Identity and anxiety: Germany’s struggle to lead

References

• Abramsohn, Jennifer, 2009. Guttenberg refers to “war” in Afghanistan, breaking Berlin taboo. Deutsche Welle, 3 November.
   Google Scholar
• Banchoff, Thomas, 1997. German policy towards the European Union: the effects of historical memory. German politics, 6 (1), 60–76. doi: 10.1080/09644009708404464
   Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, Felix and Giegerich, Bastian, 2010. From NATO to ESDP: a social constructivist analysis of German strategic adjustment after the end of the cold war. Security studies, 19, 407–452. doi: 10.1080/09636412.2010.505128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, Thomas U., 1997. The past in the present: historical memory and German national security policy. German politics, 6 (1), 39–59. doi: 10.1080/09644009708404463
   Google Scholar
• Berger, Thomas U., 1998. Cultures of antimilitarism: national security in Germany and Japan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, Michael and Noack, Rick, 2017. Germans perplexed as Trump escalates feud. The Washington Post, 30 May.
   Google Scholar
• Borger, Julian, 2012. Germany slowly comes to terms with sending its armed forces abroad. The Guardian, 18 September.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, Christopher and Joenniemi, Pertti, 2015. The ontological significance of Karelia: Finland's reconciliation with losing the promised land. In: Bahar Rumelili, ed. Conflict resolution and ontological security: peace anxieties. London: Routledge, 154–171.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, Simon and Paterson, William E., 1996. Germany in the european union: gentle giant or emergent leader?. International affairs, 72 (1), 9–32. doi: 10.2307/2624746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, Simon and Paterson, William E., 2013. Germany as the EU’s reluctant hegemon? Of economic strength and political constraints. Journal of European public policy, 20 (10), 1387–1405. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2013.822824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, Simon, Paterson, William E., and Jeffery, Charlie, 2000. Germany’s European diplomacy: shaping the regional milieu. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, David, 1992. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Beverly, 1995. German foreign policy and European political cooperation: the diplomatic recognition of Croatia in 1991. German politics and society, 13 (1), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Beverly, 1996. Defection from international cooperation: Germany’s unilateral recognition of Croatia. World politics, 48, 425–521. doi: 10.1353/wp.1996.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, Beverly, 2010. The normative power of a normal state. German politics and society, 28, 165–184. doi: 10.3167/gps.2010.280211
   Google Scholar
• Croft, Stuart, 2012. Securitizing Islam: identity and the search for security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demesmay, Claire, Puglierin, Jana, and Rappold, Julian, 2017. Deutschland als europäische Führungsmacht: die sicht aus Frankreich, Griechenland und Polen. DGAP analyse, 5.
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, John S., 1994. German security policy after unification: sources of continuity and restraint. Contemporary security policy, 15 (3), 170–198. doi: 10.1080/13523269408404083
   Google Scholar
• Duffield, John S., 1999a. Political culture and state behavior: why Germany confounds neorealism. International organization, 53 (4), 765–803. doi: 10.1162/002081899551066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, John S., 1999b. World power forsaken: political culture, international institutions, and German security policy after unification. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist, 2011. Sikorski: German inaction scarier than Germans in action. 29 November.
   Google Scholar
• Euobserver, 2017. Schulz wants the U.S. to remove nuclear weapons from Germany. 23 August. https://euobserver.com/tickers/138780.
   Google Scholar
• European Council on Foreign Relations, 2016. Preferences, power and coalition building: Findings from the ECFR expert survey 2015. 6 June. http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-RethinkEurope_EU28_survey_2015_analysis_and_results_June16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Foreign Office, 2014. Review 2014 – A fresh look at foreign policy. Berlin. http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/cae/servlet/contentblob/699442/publicationFile/203008/Schlussbericht.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of Defense, 2016. White Paper on German Security Policy and the Future of the Bundeswehr. http://www.gmfus.org/publications/white-paper-german-security-policy-and-future-bundeswehr.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Joschka, 2007. Die rot-grünen Jahre: Deutsche Aussenpolitik – vom Kosova bis zum 11. September. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
   Google Scholar
• Gauck, Joachim, 2014. Speech at 50th Munich security conference, January 31. http://www.bundespraesident.de/SharedDocs/Reden/EN/JoachimGauck/Reden/2014/140131-Munich-Security-Conference.html.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony, 1991. Modernity and self-identity. Stanford, CA: Stanford, University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, Karl, 2015. How to make a former aggressor repent through shaming and praising: the case of Sino-Japanese relations. Global affairs, 1 (3), 315–324.
   Google Scholar
• Haftendorn, Helga, 2006. Coming of age: German foreign policy since 1945. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Harnisch, Sebastian and Maull, Hanns Walter, eds., 2001. Germany as a civilian power? The foreign policy of the Berlin republic. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, Adrian, 2015. The “sleep-walking giant” awakes: resetting German foreign and security policy. European security, 24 (4), 600–616. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2015.1065484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter J., ed., 1996. The culture of national security: norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, Peter J., ed., 1997. Tamed power: Germany in Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, Patrick, 2015. Halbzeit im Weissbuchprozess http://www.kas.de/wf/doc/kas_42989-544-1-30.pdf?151125103516.
   Google Scholar
• Kinkel, Klaus, 1997. Verantwortungspolitik als Realitätspolitik. speech, New York City, United Nations, 24 September. http://www.dgvn.de/fileadmin/publications/PDFs/Zeitschrift_VN/VN_1998/Heft_1_1998/04_Beitrag_Kinkel_VN_1-98.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, Catarina, 2004. Globalization and religious nationalism: self, identity, and the search for ontological security. Political psychology, 25 (5), 741–767. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Körber Foundation, 2017. The Berlin pulse: German foreign policy in perspective. Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs, Ronald R., 2015. Narrative and the making of US national security. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krolikowski, Anna, 2008. State personhood in ontological security theories of international relations and Chinese nationalism. Chinese journal of international relations, 2 (1), 109–133.
   Google Scholar
• Kühn, Ulrich and Volpe, Tristan, 2017. Keine Atombombe, Bitte. Why Germany should not go nuclear. Foreign affairs, 96 (4), 103–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulish, Nicholas, 2009. German Minister resigns over Afghan airstrike. The New York Times, 12 November. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/28/world/europe/28germany.html.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, R.D., 1960. The divided self. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Langenbacher, Eric, 2005. Moralpolitik versus Moralpolitik: recent struggles over the construction of cultural memory in Germany. German politics & society, 23 (3), 106–134.
   Google Scholar
• Langenbacher, Eric, 2010. The mastered past? Collective memory trends in Germany since unification. German politics & society, 28 (1), 42–68. doi: 10.3167/gps.2010.280104
   Google Scholar
• Mangasarian, Leon and Techau, Jan, 2017. Führungsmacht Deutschland. Strategie ohne Angst und Anmassung. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Maull, Hanns Walter, 1990/91. Germany and Japan: the new civilian powers. Foreign affairs, 69 (5), 91–106. doi: 10.2307/20044603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maull, Hanns Walter, 2000. Germany and the use of force: still a “civilian power”?. Survival, 42 (2), 56–80. doi: 10.1093/survival/42.2.56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney, Bill, 1999. Security, identity and interests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, Jennifer, 2006a. Anchoring Europe’s civilizing identity. Journal of european public policy, 13 (2), 341–370. doi: 10.1080/13501760500451709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitzen, Jennifer, 2006b. Ontological security in world politics: state identity and the security dilemma. European journal of international relations, 12 (3), 341–370. doi: 10.1177/1354066106067346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, William E., 2010. Does Germany still have a European vocation? German politics, 19 (1), 41–52. doi: 10.1080/09644001003588556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Dirk, 2001. The debate about a new German foreign policy. In: Volker Rittberger, ed. German foreign policy since unification: theories and case studies. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Philippi, Nina, 2001. Civilian power and war: the German debate about out-of-area operations 1990–1999. In: Simon Harnisch and Hanns Walter Maull, ed. Germany as a civilian power? The foreign policy of the Berlin republic. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Ringmar, Erik, 1996. Identity, interest and action: a cultural explanation of Sweden's intervention in the thirty years war. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelili, Bahar, ed., 2015. Conflict resolution and ontological security: peace anxieties. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sandschneider, Eberhard, 2012. Deutsche Aussenpolitik : Eine Gestaltungsmacht in der Kontinuitätsfalle. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, 62 (10), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Schoellgen, Gregor, 1993. Angst vor der Macht. Die Deutschen und ihre ussenpolitik. Berlin: Ullstein.
   Google Scholar
• Spengler, Thorsten and Scholz, Christiane, 2016. Die Sicht der Deutschen auf Europa und die Aussenpolitik. TNS Infratest Politikforschung. https://www.koerber-stiftung.de/fileadmin/user_upload/koerber-stiftung/redaktion/berliner-forum-aussenpolitik/pdf/europa-umfrage_charts.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel International, 2011. Germany hesitates as UN organizes action against Libya. 18 March.
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel Online, 2012. Die Sprüche des Peter Struck. 19 December.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, Brent J., 2005. Ontological security and the power of self-identity. Review of international studies, 31, 519–540. doi: 10.1017/S0260210505006613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele, Brent J., 2008. Ontological security in international relations: self-identity and the IR state. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, Bruce, 2016. Key findings on how Europeans see their place in the world. Pew Research, 13 June.
   Google Scholar
• Sturm, Daniel Friedrich, 2011. Horst Köhler bricht sin Schweigen. Die Zeit, 8 June.
   Google Scholar
• Subotic, Jelena, 2016. Narrative, ontological security, and foreign policy change. Foreign policy analysis, 12 (4), 610–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillich, Paul, 1952. The courage to be. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von der Leyen, Ursula, 2014. Speech, 50th Munich security conference, 31 January. https://www.securityconference.de/fileadmin/MSC_/2014/Reden/2014-01-31-Speech-MinDef_von_der_Leyen-MuSeCo.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Von der Leyen, Ursula, 2015. Leadership from the center. Speech, 51st Munich Security Conference Munich, 6 February.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, Douglas, 2014. How likely is it that the European Union will disintegrate? A critical analysis of theoretical perspectives. European journal of international relations, 20 (2), 341–365. doi: 10.1177/1354066112461286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland, Severin, 2017. Einsames Deutschland. Spiegel Online, 6 June.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, Alexander, 2004. The state as person in international theory. Review of international studies, 30 (2), 289–316. doi: 10.1017/S0260210504006084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werkhuser, Nina, 2015. To lead or not to lead. Deutsche Welle, 2 February.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott, Hugh C., 1986. Unconscious sources of motivation in the theory of the subject; an exploration and critique of giddens? Dualistic models of action and personality. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 16 (1986), 105–121. in Mitzen 2006b: 351. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1986.tb00069.x
   Google Scholar
• Wittlinger, Ruth, 2010. German national identity in the twenty-first century: a different republic after all? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zarakol, Ayse, 2017. States and ontological security: a historical rethinking. Cooperation and conflict, 52 (1), 48–68. doi: 10.1177/0010836716653158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar