Copying in EU security and defence policies: the case of EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia

References

• Aalberts, T.E. and Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., 2014. Sovereignty at sea: the law and politics of saving lives in mare liberum. Journal of international relations and development, 17 (4), 439–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amnesty International, 2017. Libya’s dark web of collusion: abuses against Europe-bond refugees and migrants. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/download/Documents/MDE1975612017ENGLISH.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Angelescu, I., 2008. All new migration debates commence in Rome: new developments in the securitization of migration in the EU. EUMAP, April. Available from: http://pdc.ceu.hu/archive/00003934/.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., 2020. Institutionalism. In: M. Riddervold, J. Trondal, and A. Newsome, eds. Handbook on EU crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Boin, A., and Keller, A., 2010. Managing transboundary crises: identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 18 (4), 195–207.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., Trondal, J., and Øgård, M., 2017. Turbulent governence. In: C. Ansell, J. Trondal, and M. Øgård, eds. Governance in turbulent times. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• BBC, 2015. Migrant crisis: PM says UK with fulfil moral responsibilities. 3 Sep. Available from: http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-34135870.
   Google Scholar
• Blockmans, S., 2016. New thrust for the CSDP from the refugee and migrant crisis, special report' 142. Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Boin, A., Ekengren, M., and Rhinard, M., 2013. The European Union as crisis manager: patterns and prospects. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boșilcă, R.L., 2017. An EU maritime security policy in the making: the case of military CSDP operations at sea. Doctoral thesis. Bucharest/Oslo: National University of Political Studies and Public Administration/ARENA Centre for European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., 2016. Doing Europe: agency and the European Union in the field of counter-piracy practice. European security, 25 (4), 407–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G., 2015. Critical junctures and institutional change. In: J. Mahoney and K. Thelen, eds. Advances in comparative-historical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 147–179.
   Google Scholar
• Capoccia, G. and Kelemen, R.D., 2007. The study of critical junctures: theory, narrative, and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World politics, 59 (3), 341–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera, S. and den Hertog, L., 2015. Whose mare? Rule of law challenges in the field of European border surveillance in the Mediterranean. CEPS paper in liberty and security in Europe, 79, 1–29. Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, D., 2017. EUNAVFOR MED, Op Sophia, an overview with rear admiral Credendino. Impetus, 24 (Autumn/Winter), 16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Central Mediterranean Contact Group, 2017. Dichiarazione di intenti. Available from: http://www.interno.gov.it/sites/default/files/allegati/cmcg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cortell, A.P. and Peterson, S., 1999. Altered states: explaining domestic institutional change. British journal of political science, 29 (1), 177–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU, 2015. Council decision on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED). 2015/778/CFSP.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU, 2016. Council decision amending decision (CFSP) 2015/778 on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA). 2016/993/CFSP.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU, 2017. Council decision amending decision (CFSP) 2015/778 on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED operation SOPHIA). 2017/1385/CFSP.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU, 2019. EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia: mandate extended until 30 September 2019, press release 246/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the EU, 2020. Council decision on a European Union military operation in the Mediterranean. 25 Mar. 6414/20.
   Google Scholar
• Cusumano, E., 2019a. Humanitarians at sea: selective emulation across migrant rescue NGOs in the Mediterranean Sea. Contemporary security policy, 40 (2), 239–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, E., 2019b. Migrant rescue as organized hypocrisy: EU maritime missions offshore Libya between humanitarianism and border control. Cooperation and conflict, 54 (1), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, E. and Villa, M., 2019. Sea rescue NGOs: a pull factor of irregular migration? European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre, Policy Brief, 22, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dibenedetto, A.G., 2019. Ensuring security in the Mediterranean Sea: the Italian navy and coast guard. In: I. Bowers and S.L.C. Koh, eds. Grey and White Hulls: an international analysis of the navy-coast guard nexus. Singapore: Springer Nature, 159–180.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W., 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48 (2), 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriadi, A., 2014. Managing the maritime borders of Europe: protection through deterrence and prevention? ELIAMEP working paper 50/2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dombrowski, P. and Reich, S., 2019. The EU's maritime operations and the future of European security: learning from operations Atalanta and Sophia. Comparative European politics, 17(6), 860–884.
   Google Scholar
• DW, 2014. Opinion: is refugee rescue attracting more? 28 Oct. Available from: https://www.dw.com/en/opinion-is-refugee-rescue-attracting-more/a-18026378.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS, 2016. EUNAVFOR MED – operation Sophia. Six monthly report: June, 22nd to December 31st 2015. Available from: https://wikileaks.org/eu-military-refugees/EEAS/EEAS-2016-126.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EEAS, 2018. Strategic review on EUNAVFOR MED Op Sophia, EUBAM Libya & EU Liaison and Planning Cell, EEAS(2018) 835. Brussels. 27 Jul.
   Google Scholar
• EUNAVFOR MED, 2016. SHADE MED follow-on: term of reference. 25 Mar.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2015. Joint Foreign and Home Affairs Council: Ten point action plan on migration. Press release IP/15/4813. Luxembourg. 20 Apr. Available from: http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-4813_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2015. Statement of the special meeting of the European Council. Statement 204/15. 23 Apr. Available from: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2015/04/23-special-euco-statement/.
   Google Scholar
• Foreign and Commonwealth Office, 2017. Explanatory memorandum on the European Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy. Council decision amending decision (CFSP) 2015/778 on a European Union military operation in the Southern Central Mediterranean (EUNAVFOR MED Operation Sophia). 13 Jul.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, G., 2018. Replicating success? A military response to maritime piracy, the Somalia experience. In: T. Reitano, L. B. Ruiz-Benitez de Lugo, and S. Jesperson, eds. Militarised responses to transnational organised crime. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 109–125.
   Google Scholar
• Gauci, J.-P. and Mallia, P., 2017. The migrant smuggling protocol and the need for a multi-faceted approach: intersectionality and multi-actor cooperation. In: V. Moreno-Lax and E. Papastavridis, eds. ‘Boat refugees’ and migrants at sea: A comprehensive approach. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff, 119–144.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmer, B., 2014. Political geographies of piracy: constructing threats and containing bodies in Somalia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Guilfoyle, D., 2016. Transnational crime and the rule of law at sea: responses to maritime migration and piracy compared. In: V. Moreno-Lax and E. Papastavridis, eds. ‘Boat refugees’ and migrants at sea: a comprehensive approach. Leiden: Brill, 169–198.
   Google Scholar
• Houben, M., 2014. Operational coordination of naval operations and capacity-building. In: T. Tardy, ed. Fighting piracy off the coast of Somalia: lessons learned from the contact group. Paris: EUISS, 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Jeandesboz, J. and Pallister-Wilkins, P., 2016. Crisis, routine, consolidation: the politics of the Mediterranean migration crisis. Mediterranean politics, 21 (2), 316–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, A.I., 2020. The European Union’s joint operation Triton and EUNAVFOR MED operation Sophia. Strategic responses to the migration crisis? PhD thesis submitted to the Department of Social Sciences and Business Roskilde University. Apr.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, K.E., et al. 2015. The SAGE handbook of european foreign policy. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Juncos, A. and Pomorska, K., 2020. The EU’s response to the Ukraine crisis. In: M. Riddervold, J. Trondal, and A. Newsome, eds. Handbook on EU crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamkhaji, J.C. and Radaelli, C.M., 2017. Crisis, learning and policy change in the European Union. Journal of European public policy, 24 (5), 714–734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeler, J.T.S., 1993. Opening the window for reform: mandates, crises, and extraordinary policy-making. Comparative political studies, 25 (4), 433–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepp, S., 2010. A contested asylum system: The European Union between refugee protection and border control in the Mediterranean Sea. European journal of migration and law, 12 (1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, J.S., 1994. Learning and foreign policy: sweeping a conceptual minefield. International organization, 48 (2), 279–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, A. and Vaughan-Williams, N., 2017. Stopping boats, saving lives, securing subjects: humanitarian borders in Europe and Australia. European journal of international relations, 23 (3), 533–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. and Thelen, K., eds., 2010. Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P., 1998. The institutional dynamics of international political orders. International organization, 52 (4), 943–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, S., 2008. Path dependence and commission activism in the evolution of the European Union’s external energy policy. Journal of international relations and development, 11 (3), 251–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitcham, P., 2018. Lessons from EU NAVFOR Somalia, Operation Atalanta: exploiting military equity for diplomatic effect. Impetus, 2018 (25), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Lax, V., 2018. The EU humanitarian border and the securitization of human rights: the ‘rescue-through-interdiction/rescue-without-protection’ paradigm. Journal of common market studies, 56 (1), 119–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nováky, N., 2018. The road to Sophia: explaining the EU’s naval operation in the Mediterranean. European view, 17 (2), 197–209.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, J.P., 2009. Change and continuity – an institutional approach to institutions of democratic government. European political science review, 1 (1), 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2015. The humanitarian politics of European border policing: Frontex and border police in Evros. International political sociology, 9 (1), 53–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panebianco, S. 2016. The Mare Nostrum Operation and the SAR approach: the Italian response to address the Mediterranean migration crisis. EUMedEA online working paper series, 3-2016, 1-27.
   Google Scholar
• Patalano, A., 2015. Nightmare Nostrum? Not quite: lessons from the Italian navy in the Mediterranean migrant crisis. The RUSI journal, 160 (3), 14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuters, 2015. Merkel says Europe must do more to prevent migrant disasters. 20 Apr. Available from: https://www.reuters.com/article/europe-migrants-germany/update-1-merkel-says-europe-must-do-more-to-prevent-migrant-disasters-idUSL5N0XH36420150420.
   Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M., 2018a. The maritime turn in EU foreign and security policies: aims, actors and mechanisms of integration. Abingdon: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M., 2018b. A humanitarian mission in line with human rights? Assessing Sophia, the EU’s naval response to the migration crisis. European security, 27 (2), 158–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddervold, M., Trondal, J., and Newsome, A., eds., 2020. Handbook on EU crisis. London: Palgrave Macmillan. In press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P., 2018. The militarisation of migration: from Triton to Sophia: assessing the credibility of the EÙs naval interventions against migrant smuggling in the Mediterranean. In: T. Reitano, L. B. Ruiz-Benitez de Lugo, and S. Jesperson, eds. Militarised responses to transnational organised crime. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 217–234.
   Google Scholar
• Roos, C. and Zaun, N., 2016. The global economic crisis as a critical juncture? The crisis’s impact on migration movements and policies in Europe and the U.S. Journal of ethnic and migration studies, 42 (10), 1579–1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénat de la France, 2015. Comptes rendues de la Comission des affaires étrangères, de la défense et des forces armées. Lutte contre les trafics d'êtres humains en Méditerranée – Audition de M. Hervé Bléjean, contre-amiral, vice-commandant de l'opération militaire de l'Union européenne dans la partie sud de la Méditerranée centrale (EUNAVFOR MED).
   Google Scholar
• Senato della Repubblica, 2016. Audizione dell’ ammiraglio di divisione Enrico Credendino, Operation Commander dellamissione EUNAVFOR MED – Operazione Sophia. 18aseduta. 4 Feb.
   Google Scholar
• Seyle, C. and Madsen, J.V., 2016. The power of networks in maritime security: what the fight against piracy can teach us about irregular migration. Broomfield, CO: One Earth Future Foundation, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M., 2017. Europe’s common security and defence policy: capacity-building, experiential learning, and institutional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stierl, M., 2019. From migrants to pirates: how identities change during Mediterranean passage. The Globe Post, April. Available from: https://theglobepost.com/2019/04/03/migrants-pirates-identities/.
   Google Scholar
• Tardy, T., 2015. Operation Sophia: tackling the migration crisis with military means, ISS brief 30. Paris: ISS.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M., 2016. Border displacements. Challenging the politics of rescue between Mare Nostrum and Triton. Migration studies, 4 (1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, M. and Garelli, G., 2020. Containment beyond detention: the hotspot system and disrupted migration movements across Europe. Environment and planning D: society and space, 38 (6), 1009–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomic, N., 2017. The EU as a learning organization: local ownership, resilience and external legitimacy in CSDP missions and operations in the horn of Africa and the Mediterranean. EUSA Fifteenth Biennial Conference, 4–6 May, Miami, FL.
   Google Scholar
• United Kingdom House of Lords (UKHL), 2017. Operation Sophia: a failed mission. 2nd report, session 2017-19, HL paper 5. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• UN Press, 2016. Security Council authorizes inspection of suspected embargo-breaking vessels off Libya’s Coast, unanimously adopting resolution 2292 (2016). SC/12401.
   Google Scholar
• UNSC, 2015. Security Council resolution 2240 (2015) [on migrant smuggling and human trafficking into, through and from the Libyan territory and off the coast of Libya]. S/RES/2240 (2015). 14 Oct.
   Google Scholar
• UNSC, 2016. Security Council resolution 2292 (2016) [on the situation in Libya]. S/RES/2292 (2016). Jun 14.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A., 2015. A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European public policy, 22 (2), 219–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar