Regional planning strategies: understanding the implementation of a new strategic tool in Norwegian planning law

References

• Aastvedt, A., and U. Higdem. 2022. “Co-creation, Collaborative Innovation and Open Innovation in the Public Sector: A Perspective on Distinctions and the Convergence of Definitions.” Nordic Journal of Innovation in the Public Sector 1: 53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Abis, E., and C. Garau. 2016. “An Assessment of the Effectiveness of Strategic Spatial Planning: A Study of Sardinian Municipalities.” European Planning Studies 24: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2006a. “Shifts in Strategic Spatial Planning? Some Evidence from Europe and Australia.” Environment and Planning A 38 (6): 1149–1170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2006b. “Bridge the gap: From Spatial Planning to Strategic Projects.” European Planning Studies 14 (10): 1487–1500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2009. “From Strategic Spatial Plans to Spatial Strategies.” Planning Theory & Practice 10: 142–145.
   Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L. 2012. “Reframing Strategic Spatial Planning by Using a Copoduction Perspective.” Planning Theory 12 (1): 46–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrechts, L., P. Healey, and K. Kunzmann. 2003. “Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe.” Journal of the American Planning Association 69 (2): 113–129. doi:10.1080/01944360308976301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amdam, J., and N. Veggeland. 1998. Teorier om samfunnsplanlegging. [Theories on Planning]. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Amdam, J., and N. Veggeland. 2011. Teorier om samfunnsstyring og planlegging. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Asmervik, S., and A. Hagen. 2001. “Planning as Rhetoric: An Examination of the Rhetoric of County Planning in Norway.” Housing, Theory and Society 18: 148–157.
   Google Scholar
• Balducci, A., V. Fedeli, and G. Pasqui. 2011. Strategic Planning for Contemporary Urban Regions: City of Cities: A Project for Milan. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., R. Rhodes, and P. Weller. 2003. “Traditions of Governance: Interpreting the Changing Role of the Public Sector.” Public Administration 81: 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråtå, H., U. Higdem, K. Gløtvold-Solbu, and M. Stokke. 2014. Partnerskap - positivt for regional utvikling og utfordrende for kommunal forankring. En evaluering av partnerskapsinstituttet i Oppland. Lillehammer: Østlandsforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Bukve, O., and R. Amdam. 2004. “Regimeskifte på norsk. [A shift in regimes of Norwegian regional policy].” In Det regionalpolitiske regimeskiftet - tilfellet Norge. [The Shift in Regimes of Norwegian Regional Policy], edited by R. Amdam, and O. Bukve, 311–329. Trondheim: Tapir.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., and B. Joerges. 1996. “Travel of Ideas.” In Translating Organizational Change, edited by B. Czarniawska, and G. Sevón. Mouton: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B., and G. Sevón. 2005. Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in a Global Economy. Copenhagen: Liber & Copenhagen Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Desmidt, S., and K. Meyfroodt. 2021. “What Motivates Politicians to use Strategic Plans as a Decision-Making Tool? Insights from the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Public Management Review 23: 447–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falleth, E., and V. Johnsen. 1996. Samordning eller retorikk? Evaluering av fylkesplanene 1996 - 99. [Coordination or rhetoric? Evaluation of County plans 1996-99]. Oslo: Norsk Institutt for By- og Regionforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. 1999. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen, G., and N. Aaarsæther. eds. 2019. Plan- og bygningsloven. Fungerer loven etter intensjonene? Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen, G., H. Hofstad, and U. Higdem. 2018. “Regional Plan.” In Plan- og bygningsloven. Fungerer loven etter intensjonene?, edited by G. Hanssen, and N. Aaarsæther. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., N. Phillips, and T. Lawrence. 1998. “Distinguishing Trust and Power in Interorganizational Relations: Forms and Facades of Trust.” In Trust Within and Between Organizations, edited by C. Lane, and R. Bachmann. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, T., and S. Stein. 2012. Dialogical Planning In A Fragmented Society: Critically Liberal, Pragmatic, Incremental. London: London Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1997. Collobrative Planning. London: MacMillian.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 1998. “Building Institutional Capacity Through Collaborative Approaches to Urban Planning.” Environment and Planning 30: 1531–1546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2006a. “Transforming Governance: Challenges of Institutional Adaptation and a new Politics of Space.” European Planning Studies 14 (3): 299–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2006b. “Relational Complexity and the Imaginative Power of Strategic Spatial Planning.” European Planning Studies 14 (4): 525–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. 2009. “The Pragmatic Tradition in Planning Thought.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 28: 277–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellspong, L. 1992. Konsten att tala. Övingsbok i praktisk retorik. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hellspong, L. 1995. “Retorik och praktisk logik.” Nordplan Meddelande 4.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, U. 2001. “Planlegging på fylkesnivå. [Planning on County level].” In planlegging.no! Innføring i samfunnsplanlegging, edited by N. Aarsæter, and A. Hagen. Oslo: Kommuneforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, U. 2014. “The co-Creation of Regional Futures: Facilitating Action Research in Regional Foresight.” Futures (57): 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, U. 2015. “Assessing the Impact on Political Partnerships on Coordinated Meta-Governance of Regional Government.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration 19: 89–109.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, U. 2018. “Regional planlegging – mellom stat og kommune.” In Plan og samfunn, edited by N. Aarsæther, E. Falleth, T. Nyseth, and R. Kristiansen. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, U., and A. Hagen. 2015. Oppfølging av Regional planstrategi for Oppland, 2012 - 2016 - en vurdering. Working paper. Lillehammer: Høgskolen i Lillehammer.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, U., and A. Hagen. 2017. “Variasjon, mangfold og hybriditet. Implementering av regional planstrategi i Norge.” Kart og Plan 77 (1): 40–53.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, U., and K. Jacobsen Kvalvik. 2018. “Regional planstrategi – strategi for planlegging eller ny fylkesplan?” In Plan- og bygningsloven 2008 – fungerer loven etter intensjonene?, edited by G. Hanssen, and N. Aaarsæther. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Higdem, U., and G. Sandkjær Hanssen. 2014. “Handling the Two Conflicting Discourses of Partnerships and Participation in Regional Planning.” European Planning Studies 22: 1444–1461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, M. 2013. The Public Policy Process. Essex: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R., and J. Stansbury. 2004. “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is it Worth the Effort?” European Political Science 64 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E., and J. Koppenjan. 2020. “Debate: Strategic Planning After the Governance Revolution.” Public Money & Management 40: 260–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kommunal- OG Regionaldepartementet. 2001. St. meld. nr. 34 (2000 - 2001)Om distrikts- og regionalpolitikken. Oslo: Kommunal-og Regionaldepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Kommunal- OG Regionaldepartementet. 2002. St.meld.nr.19 (2001-2002) Nye oppgaver for lokaldemokratiet - regionalt og lokalt nivå. Oslo: Kommunal- Regionaldepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Kommunal-OG Arbeidsdepartementet. 1997. St. meld. nr. 31 (1996 - 1997) Om distrikts- og regionalpolitikken. [White paper on the rural-and regional policy]. Oslo: Kommunal- og arbeidsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Kommunal-OG Moderniseringsdepartementet. 2015. Meld.St. 22 (2015-2016). Nye folkevalgte regioner - rolle, struktur og oppgaver. (New regions - role, structure and tasks]. In: Moderniseringsdepartementet, K.-O. (ed.). Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste.
   Google Scholar
• Le Galés, P. 2002. European Cities: Social Conflicts and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lingua, V., and V. Balz, eds. 2019. Shaping Regional Futures. Designing and Visioning in Governance Rescaling. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lovdata lov/2008-06-27-71. URL: https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2008-06-27-71, 12.02.2024
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., and K. Thelen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mäntysalo, R., J. Kangasoja, and V. Kanninen. 2015a. “The Paradox og Strategic Spatial Planning: A Theoretical Outline with a View on Finland.” Planning Theory & Pratice 16 (2).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miljøverndepartementet. 2004. Ot.prp.nr 47 (2003 - 2004). Om lov om endringer i plan- og bygningsloven (konsekvensutredninger). In: Miljøverndepartementet (ed.). Oslo: Statens Forvaltningstjeneste.
   Google Scholar
• Miljøverndepartementet. 2007-2008. Ot.prp. nr 32 (2007-2008) Om lov om planlegging og bygesaksbehandling (plan-og bygningsloven) (plandelen). [On law of planning- and building ]. In: Miljøverndepartementet (ed.). Oslo: Statens forvaltningstjeneste.
   Google Scholar
• Mitlin, D. 2008. “With and Beyond the State: Coproduction as a Route to Political Influence, Power and Transformation for Grassroots Organizations.” Environment and Urbanization 20: 339–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOU. 2003:14. Bedre kommunal og regional planlegging etter plan-og bygningsloven. The planning law's suggestion part 11. Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. 2017. “Talk to the Hand: Strategic Planning as Persuasive Storytelling of the Loop City.” European Planning Studies 25: 6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, K., and T. Richardson. 2012. “Strategic Planning in Transition: Contested Rationalities and Spatial Logics in Twenty-First Century Danish Planning Experiments.” European Planning Studies 20: 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PBA. 2008. Lov om planlegging og byggesaksbehandling [The Planning-and building act].
   Google Scholar
• Purkarthofer, E., A. Humer, and R. Mäntysalo. 2021. “Regional Planning: An Arena of Interests, Institutions and Relations.” Regional Studies 55: 773–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez, J. 1995a. “Skapande mening: Bidrag til en humanvetenskaplig handlings- og planeringsteori.” Stockholm, Nordplan Avhandling 13 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez, J. 1995b. “Skapande mening. En begreppsgenealogisk undersöking om rationalitet, vetenskap och planering.” Stockholm, Nordplan Avhandling 13 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 1991. “Policy Networks and sub-Central Government.” In Markets, Hierarchies & Networks. The Coordination of Social Life, edited by G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic, and J. Michell. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rogaland Fylkeskommune. 2021. Regional Utviklingsplan for Rogaland -regional planstrategi 2021-2024. https://www.rogfk.no/vare-tjenester/planlegging/utviklingsplan-for-rogaland-regional-planstrategi/
   Google Scholar
• Røsnes, A. 2001. “Norsk regional planlegging - umulig enhet eller mulig mangfold? [Regional Planning in Norway - an Impossible Unity or a Possible Diversity?].” Kart og Plan 94: 213–228.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. 1998. Moderne organisasjoner. Trender i organisasjonstenkningen ved årtusenskiftet. [Modern Organisations. Trends in Organisational Thinking at a new Millenium]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. 2002. “The Secrets of the Winners: Management Ideas That Flow.” In The Expansion of Management Knowledge. Carriers, Flows, and Sources, edited by K. Sahlin-Andersson, and L. Engwall, 113–143. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. 2007. Trender og translasjoner : ideer som former det 21. århundrets organisasjon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Røvik, K. 2016. “Knowledge Transfer as Translation: Review and Elements of an Instrumental Theory.” International Journal of Management Reviews 18 (3): 290–310. doi:10.1111/ijmr.12097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagalyn, L. 2007. “Public/Private Development. Lessons from History, Research and Practice.” Journal of the American Planning Association 73: 7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sager, T. 2013. Reviving Critical Planning Theory. Dealing with Pressure, Neo-Liberalism, and Responsibility in Communicative Planning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing. 2005. “The Democtratic Anchorage of Governance Networks.” Scandinavian Political Studies 28: 195–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., and J. Torfing, eds. 2007. Theories of Democtratic Network Governance. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. 1992. “Planning as Persuasive Storytelling About the Future: Negotiating an Electric Power Rate Settlement in Illinois.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 12: 17–31.
   Google Scholar
• Vike, H. 1995. Evaluering av fylkesplan for Telemark. En vurdering av plan og prosess. [Evaluation of the County Plan of Telemark. An Assessment of the Plan and the Process]. Bø: Telemarksforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, V. 2014. “Co-production and Collaboration in Planning – The Difference.” Planning Theory & Pratice 15: 1.
   Google Scholar