Speaking sovereignty: the EU in the cyber domain

References

• Adonis, A., 2020. European digital sovereignty: EU’s projection of normative power? Global Media and Technologies Culture Lab, Network Sovereignty Blog, 9 September. Available from: https://globalmedia.mit.edu/2020/09/09/european-digital-sovereignty-eus-projection-of-normative-power/ [Accessed 22 June 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, J.P., 1996. A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Electronic Frontier Foundation, 8 February. Available from: https://www.eff.org/fr/cyberspace-independence [Accessed 14 November 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Barrinha, A., and Renard, T., 2020. Power and diplomacy in the post-liberal cyberspace. International affairs, 96 (3), 749–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartelson, J., 2008. Sovereignty before and after the linguistic turn. In: Rebecca Adler-Nissen, and Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, eds. Sovereignty games. Intrumentalizing state sovereignty in Europe and beyond. London: Palgrave, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, M., and Erixon, F., 2020. Europe's quest for technology sovereignty: opportunities and pitfalls. European Centre for International Political Economy, ECIPE Occasional Paper, 02/2020, 1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanger, P., 2012. De la souveraineté numérique. Le Débat, 170 (3), 149–159.
   Google Scholar
• Borell, J., 2020. Why European strategic autonomy matters. From the blog, European External Action Service, 3 December. Available from: https://eeas.europa.eu/headquarters/headquarters-homepage/89865/why-european-strategic-autonomy-matters_en [Accessed 14 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Breton, T., 2021. The Geopolitics of Technology, 27 July. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/breton/announcements/geopolitics-technology_en [Accessed 14 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Burwell, F.G., and Propp, K., 2020. ‘The European Union and the search for digital sovereignty: building “fortress Europe” or preparing for a new World?’ Issue Brief, Atlantic Council, Future Europe Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., 2015. Power plays in global internet governance. Millennium: journal of international studies, 43 (2), 640–659. doi:10.1177/0305829814562655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrapico, H., and Barrinha, A., 2017. The EU as coherent (cyber) security actor? JCMS: journal of common market studies, 55 (6), 1254–1272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christakis, T., 2020. European digital sovereignty. Successfully navigating between the “Brussels effect” and Europe’s quest for strategic autonomy. Multidisciplinary Institute on Artificial Intelligence/Grenoble Alpes Data Institute, e-book. Available from https://ai-regulation.com [Accessed December 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Christou, G., and Raska, M., 2021. EU–ASIA cybersecurity cooperation: paths and patterns. In: Thomas Christiansen, Emil Kirchner, and Tan See Seng, eds. The European union’s security relations with Asian partners (pp. 209–230). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Christou, G., and Soo Lee, J., 2021. EU–ROK cooperation on cyber-security and data protection. In: Nicola Casarini, ed. EU-Korea Security relations (pp. 55–77). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2021a. A globally connected Europe. Council Conclusions, Brussels, 12 July, 10629/21.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union, 2021b. Foreign affairs council, 12 July. Main results. Available from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/fac/2021/07/12 [Accessed 14 August 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Couture, S., and Toupin, S., 2019. What does the notion of “sovereignty” mean when referring to the digital? New media & society, 21 (10), 2305–2322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R., 2021. The EU’s rise as a defense technological power: from strategic autonomy to technological sovereignty. Carnegie Europe, 12 August 2021. Available from: https://carnegieeurope.eu/2021/08/12/eu-s-rise-as-defense-technological-power-from-strategic-autonomy-to-technological-sovereignty/$ [Accessed 12 August 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2019. Speech by President-elect von der Leyen in the European parliament plenary on the occasion of the presentation of her college of commissioners and their programme, 27 November. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/es/speech_19_6408 [Accessed 15 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2020a. State of the Union address by President von der Leyen at the European parliament plenary, 16 September. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_20_1655 [Accessed 15 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2020b. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘EU Security Union Strategy’, Brussels, 24.7.2020, COM (2020) 605 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2020c. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, ‘A European Strategy for Data’, Brussels, 19 February, 2020, COM(2020) 66 final,.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2021. 2030 Digital Compass: the European way for the Digital Decade, 9 March 2021. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/europes-digital-decade-digital-targets-2030_en [Accessed 15 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy/Vice-President of the Commission, 2013. Cybersecurity strategy of the EU: an open, safe and secure cyberspace, Brussels, 7 February.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, 2017. Joint communication to the European parliament and the council resilience, deterrence and defence: building strong cybersecurity for the EU, JOIN/2017/0450 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, 2020. Joint communication to the European Parliament and the Council, “The EU’s Cybersecurity Strategy for the Digital Decade”, Brussels, 16.12.2020 JOIN (2020) 16 final, 19.
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2019. European Council conclusions, Brussels, 21–22 March 2019. Available from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/european-council/2019/03/21-22/ [Accessed 14 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2020a. European Council conclusions, Brussels, 1–2 October 2020, EUCO 13/20, CO EUR 10, CONCL 6.
   Google Scholar
• European Council 2020b. European Council conclusions, Brussels, 10-11 December 2020, EUCO 22/20, CO EUR 17, CONCL 8.
   Google Scholar
• European Council, 2021. Statement of the members of the European Council, Brussels, 25 March 2021, SN18/21.
   Google Scholar
• European Council and Council of the EU, 2021a. Video conference of the members of the European Council, 25–25 March 2021.
   Google Scholar
• European Council and Council of the EU, 2021b. A digital future for Europe: EU leaders stress need to enhance the EU’s digital sovereignty. Available from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/a-digital-future-for-europe/ [Accessed 14 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European Council and Council of the European Union, 2019. A new strategic agenda for the EU: 2019-2024. Available from: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/eu-strategic-agenda-2019-2024/.
   Google Scholar
• European Diplomat, 2021. Interview with A. Barrinha. MS Teams. 16 July.
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service, 2017. Shared vision, common action: a stronger Europe: a global strategy for the European Union's foreign and security policy. Publications Office.
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service, 2019. EU general statement. OEWG on cyber, First Session, New York, 9 September. Available from: https://ceipfiles.s3.amazonaws.com/pdf/CyberNorms/UNGGE/EU(General(Statement(to(the(OEWG(on(Cyber%2C(First(Session.pdf [Accessed 14 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, 2019. Security threats connected with the rising Chinese technological presence in the EU and possible action on the EU level to reduce them. European Parliament, 2019/2575(RSP), 12 March 2019. Available from: https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/popups/summary.do?id=1577382&t=d&l=en [Accessed 14 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• European Political Strategy Centre, 2019. Rethinking strategic autonomy in the digital age. EPSC Strategic Notes, Issue 30, July 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Fiott, D., 2021. European sovereignty: strategy and interdependence. Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies. Chaillot Paper/169, July 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Gammeltoft-Hansen, T., and Adler-Nissen, R., 2008. An introduction to sovereignty games. In: R. Adler-Nissen, and T Gammeltoft-Hansen, eds. Sovereignty games. Intrumentalizing state sovereignty in Europe and beyond. London: Palgrave, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, C., 2020. Europe’s digital sovereignty: From rulemaker to superpower in the age of US-China rivalry, Essay Collection, European Council on Foreign Relations, 30 July. Available from: https://ecfr.eu/publication/europe_digital_sovereignty_rulemaker_superpower_age_us_china_rivalry/ [Accessed 8 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Ilves, L., and Osula, A.-M., 2020. The technological sovereignty dilemma–And How New technology Can offer a Way Out. European cybersecurity journal, 6 (1), 24–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kello, L., 2018. The virtual weapon and international order. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Komaitis, K., 2021. Europe’s ambition for digital sovereignty must not undermine the internet’s values. Computer fraud & security, 2021 (1), 11–13.
   Google Scholar
• Krasner, S.D., 1999. Sovereignty and its discontents, in power, the state, and sovereignty: essays on international relations. London: Routledge, 179–180.
   Google Scholar
• Madiega, T., 2020. Digital sovereignty for Europe, briefing, European Parliamentary Research Service, Ideas Paper, PE651.992, July 2020.
   Google Scholar
• March, C., and Schieferdecker, I. 2021. Technological sovereignty as ability, not autarky, CESifo Working Paper No. 9139. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3872378.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, R.E., 2014. The pirate and the sovereign: negative identification and the constitutive rhetoric of the nation-state. Rhetoric and public affairs, 17 (1), 105–136.
   Google Scholar
• Moerel, L., and Timmers, P. 2021. Reflections on digital sovereignty, research in focus, EU Cyber Direct. https://eucyberdirect.eu/research/reflections-on-digital-sovereignty [Accessed 22 June 2022].
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, M.L., 2020. Against sovereignty in cyberspace. International studies review, 22 (4), 779–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hara, K., and Hall, W., 2021. Four internets. data, geopolitics, and the governance of cyberspace. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Pohle, J., and Thiel, T., 2020. Digital sovereignty. Internet policy review, 9 (4), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Renard, T., 2018. EU cyber partnerships: assessing the EU strategic partnerships with third countries in the cyber domain. European politics and society, 19 (3), 321–337.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, J., 2020. Introduction: Europe’s digital sovereignty. In: C Hobbs, ed. Europe’s digital sovereignty: from rulemaker to superpower in the age of US-China rivalry (pp. 6–29). Essay Collection, European Council on Foreign Relations. 30 July. Available form: https://ecfr.eu/publication/europe_digital_sovereignty_rulemaker_superpower_age_us_china_rivalry/ [Accessed 8 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Thumfart, J., 2021, The COVID-crisis as catalyst for the norm development of digital sovereignty. Building barriers or improving digital policies?. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3793530
   Google Scholar
• Timmers, P., 2019. Strategic autonomy and cybersecurity, policy in focus, EU Cyber Direct, 10 May 2019. Available from: https://eucyberdirect.eu/research/strategic-autonomy-and-cybersecurity [Accessed 14 September 2021].
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O., 2009. Discursive approaches. In: Antje Wiener, and Thomas Diez, eds. European integration theory (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 163–180.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, B., and Ferro, Carolina, 2020. Governance of digitalization in Europe. Gütersloh, Germany: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, N., 2008. The variety of sovereignty. In: Rebecca Adler-Nissen, and Thomas Gammeltoft-Hansen, eds. Sovereignty games. Intrumentalizing state sovereignty in Europe and beyond. London: Palgrave, 21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, W.G., and De Wilde, J.H., 2001. The endurance of sovereignty. European journal of international relations, 7 (3), 283–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, G., Poiters, N., and Weil, P., 2021. Sovereignty and digital interdependence. In: D. Fiott, ed. European sovereignty: strategy and interdependence (pp. 16–22). Paris: European Union Institute for Security Studies. Chaillot Paper/169, July.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T., 1997. Cyberspace sovereignty? – The internet and the international system. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 10 (1997), 647. Available from: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/2227.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R., 2021. The EU’s strategic autonomy trap. Carnegie Europe, 8 March 2021. Available from: https://carnegieeurope.eu/publications/83955 [Accessed 8 March 2021].
   Google Scholar