Digital/sovereignty and European security integration: an introduction

References

• Amoore, L., 2013. The politics of possibility. Risk and security beyond probability. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L., 2020. Cloud ethics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L., and De Goede, M., 2008. Risk and the war on terror. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, R., 2016. Hardwiring the frontier? The politics of security technology in Europe’s ‘fight against illegal migration’. Security dialogue, 47, 22–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avbelj, M., 2014. Theorizing sovereignty and European integration. Ratio juris, 27, 344–363.
   Google Scholar
• Barrinha, A., and Christou, G., 2022. Speaking sovereignty: the EU in the Cyber Domain. European Security, 31 (3), 356–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., 2018. What is globalization? Cambridge. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., 2017. A European republic of sovereign states: sovereignty, republicanism and the European Union. European journal of political theory, 16, 188–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., and Castiglione, D., 2005. Building the Union: the nature of sovereignty in the political architecture of Europe. In: D. Karmis and W. Norman, eds. Theories of federalism: a reader (pp. 293–310). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanger, P., 2014. La souveraineté numérique. Paris: Stock.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., and De Goede, M., 2021. Co-producing security: platform content moderation and European security integration. JCMS: journal of common market studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13306
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., and Duez, D., 2012. A different view on the ‘making’ of European security: the EU passenger name record system as a socio-technical assemblage. European foreign affairs review, 17, 109–124.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., and Glouftsios, G., 2022. Formatting European security integration through database interoperability. European Security, 31 (3), 454–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., 2014. The (in)securitization practices of the three universes of EU border control: military/navy – border guards/police – database analysts. Security dialogue, 45, 209–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodin, J., 1955[1576]. Six books of the commonwealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrell, J. 2020. Why European strategic autonomy matters. European External Action Service. HR/VP blog [Online]. Available from: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/89865/why-european-strategic-autonomy-matters_en.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel, T., 2021. Why noncompliance. The politics of law in the European Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bossong, R., and Carrapico, H.2016. EU borders and shifting internal security – technology, externalization and accountability. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G.C., and Star, S.L., 1999. Sorting things out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brack, N., Coman, R., and Crespy, A., 2019. Unpacking old and new conflicts of sovereignty in the European polity. Journal of European integration, 41, 817–832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, N., Coman, R., and Crespy, A., 2021. Understanding conflicts of sovereignty in the EU. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, B., 2015. The stack. On software and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broeders, D., and Dijstelbloem, H., 2016. The datafication of mobility and migration management. In: I. Van Der Ploeg and J. Pridmore, eds. Digitizing identities (pp. 242–260). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Budnitsky, S., and Jia, L., 2018. Branding internet sovereignty: digital media and the Chinese–Russian cyberalliance. European journal of cultural studies, 21, 594–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calcara, A., Csernatoni, R., and Lavallée, C.2020. Emerging security technologies and EU governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calderaro, A., and Blumfelde, 2022. Artificial intelligence and EU security: the false promise of digital sovereignty. European Security, 31 (3), 415–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrapico, H., and Barrinha, A., 2017. The EU as a coherent (cyber)security actor? JCMS: journal of common market studies, 55, 1254–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M., 1996. The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cattaruzza, A., et al. Sovereignty in cyberspace: balkanization or democratization. 2016 International Conference on Cyber Conflict (CyCon U.S.), 2016/10// 2016. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Celeste, E., 2021. Digital sovereignty in the EU: challenges and future perspectives. In: F. Fabbrini, E. Celeste, and J. Quinn, eds. Data protection beyond borders. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Christakis, T., 2020. ‘European digital sovereignty’: successfully navigating between the ‘Brussels Effect’ and Europe’s quest for strategic autonomy. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Christou, G., 2016. Cybersecurity in the European Union. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Christou, G., 2019. The collective securitisation of cyberspace in the European Union. West European politics, 42, 278–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coman, R., and Leconte, C., 2019. Contesting EU authority in the name of European identity: the new clothes of the sovereignty discourse in Central Europe. Journal of European integration, 41, 855–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Court Of Justice Of The European, U. 2015. Case C-362/14, Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner.
   Google Scholar
• Couture, S., and Toupin, S., 2019. What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New media & society, 21, 2305–2322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremona, M.2012. Compliance and the enforcement of EU Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R., 2022. The EU’s hegemonic imaginaries: from European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty. European Security, 31 (3), 395–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Goede, M., 2012. The SWIFT affair and the global politics of European security. Journal of common market studies, 50, 214–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hert, P., and Thumfart, J., 2018. The Microsoft Ireland case and the cyberspace sovereignty trilemma. Brussels privacy Hub working paper, 4, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Deleixhe, M., and Duez, D., 2019. The new European border and coast guard agency: pooling sovereignty or giving it up? Journal of European integration, 41, 921–936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A., 1998. The politics of large numbers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duez, D., 2019. De l’État à l’Union. Pour une sociologie historique de la sécurité intérieure européenne. Politique Européenne, 65, 30–61.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M., 2018. Europe’s cyber-power. European politics and society, 19, 304–320.
   Google Scholar
• Easterling, K., 2014. Extrastatecraft. The power of infrastructure space. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• EC, 2020a. Communication […] on the EU Security Union Strategy. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC, 2020b. Cybersecurity – our digital anchor – a European perspective. Brussels: EU Science Hub - European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S., 2007. Governmentality, calculation, territory. Environment and planning D: society and space, 25, 562–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias, N., 2012. On the process of civilisation: sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Dublin: UCD Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ep, Council, Eesc & Cotr, 2013. Cybersecurity strategy of the European Union: an open, safe and secure cyberspace. Brussels: High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2020. Shaping Europe’s Digital Future- Council Conclusions- 8711/20.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2021. European Council Meeting Conclusions- EUCO 17/21.
   Google Scholar
• Farrand, B., and Carrapico, H., 2022. Digital sovereignty and taking back control: from regulatory capitalism to regulatory mercantilism in EU cybersecurity. European Security, 31 (3), 435–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floridi, L., 2020. The fight for digital sovereignty: what it is, and why it matters, especially for the EU. Philosophy & technology, 33, 369–378.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2009. Security, territory, population. New York: Picador/Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• German Presidency of the Council of the European Union. 2020. Expanding the EU’s digital sovereignty.
   Google Scholar
• Gheham, F. 2017. Digital sovereignty – steps towards a new system of Internet Governance. Fondation pour l’Innovation Politique.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1996. Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, O., 2014. Beautiful data. A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, C., 1993. The capability-expectations gap, or conceptualizing Europe’s international role. JCMS: journal of common market studies, 31, 305–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, T., 1996[1651]. Leviathan or the matter, forme and power of a common wealth ecclesiasticall and civil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, C. (Ed.). 2020. Europe's digital sovereignty: From rulemaker to superpower in the age of US-China rivalry. Essay Collection. European Council on Foreign Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R., 1999. Sovereignty in World Politics: a Glance at the Conceptual and Historical Landscape. Political Studies, 47, 431–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and Kim, S.H.2015. Dreamscapes of modernity. Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeandesboz, J., 2017. European border policing: EUROSUR, knowledge, calculation. Global crime, 18, 256–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeandesboz, J., 2022. European Union information systems for border and migration enforcement: trajectories, programmatics, and uses. In: G. Hudson and I. Atak, eds. Migration, security, and resistance (pp. 47–65). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, M., 2010. Authoritarian informationalism: China’s approach to internet sovereignty. SAIS review of international affairs, 30, 71–89.
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C., and Léonard, S., 2019. The collective securitisation of terrorism in the European Union. West European politics, 42, 261–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., 2002. Ironies of sovereignty: the European Union and the United States. JCMS: journal of common market studies, 40, 743–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R.O., and Hoffmann, S., 1991. The new European community. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschenbaum, M., 2004. Extreme inscription. TEXT technology, 13, 91–125.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S.D., 1999. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madiega, T., 2020. Digital sovereignty for Europe (No. PE 651.992). European Parliamentary Research Service, European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, M., 1984. The autonomous power of the state: its origins, mechanisms and results. European journal of sociology / archives européennes de sociologie / europäisches archiv für soziologie, 25, 185–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, V., and Cukier, K., 2013. Big data. Boston, MA: Eamon Dolan.
   Google Scholar
• Mccarthy, D., 2018. Introduction. Technology in world politics. In: D. Mccarthy, ed. Technology and world politics (pp. 1–22). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, C. 2021. Digital sovereignty is central to European strategic autonomy – Speech by President Charles Michel at “Masters of digital 2021” online event.
   Google Scholar
• Moerel, L., and Timmers, P., 2021. Reflections on digital sovereignty. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
   Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F., 2016. Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe. Brussels: High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Monsees, L., and Lambach, D., 2022. Digital sovereignty, geopolitical imaginaries, and the reproduction of European identity. European Security, 31 (3), 377–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A., 1998. The choice for Europe. Social purpose and state power from Messina to Maastricht. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morin-Desailly, C. 2013. L’Union européenne, colonie du monde numérique? Paris, Commission des Affaires Europeennes, Senat.
   Google Scholar
• Musiani, F., 2022. Infrastructuring digital sovereignty. Information, communication & society, 25, 785–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oettinger, G. 2016. Speech: EU Commissioner Oettinger at WSBI innovation conference.
   Google Scholar
• Olviveira Martins, B., Liden, K., and Jumbert, M.G., 2022. Border security and the digitalization of sovereignty: insights from EU borderwork. European security, 31 (3), 475–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B., 2016. Digital. In: B. Peters, ed. Digital keywords. A vocabulary of information society & culture (pp. 93–108). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pohle, J., 2020. Digital sovereignty. A new key concept of digital policy in Germany and Europe. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Pohle, J., and Thiel, T., 2020. Digital sovereignty. Internet policy review, 9, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Prokhovnik, R., 2007. Sovereignties: contemporary theory and practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prokhovnik, R., 2008. Sovereignty. History and theory. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Reding, V., 2016. Digital sovereignty: Europe at a crossroads. European investment bank institute.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, H., et al., 2021. Safeguarding European values with digital sovereignty: an analysis of statements and policies. Internet policy review, 10. https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.3.1575
   Google Scholar
• Rosanvallon, P., 2000. La Démocratie inachevée: histoire de la souveraineté du peuple en France. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S., 1996. Losing control?: sovereignty in the age of globalization. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J.C., 1998. Seeing like a state. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, S., 2021. Algorithmic governance and the international politics of Big Tech. Perspectives on politics, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721003145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S.L., 1999. The ethnography of infrastructure. American behavioral scientist, 43, 377–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, S., Schünemann, W.J., and Dimmroth, K., 2017. Outrage without consequences? Post-Snowden discourses and governmental practice in Germany. Media and communication, 5, 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thumfart, J., 2022. The norm development of digital sovereignty between China, Russia, the EU and the US: from the late 1990s to the Covid-crisis 2020/21 as catalytic event. In: D. Hallinan, R. Leenes, and P. De Hert, eds. CPDP 2021: enforcing rights in a changing world (pp. 1–44). London: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 1990. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1990. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Traynor, I., 2015. EU unveils plans to set up digital single market for online firms. The Guardian, 2015/05/06/T14:44:39.000Z.
   Google Scholar
• Valverde, M., and Mopas, M.S., 2004. Insecurity and the dream of targeted governance. In: W. Larner and W. Walters, eds. Global governmentality (pp. 1–44). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., and De Waal, M., 2018. The platform society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Von Der Leyen, U., 2019. A Europe that strives for more: my agenda for Europe. Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, W., 1999. The sharing of sovereignty: the European Paradox. Political studies, 47, 503–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, W., and Haahr, J.H., 2005. Governing Europe. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, C., 1994. Simulating sovereignty: intervention, the state and symbolic exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., Gerth, H., and Wright, M.C.2007. From Max Weber: essays in sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar