1,514
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

No supply without demand: explaining the absence of the EU Battlegroups in Libya, Mali and the Central African Republic

Pages 346-365 | Received 26 Apr 2016, Accepted 22 Jun 2016, Published online: 19 Jul 2016

References

  • Abbott, K.W. and Snidal, D.J., 1998. Why states act through formal international organizations. Journal of conflict resolution, 42, 3–32. doi: 10.1177/0022002798042001001
  • Adler-Nissen, R. and Pouliot, V., 2014. Power in practice: negotiating the international intervention in Libya. European journal of international relations, 20 (4), 889–911. doi: 10.1177/1354066113512702
  • Andersson, J.J., 2015. If not now, when? The Nordic EU Battlegroup. European union institute for security studies issue alert, 11, 1–2.
  • Balossi-Restelli, L.M., 2011. Fit for what? Explaining Battlegroup inaction. European security, 20 (2), 155–184. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2011.564767
  • Bannelier, K. and Christakis, T., 2013. Under the UN security council’s watchful eyes: military intervention by invitation in the Malian conflict. Leiden journal of international law, 26 (4), 855–874. doi: 10.1017/S0922156513000447
  • Barcikowski, A., 2013. EU Battlegroups – ready to go? European Union institute for security studies issue brief, 40, 1–4.
  • Barnett, M.N. and Finnemore, M., 1999. The politics, power and pathologies of international organizations. International organization, 53 (4), 699–732. doi: 10.1162/002081899551048
  • Brosig, M., 2010. The multi-actor game of peacekeeping in Africa. International peacekeeping, 17 (3), 327–342. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2010.500142
  • Chappell, L., 2009. Differing member state approaches to the development of the EU Battlegroup concept: implications for CSDP. European security, 18 (4), 417–439. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2010.498419
  • Coolsaet, R., Biscop, S., and Coelmont, J., 2013. Mali : another European intervention without the EU? Egmont institute security policy brief, 42 (January).
  • Council of the European Union. Council Decision 2011/210/CFSP of 1 April 2011 on a European Union Military Operation in Support of Humanitarian Assistance Operations in Response to the Crisis Situation in Libya (EUFOR Libya), Brussels, 1 April 2011.
  • Council of the European Union. Council Decision 2011/871/CFSP of 14 May 2007 on the mechanism for financing military operations (Athena), Brussels, 14 May 2007.
  • Council of the European Union. Council Decision 2013/87/CFSP of 18 February 2013 on the launch of a European Union military mission to contribute to the training of the Malian Armed Forces (EUTM Mali), Brussels, 18 February 2013.
  • Council of the European Union. Council Decision, 2014/73/CFSP of 10 February 2014 on a European Union military operation in the Central African Republic (EUFOR RCA), Brussels, 10 February 2014.
  • Council of the European Union, Press Release: 3079th Council meeting, General Affairs. Brussels, 22 March 2011.
  • Dijkstra, H., 2012. Agenda-setting in the common security and defence policy: an institutionalist perspective. Cooperation and conflict, 47 (4), 454–472. doi: 10.1177/0010836712462772
  • Engberg, K., 2013. Ten years of EU military operations. European Union institute for security studies issue brief, 43, 1–4.
  • European Consilium, 2013. EU Battlegroups. European external action service, April.
  • European Council, 2003. A Secure Europe in a Better World: European Security Strategy. European Council, 12 December.
  • European External Action Service, 2014. The EU engagement in the central African republic (Factsheet), September 17.
  • European Political Strategy Centre, 2015. In defence of Europe. EPSC strategic notes, Issue 4, June 15.
  • European Union, 2003. European security strategy: a secure Europe in better world. Brussels. December 12.
  • Faleg, G., 2013. Castles in the sand: Mali and the demise of the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy. CEPS Commentary.
  • Finabel, 2014. European Union battle group manual: guidance for operational preparation and tactical use. European land forces interoperability center report (27 June).
  • Francis, D.J., 2013. The regional impact of the armed conflict and French intervention in Mali. Norwegian peacebuilding resource centre report (April 2013).
  • Gegout, C., 2005. Causes and consequences of the EU’s military intervention in the democratic Republic of Congo: a realist explanation. European foreign affairs review, 10 (3), 427–443.
  • General Secretariat of the Council, 2013. Conclusions of the European Council – 19/20 December. Brussels, 20 December 2013.
  • Gowan, R., 2009. The case of the missing Battlegroups: Is EU-UN military cooperation in decline? Studia diplomatica, LXII (3), 53–61.
  • Gowan, R., 2011a. From rapid reaction to delayed inaction? Congo, the UN and the EU. International peacekeeping, 18 (5), 593–611. doi: 10.1080/13533312.2011.598324
  • Gowan, R., 2011b. The EU and Libya: Missing in action in Misrata. European Council on Foreign Relations Commentary [online]. Available from: http://www.ecfr.eu/article/commentary_the_eu_and_libya_missing_in_action_in_misrata.
  • Granholm, N., 2006. EU-Battlegroups: some new capabilities, actually. The RUSI journal, 151 (6), 62–66. doi: 10.1080/03071840608522860
  • Granholm, N. and Jonson, P., 2006. EU-Battlegroups in context. Underlying dynamics, military and political challenges. FOI – Swedish Defence Research Agency.
  • Hawkins, D.G., et al., ed., 2006. Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hill, C., 1993. The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualising Europe’s international role. Journal of common market studies, 31 (3), 305–328. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00466.x
  • Howorth, J., 2014. ‘Opération harmattan’ in Libya: a paradigm shift in French, European and transatlantic security arrangements? Journal of transatlantic studies, 12 (4), 405–417. doi: 10.1080/14794012.2014.962738
  • Jacoby, J. and Jones, C., 2008. The EU battle groups in Sweden and the Czech Republic: what national defense reforms tell us about European rapid reaction capabilities. European security, 17 (2–3), 315–338. doi: 10.1080/09662830802642587
  • Keohane, D., 2015. The unbearable lightness of European defense [online]. Carnegie Europe. Available from: http://carnegieeurope.eu/strategiceurope/?fa=62066 [Accessed 13 April 2016].
  • Koenig, N. 2011. The EU and the Libyan crisis? In quest of coherence. The international spectator: Italian journal of international affairs, 46 (4), 11–30. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2011.628089
  • Lindstrom, G., 2007. Enter the EU Battlegroups. Chaillot Paper, 97. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
  • Menon, A., 2011. European defence policy from Lisbon to Libya. Survival, 53 (3), 75–90. doi: 10.1080/00396338.2011.586191
  • Miskimmon, A., 2012. German foreign policy and the Libya crisis. German politics, 21 (4), 392–410. doi: 10.1080/09644008.2012.739610
  • Nadin, P., 2016. UN security council reform. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Novaky, N., 2015. Deploying EU military crisis management operations: a collective action perspective. European security, 24 (4), 491–508. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2014.982063
  • Pohl, B., 2014. To what ends? Governmental interests and European Union (non-) intervention in chad and the democratic republic of Congo. Cooperation and conflict, 49 (2), 191–211. doi: 10.1177/0010836713482875
  • Reykers, Y., 2016. Hurry up and wait: EU Battlegroups and a UN rapid reaction force [online]. Global Peace Operations Review. Available from: http://peaceoperationsreview.org/thematic-essays/hurry-up-and-wait-eu-battlegroups-and-a-un-rapid-reaction-force/.
  • Reykers, Y. and Smeets, N., 2015. Losing control: a principal-agent analysis of Russia in the United Nations security council’s decision-making towards the Libya crisis. East European politics, 31 (4), 369–387. doi: 10.1080/21599165.2015.1070729
  • Riddervold, M., 2011. Finally flexing its muscles? Atalanta – The European Union’s naval military operation against piracy. European security, 20 (3), 385–404. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2011.592979
  • Tardy, T., 2014. EUFOR RCA Bangui: ‘defence matters’. European Union institute for security studies issue alert, 7, 1–2.
  • UK House of Lords, 2012. European defence capabilities: lessons from the past, signposts for the future. London: European Union Committee (House of Lords), April 24.
  • United Nations, 2015. Leaders’ summit on peacekeeping [online]. Available from: http://peaceoperationsreview.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/10/un_2015_peakeeping_summit_pledges.jpg.
  • United Nations, 2015. Report of the high-level independent panel on United Nations peace operations: uniting our strengths for peace: politics, partnership and people. A/70/95-S/2015/446, June 16.
  • United Nations, 2015. Report of the secretary-general: the future of United Nations peace operations: implementation of the recommendations of the high-level independent panel on peace operations, A/70/357–S/2015/682, September 2.
  • Viggo Jakobsen, P., 2007. Still punching above their weight? Nordic cooperation in peace operations after the cold war. International peacekeeping, 14 (4), 458–475. doi: 10.1080/13533310701427751
  • Vogt, C., 2013. Weimar triangle on Mali: Germany: Mali illustrates limits of German and EU security policy [online]. Available from: https://ip-journal.dgap.org/en/blog/eye-europe/weimar-triangle-Mali-Germany.
  • Weltz, M., 2014. Briefing: crisis in the central African republic and the international response. African affairs, 113/453, 301–310.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.