Positioning member states in EU-NATO security cooperation: towards a typology

References

• Abbott, K.W., and Snidal, D., 1998. Why states act through formal international organisations. Journal of conflict resolution, 42 (1), 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acikmese, S.A., and Triantaphyllou, D., 2012. The NATO-EU-Turkey trilogy: the impact of the Cyprus conundrum. European and Black Sea studies, 12 (4), 555–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adam, S., and Kriesi, H., 2007. The network approach. In: P. A Sabatier, ed. Theories of the policy process. Boulder: Westview Press, 129–154.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, H.E., and Whetten, D.A., 1981. Organisation sets, action sets, and networks: making the most of simplicity. In: P. Nystrom and W Starbuck, eds. Handbook of organisation design. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 385–408.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K.J., and Meunier, S., 2009. The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on politics: symposium, 7 (1), 13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, K.J., and Raustiala, K., 2018. The rise of international regime complexity. Annual review of law and social sciences, 14 (1), 329–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M., and Finnemore, M., 1999. The politics, power, and pathologies of international organisations. International organisation, 53 (4), 699–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, F., 2017. Approaches to concept analysis. Millennium: journal of international studies, 45 (2), 151–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biehl, H., Giegerich, B., and Jonas, A., 2013. Strategic cultures in Europe: security and defence policies across the continent. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., 2008. Towards a theory of inter-organisational networking: The Euro-Atlantic security institutions interacting. The Review of international organisations, 3 (2), 151–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., 2009. Interorganisationalism in theory and practice. Studia diplomatica: the Brussels journal of international relations, 62 (3), 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., 2011. Inter-organisational relations: an emerging research programme. In: B Reinalda, ed. The Ashgate research companion to non-state actors. London: Ashgate, 173–184.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, R., and Koops, J.A., 2017. Palgrave handbook on inter-organisational relations in world politics. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bloomfield, A., 2012. Time to move on: reconceptualising the strategic culture debate. Contemporary security policy, 33 (3), 437–461.
   Google Scholar
• Brosig, M., 2011. Overlap and interplay between international organisations: theories and approaches. South African journal of international relations, 18 (2), 147–167.
   Google Scholar
• Brosig, M., 2020. Whither a theory of inter-organisational relations: a burgeon field of research between conceptual innovation and fragmentation. Journal of intervention and statebuilding, 14 (2), 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., LaPorte, J., and Seawright, J., 2012. Putting typologies to work: concept formation, measurement, and analytic rigor. Political research quarterly, 65 (1), 217–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, H., 2017. The rational design of relations between Intergovernmental organisations. In: R. Biermann and J. A Koops, eds. Palgrave handbook of inter-organisational relations in world politics. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Doreian, P., and Fujimoto, K., 2004. Identifying linking-pin organisations in inter-organisational networks. Computational & mathematical organisation theory, 10 (1), 45–68.
   Google Scholar
• Dorussen, H., and Ward, H., 2008. Intergovernmental organisations and the Kantian peace: a network perspective. Journal of conflict resolution, 52 (2), 189–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drezner, D.W., 2009. The power and peril of international regime complexity. Perspectives on politics: symposium, 7 (1), 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S., 2008. The future of EU–NATO relations: a case of mutual irrelevance through competition? Journal of European integration, 30 (1), 27–43.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, S., and Gebhard, C., 2017. The EU and NATO’s dilemma with Russia and the prospects for deconfliction. European security, 26 (3), 379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewers-Peters, N.M., 2020. Germany going ‘midstream’: balancing vs leadership in EU-NATO cooperation. German politics, DOI:10.1080/09644008.2020.1826439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewers-Peters, N.M., 2021. Brexit’s implications for EU-NATO cooperation: transatlantic bridge no more? British journal of politics and international relations, 23 (4), 576–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faude, B., 2015. Zur Dynamik inter-organisationaler Beziehungen: Wie aus Konkurrenz Arbeitsteilung entsteht. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 49, 294–321.
   Google Scholar
• Flockhart, T., 2014. NATO and EU: a “Strategic partnership” or a practice of “muddling through”? In: L Odgaard, ed. Strategy in NATO: preparing for an imperfect world. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 75–89.
   Google Scholar
• Franke, U.E., and Varma, T. 2019. Independence play: Europe’s pursuit of strategic autonomy. ECFR Flash Scorecard. Available from: https://ecfr.eu/special/independence_play_europes_pursuit_of_strategic_autonomy.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhard, C., and Smith, S.J., 2015. The two faces of EU-NATO cooperation: counter-piracy operations off the Somali coast. Cooperation and conflict, 50 (1), 107–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., and Faude, B., 2014. A theory of emerging order within international complexes: how competition among regulatory international institutions leads to institutional adaptation and division of labour. Review of international organisations, 9 (4), 471–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., and Oberthür, S. 2003. Investigating institutional interaction: toward a systematic analysis. ISA Annual Convention, Portland, Oregon, 26 February–1 March.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., and Oberthür, S., 2004. Exploring regime interaction: a framework of analysis. In: A. Underdal and O. R Young, eds. Regime consequences: methodological challenges and research strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 247–269.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., and Oberthür, S., 2009. The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions. European journal of international relations, 15 (1), 125–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, S.E., 2009. Brokering change: networks and entrepreneurs in international politics. International theory, 1 (2), 249–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Græger, N., 2016. European security as practice: EU-NATO communities of practice in the making? European security, 25 (4), 478–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Græger, N., 2017. Grasping the everyday and extraordinary in EU-NATO relations: the added value of practice approaches. European security, 26 (3), 340–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Græger, N., and Haugevik, K.M., 2011. The EU’s performance with and within NATO: assessing objectives, outcomes and organisational practices. European integration, 33 (6), 743–757.
   Google Scholar
• Hadfield, A., Manners, I., and Whitman, R.G., 2017. Foreign policies of EU member states: continuity and Europeanisation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haukkala, H., Etzold, T., and Raik, K., 2017. The northern European member states. In: A. Hadfield, I. Manners, and R. G Whitman, eds. Foreign policies of EU member states: continuity and Europeanisation. Abingdon: Routledge, 23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S.C., 2009. Overlapping institutions in the realm of international security: the case of NATO and ESDP. Perspectives on politics: symposium, 7 (1), 45–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S.C., 2011. Why institutional overlap matters: CSDP in the European Security architecture. Journal of common market studies, 49 (1), 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S.C., 2017. Party preferences and institutional transformation: revisiting France’s relationship with NATO (and the common wisdom on gaullism). Journal of strategic studies, 40 (4), 505–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S.C., 2019. The politics of overlapping organisations: hostage-taking, forum-shopping and brokering. Journal of European public policy, 26 (6), 883–905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2000. Britain, NATO and CESDP: fixed strategy, changing tactics. European foreign affairs review, 5 (3), 377–396.
   Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., 2017. EU-NATO cooperation: the key to Europe’s security future. European security, 26 (3), 454–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, J., and Keeler, J.T.S., 2003. Defending Europe: the EU, NATO and the quest for European autonomy. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, A.I., 2001. Treating international institutions as Social environments. International studies quarterly, 45 (4), 487–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, C., 1986. Interorganisation theory and international organisation. International studies quarterly, 30 (1), 39–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karemos, B., Lipson, C., and Snidal, D., 2001. The rational design of international institutions. International organisation, 55 (4), 761–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsrud, J., and Reykers, Y., 2020. Ad hoc coalitions and institutional exploitation in international security: towards a typology. Third world quarterly, 41 (9), 1518–1536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M., 2008. Verselbstständigungsprozesse internationaler organisationen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., 2007. Towards effective and integrative inter-organisationalism. DGAP Bericht: from conflict to regional stability – linking security and development, New faces conference. Toledo, 23–32.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., 2012. Inter-organisational approaches”. In: K. E. Jørgensen and K Laatikainen, eds. Routledge handbook on the European Union and international institutions. London, New York: Routledge, 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., 2017a. Inter-organisationalism in international relations: a multilevel framework of analysis. In: R. Biermann and J. A Koops, eds. Palgrave handbook of inter-organisational relations in world politics. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 189–216.
   Google Scholar
• Koops, J.A., 2017b. Theorising inter-organisational relations: the “EU–NATO relationship” as a catalytic case study. European security, 26 (3), 315–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachmann, N., 2010. The EU-CSDP-NATO relationship: asymmetric cooperation and the search for momentum. Studia diplomatica: the Brussels journal of international relations, 63 (3–4), 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Lipson, M., 2017. Organisation theory and cooperation and conflict among international organisations. In: R. Biermann and J. A Koops, eds. Palgrave handbook of inter-organisational relations in world politics. New York, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 67–96.
   Google Scholar
• Loewen, H., 2006. Towards a dynamic model of the interplay between international institutions. GIGA working paper, 17, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Magliveras, K.D., 2011. Membership in international organisations. In: J. Klabbers and Å Wallendahl, eds. Research handbook on the law of international organisations. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar, 84–107.
   Google Scholar
• Major, C., 2021. A committed but challenging ally: France’s NATO policy. In: R. Kempin, ed. France’s foreign and security policy under macron. Berlin: SWP, 35–41.
   Google Scholar
• Maoz, Z., 2012. How network analysis can inform the study of international relations. Conflict management and peace science, 29 (3), 247–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, A., and Di Camillo, F., 2013. Italy. In: H. Biehl, B. Giegerich, and A Jonas, eds. Strategic cultures in Europe: security and defence policies across the continent. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 193–206.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, H., and Wright, N., 2021. Ten years after Lisbon: member states in EU foreign and security policy. LEGOF policy brief, 1/2021, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mérand, F., Hofmann, S.C., and Irondelle, B., 2011. Governance and state power: a network analysis of European security. Journal of common market studies, 49 (1), 121–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messervy-Whiting, G., 2005. The growing EU-NATO relationship: beyond Berlin. The international spectator, 40 (2), 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Missiroli, A., 2002. EU–NATO cooperation in crisis management: No Turkish delight for ESDP. Security dialogue, 33 (1), 9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moret, E., 2016. Effective minilateralism for the EU: what, when and how. EUISS brief, 17, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, C.M., 2011. Britain's coalition government and EU defence cooperation: undermining British interests. International affairs, 87 (2), 419–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojanen, H., 2006. The EU and NATO: two competing models for a common defence policy. Journal of common market studies, 44 (1), 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojanen, H., 2018. The EU’s power in interorganisational relations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pannier, A. 2022. How to keep France engaged in NATO. Real Institute Elcarno. Available from https://www.realinstitutoelcano.org/en/analyses/how-to-keep-france-engaged-in-nato/.
   Google Scholar
• Perruche, J.-P., 2014. From exception to facilitator: what place for France in the EU/NATO partnership in the post-Cold War global world? Journal of transatlantic studies, 12 (4), 432–442.
   Google Scholar
• Pomorska, K., 2017. Foreign policies of Eastern EU states. In: A. Hadfield, I. Manners, and R. G Whitman, eds. Foreign policies of EU Member States: Continuity and Europeanisation. Abingdon: Routledge, 51–65.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K., and Victor, D.G., 2004. The regime complex for plant generic resources. International organisation, 58 (2), 277–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichard, M., 2006. The EU-NATO relationship: a legal and political perspective. Abingdon: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schleich, C., 2014. NATO and EU in conflict regulation: interlocking institutions and division of labour. Journal of transatlantic studies, 12 (2), 182–205.
   Google Scholar
• Simón, L., 2010. The EU-NATO conundrum in context: bringing the state back in. In: C. Gebhard and D. J Galbreath, eds. Cooperation or conflict? problematising organisational overlap in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge, 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.J., 2011. EU-NATO cooperation: a case of institutional fatigue? European security, 20 (2), 243–264.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.J., and Gebhard, C., 2017. EU–NATO relations: running on the fumes of informed deconfliction. European security, 26 (3), 303–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, S.J., Tomic, N., and Gebhard, C., 2017. The father, the son and the holy ghost: a grounded theory approach to the comparative study of decision-making in the NAC and PSC. European security, 26 (3), 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiilikainen, T., 2006. The Nordic countries and the EU-NATO relationship. In: G. Herolf, A. J. K. Bailes, and B Sundelius, eds. Nordic countries and the European security and defence policy. Stockholm: SIPRI, 50–66.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, K.N., 1959. Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R.G., 2020. Missing in action: The EU-UK foreign, security and defence policy relationship after Brexit. European view, 19 (2), 222–229.
   Google Scholar
• Wivel, A., 2013. A pace-setter out of sync? Danish foreign, security and defence policy and the European Union. In: L. Miles and A. Wivel, eds. Denmark and the European Union. Abingdon: Routledge, 80–94.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O.R., 1999. Governance in world affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar