References
- Adler-Nissen, R., 2014. Stigma management in international relations: transgressive identities, norms, and order in international society. International organization, 68 (1), 143–176.
- Hansson, S., 2015. Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: a framework for analysis. Discourse & Society, 26 (3), 297–322.
- Hansson, S., 2018a. Analysing opposition–government blame games: argument models and strategic maneuvering. Critical Discourse Studies, 15 (3), 228–246.
- Hansson, S., 2018b. The discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: unpacking the language of government blame games. Policy sciences, 51 (4), 545–564.
- Madisson, M.L., and Ventsel, A. 2020. Strategic conspiracy narratives: A semiotic approach. London: Routledge.
- Ventsel, A., Hansson, S., Madisson, M.L. and Sazonov, V., 2021. Discourse of fear in strategic narratives: the case of Russia’s Zapad war games. Media, war & conflict, 14 (1), 21–39.
- Balzacq, T., and Rousseau, E., 2020. Blame and complicity in international relations: making non-intervention morally bearable. European review of international studies, 7 (2–3), 293–316.
- Boffey, D., and Rankin, J. 2017. EU escalates its campaign against Russian propaganda. The Guardian. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/jan/23/eu-escalates-campaign-russian-propaganda.
- Burunov, Oleg. 2020. Huawei official claims ‘US can’t afford to work without’ Chinese tech giant. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/business/202002291078436838-huawei-official-claims-us-cant-afford-to-work-without-chinese-tech-giant/.
- Chaban, N., Miskimmon, A., and O’Loughlin, B., 2019. Understanding EU crisis diplomacy in the European neighbourhood: strategic narratives and perceptions of the EU in Ukraine, Israel and Palestine. European security, 28 (3), 235–250.
- Crilley, R., and Chatterje-Doody, P.N., 2020. Emotions and war on YouTube: affective investments in RT’s visual narratives of the conflict in Syria. Cambridge review of international affairs, 33 (5), 713–733.
- Dajani, D., Gillespie, M., and Crilley, R., 2021. Differentiated visibilities: RT Arabic’s narration of Russia’s role in the Syrian war. Media, war & conflict, 14 (4), 437–458.
- Flaherty, E., and Roselle, L., 2018. Contentious narratives and Europe: conspiracy theories and strategic narratives surroundin,g RT’s Brexit news coverage. Journal of international affairs, 71 (1.5), 53–60.
- Campell, Kwan. 2020. US District Court dismisses Huawei lawsuit that federal ban is unconstitutional. ZD Net, February 19. Available from: https://www.zdnet.com/article/us-district-court-dismisses-huawei-lawsuit-that-federal-ban-is-unconstitutional/.
- Cureton, D. 2020a. Trump’s Trade War costing US influence in Int’l 5G bodies as China, Huawei leads in contributions. Sputnik. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/world/202004301079145669-trumps-trade-war-costing-us-influence-in-intl-5g-bodies-as-china-huawei-leads-in-contributions/.
- Cureton, D. 2020b. After winter comes spring: Huawei product launch impresses with fresh 5G devices, high sales growth. Sputnik. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/business/202002251078400633-after-winter-comes-spring-huawei-product-launch-impresses-with-fresh-5g-devices-high-sales-growth/.
- Cureton, D. 2020c. Huawei slams WSJ report claiming proof of backdoor spying as WaPo reveals CIA tech spied for decades. Sputnik. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/business/202002131078303467-huawei-slams-wsj-report-claiming-proof-of-backdoor-spying-as-wapo-reveals-cia-tech-spied-for/.
- Doncheva, Tihomira. 2020. Tracking Russia’s narratives in the Western Balkan media. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. Available from: https://stratcomcoe.org/tracking-russias-narratives-western-balkan-media.
- Ekimenko, S. 2020. ‘Nipping at Huawei’s heels’: US seeking viable alternatives to Chinese tech giant’s dominance. Sputnik, March 9. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/world/202003091078517439-nipping-at-huaweis-heels-us-seeking-viable-alternatives-to-chinese-tech-giants-dominance/.
- Elswah, M., and Howard, P.N., 2020. “Anything that causes chaos”: the organizational behavior of Russia Today (RT). Journal of communication, 70 (5), 623–645.
- Epifanova, Alena. 2020. Deciphering Russia’s “Sovereign Internet Law”: tightening control and accelerating the Splinternet. German Council of Foreign Policy: DGP Analysis, No 2. Available from: https://dgap.org/sites/default/files/article_pdfs/dgap-analyse_2-2020_epifanova_0.pdf.
- Epstein, C., 2008. The power of words in international relations: birth of an anti-whaling discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Epstein, C., 2011. Who speaks? Discourse, the subject and the study of identity in international politics. European journal of international relations, 17 (2), 327–350.
- Erskine, T., 2008. Locating responsibility: the problem of moral agency in international relations. In: C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, eds. The Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 699–707.
- Fournier, P., Soroka, S.N., and Nir, L., 2020. Negativity biases and political ideology: a comparative test across 17 countries. American political science review, 114 (3), 775–791. ).
- Fritz, K.G., and Miller, D., 2018. Hypocrisy and the standing to blame. Pacific philosophical quarterly, 99 (1), 118–139.
- Gorian, E., 2020. Genesis of Russian cyber security legal mechanism: an authentic or a trend alike model? In: D. Solovev, V. Savaley, A. Bekker, and V Petukhov, eds. Proceeding of the international science and technology conference “FarEastСon 2019”. smart innovation, systems and technologies, vol. 172. Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-2244-4_90.
- Götz, Elias, and Merlen, Camille-Renaud, 2019. Russia and the question of world order. European politics and society, 20 (2), 133–153.
- Hansson, S., 2017. Anticipative strategies of blame avoidance in government: The case of communication guidelines. Journal of Language and Politics, 16 (2), 219–241.
- Hansson, S. and Page, R. 2022. Legitimation in government social media communication: the case of the Brexit department. Critical Discourse Studies, doi:10.1080/17405904.2022.2058971
- Haugevik, K., and Neumann, C.B., 2021. Reputation crisis management and the state: theorising containment as diplomatic mode. European journal of international relations, doi:10.1177/13540661211008213.
- Hellman, M., and Wagnsson, C., 2017. How can European states respond to Russian information warfare? An analytical framework. European security, 26 (2), 153–170.
- Hinck, Robert S., Kluver, Randolph, and Cooley, Skye, 2018. Russia re-envisions the world: strategic narratives in Russian broadcast and news media during 2015. Russian journal of communication, 10 (1), 21–37.
- Hinterleitner, M., 2020. Policy controversies and political blame games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hood, C., 2011. The blame game: spin, bureaucracy and self-preservation in government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Hutchison, E., 2016. Affective communities in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Hutchison, E., and Bleiker, R., 2014. Theorizing emotions in world politics. International theory, 6 (3), 491–514.
- Jaworsky, B.N., and Qiaoan, R., 2021. The politics of blaming: the narrative battle between China and the US over COVID-19. Journal of Chinese political science, 26 (2), 295–315.
- Kaska, Kadri, Beckvard, Hendrik, and Minárik, Tomáš, 2019. Huawei, 5G and China as a security threat. Tallinn: The NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence (CCDCOE).
- Kim, M.J., Lee, H., and Kwak, J., 2020. The changing patterns of China’s international standardisation in ICT under techno-nationalism: a reflection through 5G standardisation. International journal of information management, 54, 102145.
- King, M., 2019. Attending to blame. Philosophical studies, 177, 1423–1439.
- Korolev, A., 2018. Theories of non-balancing and Russia’s foreign policy. Journal of strategic studies, 41 (6), 887–912.
- Korso, T. 2020a. US Carriers to report any Huawei and ZTE equipment in use as Washington plans to pay for its removal. Sputnik, February 27. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/us/202002271078420152-us-carriers-to-report-any-huawei-and-zte-equipment-in-use-as-washington-plans-to-pay-for-its/.
- Korso, T. 2020b. Absolutely unrelated: scientists bust myths that 5G equipment helps to spread coronavirus. Sputnik, April 5. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/science/202004051078843659-absolutely-unrelated-scientists-bust-myths-that-5g-equipment-helps-to-spread-coronavirus/.
- Kragh, M., and Åsberg, S., 2017. Russia’s strategy for influence through public diplomacy and active measures: the Swedish case. Journal of strategic studies, 40 (6), 773–816.
- Lanoszka, Alexander, 2019. Disinformation in international politics. European journal of international security, 4 (2), 227–248.
- Lipman, Maria, 2015. Putin’s „Besieged Fortress“ and its ideological arms. In: Maria Lipman and Nikolay Petrov, eds. The state of Russia: what comes next? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 110–136.
- Livingston, S., and Nassetta, J., 2018. Framing and strategic narratives: synthesis and analytical framework. SAIS review of international affairs, 38 (2), 101–110.
- Luoma-Aho, V., Tsetsura, K., and Kugappi, A., 2021. Russian strategic communications on the global stage. In: K. Tsetsura and D. Kruckeberg, eds. Strategic communications in Russia: public relations and advertising. Abingdon: Routledge, 12–25.
- Makarychev, Andrey, 2014. Russia and/versus the EU: from post-political consensus to political contestations. L’Europe en formation, 374 (4), 27–39.
- Manor, I., 2019. The digitalization of public diplomacy. New York: Springer.
- Mckune, Sarah, and Ahmed, Shazeda, 2018. The contestation and shaping of cyber norms through China’s Internet Sovereignty Agenda. International Journal of communication, 12 (2018), 3835–3855.
- Medeiros, Evan S, 2019. The changing fundamentals of US-China relations. The Washington quarterly, 42 (3), 93–119.
- Miazhevich, G., 2018. Nation branding in the post-broadcast era: the case of RT. European journal of cultural studies, 21 (5), 575–593.
- Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., and Roselle, L., 2013. Strategic narratives: communication power and the new world order. New York: Routledge.
- Miskimmon, Alister, O’Loughlin, Ben, and Roselle, Laura, 2017. Introduction. In: A. Miskimmon, B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle, eds. Forging the world: strategic narratives and international relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1–22.
- Miskimmon, Alister, and O’Loughlin, Ben, 2017. Russia’s narratives of global order: great power legacies in a polycentric world. Politics and governance, 5 (3), 111–120.
- A. Miskimmon, B. O’Loughlin, and J. Zeng, eds. 2021. One belt, one road, one story?: towards an EU-China strategic narrative. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Missiroli, Antonio, et al., 2016. Strategic communications: east and south. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
- Nimmo, Ben. 2016. Backdating the Blame: How Russia made NATO a Party of the Ukraine Conflict. NATO Strategic Communications Centre of Excellence. https://www.stratcomcoe.org/backdating-blame-how-russia-made-nato-party-ukraine-conflict-author-ben-nimmo.
- Orttung, R.W., and Nelson, E., 2019. Russia today’s strategy and effectiveness on YouTube. Post-Soviet affairs, 35 (2), 77–92.
- O’Loughlin, Ben, Miskimmon, Alister, and Roselle, Laura, 2017. Strategic narratives: methods and ethics. In: A. Miskimmon, B. O’Loughlin, and L. Roselle, eds. Forging the World: Strategic Narratives and International relations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 23–55.
- Perthes, V., 2021. Dimensions of rivalry: China, the United States, and Europe. China international strategy review, 3, 56–65.
- Pomerantsev, P., 2016. The Kremlin’s information war. In: L. Diamond, M. F. Plattner, and C. Walker, eds. Authoritarianism goes global: the challenge to democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 174–186.
- Pomerantsev, Peter, and Weiss, Michael, 2014. The menace of unreality: how the Kremlin weaponizes information, culture and money. New York: Institute of Modern Russia. Available from: https://www.stratcomcoe.org/peter-pomerantsev-michael-weiss-menace-unreality-how-kremlin-weaponizes-information-culture-and.
- Prozorov, Sergei, 2007. The narratives of exclusion and self-exclusion in the Russian conflict discourse on EU–Russian relations. Political geography, 26 (3), 309–329.
- Ramsay, G., and Robertshaw, S., 2019. Weaponising news: RT, sputnik and targeted disinformation. London: King’s College London: The Policy Institute, Center for the Study of Media, Communication, and Power. Available from: https://www.kcl.ac.uk/policy-institute/assets/weaponising-news.pdf.
- Raud, Mikk, 2016. China and cyber: attitudes, strategies, organisation. The NATO Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence, Tallinn. Available from: https://ccdcoe.org/library/publications/china-and-cyber-attitudes-strategies-organisation/.
- Ringsmose, J., and Børgesen, B.K., 2011. Shaping public attitudes towards the deployment of military power: NATO, Afghanistan and the use of strategic narratives. European security, 20 (4), 505–528.
- RT. 2020a. US charges Huawei with RACKETEERING & attempting to steal American trade secrets. Available from: https://www.rt.com/news/480791-us-charge-huawei-racketeering-steal/.
- RT. 2020b. China warns France not to discriminate against Huawei on 5G contracts. RT, February 10. Available from: https://www.rt.com/business/480477-china-warns-france-huawei/.
- RT. 2020c. Huawei urges UK to stick with 5G collaboration as Chinese firm becomes target of Covid-19 conspiracies. RT. Available from: https://www.rt.com/uk/485695-huawei-china-5g-review-coronavirus/.
- RT. 2020d. ‘The worst kind of fake news’: UK government blasts 5G coronavirus conspiracy theories. RT. Available from: https://www.rt.com/uk/484980-5g-fake-news-uk-government/.
- RT. 2020e. Anti-5G fever spreads to the Netherlands as towers suffer ‘arson and sabotage’. RT. Available from: https://www.rt.com/news/485561-russia-coronavirus-daily-record/.
- RT. 2020f. Huawei urges UK to stick with 5G collaboration as Chinese firm becomes target of Covid-19 conspiracies. RT. Available from: https://www.rt.com/uk/485695-huawei-china-5g-review-coronavirus/.
- RT. 2020g. ‘Is the democratic system so fragile?’ Audience applauds as Pelosi’s Huawei scare session prompts rebuke from Chinese delegate. RT, February 16. Available from: https://www.rt.com/news/480955-pelosi-huawei-rebuke-munich/.
- RT. 2020h. Between a rock and a hard place: UK trying to balance between China & US over Huawei’s 5G rollout. RT, February 21. Available from: https://www.rt.com/business/481393-uk-5g-huawei-us-china/.
- RT. 2020i. Chinese FM after Pompeo & Esper speeches: Replace ‘China’ with ‘US’, and maybe lies become facts? RT, February 15. Available from: https://www.rt.com/news/480929-china-lies-us-huawei-empire/.
- RT. 2020j. Between a rock and a hard place: UK trying to balance between China & US over Huawei’s 5G rollout. RT, February 21. Available from: https://www.rt.com/business/481393-uk-5g-huawei-us-china/.
- RT. 2020k. US attempts to hurt China & Huawei ‘so badly’ will only hurt itself, Huawei USA chief tells Boom Bust. RT, February 19. Available from: https://www.rt.com/business/481202-us-china-huawei-5g/.
- RT. 2020l. Unnamed White House official compares Huawei to ‘the Mafia’. RT, February 26. Available from: https://www.rt.com/business/481709-white-house-huawei-mafia/.
- Russian Federal Law. 2019a. Article 46. No. 90-FZ dated May 1, 2019 “On Amendments to the Federal Law ‘On Communications’ and the Federal Law ‘On Information, Information Technologies, and Information Protection’”, Official Internet Portal for Legal Information, May 1, 2019. Available from: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201905010025?index = 2&rangeSize = 1.
- Russian Federal Law. 2019b. Article 2, “Order of the Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technologies, and Mass Communications No. 224 dated July 31, 2019 ‘On the Approval of the Rules for Routing Telecommunication Messages in the Case of Centralized Management of a Public Communication Network’”, Official internet portal for legal information, November 6, 2019. Available from: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/Document/View/0001201911060018?index = 2&rangeSize = 1.
- Schmitt, O., 2018. When are strategic narratives effective? The shaping of political discourse through the interaction between political myths and strategic narratives. Contemporary security policy, 39 (4), 487–511.
- Scobell, A., 2020. Perception and misperception in US-China relations. Political science quarterly, doi:10.1002/polq.13099.
- Segal, A., 2018. When China rules the web: technology in service of the state. Foreign affairs, 97, 10–18.
- Shifrinson, J., 2020. The rise of China, balance of power theory and US national security: reasons for optimism? Journal of strategic studies, 43 (2), 175–216.
- Soroka, S., and McAdams, S., 2015. News, politics, and negativity. Political communication, 32 (1), 1–22.
- Sputnik. 2020a. Huawei finds renewed ‘Sense of Mission’ in global fight against COVID-19 with record R&D investment. Sputnik. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/business/202003261078714833-huawei-finds-renewed-sense-of-mission-in-global-fight-against-covid-19-with-record-rd-investment/.
- Sputnik. 2020c. There is ‘an Element of Scaremongering’ over Chinese tech firms in UK – Academic. Sputnik. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/analysis/202004141078952175-there-is-an-element-of-scaremongering-over-chinese-tech-firms-in-uk—academic/.
- Sputnik. 2020d. Final bout? White House Chief of Staff to pressure UK to reconsider use of Huawei in 5G – Report, Sputnik. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/world/202002181078340112-final-bout-white-house-chief-of-staff-to-pressure-uk-to-reconsider-use-of-huawei-in-5g–report/.
- Sputnik. 2020e. US delegation to give ‘B*****King’ to UK officials over Huawei 5G decision – Report, Sputnik. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/uk/202002151078320305-us-delegation-to-give-bking-to-uk-officials-over-huawei-5g-decision–report/.
- Sputnik. 2020f. Donald Trump cried ‘Betrayal’ at Boris Johnson’s Huawei 5G move – Report. Sputnik. Available from: https://sputniknews.com/world/202002231078386607-donald-trump-cried-betrayal-at-boris-johnsons-huawei-5g-move–report/.
- Szostek, J., 2018. Nothing is true? The credibility of news and conflicting narratives during “information war” in Ukraine. The international journal of press/politics, 23 (1), 116–135.
- Tang, Min, 2020. Huawei versus the United States? The geopolitics of exterritorial internet infrastructure. International journal of communication, 14 (2020), 4556–4577.
- Tao, L. 2019. Huawei says relationship with Chinese government ‘no different’ from any other private company in China. South China Morning Post. Available from: https://www.scmp.com/tech/big-tech/article/3043558/huawei-says-relationship-chinese-government-no-different-any-other.
- Tolz, V., et al., 2020. Mediatization and journalistic agency: Russian television coverage of the Skripal poisonings. Journalism, doi:10.1177/1464884920941967.
- Turner, S., 2009. Russia, China and a multipolar world order: the danger in the undefined. Asian perspective, 33 (1), 159–184.
- van Leeuwen, T., 2008. Discourse and practice: new tools for critical discourse analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- van Noort, C., 2021. Infrastructure communication in international relations. London: Routledge.
- van Noort, C., 2022. On the use of pride, hope and fear in China’s international artificial intelligence narratives on CGTN. AI & society, doi:10.1007/s00146-022-01393-3.
- van Noort, C., and Colley, T., 2021. How do strategic narratives shape policy adoption? Responses to China’s belt and road initiative. Review of international studies, 47 (1), 39–63.
- Vaswani, K. 2020. US China cold war ‘bigger global threat than virus’. BBC News, June 21. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-53104730.
- Vennesson, P., 2014. War under transnational surveillance: framing ambiguity and the politics of shame. Review of international studies, 40 (1), 25–51.
- Wagnsson, C., 2022. The paperboys of Russian messaging: RT/Sputnik audiences as vehicles for malign information influence. Information, communication & society, doi:10.1080/1369118X.2022.2041700.
- Wagnsson, C., and Barzanje, C., 2019. A framework for analysing antagonistic narrative strategies: a Russian tale of Swedish decline. Media, war & conflict, doi:10.1177/1750635219884343.
- Watanabe, Kohei. 2018. Conspiracist propaganda: how Russia promotes anti-establishment sentiment online? ECPR General Conference 2018, Hamburg. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327022625_Conspiracist_propaganda_How_Russia_promotes_anti-establishment_sentiment_online.
- Weaver, R.K., 1986. The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of public policy, 6 (4), 371–398.
- Wendt, A., 1992. Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International organization, 46 (2), 391–425.
- Woods, Heather. 2018. Do I want an always-on digital assistant listening in all the time? The Conversation, 16 July 2018. Available from: https://theconversation.com/do-i-want-an-always-on-digital-assistant-listening-in-all-the-time-92571.
- Yablokov, I., 2015. Conspiracy theories as a Russian public diplomacy tool: the case of Russia Today (RT). Politics, 35 (3–4), 301–315.
- Yablokov, I., 2018. Fortress russia: conspiracy theories in the Post-Soviet world. New York: Polity.
- Zhukova, E., Sundström, M.R., and Elgström, O., 2021. Feminist foreign policies (FFPs) as strategic narratives: norm translation in Sweden, Canada, France, and Mexico. Review of international studies, doi:10.1017/S0260210521000413.