1,126
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Unpacking postcolonial and masculine anxieties: Hungary and Turkey’s responses to the EU’s handling of the 2015–2016 refugee “crisis”

&
Pages 385-403 | Received 25 Nov 2022, Accepted 30 Jun 2023, Published online: 24 Aug 2023

References

  • Agathangelou, A.M., 2002. “Sexing” globalization in international relations: migrant sex and domestic workers in Cyprus, Greece and Turkey. In: G Chowdhry, and S Nair, eds. Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. London: Routledge, 142–169.
  • Agathangelou, A.M., and Ling, L.H.M., 2004. Power, borders, security, wealth: lessons of violence and desire from September 11. International studies quarterly, 48 (3), 517–538.
  • Agathangelou, A.M., and Turcotte, H.M., 2016. Reworking postcolonial feminisms in the sites of IR. In: J. Steans, and D. Tepe-Belfrage, eds. Handbook on gender in world politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 41–49.
  • Antypas, I., and Yildiz, Z. 2018. Turkey refugee deal: following the money [online], Euronews. Available from: https://www.euronews.com/2018/03/24/over-1bn-pledged-in-eu-turkey-migrant-deal-still-to-be-paid- [Accessed 16 November 2022].
  • Åse, C., 2019. The gendered myth of protection. In: C. Gentry, L. Shepherd, and L. Sjoberg, eds. Routledge handbook of gender and security. London: Routledge, 273–283.
  • Aydın-Düzgit, S., 2013. Critical discourse analysis in analysing European Union foreign policy: prospects and challenges. Cooperation and conflict, 49 (3), 354–367.
  • Baker, C., 2018. Postcoloniality without race? Racial exceptionalism and Southeast European cultural studies. Interventions, 20 (6), 759–784.
  • Barnett, M., 2017. Hierarchy and paternalism. In: A. Zarakol, ed. Hierarchies in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66–94.
  • Batory, A., 2016. Dyeing the commission: creative compliance and respect for the rule of law in the EU. Public administration, 94 (3), 685–699.
  • Bilefsky, D. 2016. Danish law requires asylum seekers to hand over valuables [online]. New York Times. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/27/world/europe/denmark-asks-refugees-for-valuables.html [Accessed 19 Novemnber 2022].
  • Bilgiç, A., 2016. “We are not barbarians”: gender politics and Turkey’s quest for the West. International relations, 29 (2), 198–218.
  • Bilgiç, A., 2018. Migrant encounters with neo-colonial masculinity: producing European sovereignty through emotions. International feminist journal of politics, 20 (4), 542–562.
  • Bilgin, P., 2012. Globalization and in/security: Middle Eastern encounters with international society and the case of Turkey. In: S. Stetter, ed. The Middle East and globalization: encounters and horizons. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 59–75.
  • Bilgin, P., 2017. The international in security, security in the international. London: Routledge.
  • Bilgin, P., and Bilgiç, A., 2012. Turkey and EU/rope: discourses of inspiration/anxiety in Turkey’s foreign policy. Review of European studies, 4 (3), 111–124.
  • Blaney, D.L., and Inayatullah, N., 2008. International relations from below. In: C. Reus-Smith, and D. Snidal, eds. Oxford handbook of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 663–674.
  • Boatcă, M., 2012. The quasi-Europes: world regions in light of the imperial difference. In: T. Reifer, ed. Global crises and the challenges of the 21st century. New York: Routledge, 123–153.
  • Capan, Z.G., and dos Reis, F., 2023. Creating colonisable land: cartography, ‘blank spaces’, and imaginaries of empire in nineteenth-century Germany. Review of international studies. doi:10.1017/S0260210523000050.
  • Çapan, Z.G., and Zarakol, A., 2019. Turkey’s ambivalent self: ontological insecurity in “Kemalism” versus “Erdoğanism”. Cambridge review of international affairs, 32 (3), 263–282.
  • Chang, K.A., and Ling, L.H.M., 2000. Globalization and its intimate other: Filipina domestic workers in Hong Kong. In: M.H. Marchand, and A.S. Runyan, eds. Gender and global restructuring: sightings, sites and resistance. London: Routledge, 27–44.
  • Connell, R.W., 2005. Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Demirtas-Bagdonas, Ö, 2014. Reading Turkey's foreign policy on Syria: The AKP's construction of a great power identity and the politics of grandeur. Turkish studies, 15 (1), 139–155.
