Party politics and military deployments: explaining political consensus on Belgian military intervention

References

• Auerswald, D.P., and Saideman, S.M., 2014. NATO in Afghanistan: Fighting together. Fighting Alone Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley, R.K., and Kaarbo, J., 2014. Explaining extremity in the foreign policies of parliamentary democracies. International Studies quarterly, 58, 729–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, 2011a. Integraal verslag met vertaald beknopt verslag van de toespraken. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, 2011b. Integraal verslag met vertaald beknopt verslag van de toespraken. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, 2014. Integraal verslag met vertaald beknopt verslag van de toespraken. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, 2016a. Integraal verslag met vertaald beknopt verslag van de toespraken. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers, 2016b. Resolution over de inzet van de Belgische Defensie tegen Islamitische Staat (IS of DAESH) in Irak en in Syrië. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., Lepgold, J., and Unger, D., 1994. Burden-Sharing in the Persian Gulf War. International organization, 48, 39–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böller, F., and Müller, M., 2018. Unleashing the watchdogs: explaining congressional assertiveness in the politics of US military interventions. European Political Science review, 10, 637–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commissie voor de Landsverdediging, 2016. Integraal verslag met vertaald beknopt verslag van de toespraken. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Commissie voor de Buitenlandse betrekkingen, 2016. Integraal verslag met vertaald beknopt verslag van de toespraken. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• De Winter, L., and Dumont, P., 2006. Do Belgian parties undermine the democratic chain of delegation? West European politics, 29, 957–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Winter, L., Swyngedouw, M., and Dumont, P., 2006. Party system(s) and electoral behaviour in Belgium: from stability to balkanisation. West European politics, 29, 933–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieterich, S., Hummel, H., and Marschall, S., 2015. Bringing democracy back in: The democratic peace, parliamentary war powers and European participation in the 2003 Iraq War. Cooperation and conflict, 50, 87–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichenberg, R.C., 2005. Victory has many friends: US public opinion and the use of military force, 1981–2005. International security, 30, 140–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonck, D., Haesebrouck, T., and Reykers, Y., 2019. Parliamentary involvement, party ideology and majority-opposition bargaining: Belgian participation in multinational military operations. Contemporary security policy, 40, 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonck, D., and Reykers, Y., 2018. Parliamentarisation as a two-way process: Explaining prior parliamentary consultation for military interventions. Parliamentary affairs, 71, 674–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, T., 2015. Democratic contributions to UN peacekeeping operations. A Two-Step Fuzzy Set QCA of Unifil II. Romanian journal of political science, 15, 4–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, T., 2017. NATO burden sharing in Libya: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of conflict resolution, 61, 2235–2261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, T., 2018. Democratic participation in the air strikes against Islamic state: A qualitative comparative analysis. Foreign policy analysis, 14, 254–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, T., and Mello, P.A., 2020. Patterns of political ideology and security policy. Foreign policy analysis, 16, 565–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, T., and Van Immerseel, A., 2020. When does politics stop at the water’s edge? A QCA of parliamentary consensus on military deployment decisions. European political science review, 12 (3), 371–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., Lenz, T., and Marks, G., 2019. Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance. The review of international organizations, 14, 731–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipsos. 2011. Majority (60%) of Global Citizens Support NATO’s Military Intervention in Libya [online]. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/ipsos-global-dvisory-majority-60-global-citizens-support-natos-military-intervention-libya [Accessed Access Date].
   Google Scholar
• Ipsos. 2014. Majority (54%) of Global Citizens Support International Coalition's Airstrikes Against ISIL [online]. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/majority-54-global-citizens-support-international-coalitions-airstrikes-against-isil [Accessed Access Date].
   Google Scholar
• Kaarbo, J., 1996. Power and influence in foreign policy decision making: The role of junior coalition partners in German and Israeli foreign policy. International studies quarterly, 40, 501–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M.T., 2009. Governments, partisanship, and foreign policy: The case of dispute duration. Journal of peace research, 46, 799–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mello, P.A., 2012. Parliamentary peace or Partisan politics? democracies’ participation in the Iraq War. Journal of international Relations and development, 15, 420–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktay, S., 2014. Constraining or enabling? The effects of government composition on international commitments. Journal of European public policy, 21, 860–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktay, S., 2018. Chamber of opportunities: Legislative politics and coalition security policy. The British journal of politics and international relations, 20, 104–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktay, S., and Beasley, R., 2017. Quantitative approaches in coalition foreign policy: Scope, content, process. European political science, 16, 475–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppermann, K., Kaarbo, J., and Brummer, K., 2017. introduction: coalition politics and foreign policy. European political science, 16, 457–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostermann, F., et al., 2020. Constructing a parliamentary deployment votes database: Challenges of data collection, classification, and indexing. London and New York: Routledge, 170–188.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, G., London, T., and Regan, P., 2004. What's stopping you? The sources of political constraints on international conflict behavior in parliamentary democracies. International interactions, 30, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, R.B., and Reykers, Y., 2020. Show them the flag: Status ambitions and recognition in small state coalition warfare. European security, 29, 16–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbun, B.C., 2004. Partisan interventions. European party politics and peace enforcement in the Balkans. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T., and Wagner, W., 2020. The party politics of foreign and security policy. Foreign policy analysis, 16 (4), 515–531.
   Google Scholar
• Ruys, T., Ferro, L., and Haesebrouck, T., 2019. Parliamentary war powers and the role of international law in foreign troop deployment decisions: The US-led coalition against “Islamic State” in Iraq and Syria. International journal of constitutional Law, 17, 118–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verenigde Commissies Voor De Buitenlandse Betrekkingen En Voor De Landsverdediging, 2011. Integraal verslag met vertaald beknopt verslag van de toespraken. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Verenigde Commissies Voor De Buitenlandse Betrekkingen En Voor De Landsverdediging, 2014. Gedachtenwisseling de toestand in Irak en de eventuele deelneming van België aan de internationale coalitie. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Verenigde Commissies Voor De Buitenlandse Betrekkingen En Voor De Landsverdediging, 2016. Integraal verslag met vertaald beknopt verslag van de toespraken. Brussels: Belgische Kamer van Volksvertegenwoordigers.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., 2018. Is there a parliamentary peace? Parliamentary veto power and military interventions from Kosovo to Daesh. The British journal of politics and international relations, 1369148117745859, 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., et al., 2018. Party politics at the water’s edge: contestation of military operations in Europe. European political science review, 10, 537–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., 2020. The democratic politics of military interventions. Political parties, contestation, and decisions to use force abroad. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., Peters, D., and Glahn, C. 2010. Parliamentary war powers around the World, 1989-2004. A New Dataset. DFAC Occasional Papers.
   Google Scholar