The post-Lisbon high representatives: an introduction

References

• Aggestam, L. and Johansson, M., 2017. The leadership paradox in EU foreign policy. Journal of common market studies, 55 (6), 1203–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. and Bicchi, F., 2019. New directions in EU foreign policy governance: cross-loading, leadership and informal grouping. Journal of common market studies, 57 (3), 515–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. and Hedling, E., 2020. Leaderization in foreign policy: performing the role of the EU high representative. European security. doi:10.1080/09662839.2020.1798411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaro, R., 2018. Europe and Iran’s nuclear crisis: lead groups and EU foreign policy-making. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Amadio Viceré, M.G. 2015. From 9/11 to Da’esh: what role for the High Representative and the external dimension of EU counter-terrorism policies? Istituto Affari Internazionali, Working Papers, September. Available from: https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/iaiwp1529.pdf [Accessed 4 December 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Amadio Viceré, M.G., 2016. The roles of the President of the European Council and the high representative in leading EU foreign policy on Kosovo. Journal of European integration, 38 (5), 557–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadio Viceré, M.G., 2018. The high representative and EU foreign policy integration. A comparative study of Kosovo and Ukraine. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Amadio Viceré, M.G., 2020. Looking towards the East: the high representative’s role in EU Foreign Policy on Kosovo and Ukraine. European security. doi:10.1080/09662839.2020.1798405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadio Viceré, M.G. and Fabbrini, S., 2017. Assessing the high representative’s role in Egypt during the Arab Spring. The international spectator, 52 (3), 64–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadio Viceré, M.G. and Tercovich, G. 2020. What role for the EU high representative during the Covid-19 Crisis? Reflections on potential avenues of research. IES Commentary (8 May). Available from: https://www.ies.be/content/what-role-eu-high-representative-during-covid-19-crisis-reflections-potential-avenues [Accessed 26 June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Barber, T., 2010. The appointments of Herman van Rompuy and Catherine Ashton. Journal of common market studies, 48 (s1), 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bassiri Tabrizi, A. and Kienzle, B., 2020. The high representative and directories in European Foreign policy: the case of the nuclear negotiations with Iran. European security. doi:10.1080/09662839.2020.1798407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann, J. and Niemann, A., 2015. Theories of European integration. In: K.E. Jorgensen, et al., eds. The Sage handbook of european foreign policy. Oaks: Sage, 165–181.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, C.J., Hodson, D., and Puetter, U., 2015. The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-Maastricht Era. Journal of common market studies, 53 (3), 703–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blockmans, S. and Russack, S. 2015. The commissioners’ group on external action CEPS, Special Report, No. 125, December. https://www.ceps.eu/system/files/SR125%20SB%20and%20SR%20Commissioners%20Group%20on%20External%20Action_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bremberg, N., 2016. Making sense of the EU’s response to the Arab uprisings: foreign policy practice at times of crisis. European security, 25 (4), 423–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremberg, N., 2020. From “partnership” to “principled pragmatism”: tracing the discursive practices of the High Representatives in the EU’s relations with the Southern Mediterranean. European security. doi:10.1080/09662839.2020.1798408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calcara, A., 2020. The hybrid role of the high representative in the security and defence field: More in 10 months than in the 10 Years? European security. doi:10.1080/09662839.2020.1798406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporaso, J.A., 2018. Europe's triple crisis and the uneven role of institutions: the Euro, refugees and brexit. Journal of common market studies, 56 (6), 1345–1361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carta, C., 2011. The European union diplomatic service. Ideas, preferences and identities. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carta, C., 2013. The EU in Geneva: the diplomatic representation of a system of governance. European journal of contemporary research, 9 (3), 406–423.
   Google Scholar
• Chopin, T. and Lequesne, C., 2016. Differentiation as a double-edged sword: member states’ practices and Brexit. International affairs, 92 (3), 531–545.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, M.K. and Karolewski, I.P., 2016. Special issue: Europe's hybrid foreign policy: the Ukraine-Russia crisis. Journal of common market studies, 55 (1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R., ed., 2011. The ‘community method’: obstinate or obsolete? New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T. and Keukeleire, S., 2017. Informal division of labour in EU foreign policy-making. Journal of European public policy, 24 (10), 1471–1490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S., 2014. The European Union and the Libyan crisis. International politics, 51 (2), 177–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S., 2015. Which European Union? Europe after the Euro crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gauttier, P., 2004. Horizontal coherence and the external competences of the European Union. European law journal, 10 (1), 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P. and Jachtenfuchs, M., eds., 2014. Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core state powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, E.B., 1958. The uniting of Europe: political. Social and economic forces 1950–1957. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.G. and Jacoby, W., 2006. How agents matter. In: D.G. Hawkins, et al., eds., Delegation and agency in international organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199–228.
   Google Scholar
• Helwig, N., 2013. ‘EU foreign policy and the high representative’s capability-expectations Gap: a question of political will’. European foreign affairs review, 18 (2), 235–254.
   Google Scholar
• Helwig, N., 2015. The high representative of the union: the quest for leadership. In: EU foreign policy, D. Spence, and J. Bátora, ed. The European external action Service. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 87–104.
   Google Scholar
• Helwig, N., 2017. Agent interaction as a source of discretion for the EU high representative. In: T. Delreux, and J. Adriaensen, ed. The principal agent model and the European Union. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 105–129.
   Google Scholar
• Helwig, N. and Rüger, C., 2014. In search of a role for the high representative: the legacy of Catherine Ashton. International spectator, 49 (4), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., 1993. The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualising Europe's international role. Journal of common market studies, 31 (3), 305–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, C., Smith, M., and Vanhoonacker, S. eds., 2017. International relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2011. The “New Faces” of Lisbon: assessing the performance of Catherine Ashton and Herman van Rompuy on the global stage. European foreign affairs review, 16 (3), 303–323.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2012. Decision-Making in security and defence policy: towards a supranational intergovernmentalism? Cooperation and conflict, 47 (4), 433–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. 2014. Catherine Ashton’s five-year term: a difficult assessment. Les Cahiers européens de Sciences Po, n.03.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2017. EU–NATO cooperation: the key to Europe’s security future, European security. European security, 26 (3), 454–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, J.D. and Shipan, C.R., 2002. Deliberate discretion? The institutional foundation of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, A., 2018. Realism and the European neighbourhood policy. In: T. Schumacher, A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber, ed. The Routledge handbook on the European neighbourhood policy. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 60–69.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, K.E. and Laatikainen, K.V. eds., 2012. Routledge handbook on the European Union and international institutions: performance, policy, power. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, K.E. and Wessel, R.A., 2011. “The position of the European Union in (other) international organisations: confronting legal and political approaches”. In: P. Koutrakos, ed. European foreign policy: legal and political perspectives. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 261–286.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, J.P., 2017. The US perspective on NATO under Trump: lessons of the past and prospects for the future. International affairs, 93 (2), 251–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C. and Leonard, S., eds., 2018. Searching for a strategy for the European Union’s area of freedom, security and justice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, I., 2018. Collapse: the European Union after the European Union. London: Biteback Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S. and MacNaughtan, J., 2008. The foreign policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., 2012. NATO’s influence on the evolution of the European Union as a security actor. In: O. Costa, and K. E. Jørgensen, ed. The influence of International institutions on the EU. when Multilateralism hits Brussels. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 155–185.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A. and Tercovich, G., 2020. Shaping the European external action service and its post-Lisbon Crisis Management Structures: an assessment of the EU high representatives’ political leadership. European security. doi:10.1080/09662839.2020.1798410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krotz, U. and Maher, R., 2011. International relations theory and the rise of European foreign and security policy. World politics, 63 (3), 548–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Z. and Schmitter, P., 2015. Transcending or descending? European integration in times of crisis. European political science review, 7 (1), 3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mérand, F. and Angers, K., 2013. Military integration in Europe. In: P. Genschel and M. Jachtenfuchs, eds. Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core state powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, A., 2011a. Power, institutions and the CSDP: The promise of Institutionalist theory. JCMS: Journal of common market studies, 49 (1), 83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon, A., 2011b. European defence policy from Lisbon to Libya. Survival. Global politics and strategy, 53 (3), 75–90.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, A. and MacFarlane, N., 2014. The EU and Ukraine. Survival: global politics and strategy, 56 (3), 95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Monar, J., 2011. ‘Modes of EU governance in the justice and home affairs domain: specific factors, types, evolution trends and evaluations’. In: U. Diedrichs, W. Reiners, and W Wessels, ed. The dynamics of change in EU governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 180–209.
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A., 1999. A new statecraft? supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation. International organization, 53 (2), 267–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. and Schimmelfennig, F., 2018. ‘Liberal intergovernmentalism’. In: A. Wiener, T. A. Börzel, and T. Risse, ed. European integration theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 64–86.
   Google Scholar
• Morillas, P., 2019. Autonomy in intergovernmentalism: the role of de novo bodies in external action during the making of the EU Global Strategy. Journal of European integration, 1–16. doi:10.1080/07036337.2019.1666116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet, G. and Rüger, C., eds., 2011. The high representative for the EU foreign and security policy: review and prospects. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, S., 2014. Single representative, single voice: magical thinking and the representation of the EU on the world Stage. Global policy, 5, 68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A., 2002. Learning from the Americanists (again): theory and method in the study of delegation. West European politics, 25 (1), 200–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollack, M.A., 2003. The Engines of European integration: delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Puetter, U., 2004. Governing Informally: The role of the Eurogroup in EMU and the Stability and Growth Pact. Journal of european public policy, 11 (5), 854–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puetter, U., 2012. Europe's deliberative intergovernmentalism: the role of the Council and European Council in EU economic governance. Journal of european public policy, 19 (2), 161–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüger, C., 2011. A Position under construction: future prospects of the high representative after the treaty of Lisbon. In: G. Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet and C. Rüger, eds. The high representative for the EU foreign and security policy: review and prospects. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 201–234.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., 2015. What’s the news in “new intergovernmentalism”? A critique of Bickerton, Hodson and Puetter. Journal of common market studies, 53 (4), 723–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P.C., 1969. Three neo-functional hypotheses about international integration. International organization, 23 (1), 161–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M., Keukeleire, S., and Vanhoonacker, S., eds., 2015. The diplomatic system of the European Union: evolution, change and challenges. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. and Bátora, J. eds., 2015. The European external action service: European diplomacy post-Westphalia. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sus, M., 2014. The high representative and the European external action service: towards institutional coherence in the Eastern Partnership. In: M. Wilga, and I.P. Karolewski, ed. New approaches to EU foreign policy. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 56–85.
   Google Scholar
• Telò, M. and Ponjaert, F., eds., 2016. The EU's foreign policy: what kind of power and diplomatic action? Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tömmel, I., 2013. The Presidents of the European Commission: transactional or transforming leaders? JCMS: journal of common market studies, 51 (4), 789–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tömmel, I., 2017. The standing president of the European Council: intergovernmental or supranational leadership? Journal of European integration, 39 (2), 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonra, B., 2019. What role for the high representative post-2019? Global affairs, 5 (4–5), 287–293.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, N., 2017. Framing the EU global Strategy. A stronger Europe in a fragile world. Abingdon: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Thym, D., 2011. The intergovernmental constitution of the EU’s foreign, security and defence executive. European constitutional law review, 7 (3), 453–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanhoonacker, S. and Pomorska, K., 2016. EU diplomacy post-Lisbon: the legacy of the Ashton era. In: M. Smith, S. Keukeleire, and S. Vanhoonacker, ed. The diplomatic system of the European Union: evolution, change and challenges. Abingdon: Palgrave, 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R.E. and McKersie, R.B., 1965. A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: an analysis of a social interaction system. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., 2013. Integrating the acquisition of leviathan’s swords? The emerging regulation of defence procurement within the EU. In: P. Genschel and M. Jachtenfuchs, eds. Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core state powers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R., 2020. EU foreign policy and energy strategy: bounded contestation. Journal of european integration, 42 (1), 147–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar