Measuring the effectiveness of counter-disinformation strategies in the Czech security forces

References

• Amazeen, M., Krishna, A., and Eschmann, R., 2022. Cutting the bunk: comparing the solo and aggregate effects of prebunking and debunking Covid-19 vaccine misinformation. Science communication, 44 (4), 387–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armáda ČR, 2019. Ženy v Armádě České republiky. Kolik jich je, jaké úkoly plní, jak jsou úspěšné? 18 September. Available from: https://www.czdefence.cz/clanek/zeny-v-armade-ceske-republiky-kolik-jich-je-jake-ukoly-plni-jak-jsou-uspesne
   Google Scholar
• Basol, M., et al., 2021. Towards psychological herd immunity: cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation. Big data & society, 8 (1): 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjola, C., 2019. The ‘dark side’ of digital diplomacy: countering disinformation and propaganda. ARI 5/2019, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Boček, J., 2017. Studie: Důvěra v média je rekordně nízká. Nevěří jim mladí dospělí nebo voliči levice. 9 March. Available from: https://interaktivni.rozhlas.cz/duvera-mediim/www/
   Google Scholar
• Bor, A., et al., 2021. Fact-checking videos reduce belief in, but not the sharing of fake news on Twitter. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Braddock, K., 2019. Vaccinating against hate: using attitudinal inoculation to confer resistance to persuasion by extremist propaganda. Terrorism and political violence, 34 (2): 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashier, N. and Schacter, D.L., 2020. Aging in an era of fake news. Current directions in psychological science, 29 (3), 316–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, M., et al., 2017. Debunking: a meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological science, 28 (11): 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coddington, M., Molyneux, L., and Lawrence, R., 2014. Fact checking the campaign: how political reporters use Twitter to set the record straight (or not). The international journal of press/politics, 19 (4), 391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J., Wigley, S., and Samoilenko, S., 2021. Inoculation theory and public relations. Public relations review, 47 (5), 102116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, L., III, et al., 2012. Does complex or simple rhetoric win elections? An integrative complexity analysis of U.S. presidential campaigns. Political psychology, 33 (5), 599–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, J., 2021. Springing the ‘Tacitus trap’: countering Chinese state-sponsored disinformation. Small wars & insurgencies, 32 (2), 229–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCook, J., 2018. Memes and symbolic violence: #proudboys and the use of memes for propaganda and the construction of collective identity. Learning, media and technology, 43 (4), 485–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dieckmann, N., et al., 2017. Seeing what you want to see: how imprecise uncertainty ranges enhance motivated reasoning. Risk analysis, 37 (3), 471–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit, P. and Max, R., 2018. How WhatsApp destroyed a village. BuzzFeed News, 10 September. Available from: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/pranavdixit/whatsapp-destroyed-village-lynchings-rainpada-india
   Google Scholar
• Dowling, M. and Legrand, T., 2023. “I do not consent”: political legitimacy, misinformation, and the compliance challenge in Australia’s Covid-19 policy response. Policy and society, 42 (3), 319–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Euronews, 2023. Pro-Russia disinformation floods Slovakia ahead of crucial parliamentary election. Euronews, 29 September. Available from: https://www.euronews.com/2023/09/29/pro-russia-disinformation-floods-slovakia-ahead-of-crucial-parliamentary-elections
   Google Scholar
• Euroskop, 2022. Čeští experti zveřejnili Desatero pro lepší porozumění a čelení dezinformacím. Euroskop, 21 February. Available from: https://euroskop.cz/2022/02/21/cesti-experti-zverejnili-desatero-pro-lepsi-porozumeni-a-celeni-dezinformacim/
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, M., Gill, R., and Giles, J., 2022. Information warfare: lessons in inoculation to disinformation. Parameters, 52 (1), 105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Fridkin, K., Kenney, P., and Wintersieck, A., 2015. Liar, liar, pants on fire: how fact-checking influences citizens’ reactions to negative advertising. Political communication, 32, 127–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, S., et al., 2021. Mapping fake news and disinformation in the Western Balkans and identifying ways to effectively counter them. The European Parliament's Committee on Foreign Affairs, EP/EXPO/AFET/FWC/2019-01/Lot1/R/01.
   Google Scholar
• Guan, T., Liu, T., and Randong, Y., 2021. Facing disinformation: five methods to counter conspiracy theories amid the Covid-19 pandemic. Media education research journal, 69, 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Guess, A.M., Nagler, J., and Tucker, J., 2019. Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science advances, 5 (1), eaau4586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellman, M. and Wagnsson, C., 2017. How can European states respond to Russian information warfare? An analytical framework. European security, 26 (2), 153–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houck, S., Repke, S., and Conway, L., 2017. Understanding what makes terrorist groups’ propaganda effective: an integrative complexity analysis of ISIL and Al Qaeda. Journal of policing, intelligence and counter terrorism, 12 (2), 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H., 2018. The pathology of hard propaganda. The journal of politics, 80 (3), 1034–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, L., 2023. Social media, disinformation, and democracy: how different types of social media usage affect democracy cross-nationally. Democratization, 30 (6), 1040–1072.
   Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z., 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological bulletin, 108 (3), 480–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landon-Murray, M., Mujkic, E., and Nussbaum, B., 2019. Disinformation in contemporary U.S. foreign policy: impacts and ethics in an era of fake news, social media, and artificial intelligence. Public integrity, 21 (5), 512–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessenski, M., 2022. How it started, how it is going: media literacy index 2022. Policy Brief 57. Available from: https://osis.bg/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/HowItStarted_MediaLiteracyIndex2022_ENG_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S., 2021. Climate change disinformation and how to combat it. Annual review of public health, 42, 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowsky, S. and van der Linden, S., 2021. Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European review of social psychology, 32 (2), 348–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liederkerke, A., 2016. The paramilitary phenomenon in Central and Eastern Europe. The Polish quarterly of international affairs, 25 (2), 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mareš, M., 2018. Radicalization in the armed forces: lessons from the Czech Republic and Germany in the Central European context. Vojenské Rozhledy, 27 (3), 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Mareš, M., 2009. Hrozba politického extremismu z hlediska Ozbrojených sil České republiky. Vojenské rozhledy, 18 (2), 138–151.
   Google Scholar
• Margolin, D., Hannak, A., and Weber, I., 2018. Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? Political communication, 35, 196–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, J., 1971. Effectiveness of international propaganda. The annals of the American academy of political and social science, 398, 61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeehan, T., 2018. Countering Russian disinformation. Parameters, 48 (1), 49–57.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W., 1961. The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24 (2), 184–197.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W., 1970. Vaccine for brainwash. Psychology today, 3 (9), 36–64.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. and Papageorgis, D., 1962. Effectiveness of forewarning in developing resistance to persuasion. Public opinion quarterly, 26, 24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merpert, A., et al., 2018. Is that even checkable? An experimental study in identifying checkable statements in political discourse. Communication research reports, 35 (1), 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MO ČR, 2023. Vývoj skutečných počtů osob v resortu MO ČR v letech 1992–2022. 11 January. Available from: https://mocr.army.cz/dokumenty-a-legislativa/vyvoj-skutecnych-poctu-osob-v-resortu-mo-cr-v-letech-1992—2017-129653/
   Google Scholar
• Mozur, P., 2018. A genocide incited on Facebook, with posts from Myanmar’s military. The New York Times. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/15/technology/myanmar-facebook-genocide.html
   Google Scholar
• Nieminen, S. and Rapeli, L., 2019. Fighting misperceptions and doubting journalists’ objectivity: a review of fact-checking literature. Political studies review, 17 (3), 296–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyhan, B. and Reifler, J., 2015. The effect of fact-checking on elites: a field experiment on U.S. state legislators. American journal of political science, 59 (3), 628–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantazi, M., Hale, S., and Klein, O., 2021. Social and cognitive aspects of the vulnerability to political misinformation. Political psychology, 42 (S1), 267–304.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., 1997. The inoculation model of resistance to influence. Progress in communication sciences, 13, 133–172.
   Google Scholar
• Policie ČR, 2022. Početní stavy příslušníků Policie České republiky. Available from: https://www.policie.cz/clanek/pocetni-stavy-prislusniku-policie-ceske-republiky.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S., and Nygren, T., 2020. Prebunking interventions based on the psychological theory of “inoculation” can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures. The Harvard Kennedy school (HKS) misinformation review, 1 (2), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J., et al., 2020. Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world. Royal society open science, 7, 201199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek, J. and van der Linden, S., 2019. Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave communications, 5 (1), 65. doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9.
   Google Scholar
• Saleh, N., et al., 2021. Active inoculation boosts attitudinal resistance against extremist persuasion techniques: a novel approach towards the prevention of violent extremism. Behavioural public policy, 8 (3): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Saurwein, F. and Spencer-Smith, Ch, 2020. Combating disinformation on social media: multilevel governance and distributed accountability in Europe. Digital journalism, 8 (6), 820–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawano, T., et al., 2019. Combating ‘fake news’ and social stigma after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant incident—the importance of accurate longitudinal clinical data. QJM: An international journal of medicine, 112, 479–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J., et al., 2018. Counter-messages as prevention or promotion of extremism?! The potential role of YouTube: recommendation algorithms. Journal of communication, 68, 780–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinatra, G., Kienhues, D., and Hofer, B., 2014. Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational psychologist, 49 (2), 123–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slothuus, R. and de Vreese, C., 2010. Political parties, motivated reasoning, and issue framing effects. The journal of politics, 72 (3), 630–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecula, D., Kuru, O., and Jamieson, K., 2020. How trust in experts and media use affect acceptance of common anti-vaccination claims. The Harvard Kennedy school misinformation review, 1 (1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• STEM, 2021. Velká část občanů uvěřila předvolebním útokům na konspiračních serverech, ukazuje nový průzkum. 16 December. Available from: https://www.stem.cz/velka-cast-obcanu-uverila-predvolebnim-utokum-na-konspiracnich-serverech-ukazuje-novy-pruzkum/
   Google Scholar
• STEM, 2024. Důvěra v armádu klesá, mezi mladými je však na vysokých číslech. 14 March. Available from: https://www.stem.cz/duvera-v-armadu-klesa-mezi-mladymi-je-vsak-na-vysokych-cislech/
   Google Scholar
• Stray, J., 2019. Institutional counter disinformation strategies in a networked democracy. In: Proceedings of WWW ‘19: the web conference (WWW ‘19), 13 May, San Francisco, USA. New York, NY: ACM, 1020–1025.
   Google Scholar
• Swire, B., et al., 2017. Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon. Royal society open science, 4 (3), 160802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay, L.Q., et al., 2022. A comparison of prebunking and debunking interventions for implied versus explicit misinformation. British journal of psychology, 113, 591–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasu, N., et al., 2018. Fake news: national security in the post-truth era. S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies Policy Report. Available from: https://www.rsis.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PR180313_Fake-News_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walter, N., et al., 2020. Fact-checking: a meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political communication, 37 (3), 350–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, N. and Salovich, N., 2021. Unchecked vs. uncheckable: how opinion-based claims can impede corrections of misinformation. Mass communication and society, 24 (4), 500–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, S. and Wiysonge, C., 2020. Social media and vaccine hesitancy. BMJ global health, 5 (10), e004206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintersieck, A., 2017. Debating the truth: the impact of fact-checking during electoral debates. American politics research, 45 (2), 304–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, F. and Kohring, M., 2020. Mistrust, disinforming news, and vote choice: a panel survey on the origins and consequences of believing disinformation in the 2017 German Parliamentary Election. Political communication, 37 (2), 215–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar