encouraging More People to Become Entrepreneurs is Bad Public Policy.” Small Business Economics 33 (2): 141–149. doi:10.1007/s11187-009-9215-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simcoe, T. 2006. “Open Standards and Intellectual Property Rights.” In Open Innovation. Researching a New Paradigm, edited by H. W. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, 161–183. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H. L. 2018. "Entrepreneurship Policies and the Development of Regional Innovation Systems: Theory, Policy and Practice." In New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems - Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons, edited by A. Isaksen, R. Martin, M. Trippl. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_12.
   Google Scholar
• Spender, J., V. Corvello, M. Grimaldi, and P. Rippa. 2017. “Startups and Open Innovation: A Review of the Literature.” European Journal of Innovation Management 20: 4–30. doi:10.1108/EJIM-12-2015-0131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szerb, L., E. Lafuente, K. Horváth, and B. Páger. 2019. “The Relevance of Quantity and Quality Entrepreneurship for Regional Performance: The Moderating Role of the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem.” Regional Studies, 53 (9): 1308–1320. doi:10.1080/00343404.2018.1510481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Global Startup Ecosystem Report. 2021. https://startupgenome.com/reports/gser2021.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., and A. Kaufmann. 2002. “SMEs in Regional Innovation Systems and the Role of Innovation Support – The Case of Upper Austria.” Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (1): 15–26. doi:10.1023/A:1013140318907.
   Google Scholar
• Tödtling, F., and M. Trippl. 2005. “One Size Fits All?: Towards a Differentiated Regional Innovation Policy Approach.” Research Policy 34 (8): 1203–1219. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Linda. 2014. America Inc.?: Innovation and Enterprise in the National Security State. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. doi:10.7591/9780801471131.
   Google Scholar
• Witt, M., and G. Jackson. 2016. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Comparative Advantage : A Test and Reinterpretation.” Journal of International Business Studies 47 (7): 778–806. doi:10.1057/s41267-016-0001-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zukauskaite, E. 2018. “Variety of Regional Innovation Systems and Their Institutional Characteristics.” In New Avenues for Regional Innovation Systems – Theoretical Advances, Empirical Cases and Policy Lessons, A. Isaksen, R. Martin, M. Trippl, 41–60. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71661-9_3.
   Google Scholar