  • Donnelly, J., 2006. Sovereign inequalities and hierarchy in anarchy: American power and international society. European journal of international relations, 12 (2), 139–170.
  • Doty, R.L., 1996. Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North- South relations. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Düvell, F., 2012. Transit migration: a blurred and politicised concept. Population, space and place, 18 (4), 415–427.
  • European Commission. 2017. EU Action in Libya on Migration. Available from: https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2017-12/20171207_eu_action_in_libya_on_migration_en.pdf
  • European Union. 2017. Official Journal of the European Union. Agreement in the form of an Exchange of Letters between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco on the amendment of Protocols 1 and 4 to the Euro-Mediterranean Agreement establishing an association between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and the Kingdom of Morocco, of the other part. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/agree_internation/2019/217/oj</
  • Feischmidt, M., 2020. Deployed fears and suspended solidarity along the migratory route in Europe. Citizenship studies, 24 (4), 441–456.
  • Freedman, J., 2016. Engendering security at the borders of Europe: women migrants and the Mediterranean “crisis”. Journal of refugee studies, 29 (4), 568–582.
  • Futak-Campbell, B., 2021. Facilitating crisis: Hungarian and Slovak securitization of refugees and their implications for EU politics. International politics, 59, 541–561.
  • Futak-Campbell, B., forthcoming. Narrating borders: Hungary and the migration “crisis”. Vienna: Central University Press.
  • Futak-Campbell, B., and De Sauvage Nolting, H., 2022. Turkey as normative power: connections with the Muslim brotherhood during the Arab Spring. Uluslararası ilişkiler dergisi, 19 (74), 3–19.
  • Chowdhry, G., & Ling, L.H.M. 2018. Race(ing) international relations: A critical overview of postcolonial feminism in international relations. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.413.
  • Go, J., and Lawson, G., 2017. Introduction: for a global historical sociology. In: J. Go, and G. Lawson, eds. Global historical sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–34.
  • Gouldner, A.W., 1977. Stalinism: a study of internal colonialism. Télos, 34 (13-14), 5–48.
  • Güney, A., 2022. Turkey’s relations with the EU from a critical perspective: from Europhilism to anti-Europeanism (2002-2021). In: B. Erdoğan, and F. Hisarlıoğlu, eds. Critical readings of Turkey’s foreign policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 211–232.
  • Han, J., and Ling, L.H.M., 1998. Authoritarianism in the hypermasculinized state: hybridity, patriarchy, and capitalism in Korea. International studies quarterly, 42 (1), 53–78.
  • Hechter, M., 1975. Internal colonialism. The Celtic fringe in British national development, 1536-1966. London: Routledge.
  • Hisarlıoğlu, F., et al., 2022. Contesting the “corrupt elites,” creating the “pure people,” and renegotiating the hierarchies of the international order? Populism and foreign policy-making in Turkey and Hungary. International studies review, 24 (1), 1–26.
  • Hobson, J.M., 2014. The twin self-delusions of IR: why “hierarchy” not “anarchy” is the core concept of IR. Millennium, 42 (3), 557–575.
  • Hobson, J.M., and Sharman, J.C., 2005. The enduring place of hierarchy in world politics: tracing the social logics of hierarchy and political change. European journal of international relations, 11 (1), 63–98.
  • Hoijtink, M., Mühlenhoff, H.L., and Welfens, N. 2023. Whose (in)security? gender, race and coloniality in European security policies: Introduction to the Special Issue. European Security, 1–12.
  • Hooper, C., 2001. Manly states: masculinities, international relations, and gender politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • IOM, 1995. Transit migration in Turkey. Geneva: IOM.
  • Kapur, R., 2007. The citizen and the migrant: postcolonial anxieties, law, and the politics of exclusion/inclusion. Theoretical inquiries in law, 8 (2), 537–569.
  • Kaya, A. 2016. Syrian refugees and cultural intimacy in Istanbul: “I feel safe here!” (RSCAS Working Paper 2016/59). Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies: European University Institute Working Papers.
  • Keskin, F., 2018. Masculinity in gender relations: hegemonic masculinity and masculine power discourse in Turkey. Public integrity, 20 (1), 93–106.
  • Kinacioğlu, M., 2021. The rise and fall of an emerging power: agency in Turkey’s identity-based regionalism. In: B. Futak-Camnpbell, ed. Globalizing regionalism and international relations. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 207–232.
  • Kirişçi, K. 2021. As EU-Turkey migration agreement reaches the five-year mark, add a job creation element [online]. Brookings. Available from: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2021/03/17/as-eu-turkey-migration-agreement-reaches-the-five-year-mark-add-a-job-creation-element/ [Accessed 16 November 2022].
  • Korkut, U., 2016. Pragmatism, moral responsibility or policy change: the Syrian refugee crisis and selective humanitarianism in the Turkish refugee regime. Comparative migration studies, 4 (2), 1–20.
  • Krishna, S., 1999. Postcolonial insecurities: India, Sri Lanka and the question of nationhood. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Krishna, S., 2018. Postcolonialism and its relevance for international relations in a globalized world. In: R.B. Persaud, and A. Sajed, eds. Race, gender, and culture in international relations: postcolonial perspective. London: Routledge, 19–34.
  • Küçük, M.N., 2018. Conceptions of ‘the international’ beyond the core: Turkey in the post-Cold war era. Turkish studies, 19 (4), 571–592.
  • Küçük, M.N., and Dikmen-Alsancak, N., 2022. Understanding the place of the Global South within Turkey’s view of world order. In: B. Erdoğan, and F. Hisarlıoğlu, eds. Critical readings of Turkey’s foreign policy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 127–147.
  • Kušić, K., 2021. Balkan subjects in intervention literature: the politics of overrepresentation and reconstruction. Journal of international relations and development, 24 (4), 910–931.
  • Ling, L.H.M., 1999. Sex machine: global hypermasculinity and images of the Asian woman in modernity. Positions: East Asia cultures critique, 72 (2), 277–306.
  • Ling, L.H.M., 2001. Hypermasculinity. In: S. Rai, ed. Routledge encyclopaedia of international women’s studies. London: Routledge, 1089–1091.
  • Ling, L.H.M., 2002a. Postcolonial international relations: conquest and desire between Asia and the West. London: Palgrave.
  • Ling, L.H.M., 2002b. Cultural chauvinism and the liberal international order: “west vs rest” in Asia’s financial crisis. In: G Chowdhry, and S Nair, eds. Power in a postcolonial world: race, gender and class in international relations. London: Routledge, 115–141.
  • Mattern, J., and Zarakol, A., 2016. Hierarchies in world politics. International organization, 70 (3), 623–654.
  • Nandy, A., 1983. The intimate enemy: loss and recovery of self under colonialism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Nayak, M., 2019. Migration and gendered insecurities in global politics. In: C.E. Gentry, L.J. Shepherd, and L. Sjoberg, eds. Routledge handbook of gender and security. London: Routledge, 194–204.
  • Ozcurumez, S., and Şenses, N., 2011. Europeanization and Turkey: studying irregular migration policy. Journal of Balkan and near eastern studies, 13 (2), 233–248.
  • Pallister-Wilkins, P., 2016. Interrogating the Mediterranean “migration crisis”. Mediterranean politics, 21 (2), 311–315.
  • Pallister-Wilkins, P., 2022. Humanitarian borders: unequal mobility and saving lives. London: Verso.
  • Peterson, V.S., 2010. Gendered identities, ideologies, and practices in the context of war and militarism. In: L. Sjoberg, and S. Via, eds. Gender, war and militarism: feminist perspectives. London: Praeger, 17–29.
  • Sjoberg, L., 2017. Revealing international hierarchy through gender lenses. In: A. Zarakol, ed. Hierarchies in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 95–112.
  • Tickner, J.A., 1992. Gender in international relations: feminist perspectives on achieving security. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Tickner, J.A., 2001. Gendering world politics: issues and approaches in the post-cold war era. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • van Reekum, R., 2016. The Mediterranean: migration corridor, border spectacle, ethical landscape. Mediterranean politics, 21 (2), 336–341.
  • Vieira, M.A., 2018. (Re-)imagining the “self” of ontological security: the case of Brazil’s ambivalent postcolonial subjectivity. Millennium: journal of international studies, 46 (2), 142–164.
  • Welfens, N., 2020. Protecting refugees inside, protecting borders abroad? Gender in the EU’s responses to the “refugee crisis”. Political studies review, 18 (3), 510–524.
  • Wodak, R., 2001. What CDA is about - a summary of its history, important concepts and its developments. In: R. Wodak, and M. Meyer, eds. Methods of critical discourse analysis. Los Angeles: Sage, 1–13.
  • Zarakol, A., 2011. After defeat: how the East learned to live with the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zarakol, A., 2017a. Hierarchies in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zarakol, A., 2017b. Theorising hierarchies: an introduction. In: A. Zarakol, ed. Hierarchies in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–14.