The rationalities of strategic planning: a structural analysis of the legitimacy basis of MAL policy

References

• Albrechts, L. 2003. “Planning and Power: Towards an Emancipatory Planning Approach.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21 (6): 905–924. doi:10.1068/c29m.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2004. “Strategic (Spatial) Planning Reexamined.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 31 (5): 743–758. doi:10.1068/b3065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2010. “How to Enhance Creativity, Diversity and Sustainability in Spatial Planning: Strategic Planning Revisited.” In Making Strategies in Spatial Planning. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, Vol 9, edited by M. Cerreta, G. Concilio, and V. Monno, 3–25. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., and A. Balducci. 2013. “Practicing Strategic Planning: In Search of Critical Features to Explain the Strategic Character of Plans.” DisP – the Planning Review 49 (3): 16–27. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, B. 1984. Strong Democracy. Participatory Politics of a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., L. Häikiö, H. Leino, and V. Kanninen. 2018. “Bypassing Publicity for Getting Things Done: Between Informal and Formal Planning Practices in Finland.” Planning Practice & Research 33 (3): 309–325. doi:10.1080/02697459.2017.1378978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäcklund, P., V. Kanninen, and T. Hanell. 2023. “Accepting Depoliticisation? Council Members’ Attitudes Towards Public-Public Contracts in Spatial Planning.” Planning Theory & Practice 24 (2): 173–189. doi:10.1080/14649357.2023.2199459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. 2003. “Standortpolitik, State Rescaling and the New Metropolitan Governance in Western Europe.” disP - The Planning Review 39 (152): 15–25. doi:10.1080/02513625.2003.10556830
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. 1988. “A Strategic Planning Process for Public and Non-profit Organizations.” Long Range Planning 21 (1): 73–81. doi:10.1016/0024-6301(88)90061-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S., K. Kallio, and J. Häkli. 2021. “Performing a Neoliberal City-Regional Imaginary: The Case of Tampere Tramway Project.” Space and Polity 25 (1): 112–131. doi:10.1080/13562576.2021.1885373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deas, I. 2014. “The Search for Territorial Fixes in Subnational Governance: City-Regions and the Disputed Emergence of Post-Political Consensus in Manchester, England.” Urban Studies 51 (11): 2285–2314. doi:10.1177/0042098013510956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1989. Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1993. Critical Theory, Public Policy and Planning Practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1998. “Rationality, Dialogue and Learning: What Community and Environmental Mediators Can Teach Us About the Practice of Civil Society.” Accessed October 25th, 2023. https://courses2.cit.cornell.edu/fit117/documents/samples_planning/RationalityDialogueLearning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Finland. 2009. Valtioneuvoston selonteko kunta- ja palvelurakenneuudistuksesta. VNS 9/2009.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Finland. 2021. Luonnos hallituksen esityksestä kaavoitus- ja rakentamislaiksi. Accessed October 25th, 2023. https://www.lausuntopalvelu.fi/FI/Proposal/DownloadProposalAttachment?proposalId=17b78d7d-ad1b-41fb-8b5b-a9e7e0c798fd&attachmentId=16515.
   Google Scholar
• Granqvist, K., H. Mattila, R. Mäntysalo, A. Hirvensalo, S. Teerikangas, and H. Kalliomäki. 2021. “Multiple Dimensions of Strategic Spatial Planning: Local Authorities Navigating Between Rationalities in Competitive and Collaborative Settings.” Planning Theory and Practice 22 (2): 173–190. doi:10.1080/14649357.2021.1904148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1982. “A Reply to My Critics.” In Habermas. Critical Debates, edited by J. B. Thompson, and D. Held, 219–283. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Transl. T. McCarthy. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action Vol. 2. Critique of Functionalist Reason. Transl. T. McCarthy. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Transl. W. Rehg. Oxford: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. 2007. “From Competitive Regions to Competitive City-Regions: A New Orthodoxy, But Some Old Mistakes.” Journal of Economic Geography 7 (3): 311–332. doi:10.1093/jeg/lbm005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1992. “Planning Through Debate.” Town Planning Review 63 (2): 143–162. doi:10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1996. “The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and Its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23 (2): 217–234. doi:10.1068/b230217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2007. Urban Complexity and Spatial Strategies. Towards Relational Planning of our Times. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2009. “In Search of the ‘Strategic’ in Spatial Strategy Making.” Planning Theory & Practice 10 (4): 439–457. doi:10.1080/14649350903417191
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2015. “Civic Capacity, Place Governance and Progressive Localism.” In Reconsidering Localism, edited by S. Davoudi, and A. Madanipour, 105–125. New York, N.Y: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hemminki, M., and H. Lönnqvist. 2022. MAL-sopimusmenettelyn tila ja kehittämistarpeet. Acta 280. Helsinki: Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2002. Shadows of Power. An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. 2003. “’Agon’izing Over Consensus: Why Habermasian Ideals Cannot Be ‘Real’?” Planning Theory 2 (1): 37–59. doi:10.1177/1473095203002001005
   Google Scholar
• Huxley, M. 2000. “The Limits to Communicative Planning.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 19 (4): 369–377. doi:10.1177/0739456X0001900406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hytönen, J., R. Mäntysalo, L. Peltonen, V. Kanninen, P. Niemi, and M. Simanainen. 2016. “Defensive Routines in Land Use Policy Steering in Finnish Urban Regions.” European Urban and Regional Studies 23 (1): 40–55. doi:10.1177/0969776413490424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, D. 2019. “Strategic Rationality.” In The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon, edited by A. Allen, and E. Mendieta, 432–434. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781316771303.113
   Google Scholar
• Innes, J., S. Connick, and D. Booher. 2007. “Informality as Planning Strategy.” Journal of the American Planning Association 73 (2): 195–210. doi:10.1080/01944360708976153
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen-Jansen, L., and T. Hutton. 2011. “Rethinking the Metropolis: Reconfiguring the Governance Structures of the Twenty-First-Century City-Region.” International Planning Studies 16 (3): 201–215. DOI:10.1080/13563475.2011.591140
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J., and H. Jacobs. 1987. “A Public Planning Perspective on Strategic Planning.” Journal of the American Planning Association 53 (1): 23–33. doi:10.1080/01944368708976632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzmann, K. 2013. “Strategic Planning: A Chance for Spatial Innovation and Creativity.” disP – The Planning Review 49 (3): 28–31. doi:10.1080/02513625.2013.859003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, H. 2020. “Habermas Revisited: Resurrecting the Contested Roots of Communicative Planning Theory.” Progress in Planning 141: 1–29. doi:10.1016/j.progress.2019.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, H., and A. Heinilä. 2022. “Soft Spaces, Soft Planning, Soft Law: Examining the Institutionalisation of City-Regional Planning in Finland.” Land Use Policy 119: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., L. Peltonen, V. Kanninen, P. Niemi, J. Hytönen, and M. Simanainen. 2010. Keskuskaupungin ja kehyskunnan jännitteiset kytkennät. Paras-ARTTU-ohjelman tutkimuksia nro 2. Kuntaliitto.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. 1994. The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning. New York: Prentice Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, P., and A. Pike. 2015. “City Deals, Decentralisation and the Governance of Local Infrastructure Funding and Financing in the UK.” National Institute Economic Review 233 (1): R14–R26. doi:10.1177/002795011523300103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N., and M. Tewdwr-Jones. 2000. “Scratching the Surface of Collaborative and Associative Governance: Identifying the Diversity of Social Action in Institutional in Institutional Capacity Building.” Environment and Planning A 32 (1): 111–130. doi:10.1068/a31175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravetz, J. 2013. City-Region 2020: Integrated Planning for a Sustainable Environment. Milton Park & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2013. Reviving Critical Planning Theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 1999. Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A. 2001. Global City-Regions: Trends, Theory, Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, A., J. Agnew, E. Soja, and M. Storper. 2001. “Global City-Regions.” In Global City-Regions, edited by A. J. Scott, 11–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smas, L., C. Fredricsson, L. Perjo, T. Anderson, J. Grunfelder, and C. Dymén. 2017. Urban Contractual Policies in Northern Europe. Nordregio Working Paper 2017:3.
   Google Scholar
• Soininvaara, I. 2022. “The Political Geographies of Strategic Partnerships: City Deals and Non-Deals.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 40 (5): 1165–1181. doi:10.1177/23996544211064743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiitu, M., A. Pätynen, M. Friipyöli, and A. Rehunen. 2023. “Seurantakatsaus MAL-sopimusten vaikuttavuudesta.” Ympäristöministeriön julkaisuja 2023: 21. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-361-414-7
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and I. Tavory. 2012. “Theory Construction in Qualitative Research.” Sociological Theory 30 (3): 167–186. doi:10.1177/0735275112457914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tønnesen, A., J. Krogstad, P. Christiansen, and K. Isaksson. 2019. “National Goals and Tools to Fulfil Them: A Study of Opportunities and Pitfalls in Norwegian Metagovernance of Urban Mobility.” Transport Policy 81 (C): 35–44. doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.018.
   Google Scholar
• Vaattovaara, M., A. Joutsiniemi, J. Airaksinen, and M. Wilenius. 2021. Kaupunki politiikassa –Yhteiskunta, ihminen ja ihana kaupunki. Tampere: Vastapaino.
   Google Scholar
• Vatilo, M., H. Mattila, and P. Jalasto. 2022. Edunvalvonnasta yhteisen hyvän tavoitteluun? MAL-sopimusmenettelyn arviointi- ja kehittämisselvitys 2022. Valtioneuvoston julkaisuja 2022:47.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, D., and K. Morgan. 2019. “City Deals in the Polycentric State: The Spaces and Politics of Metrophilia in the UK.” European Urban and Regional Studies 26 (4): 382–399. doi:10.1177/096977641879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K., and A. Jonas. 2004. “Competitive City-Regionalism as a Politics of Space. A Critical Reinterpretation of the New Regionalism.” Environment and Planning A. Economy and Space 36 (12): 2119–2139. doi:10.1068/a36223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westskog, H., H. Amundsen, P. Christiansen, and A. Tønnesen. 2020. “Urban Contractual Agreements as an Adaptive Governance Strategy: Under What Conditions Do They Work in Multi-Level Cooperation?” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 22 (4): 554–567. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2020.1784115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. 2000. “Planning for Metropolitan Sustainability.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 20 (2): 133–145. DOI:10.1177/0739456X0002000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ympäristöministeriö. n.d. Maankäytön, asumisen ja liikenteen sopimukset. Accessed October 25th, 2023. https://ym.fi/maankayton-asumisen-ja-liikenteen-sopimukset.
   Google Scholar