Prevention of terrorism, extremism and radicalisation in Sweden: a sociological institutional perspective on development and change

References

• Andersson Malmros, R., 2019. From idea to policy: Scandinavian municipalities translating radicalization. Journal for deradicalization (18), 38–73.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson Malmros, R. and Mattsson, C., 2017. Från ord till handlingsplan – En rapport om kommunala handlingsplaner mot våldsbejakande extremism [From words to action plan: a report on municipal action plans against violent extremism]. Stockholm: Sveriges kommuner och landsting.
   Google Scholar
• Argomaniz, J., 2009. Post-9/11 institutionalization of European Union counter-terrorism: emergence, acceleration and inertia. European security, 18 (2), 151–172.
   Google Scholar
• Balestrini, P.P., 2020. Public opinion and terrorism: does the national economic, societal and political context really matter? European security, 29 (2), 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkland, T., 2004. “The world changed today”: agenda-setting and policy change in the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks. Review of policy research, 21 (2), 179–200.
   Google Scholar
• Bodström, T. 2006. Terrorismen slår mot demokratin [Terrorism strikes against democracy]. Aftonbladet, 12 August, p. 30.
   Google Scholar
• Bossong, R., ed. 2012. The evolution of EU counter-terrorism: European security policy after 9/11. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brinson, M.E. and Stohl, M., 2012. Media framing of terrorism: implications for public opinion, civil liberties, and counterterrorism policies. Journal of international and intercultural communication, 5 (4), 270–290.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, M., 2001. Counterterrorism policy and the political process. Studies in conflict and terrorism, 24 (5), 329–337.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, L., 2018. Review of educational initiatives in counter-extremism internationally: what works? Gothenburg: The Segerstedt Institute, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Du Gay, P., 1996. Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Duriau, V., Reger, R., and Pfarrer, M., 2007. A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational research methods, 10 (1), 5–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fligstein, N. and McAdam, D., 2012. A theory of fields. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, F., 2009. Reforming counterterrorism: institutions and organizational routines in Britain and France. Security studies, 18 (3), 435–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W.A. and Modigliani, A., 1989. Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach. American journal of sociology, 95 (1), 1–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., et al., 2016. Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of management journal, 59 (6), 1880–1895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E., 1974. Frame analysis: an essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., and Hinings, C.R., 2002. Theorizing change: the role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of management journal, 45 (1), 58–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodal, S., 2007. The emergence of a new organizational field: labels, meaning and emotions in nanotechnology. Thesis (PhD). Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Grodal, S. and O’Mahony, S., 2017. How does a grand challenge become displaced? explaining the duality of field mobilization. Academy of management journal, 60 (5), 1801–1827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, L. and Ranstorp, M., 2017. Swedish foreign fighters in Syria and Iraq. Stockholm: Center for Asymmetric Threat Studies, Swedish Defense University.
   Google Scholar
• Harris-Hogan, S., Barrelle, K., and Zammit, A., 2016. What is countering violent extremism? exploring CVE policy and practice in Australia. Behavioral sciences of terrorism and political aggression, 8 (1), 6–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, O., 2010. Constructing crises (in) securitising terror: the punctuated evolution of EU counter-terror strategy. European security, 19 (3), 445–466.
   Google Scholar
• Heath-Kelly, C., 2013. Counter-terrorism and the counterfactual: producing the “radicalisation”discourse and the UK PREVENT strategy. The British journal of politics and international relations, 15 (3), 394–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herz, M., 2016. Socialt arbete, pedagogik och arbetet mot så kallad våldsbejakande extremism: En översyn [Social work, pedagogy and the work against so-called violent extremism: a review]. Gothenburg: The Segerstedt Institute, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Hinings, C.R., Logue, D.M., and Zietsma, C., 2017. Fields, institutional infrastructure and governance. In: R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. Lawrence, and R. Meyer, eds. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: Sage, 163–189.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A., 1999. Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of management journal, 42 (4), 351–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A.J. and Ocasio, W., 2001. Not all events are attended equally: toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization science, 12 (4), 414–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundnani, A., 2012. Radicalisation: the journey of a concept. Race & class, 54 (2), 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindekilde, L., 2012. Introduction: assessing the effectiveness of counter–radicalisation policies in northwestern Europe. Critical studies on terrorism, 5 (3), 335–344.
   Google Scholar
• Lööw, H., Mattsson, C., and Poohl, D. 2013. Olika slag av extremism kräver olika slags åtgärder [Different forms of extremism demands different measures]. Dagens Nyheter, 15 December, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., Ventresca, M., and Hirsch, P.M., 2003. Social movements, field frames and industry emergence: a cultural–political perspective on US recycling. Socio-economic review, 1 (1), 71–104.
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, S. and Hardy, C., 2009. Discourse and deinstitutionalization: the decline of DDT. Academy of management journal, 52 (1), 148–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkki, L., 2016. International pressure to perform: counterterrorism policy development in Finland. Studies in conflict & terrorism, 39 (4), 342–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattsson, C. and Johansson, T., 2019. Life trajectories into and out of contemporary neo-Nazism: becoming and unbecoming the hateful other. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A., 1982. Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative science quarterly, 27 (4), 515–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R.E. and Höllerer, M.A., 2010. Meaning structures in a contested issue field: a topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of management journal, 53 (6), 1241–1262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir, K.A., 2005. The social construction of events: a study of institutional change in the photographic field. Organization studies, 26 (1), 93–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigam, A. and Ocasio, W., 2010. Event attention, environmental sensemaking, and change in institutional logics: an inductive analysis of the effects of public attention to Clinton’s health care reform initiative. Organization science, 21 (4), 823–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, D. and Hansén, D., 2010. Converging under pressure? Counterterrorism policy developments in the European Union member states. Public administration, 88 (1), 190–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien, P., 2016. Counter-terrorism in Europe: the elusive search for order. European security, 25 (3), 366–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekgul, C. 2010. De skapar en kränkt muslimsk identitet [They create a violated Muslim identity]. Aftonbladet, 18 December, p. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Pride, R.A., 1995. How activists and media frame social problems: critical events versus performance trends for schools. Political communication, 12 (1), 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranstorp, M. and Hyllengren, P., 2013. Förebyggande av våldsbejakande extremism i tredjeland: Åtgärder för att förhindra att personer ansluter sig till väpnade extremistgrupper i konfliktzoner [Prevention of violent extremism in third countries: measures to prevent people from joining armed extremist groups in conflict zones]. Stockholm: Swedish National Defence College.
   Google Scholar
• Ranstorp, M. and Hyllengren, P. 2015. Stort behov förebygga radikalisering i Sverige [Great need to prevent radicalisation in Sweden]. Dagens Nyheter, 16 February, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlin, M. 2016. Många kommuner saknar en plan mot extremism [Many municipalities lack a policy against extremism]. Dagens Nyheter, 20 April, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W.R., 2014. Institutions and organizations: ideas, interests, and identities. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sivenbring, J. and Andersson Malmros, R., 2019. Mixing logics: multiagency approaches for countering violent extremism. Gothenburg: The Segerstedt Institute, University of Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B.K., Stohl, M., and Al-Gharbi, M., 2019. Discourses on countering violent extremism: the strategic interplay between fear and security after 9/11. Critical Studies on terrorism, 12 (1), 151–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A. and Benford, R.D., 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International social movement research, 1 (1), 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, A., 2010. The tabloid terrorist: the predicative construction of new terrorism in the media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, A., 2012. The social construction of terrorism: media, metaphors and policy implications. Journal of international relations and development, 15 (3), 393–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandh, V. and Eklund, N., 2015. Swedish counterterrorism policy: an intersection between prevention and mitigation? Studies in conflict and terrorism, 38 (5), 359–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R., 2005. Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative science quarterly, 50 (1), 35–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Ministry of Culture. 2011. Handlingsplan för att värna demokrati mot våldsbejakande extremism [Action plan to protect democracy against violent extremism]. (Report No. Skr. 2011/12:44). Available from: https://www.regeringen.se/rattsliga-dokument/skrivelse/2011/12/skr.-20111244/ [Accessed 31 August 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Security Police. 2010. Våldsbejakande islamistisk extremism i sverige [Violent-affirming Islamic extremism in Sweden]. Available from: https://www.cve.se/download/18.62c6cfa2166eca5d70e2160/1547452379244/Säpo%20Våldsbejakande%20islamistisk%20extremism%202010.pdf [Accessed 31 August 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, F., 2014. Suspect communities – targeting violent extremism at the local level: policies of engagement in Amsterdam, Berlin, and London. Terrorism and political violence, 26 (2), 286–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietsma, C., et al., 2017. Field or fields? Building the scaffolding for cumulation of research on institutional fields. Academy of management annals, 11 (1), 391–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar