Leaderisation in foreign policy: performing the role of EU High Representative

References

• Adler-Nissen, R., 2012. Diplomacy as impression management: strategic face-work and post colonial embarrassment. Available from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2284791.
   Google Scholar
• Adler-Nissen, R., 2016. The social self in international relations: identity, power and the symbolic interactionist roots of constructivism. European review of international studies, 3 (3), 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. and Bicchi, F., 2019. New directions in EU foreign policy governance: cross-loading, leadership and informal governance. Journal of common market studies, 57 (3), 515–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. and Johansson, M., 2017. The leadership paradox in EU foreign policy. Journal of common market studies, 55 (6), 1203–1220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L. and Johansson, M., 2020. Leadership in the European Union. In: Oxford research encyclopaedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1484
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M. and Spicer, A., 2012. Critical leadership studies: The case for critical performativity. Human Relations, 65 (4), 367–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadio Viceré, M.G., 2020. Looking towards the east: the High Representative’s role in EU foreign policy on Kosovo and Ukraine. European security. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2020.1798405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadio Viceré, M.G., Tercovich, G., and Carta, C., 2020. Assessing the post-Lisbon High Representatives: an introduction. European security. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2020.1798409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Boin, A., and ’t Hart, P., 2014. Political leadership in times of crisis. In: R.A.W. Rhodes and P. ’t Hart, eds. The Oxford handbook of political leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 418–433.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, T., 2010. The appointments of Herman van Rompuy and Catherine Ashton. Journal of common market studies, 48 (1), 55–67.
   Google Scholar
• Bremberg, N., 2020. From “partnership” to “principled pragmatism": tracing the discursive practices of the High Representatives in the EU's relations with the Southern Mediterranean. European security, 29, 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byman, D.L. and Pollack, K.M., 2001. Let us now praise great men. Bringing the statesmen back in. International security, 25 (4), 107–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calcara, A., 2020. The hybrid role of the High Representative in the security and defence field: more in 10 months than in the 10 years? European security. doi: 10.1080/09662839.2020.1798406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campus, D., 2010. Mediatization and personalization of politics in Italy and France: the cases of Berlusconi and Sarkozy. The international journal of press/politics, 15 (2), 219–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cull, N.J. 2014. “Public diplomacy” before Gullion: the evolution of a phrase. US Center on Public Diplomacy. Available from: https://www.uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/public-diplomacy-gullion-evolution-phrase [Accessed 4 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Cross, M.D., 2015. The public diplomacy role of the EEAS:
crafting a resilient image for Europe. In: D. Spence and J. Bátora, eds. The European external action service. European diplomacy post-Westphalia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 341–355.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. 2014. A portrait of Federica Mogherini, the EU's next foreign policy chief. The Guardian, 30 Aug.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, C., 2019. Digital diplomacy: emotion and identity in the public realm. The Hague journal of diplomacy, 14 (1–2), 102–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European External Action Service, 2015. 9 October. Available from: http://twitter.com/eu_eeas [Accessed 26 May 2020 ].
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service, 2016. 29 June. Federica Mogherini presents the EU global strategy [Video] Available from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nj55LNZtuVM&t=41s [Accessed 4 November 2019 ].
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service, 2017a. 8 May. Available from: http://twitter.com/eu_eeas [Accessed 26 May 2020 ].
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service, 2017b. 9 May. Available from: http://twitter.com/eu_eeas [Accessed 26 May 2020 ].
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2016. Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe. A global strategy for the European Union's Foreign and Security Policy. Available from: http://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/file/441/download?token=KVSh5tD [Accessed 4 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, W.L. and Avolio, B.J., 1998. The charismatic relationship: a dramaturgical perspective. Academy of management review, 23 (1), 32–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1966. Behaviour in public places. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1974. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1983. The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American sociological review, 48 (1), 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedling, E. 2018. Blending politics and new media: mediatized practices of EU digital diplomacy. Thesis (PhD). Lund Political Studies 193. Lund University: Media-Tryck.
   Google Scholar
• Hedling, E., 2019. Storytelling in EU public diplomacy: reputation management and recognition of success. Place branding & public diplomacy, 16, 143–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helwig, N., 2016. Europe’s new political engine: Germany’s role in the EU’s foreign and security policy. Helsinki: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. and Bjola, C., 2015. Digital diplomacy: theory and practice. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2011. The ‘new faces’ of Lisbon: assessing the performance of Catherine Ashton and Herman van Rompuy on the global stage. European foreign affairs review, 16 (3), 302–323.
   Google Scholar
• Hjavard, S., 2008. The mediatization of society, a theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom review, 29 (2), 105–134.
   Google Scholar
• Huijgh, E., 2013. Changing tunes for public diplomacy: exploring the domestic dimension. Exchange: the journal of public diplomacy, 2 (1), 62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, A.E., 2017. Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn? European security, 26 (1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncker, J-C. 2014. Mission letter to Federica Mogherini, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Policy and Security Policy/Vice-President of the European Commission. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/sites/cwt/files/commissioner_mission_le tters/mogherini_en.pdf [Accessed 4 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A. and Tercovich, G., 2020. Shaping the European external action service and its post-Lisbon crisis management structures: an assessment of the EU High Representatives’ political leadership. European security, doi: 10.1080/09662839.2020.1798410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madestam, J. and Falkman, L. L., 2017. Rhetorical construction of political leadership in social media. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 30 (3), 299–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, P., 2011. Leader, president, person: lexical ambiguities and interpretive implications. European journal of communication, 26 (1), 48–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, M. 2015. The European External Action Service and digital diplomacy. Twidiplomacy. Available from: http://twiplomacy.com/blog/the-european-external-action-service-and-digital-diplomacy/ [Accessed 26 May 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G., 2008. Mediatization of politics. In: W. Donbasch, ed. The international encyclopaedia of communication. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Melissen, J., 2005. The new public diplomacy: soft power in international relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., and Roselle, L., 2013. Strategic narratives. Communication power and the new world order. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. 2014. BlogMog. Available from: http://www.blogmog.it [Accessed 4 November 2019 ].
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. 2016a. Speech by the High Representative/Vice-President Federica Mogherini at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. 2016b. Speech by Federica Mogherini at the public seminar “EU as a Global Actor”. Stockholm: 10 October.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. 2016c. Speech by HR/VP to EU Ambassadors, Brussels: 5 September. Available from: https://europa.eu/globalstrategy/en/speech-hrvp-mogherini-eu-ambassadors [Accessed 4 November 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. 2017a. Speech by Federica Mogherini at the Munich security conference. Munich: 18 February.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. 2017b. Speech by HR/VP Mogherini at the 2017 European Union Institute for Security Studies annual conference on “The EU Global Strategy: Translating vision into action”. Brussels, 21 June.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. 2017c. Foreword in From Shared Vision to Common Action: Implementing the Global Strategy Year 1. EEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M., 2016. From the ESS to the EU global strategy: external policy, internal purpose. Contemporary European security, 37 (3), 375–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmelee, J. H., and Bichard. L. S. 2012. Politics and the Twitter revolution: How tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pisarska, K., 2016. The domestic dimension of public diplomacy. Evaluating success through civil engagement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, A., 2011. Digital diplomacy and US foreign policy. Hague journal of diplomacy, 6 (2), 451–455.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., 2002. Goffman meets IR: dramaturgical action in international community. International review of sociology, 12 (3), 417–437.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, A. and Grant, D., 2011. Narrative, drama and charismatic leadership: The case of Apple's Steve Jobs. Leadership, 7 (1), 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A. and Benford, R.D., 2000. Master frames and cycles of protest. In: A.D. Morris and C. M. Mueller, eds. Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven: Yale University Press, 133–155.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J., 2008. Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. The international journal of press/politics, 13 (3), 228–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci, N., 2016. The making of the EU global strategy. Contemporary security policy, 37 (3), 461–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tocci, N., 2017. Framing the EU global strategy: a stronger Europe in a fragile world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. and Poell, T., 2014. Understanding social media logic. Media and communication, 1 (1), 2–14.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K.E., 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar