From prescriptive rules to responsible organisations – making sense of risk in protective security management – a study from Norway

References

• Alvesson, M. and Sköldberg, K., 2018. Reflexive methodology: new vistas for qualitative research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L., 2013. The politics of possibility: risk and security beyond probability. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C. and Baur, P., 2018. Explaining trends in risk governance: how problem definitions underpin risk regimes. Risk, hazards & crisis in public policy, 9 (4), 397–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., 2017. The promise of security: resilience, surprise and epistemic politics. In: D. Chandler and J. Coaffee, eds. The Routledge handbook of international resilience. London: Routledge, 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. and Van Munster, R., 2007. Governing terrorism through risk: taking precautions, (un)knowing the future. European journal of international relations, 13 (1), 89–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aven, T. and Renn, O., 2010. Risk management and governance: concepts, guidelines and applications: Berlin: Imprint: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Battistelli, F. and Galantino, M.G., 2019. Dangers, risks and threats: an alternative conceptualization to the catch-all concept of risk. Current sociology, 67 (1), 64–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, L., Borg, S., and Rhinard, M., 2018. European security and early warning systems: from risks to threats in the European Union’s health security sector. European security, 27 (1), 20–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berling, T.V. and Bueger, C., 2015. Security expertise: practice, power, responsibility. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berling, T.V., et al., 2021. Translations of security: a framework for the study of unwanted futures. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berling, T.V. and Petersen, K.L., 2021. Designing resilience for security in the Nordic region: implications for strategy. In: S. Larsson and M. Rhinard, eds. Nordic societal security. London: Routledge, 131–153.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., 2002. Security and immigration: toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives, 27, 63–92.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., 2006. Internal and external aspects of security. European security, 15 (4), 385–404.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., 2009. Protection: security, territory and population. In: J. Huysmans, A. Dobson, and R. Prokhovnik, eds. The politics of protection: sites of insecurity and political agency. London: Routledge, 84–100.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., Bonditti, P., and Olsson, C., 2010. Mapping the European field of security professionals. In: D. Bigo, S. Carrera, E. Guild, and R.B.J. Walker, eds. Europe’s 21st century challenge. Farnham: Ashgate, 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Blumer, H., 1954. What is wrong with social theory? American sociological review, 19 (1), 3–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boholm, Å and Corvellec, H., 2011. A relational theory of risk. Journal of risk research, 14 (2), 175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, K., 1991. Security and emancipation. Review of international studies, 17 (4), 313–326.
   Google Scholar
• Bossong, R., 2014. The European programme for the protection of critical infrastructures – meta-governing a new security problem? European security, 23 (2), 210–226.
   Google Scholar
• Bossong, R. and Hegemann, H., 2019. Internal security. In: D.J. Galbreath, J. Mawdsley, and L. Chappell, eds. Contemporary European security. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• Bourbeau, P., 2018. A genealogy of resilience. International political sociology, 12 (1), 19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunner, J. and Plotkin Amrami, G., 2019. From the therapeutic to the post-therapeutic: the resilient subject, its social imaginary, and its practices in the shadow of 9/11. Theory & psychology, 29 (2), 219–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busmundrud, O., et al., 2015. Tilnærminger til risikovurderinger for tilsiktede uønskede handlinger [Approaches to risk assessments for intentional adverse actions]. Kjeller: Norwegian Defence Research Establishment.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., de Wilde, J., and Wæver, O., 1998. Security: a new framework for analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Ciută, F., 2009. Security and the problem of context: a hermeneutical critique of securitisation theory. Review of international studies, 35 (2), 301–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2017. The Power of Constructivist Grounded Theory for Critical Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23 (1), 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corry, O., 2012. Securitisation and ‘riskification’: second-order security and the politics of climate change. Millennium, 40 (2), 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A., 1982. Risk and culture: an essay on the selection of technical and environmental dangers. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• DSB (The Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection). 2020. Risikostyring i digitale verdikjeder. [Risk management in digital value chains].
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M., Kaufmann, M., and Søby Kristensen, K., 2015. Resilience and (in)security: practices, subjects, temporalities. Security dialogue, 46 (1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M. and Søby Kristensen, K., 2008. Securing ‘the homeland’: critical infrastructure, risk and (in)security. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, C., et al., 2020. Organizing risk: organization and management theory for the risk society. Academy of management annals, 14 (2), 1032–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyerdahl, A., 2022. Risk assessment without the risk? A controversy about security and risk in Norway. Journal of Risk Research, 25 (2), 252–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyerdahl, A., n.d. Standardizing policy in a non-standard way – a public/private standardization process in Norway. forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Hovden, J., 2004. Public policy and administration in a vulnerable society: regulatory reforms initiated by a Norwegian commission. Journal of risk research, 7 (6), 629–641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, B. and Power, M., 2005. Organizational encounters with risk: an introduction. In: B. Hutter and M. Power, eds. Organizational encounters with risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J., 2009. Agency and the politics of protection. implication for security studies. In: J. Huysmans, A. Dobson, and R. Prokhovnik, eds. The politics of protection: sites of insecurity and political agency. London: Routledge, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jore, S.H., 2019. The conceptual and scientific demarcation of security in contrast to safety. European journal for security research, 4 (1), 157–174.
   Google Scholar
• Jore, S.H., 2020. Is resilience a good concept in terrorism research? A conceptual adequacy analysis of terrorism resilience. Studies in conflict & terrorism. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2020.1738681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, S. and Rhinard, M., eds., 2021. Nordic societal security: convergence and divergence. London: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1993. Risk: a sociological theory. Berlin: Wallter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., 2013. Risk. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Maal, M., Busmundrud, O., and Endregard, M., 2016. Methodology for security risk assessments – is there a best practice? In: M. Revie, T. Bedford, and L. Walls, eds. Risk, reliability and safety: innovating theory and practice. London: Taylor & Francis, 860–866.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, A.W., 2019. Security as politics: beyond the state of exception. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norheim-Martinsen, P.M., 2016. New sources of military change - armed forces as normal organizations. Defence studies, 16 (3), 312–326.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Defence. 2001. Lov om forebyggende sikkerhetstjeneste [Security Act].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Defence. 2017. Prop. 153L Lov om nasjonal sikkerhet [Security Act Proposal].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Ministry of Justice and Public Security. 2019. Lov om nasjonal sikkerhet [Security Act].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Security Authority, Norwegian Police Security Agency, and National Police Directorate. 2010. En veiledning. Sikkerhets- og beredskapstiltak mot terrorhandlinger [Guideline to protective and preparedness measures against terrorism].
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian National Security Authority, Norwegian Police Security Service, and National Police Directorate, 2015. Terrorsikring. En veildning i sikrings- og beredskapstiltak mot tilsiktede uønskede handlinger [Terror protection. A guideline in security- and preparedness measures against intentional unwanted actions].
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2000. Et sårbart samfunn. [A vulnerable society]. No. 24.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2012. Rapport fra 22. juli-kommisjonen [Report from the 22. July commission]. No. 14.
   Google Scholar
• NOU. 2016. Samhandling for sikkerhet [Cooperation for security]. No. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Nyman, J., 2016. What is the value of security? Contextualising the negative/positive debate. Review of international studies, 42 (5), 821–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, O.E., Kruke, B.I., and Hovden, J., 2007. Societal safety: concept, borders and dilemmas. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 15 (2), 69–79.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, K.L., 2012. Risk analysis – a field within security studies? European journal of international relations, 18 (4), 693–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersen Gould, K.A. and Bieder, C., 2020. Safety and security: the challenges of bringing them together. In: C. Bieder and K.A. Pettersen Gould, eds. The coupling of safety and security: exploring interrelations in theory and practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 1997. The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2007. Organized uncertainty: designing a world of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2014. Risk, social theories, and organizations. In: P. Adler, P. du Gay, G. Morgan, and M. Reed, eds. The Oxford handbook of sociology, social theory, and organization studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 370–392.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2016. Introduction. In: M. Power, ed. Riskwork: essays on the organizational life of risk management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 2021. Modelling the micro-foundations of the audit society: organizations and the logic of the audit trail. Academy of management review, 46 (1), 6–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, J., 1997. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Renå, H. and Christensen, J., 2020. Learning from crisis: the role of enquiry commissions. Journal of contingencies and crisis management, 28 (1), 41–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., 2017. The etymology and genealogy of a contested concept. In: D. Chandler and J. Coaffee, eds. The Routledge handbook of international resilience. London: Routledge, 13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M.M., 2016. The conceptual articulation of the reality of life: Max Weber’s theoretical constitution of sociological ideal types. Journal of classical sociology, 16 (1), 84–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M.B. and Mutlu, C.E., 2013. Research methods in critical security studies: an introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Søby Kristensen, K., 2008. ‘The absolute protection of our citizens’: critical infrastructure protection and the practice of security. In: M. Dunn Cavelty and K. Søby Kristensen, eds. Securing ‘the homeland’: critical infrastructure, risk and (in)security. London: Routledge, 63–83.
   Google Scholar
• Standards Norway, 2012. NS 5830 Samfunnssikkerhet. Beskyttelse mot tilsiktede uønskede handlinger. Terminologi [Societal security. Protection against undesirable intentional actions. Terminology].
   Google Scholar
• Standards Norway. 2014. NS 5832 Samfunnssikkerhet. Beskyttelse mot tilsiktede uønskede handlinger. Krav til sikringsrisikoanalyse [Societal security. Protection against intentional undesirable actions. Requirements for security risk analysis].
   Google Scholar
• Stranden, R., 2019. Sikring: en innføring i teori og praksis. 1. utgave. Oslo: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, T., 2012. The limited capacity of management to rescue UK defence policy: a review and a word of caution. International affairs, 88 (2), 223–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S. and Tavory, I., 2012. Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological theory, 30 (3), 167–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjora, A., 2018. Qualitative research as stepwise-deductive induction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar