Contested views? Tracing European positions on lethal autonomous weapon systems

References

• Barbé, E., and Badell, D., 2020. The EU and lethal autonomous weapons systems: united in diversity? In: E. Johansson-Nogués, M.C. Vlaskamp, and E. Barbé, eds. European Union contested: foreign policy in a new global context. Cham: Springer, 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Barbé, E., Costa, O., and Kissack, R., 2016. EU policy responses to a shifting multilateral system. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Belgian Parliament, 2018. Proposition de résolution visant à interdire l’utilisation, pour la défense belge, de robots tueurs et de drones armés. Brussels: Defence Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Biedenkopf, K., Costa, O., and Góra, M., 2021. Introduction: shades of contestation and politicisation of CFSP. European security, 30 (3), 325–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, I., and Huelss, H., 2018. Autonomous weapons systems and changing norms in international relations. Review of international studies, 44 (3), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulanin, V., and Verbruggen, M., 2017. Mapping the development of autonomy in weapon systems. Stockholm: SIPRI.
   Google Scholar
• Calcara, A., 2020. The European Defence Agency and the Subcommittee on Security and Defence: a “discursive coalition” for EU defence research. In: A. Calcara, R. Csernatoni, and C. Lavallée, eds. Emerging security technologies and EU governance: actors, practices and processes. London: Routledge, 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O., 2009. The unexpected EU leadership on landmines: the influence of the Ottawa Convention on the EU. European security, 18 (3), 245–261.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O. 2019. The politicization of EU external relations. Journal of European Public Policy, 26 (5), 790–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, O., Collantes-Celador, G., and Badell, D., 2021. The dog that did not bark: the EU and the clash between sovereignty and justice in the International Criminal Court. European security, 30 (3), 402–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the EU. 2020. CFSP report-our priorities in 2020. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Delcker, J., 2019. France, Germany under fire for failing to back ‘killer robots’ ban. Politico, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, T., 2008. Good citizen Europe. International affairs, 84 (1), 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEAS. 2018. International security and lethal autonomous weapons.
   Google Scholar
• Elgström, O., 2000. Norm negotiations: the construction of new norms regarding gender and development in EU foreign aid policy. Journal of European public policy, 7 (3), 457–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EUGS. 2016. EU Global Strategy. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EUGS. 2017. Implementing the EU Global Strategy Year 1. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EUGS. 2018. Implementing the EU Global Strategy Year 2. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EUGS. 2019. Three years on, looking forward. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2021. Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial intelligence Act). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2018. European Parliament resolution on autonomous weapon systems. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2021a. Artificial intelligence: questions of interpretation and application of international law. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2021b. AIDA working paper on ‘The external policy dimensions of AI’. Brussels: European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• European Union, 2013. Interactive dialogue with Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, and with the Special Rapporteur on internally displaced persons. Geneva: EU Permanent Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2015. European Union Statement by H.E. Mr Peter Sørensen, Ambassador, Permanent Delegation of the European, Union to the United Nations and other international organisations in Geneva Meeting of the High Contracting Parties to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons. Geneva: EU Permanent Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, U., and Sartori, P. 2019. Machine Politics: Europe and the AI Revolution. ECFR Policy Brief.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and Sikkink, K., 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. International organization, 52 (4), 887–917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government of Croatia, 2015a. Closing statement of the Republic of Croatia. UNCCW informal meeting of experts on lethal autonomous weapons systems. Geneva: Croatia Permanent Delegation to the UN.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Croatia, 2015b. Opening statement of the Republic of Croatia. UNCCW informal meeting of experts on lethal autonomous weapons systems. Geneva: Croatia Permanent Delegation to the UN.
   Google Scholar
• Government of France, 2015. Convention sur Certaines Armes Classiques (CCAC) Réunion informelle d’experts sur les systèmes d’armes letaux autonomes (SALA) Intervention générale. Geneva: France Permanent Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• Government of France, 2016. Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (UNCCW). Meeting of experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) non-paper characterization of a laws. Geneva: France Permanent Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• Government of France, 2018. Human-machine interaction in the development, deployment and use of emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems. Geneva: France Permanent Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• Government of France, 2019. Discours de Florence Parly, Ministre des Armées: intelligence artificielle et défense. Saclay: Government of France.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Germany, 2015. UNCCW expert meeting lethal autonomous weapons systems final statement by Germany. Geneva: Germany Permanent Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Germany. 2018. Speech by the Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs, Heiko Maas, Member of the German Bundestag at the general debate of the 73rd General Assembly of the United Nations. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Germany. 2019. Speech by Federal Foreign Minister Heiko Maas at the Conference 2019 Capturing Technology. Rethinking Arms Control. Berlin: German Federal Foreign Office.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Ireland, 2018. Group of Governmental Experts lethal autonomous weapons systems convention on certain conventional weapons Ireland’s intervention. Geneva: Ireland Permanent Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Slovenia, 2018. Statement of Slovenia. GGE LAWS. Geneva: Slovenia Permanent Delegation.
   Google Scholar
• Governments of Belgium, Ireland, & Luxembourg. 2019. Food for thought paper. 4th Session of the GGE LAWS, Geneva, 25–29 March 2019. Geneva: Governments of Belgium, Ireland, and Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson, C., 2021. The European Commission’s new role in EU security and defence cooperation: the case of the European Defence Fund. European security, 30 (4), 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland Michel, A., 2020. The black box, unlocked: predictability and understandability in military AI. Geneva: UN Institute for Disarmament Research.
   Google Scholar
• Horrowitz, M.C. 2018. The algorithms of August. Foreign Policy. Available from https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/09/12/will-the-united-states-lose-the-artificial-intelligence-arms-race/ [Accessed 22 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and Marks, G., 2009. A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British journal of political science, 39 (1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Rights Council, 2013. Report of the Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions, Christof Heyns. Geneva: Human Rights Council.
   Google Scholar
• Human Rights Watch. 2016. Killer robots and the concept of meaningful human control. Memorandum to Convention on Conventional Weapons (UNCCW) Delegates April 2016 Introduction, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde-Price, A., 2006. Normative’ power Europe: a realist critique. Journal of European public policy, 13 (2), 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICRC, 2016. Views of the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on autonomous weapon systems. Geneva: UN Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.
   Google Scholar
• Jenichen, A., 2020. The politics of normative power Europe: norm entrepreneurs and contestation in the making of EU external human rights policy. Journal of common market studies, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson-Nogués, E., Vlaskamp, M., and Barbé, E., 2020. European Union contested: foreign policy in a new global context. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S., and Delreux, T. 2014. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., and Schimmelfennig, F. 2009. EU rules beyond EU borders: theorizing external governance in European politics, Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6): 791–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. Normative Power Europe: A Contradication in Terms? Journal of Common Market Studies, 40 (2), 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, James G., and Olsen, Johan P., 2004. The logic of appropriateness. In: R.E Goodin, M. Moran, and M. Rein, eds. The Oxford handbook of public policy, 689–708. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, H. and Wright. N. 2021. Still governing in the shadows? Member states and the political and security committee in the post-lisbon EU Foreign policy architecture*. Journal of common market studies, 59 (4), 856–872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministère des Armées, 2019. L’intelligence artificielle au service de la défense. Paris: Ministère des Armées.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F., 2018a. High representative letter to members of the Global Tech Panel (June 2018). Brussels: EEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F., 2018b. High representative letter to members of the Global Tech Panel (October 2018). Brussels: EEAS.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, E., and Stefan, C.G. 2020. Normative power Europe? The EU’s embrace of the responsibility to protect in a transitional international order. Journal of common market studies, 58 (2), 472–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onuf, N. 1997. A Constructivist manifesto. In K. Burch, & R.A. Denemark (Eds.), Constituting international political economy. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, K., 2021. I, Warbot. London: Hurst Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Political Declaration, 2017. Examination of various dimensions of emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems, in the context of the objectives and purposes of the convention. Geneva: Submitted by France and Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Risse, T. 2000. Let's argue. International Organization, 54 (1), 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roff, H.M., and Moyes, R. 2016. Meaningful human control, artificial intelligence and autonomous weapons.
   Google Scholar
• Sauer, F., 2020. Stepping back from the brink: why multilateral regulation of autonomy in weapons systems is difficult, yet imperative and feasible. International review of the red cross, 102 (913), 235–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharre, P., 2017. The opportunity and challenge of autonomous sytems. In: A. Wiliiams and P. Scharre, eds. Autonomous systems: issues for defence policymakers. The Hague: NATO Communications and Information Agency, 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, L., 2021. Mapping global AI governance: a nascent regime in a fragmented landscape. AI and ethics, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Stimmer, A., and Wisken, L. 2019. The dynamics of dissent: When actions are louder than words. International Affairs, 95 (3), 515–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D. 2021. The return of intergovernmentalism? De- Europeanisation and EU Foreign policy decisionmaking. Journal of European Integration, 43 (5), 619–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General, 2018a. Remarks at the university of Geneva on the launch of the disarmament agenda. Geneva: UN Secretary-General.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General, 2018b. Remarks at “Web Summit”. Lisbon: Web Summit.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General, 2018c. Remarks to the conference on disarmament. Geneva: UN Secretary-General.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2016a. Advanced Version Recommendations to the 2016 Review Conference Submitted by the Chairperson of the Informal Meeting of Experts. Geneva: CCW.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2016b. Advanced Version Report of the 2016 Informal Meeting of Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS) Submitted by the Chairperson of the Informal Meeting of Experts. Geneva: CCW.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2017. Report of the 2017 Group of Governmental Experts on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems (LAWS). Geneva: CCW.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2018. Report of the 2018 session of the Group of Governmental Experts on Emerging Technologies in the Area of Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems. Geneva: CCW.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2021. Letter dated 8 March 2021 from the Panel of Experts on Libya established pursuant to resolution 1973 (2011) addressed to the President of the Security Council.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W., 2017. Liberal power Europe. Journal of common market studies, 55 (6), 1398–1414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiener, A. 2007. The dual quality of norms and governance beyond the state: Sociological and normative approaches to ‘interaction.’ Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 10 (1), 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Wiener, A., 2014. A theory of norm contestation. Cham: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar