The Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost: a Grounded Theory approach to the comparative study of decision-making in the NAC and PSC

References

• Aggestam, L., 2004. Role identity and the Europeanisation of foreign policy: a political-cultural approach. In: B. Tonra and T. Christiansen, eds. Rethinking European Union foreign policy. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, G., 2003. A critique of using grounded theory as a research method. Electronic journal of business research methods, 2 (1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C.J., 2011. European Union foreign policy: from effectiveness to functionality. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Blagden, D., 2016. Induction and deduction in international relations: squaring the circle between theory and evidence. International studies review, 18 (2), 195–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G.A., 2008. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: a research note. Qualitative research, 8, 137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2001. Council Decision 2001/78/CFSP of 22 January 2001 setting up the Political and Security Committee, OJ No. L27/1, 17.11.93.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M.K.D., 2011. Security integration in the European Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, S., 2005. The Linchpin COPS. Assessing the workings and institutional relations of the Political and Security Committee. Maastricht: EIPA, Working Paper 2005/W/05.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, S. and Gebhard, C., 2017. The EU and NATO’s dilemmas with Russia and prospects for deconfliction. European security, 26 (3), 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Council, 2003. Background on EU-NATO permanent arrangements (Berlin +). Available from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/03-11-11%20Berlin%20Plus%20press%20note%20BL.pdf [Accessed 30 May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2016a. Bratislava declaration and roadmap. Bratislava, 16 September. Available from: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/09/pdf/160916-Bratislava-declaration-and-roadmap_en16_pdf/ [Accessed 13 December 2016].
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2016b. EU-NATO Joint Declaration, 8 July. Available from: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/07/08-eu-nato-joint-declaration/ [Accessed 10 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L., 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Græger, N., 2017. Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations: the added value of practice approaches. European security, 26 (3), 340–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, K.E., 2000. Discovering the limits of European integration: applying grounded theory. New York: Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2007. Security and defence policy in the European Union. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2012. Decision-making in security and defense policy: towards supranational inter-governmentalism? Cooperation and conflict, 47 (4), 433–453. doi: 10.1177/0010836712462770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, K.E., 2004. Theorising the European Union’s foreign policy. In: B. Tonra and T. Christiansen, eds. Rethinking European Union foreign policy. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, A.E. and Pomorska, K., 2011. Invisible and unaccountable? National representatives and council officials in EU foreign policy. Journal of European public policy, 18 (8), 1096–1114. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2011.615197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncos, A.E. and Reynolds, C., 2007. The Political and Security Committee: governing in the shadow. European foreign affairs review, 12 (2), 127–147.
   Google Scholar
• Kelle, U., 2005. “Emergence” vs. “forcing” of empirical data? A crucial problem of “grounded theory” reconsidered. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6 (2), article 27.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J., 2017. Theorising inter-organisational relations: the “EU-NATO relationship” as a catalystic case study. European security, 26 (3), 315–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynggaard, K., Manners, I., and Löfgren, K., 2015. Research methods in European Union studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Medcalf, J., 2006. NATO handbook. Brussels: Public Diplomacy Division NATO. Available from: http://www.nato.int/docu/handbook/2006/hb-en-2006.pdf [Accessed 20 November 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Mérand, F., 2012. Bricolage: a sociological approach to the making of CSDP. In: X. Kurowska and F. Breuer, eds. Explaining the EU’s common security and defence policy: theory in action. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 136–161.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, C.O., 2006. The quest for a European strategic culture: changing norms on security and defence in the European Union. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• North Atlantic Treaty Organization, 2016. NATO – EU relations fact sheet. Available from: http://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/pdf_2016_07/20160630_1607-factsheet-nato-eu-en.pdf [Accessed 30 May 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Panetta, G., 2013. EU-Sicherheitspolitik als Stabilisierungsarbeit: Eine Grounded-Theory-Studie. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, I., 2015. The European Union’s foreign policy in comparative perspective: beyond the “actorness and power” debate. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., 2010. International security in practice: the politics of NATO-Russia diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puetter, U., 2014. The European Council and the council: new intergovernmentalism and institutional change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, C.R., 2010. Understanding the emergence of the European security and defence policy: an historical institutionalist analysis. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, C. and Farrokhnia, F., 2016. Optimizing grounded theory for policy research: a knowledge-building approach to analyzing WTO E-Commerce policies. International journal of qualitative methods, 15 (1), 1–14. doi: 10.1177/1609406915621380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadler, F., 2004. Induction and deduction in the sciences. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Yost, D.S., 2007. NATO and international organizations. Rome: NATO Defence College.
   Google Scholar