Cyber conflict short of war: a European strategic vacuum

References

• Abrahamsen, Rita, 2017. Africa and international relations: assembling Africa, studying the world. African affairs, 116 (462), 125–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, Thierry, and Cavelty, Myriam D., 2016. A theory of actor-network for cyber-security. European journal of international security, 1 (2), 176–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeke, Sergei, 2018. Hackers, wiz kids, en offensieve cyberoperaties. Atlantisch perspectief, 42 (5), 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Boeke, Sergei, and Broeders, Dennis, 2018. The demilitarisation of cyber conflict. Survival, 60 (6), 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghard, Erica D., and Lonergan, Shawn W., 2017. The logic of coercion in cyberspace. Security studies, 26 (3), 452–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeders, Dennis, 2017. Aligning the international protection of ‘the public core of the internet’ with state sovereignty and national security. Journal of cyber policy, 2 (3), 366–376.
   Google Scholar
• Breitenbauch, Henrik, and Liebetrau, Tobias, 2021. Technology competition: implications for the West and Denmark. Copenhagen: Djøf Publishing and The Centre for Military Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Ben, 2016. The cybersecurity dilemma: hacking, trust, and fear between nations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bunk, Joost, and Smeets, Max, 2021. Dutch cyber security strategy. In: Scott N. Romaniuk and Mary Manjikian, eds. Routledge companion to global cyber-security strategy. London: Routledge, 132–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cavelty, Myriam D., and Egloff, Florian J., 2019. The politics of cybersecurity: balancing different roles of the state. St Antony’s international review, 15 (1), 37–57.
   Google Scholar
• Cavelty, Myriam D, 2018. Cybersecurity research meets science and technology studies. Politics and governance, 6 (2), 22–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney, Robert, and Smeets, Max W., 2020. The dynamic of cyber conflict and competition. Texas national security review, 3 (4), 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chopin, Olivier, 2017. Intelligence reform and the transformation of the state: the end of a French exception. Journal of strategic studies, 40 (4), 532–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen and Liebetrau, 2019. A new role for ‘the public’? Exploring cyber security controversies in the case of WannaCry. Intelligence and national security, 34 (3), 395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claver, Alexander, 2018. Governance of cyber warfare in the Netherlands: an exploratory investigation. The international journal of intelligence, security, and public affairs, 20 (2), 155–180.
   Google Scholar
• Crerar, Pippa, Henley, Jon, and Wintour, Patrick, 2018. Russia accused of cyber-attack on chemical weapons watchdog. The Guardian, 4, October.
   Google Scholar
• Commission du Livre blanc sur la défense et la sécurité nationale. 2008. Livre Blanc sur la Défense et Sécurité nationale 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Commission du Livre blanc sur la défense et la sécurité nationale. 2013. Livre Blanc sur la Défense et Sécurité nationale 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Darwish, Amber, and Romaniuk, Scott N., 2020. Cyber security in the French Republic. In: Scott N. Romaniuk and Mary Manjikian, eds. Routledge companion to global cyber-security strategy. London: Routledge, 62–72.
   Google Scholar
• Delerue, François, and Géry, Aude. 2018. France’s Cyber Defense Strategic Review and International Law, Lawfare.
   Google Scholar
• Delerue, François Delerue, Desforges, Alix, and Géry, Aude, 2019. A close look at France’s new military cyber strategy. War on the Rocks.
   Google Scholar
• Devanny, Joe, and Stevens, Tim, 2021. What will Britain’s new Cyber Force actually do? War on the Rocks.
   Google Scholar
• Devanny, Joe, et al. 2021. The National Cyber Force that Britain needs?, Project Report. King’s College London; London.
   Google Scholar
• Ducheine, P.A.L., and Pijpers, Peter. 2020. The notion of cyber operations, Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-09, Amsterdam Center for International Law No. 2020-08.
   Google Scholar
• Ducheine, P.A.L., Arnold, K.L., and Pijpers, Peter. 2020. Decision-making and Parliamentary control for International Military Cyber operations by the Netherlands Armed Forces. Amsterdam Law School Research Paper No. 2020-07, Amsterdam Center for International Law No. 2020-06.
   Google Scholar
• Fischerkeller, Michael P., and Harknett, Richard J., 2017. Deterrence is not a credible strategy for cyberspace. Orbis, 61 (3), 381–393.
   Google Scholar
• Fischerkeller, Michael P., and Harknett, Richard J. 2019. Persistent engagement, agreed competition, and cyberspace interaction dynamics and escalation. The Cyber Defence Review, special edition, p. 267–287.
   Google Scholar
• Flybjerg, Bent, 2006. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, 12 (2), 232–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsvaret. 2019. Et styrket forsvar – Forsvarssjefens Fagmilitære Råd.
   Google Scholar
• Forsvarsdepartementet. 2012. Et forsvar for vår tid – Langtidsplan for Forsvaret 2013-2016.
   Google Scholar
• Forsvarsdepartementet, 2014. Forsvarsdepartementets retningslinjer for informasjonssikkerhet og cyberoperasjoner. Oslo: Forsvarsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Forsvarsdepartementet. 2016. Kampkraft og bærekraft 2017-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Forsvarsdepartementet. 2018. Høringsnotat. Forslag til ny lov om Etterretningstjenesten, 12. November, Oslo: Forsvarsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Forsvarsdepartementet. 2019. cyberoperasjoner [cyber operations]. Letter to the author.
   Google Scholar
• Forsvarsdepartementet. 2020. Prop. 14 S (2020–2021). Evne til forsvar – vilje til beredskap. Langtidsplan for forsvarssektoren.
   Google Scholar
• Friis, Karsten, 2020. Offensive cyberoperasjoner: Den nye normalen? Økonomi og politik, 93 (3), 30–44.
   Google Scholar
• Garfinkel, Ben, and Dafoe, Allan, 2019. How does the offense-defense balance scale? Journal of strategic studies, 42 (6), 736–763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzke, Gartzke, 2013. The myth of cyberwar: bringing war in cyberspace back down to earth. International security, 38 (2), 41–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartzke, Erik, and Lindsay, Jon R., 2015. Weaving tangled webs: offense, defense, and deception in cyberspace. Security studies, 24 (29), 316–348.
   Google Scholar
• Gioe, David V, Goodman, Michael S., and Stevens, Tim, 2020. Intelligence in the cyber era: evolution or revolution? Political science quarterly, 135 (2), 191–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goede, Marieke De, Bosma, Esmé, and Pallister-Wilkins, Polly, 2019. Secrecy and methods in security research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, Colin, 1999. Modern strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harknett, Richard J., and Goldman, Emily, 2016. The search for cyber fundamentals. Journal of information warfare, 15 (2), 81–88.
   Google Scholar
• Harknett, Richard J., and Smeets, Max, 2020. Cyber campaigns and strategic outcomes. Journal of Strategic studies.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, Jason, 2013. A fierce domain: conflict in cyberspace, 1986 to 2012. Arlington, VA: Cyber Conflict Studies Association.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, Jason, 2019. The implications of persistent (and permanent) engagement in cyberspace. Journal of cybersecurity, 5 (1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennis-Plasschaert, Jeanine A, 2015. Defence cyber strategy: letter from the minister of defence.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, Wyatt, 2019. Is cyber strategy possible? The Washington quarterly, 42 (1), 131–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogeveen, Bart, 2018. A rare insight into cyber espionage: Dutch intelligence and two Russian bears. Australian Strategic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, Jeppe T, 2021. Cyber offense in NATO: challenges and opportunities. International affairs, 97 (3), 703–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, Lucas, 2013. The meaning of the cyber revolution: perils to theory and statecraft. Quarterly Journal: International Security, 38 (2), 7–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinkenberg, J.C., and Dieker, J.B., 2021. Geloofwaardige afschrikking in het cyberdomein? Militaire Spectator.
   Google Scholar
• Klimburg, Alexander, 2020. Mixed signals: a flawed approach to cyber deterrence. Survival, 62 (1), 107–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knapen, H.P.M. 2021. Breif van De Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken. Den Haag, 6. October 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Laudrain, Arthur P.B, 2019. France’s new offensive cyber doctrine. Lawfare.
   Google Scholar
• Le Drian, Jean Yves. 2016. Déclaration de M. Jean-Yves Le Drian, ministre de la défense, sur la cyberdéfense, à Bruz, 12. December.
   Google Scholar
• Liebetrau, Tobias, and Christensen, Kristoffer K., 2021. The ontological politics of cyber security: emerging agencies, actors, sides and spaces. European journal of international security, 6 (1), 25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Jon R., and Kello, Lucas, 2014. Correspondence: a cyber disagreement. International security, 39 (2), 181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Jon R, 2021. Cyber conflict vs. Cyber Command: hidden dangers in the American military solution to a large-scale intelligence problem. Intelligence and National security, 36 (2), 260–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministère des Armées. 2017. Defence and National Security Strategic Review.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Armées. 2019a. Politique ministérielle de lutte informatique défensive.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Armées. 2019b. Éléments publics de doctrine militaire de lutte informatique offensive.
   Google Scholar
• Ministère des Armées. 2021. Éléments publics de doctrine militaire de lutte informatique d’influence (L21).
   Google Scholar
• Nakasone, Paul M, 2019. A Cyber Force for persistent operations. Joint force quarterly, 92 (19), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2021. Brussels Summit Communiqué, 14, June.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph Jr., 2016/17. Deterrence and dissuasion in cyberspace. International security, 41 (3), 44–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parly, Florence. 2019a. Déclaration de Mme Florence Parly, ministre des armées, sur le volet de la cyberdéfense des armées, à Paris, 18, janvier.
   Google Scholar
• Parly, Florence. 2019b. Discours de Florence Parly, ministre des Armées, à l’inauguration du premier bâtiment du commandement de la cyberdéfense du ministère des Armées, à Rennes, 3 October.
   Google Scholar
• Perlroth, Nicole, 2021. This is how they tell Me the world ends: the cyberweapons arms race. New York: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Rid, Thomas, and Buchanan, Ben, 2014. Attributing cyber attacks. Journal of Strategic studies, 38 (1–2), 4–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rover, Joshua. 2019. Cyber war as an intelligence contest, War on the Rocks, Sept. 16. 2019. Available from: https://warontherocks.com/2019/09/cyber-war-as-an-intelligence-contest/.
   Google Scholar
• Rovner, Joshua. 2020. “The intelligence contest in cyberspace.” Lawfare, March 26, 2020. Available from: https://www.lawfareblog.com/intelligence-contest-cyberspace.
   Google Scholar
• Secrétariat général de la défense et de la sécurité nationale. 2018. Strategic review of cyber defence.
   Google Scholar
• Slayton, Rebecca, 2017. What is the cyber offense-defense balance? Conceptions, causes and assessment. International security, 41 (3), 72–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, Max, and Lin, Herbet, 2019. A strategic assessment of the U.S. Cyber Command vision. In: H Lin and A Zegart, eds. Bytes, bombs and spies: the strategic dimensions of offensive cyber operations. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 81–104.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, Max, 2017. A matter of time: on the transitory nature of cyberweapons. Journal of strategic studies, 41 (1–2), 6–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeets, Max, 2018. The strategic promise of offensive cyber operations. Strategic studies quarterly, 12 (3), 90–113.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, Max. 2019. NATO members’ organizational path towards conducting offensive cyber operations: a framework for analysis. 11th International Conference on Cyber Conflict. Silent Battle, NATO CCD COE Publications, Tallinn.
   Google Scholar
• Smeets, Max, 2020. U.S. cyber strategy of persistent engagement & defending forward: implications for the alliance and intelligence collection. Intelligence and national security, 35 (3), 444–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, Tim, 2018a. Global cybersecurity: new directions in theory and methods politics and governance. Politics and Governance, 6 (2), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, Tim, 2018b. Cyberweapons: power and the governance of the invisible. International politics, 55, 482–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taillat, Stéphane, 2019. Signaling, victory, and strategy in France’s military cyber doctrine. War on the rocks.
   Google Scholar
• Texas National Security Review. 2002. https://tnsr.org/volume-3-issue-4/
   Google Scholar
• The Dutch Defence Cyber Command. 2019. The Netherlands Armed Forces Doctrine for Military Cyberspace Operations.
   Google Scholar
• The Dutch Military Security and Intelligence Service. 2020. 2019 Public Annual Report.
   Google Scholar
• The Dutch Ministry of Defence. 2012. Defense cyber strategy.
   Google Scholar
• The Dutch Ministry of Defence. 2018. Defense cyber strategy.
   Google Scholar
• The Dutch National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism. 2018. National cyber security agenda.
   Google Scholar
• The Dutch National Coordinator for Security and Counterterrorism. 2020. Cyber security assessment Netherlands 2020.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Cyber Command. 2018. Achieve and maintain cyberspace superiority command vision for US Cyber Command.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense. 2018. Department of defense cyber strategy – summary.
   Google Scholar
• Valeriano, Brandon, Jensen, Benjamin, and Maness, Ryan C., 2018. Cyber strategy: the evolving character of cyber power and coercion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vitel, Philippe, and Bliddal, Henrik, 2015. French cybersecurity and defence: an overview. Information & security: an international journal, 32 (1), 29–41.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Michael, 2012. Cybersecurity: a pre-history. Intelligence and national security, 27 (5), 781–799.
   Google Scholar