European diplomatic practices: contemporary challenges and innovative approaches

References

• Adler, E., 2008. The spread of security communities: communities of practices, self-restraint, and NATO‘s post-cold war evolution. European journal of international relations, 14 (2), 195–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E. and Barnett, M. eds., 1998. Security communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, E. and Greve, P., 2009. When security community meets balance of power: overlapping regional mechanisms of security governance. Review of international studies, 35 (1), 59–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., eds., 2011a. International practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler, E. and Pouliot, V., 2011b. International practices. International theory, 3 (1), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R., 2014. Opting out of the European Union: diplomacy, sovereignty and European integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R., 2016. Towards a practice turn in EU studies: the everyday of European integration. JCMS: journal of common market studies, 54 (1), 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R. and Pouliot, V., 2014. Power in practice: negotiating the international intervention in Libya. European journal of international relations, 20 (4), 889–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balfour, R., Carta, C. and Raik, K., 2015. Introduction. In: R. Balfour, C. Carta and K. Raik, eds. The European external action service and national foreign ministries. Farnham: Asghate, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Barston, R.P., 1997. Modern diplomacy. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Bátora, J., 2005. Does the European Union transform the institution of diplomacy? Journal of European public policy, 12 (1), 44–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baylon, D., 2016. The making of a diplomat: The case of the French Diplomatic and Consular Institute as an identity workspace. European security, doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1236333
   Google Scholar
• Benson-Rea, M. and Shore, C., 2012. Representing Europe: the emerging “culture” of EU diplomacy. Public adminstration, 90 (2), 480–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berridge, G., 2010. Diplomacy: theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchi, F., 2016. Europe under occupation: The European diplomatic community of practice in the Jerusalem area. European security, doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1237942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C.J., 2012. European integration: from nation-states to member states. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bremberg, N., 2015. The EU as security community-building institution: venues, networks and cooperative security practices. Journal of common market studies, 53 (3), 674–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremberg, N., 2016. Making sense of the EU's response to the Arab uprisings: Foreign policy practice at times of crisis. European security, doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1236019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, C., 2012. The “practice turn”, phronesis and classical realism: towards a phronetic international political theory? Millennium – journal of international studies, 40 (3), 439–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., 2014. Pathways to practice: praxiography and international politics. European political science review, 6 (3), 383–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., 2016. Doing Europe: Agency and the European union in the field of counter-piracy practice. European security, doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1236020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C. and Gadinger, F., 2014. International practice theory: new perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bull, H., 1977. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carta, C., 2012. The European Union diplomatic service: ideas, preferences and identities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Certeau, M.D., 1984. The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chelotti, C., 2016. Transgovernmental networks and rationalist outputs? The partial social construction of EU foreign policy. European security, doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1236791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C.M. and Der Derian, J., 2010. Sustainable diplomacies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, A.F., Heine, J. and Thakur, R., 2013. Introduction: the challenges of 21-st century diplomacy. In: A.F. Cooper, J. Heine, and R. Thakur, eds. The Oxford handbook of modern diplomacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M.A.K.D., 2007. The European diplomatic corps: diplomats and international cooperation from Westphalia to Maastricht. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dick, B., Stringer, E., and Huxham, C., 2009. Theory in action research. Action research, 7 (1), 5–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diez, T., 2014. Setting the limits: discourse and EU foreign policy. Cooperation and conflict, 49 (3), 319–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutsch, K., et al., 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area: international organization in the light of historical experience. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, G., 2014. The public face of a proto-something … : diplomacy and the European Union. Diplomacy & statecraft, 25 (1), 115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, M. and Lechner, S., 2016. Understanding international practices from the internal point of view. Journal of international political theory, 12 (3), 299–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeger, N., 2014. EU-NATO relations: informal cooperation as a common lifestyle. In: A. Orsini, ed. The European Union with(in) international organisations: commitment, consistency and effects across time. London: Routledge, 157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Græger, N., 2016. European security as practice: EU-NATO communities of practice in-the-making? European security, doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1236021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L., 2011. Performing practices: a poststructuralist analysis of the Muhammad cartoon crisis. In: E. Adler and V. Pouliot, eds. International practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 280–309.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, K.E., et al., eds., 2015. The SAGE handbook of European foreign policy. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S., Little, R. and Wohlforth, W., 2007. The balance of power in world history. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S. and Delreux, T., 2014. The foreign policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A. and Macaj, G., eds., 2014. The European Union as a diplomatic actor. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M., 2013. Foreign policy and ethnography: a sceptical intervention. Geopolitics, 18 (1), 115–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M., 2014. Geopolitics and expertise: knowledge and authority in European diplomacy. West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M., 2015. For slow research. International journal of urban and regional research, 39 (4), 838–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcnamara, K.R., 2015. The politics of everyday Europe: constructing authority in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mérand, F., 2010. Pierre Bourdieu and the birth of European defense. Security studies, 19 (2), 342–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mérand, F., and Rayroux, A., 2016. The practice of burden sharing in European crisis management operations. European security, doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1236022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, A.S., 1992. The European rescue of the nation-state. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I.B., 2002. Returning practice to the linguistic turn: the case of diplomacy. Millennium – journal of international studies, 31 (3), 627–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I.B., 2012. Euro-centric diplomacy: challenging but manageable. European journal of international relations, 18 (2), 299–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I.B., 2013. Diplomatic sites: a critical enquiry. London: Hurst & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., 2009. Articulating practice through the interview to the double. Management learning, 40 (2), 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D., 2013. Practice theory, work, and organization: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., 2008. The logic of practicality: a theory of practice of security communities. International organization, 62 (2), 257–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., 2010. International security in practice: the politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., 2014. Practice tracing. In: A. Bennett and J. T. Checkel, eds. Process tracing: from metaphor to analytical tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 237–259.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V. and Cornut, J., 2015. Practice theory and study of diplomacy: a research agenda. Cooperation and conflict, 50 (3), 297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringmar, E., 2014. The search for dialogue as a hindrance to understanding: practices as inter-paradigmatic research program. International theory, 6 (1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T., 2005. Neofunctionalism, European identity, and the puzzles of European integration. Journal of european public policy, 12 (2), 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J., 2014. Blue-collar qualitative research: a rant. Qualitative inquiry, 20 (8), 976–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satow, E.M., 1917/1979. A guide to diplomatic practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T.R., 2000. Introduction. Practice theory. In: K.D. Knorr-Cetina, T.R. Schatzki, and E.V. Savigny, eds. The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T.R., 2012. A primer on practices. In: Joy Higgs, ed. Practice-based education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T.R., Karin D. Knorr-Cetina, and Eike von Savigny, 2001. The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sending, O.J., and Neumann, T.B., 2011. Banking on power: How some practices in an international organization anchor others. In: Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot, eds. International Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–254.
   Google Scholar
• Sending, O.J., Pouliot, V., and Neumann, I.B., 2011. The future of diplomacy: changing practices, evolving relationships. International journal: Canada’s journal of global policy analysis, 66 (3), 527–542.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., 2004. Europe’s foreign and security policy: the institutionalization of cooperation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.H., 2014. The EU as a diplomatic actor in the post-Lisbon era: robust or rootless hybrid? In: J.A. Koops and G. Macaj, eds. The European Union as a diplomatic actor. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 11–30.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D., 2009. Taking stock: 50 years of European diplomacy. The Hague journal of diplomacy, 4 (2), 235–259.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. and Bátora, J., eds., 2015. The European external action service. European diplomacy post-Westphalia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, J., 2011. Background knowledge in the foreground: conversations about competent practice in “sacred space”. In: E. Adler and V. Pouliot, eds. International practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 87–107.
   Google Scholar
• Swidler, A., 2001. 'What anchors cultural practices'. In: Theodore Schatzki, Karin D. Knorr-Cetina and Eike Von Savigny, eds. The practice turn in contemporary theory. Abingdon: Routledge, 74–92.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 1992. Coercion, capital and European states: AD 990–1992. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O., 1998. Insecurity, security and asecurity in the West European non-war community. In: E. Adler and M. Barnett, eds. Security communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 69–118.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O., 2002. Identity, communities and foreign policy: discourse analysis as foreign policy theory. In: L. Hansen and O. Wæver, eds. European integration and national identity: the challenge of the Nordic states. London: Routledge, 20–49.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K., 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, R. and Hill, C., eds., 2011. National and European foreign policies: towards Europeanization. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar