Putting down verbal and cognitive weaponry: the need for ‘experimental-relational spaces of encounter’ between people with and without severe intellectual disabilities

References

• Abma, T. A., H. Leyerzapf, and E. Landeweer. 2017. “Responsive Evaluation in the Interference Zone between System and Lifeworld.” American Journal of Evaluation 38 (4): 507–520. doi:10.1177/1098214016667211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abma, T. A., and G. A. M. Widdershoven. 2014. “Dialogical Ethics and Responsive Evaluation as a Framework for Patient Participation.” The American Journal of Bioethics 14 (6): 27–29. doi:10.1080/15265161.2014.900143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abma, T. A., S. Banks, T. Cook, S. Dias, W. Madsen, J. Springett, et al. 2019. Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A. 2016. Job Satisfaction of People with Intellectual Disabilities: Associations with Job Characteristics, Fulfilment of Basic Psychological Needs and Autonomous Motivation. Doctoral Thesis: Amsterdam: VU University.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, D. 1999. Advocacy: A Review. Brighton: Pavilion.
   Google Scholar
• Bach, M. 2017. “Inclusive Citizenship: Refusing the Construction of “Cognitive Foreigners” in Neo-Liberal Times.” Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 4 (1): 4–25. doi:10.1080/23297018.2017.1306794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. 2013. “Negotiating Personal Engagement and Professional Accountability: Professional Wisdom and Ethics Work.” European Journal of Social Work 16 (5): 587–604. doi:10.1080/13691457.2012.732931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. 2016. “Everyday Ethics in Professional Life: Social Work as Ethics Work.” Ethics and Social Welfare 10 (1): 35–52. doi:10.1080/17496535.2015.1126623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltman, H. 2001. “Buigen of Barsten? Hoofdstukken Uit de Geschiedenis Van de Zorg Aan Mensen Met Een Verstandelijke Handicap in Nederland 1945-2000. [Bending or Breaking? Chapters in the History of the Care for People with an Intellectual Disability in The Netherlands 1945-2000].” Dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, J. 1998. Shadow of the Other: Intersubjectivity and Gender in Psychoanalysis. NewYork, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, G. F. 2016. “Antwoorden op Andersheid. Over Ontmoetingen Tussen Mensen Met en Zonder Verstandelijke Beperking in Omgekeerde-Integratiesettingen. [Responding to Otherness: About Encounters between People with and without Intellectual Disabilities in ‘Reversed Integration’ Settings].” Doctoral Thesis: Amsterdam: VU University.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, G. F., and D. Kal. 2016. “The Value of Inequality.” Social Inclusion 4 (4): 129–139. doi:10.17645/si.v4i4.689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, R. 2014. “Waardenwerk Voor de Strijdigheid Van Het Bestaan. [Virtueous Work for the Contravenity of Life].” Waardenwerk 57: 72–84.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2004. Precarious Life: The Power of Mourning and Violence. Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. A. K. 2008. “Exploring Internalized Ableism Using Critical Race Theory.” Disability & Society 23 (2): 151–162. doi:10.1080/09687590701841190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, F. K. 2018. “Precision Ableism: A Studies in Ableism Approach to Developing Histories of Disability and Abledment.” Rethinking History 22 (3), Critical Ability Histories, 1-23 [autumn 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Clifford Simplican, S. 2015. The Capacity Contract: Intellectual Disability and the Question of Citizenship. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford Simplican, S. 2019a. “Theorizing Community Participation: Successful Concept or Empty Buzzword?.” Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 6 (2): 116–124. doi:10.1080/23297018.2018.1503938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford Simplican, S. 2019b. “Behaviors That Challenge Disability Studies.” Disability & Society 34 (9-10): 1379–1398. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1552119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford Simplican, S., and G. Leader. 2015. “Counting Inclusion with Chantal Mouffe: A Radical Democratic Approach to Intellectual Disability Research.” Disability & Society 30 (5): 717–730. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1021763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobigo, V., H. Ouellette-Kuntz, R. Lysaght, and L. Martin. 2012. “Shifting Our Conceptualization of Social Inclusion.” Stigma Research and Action 2 (2): 75–84. doi:10.5463/sra.v1i3.45.
   Google Scholar
• Cockain, A. 2018. “Walking Small with ‘Paul’, a Man with ‘Severe Learning Difficulties’: On (Not) Passing in Purportedly Public Places.” Disability & Society 33 (5): 705–722. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1455578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. 1999. The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, R. A., and A. L. D. Lau. 2003. “Community Integration or Community Exposure? A Review and Discussion in Relation to People with an Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 16 (2): 145–157. doi:10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00157.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, C. A. 1998/2008. Reflexive Ethnography: A Guide to Researching Selves and Others. 2nd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., and F. Guattari. 1987/2003. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. 1997. Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Schauwer, E., S. Daelman, H. Vandenbussche, S. Sergeant, I. Van de Putte, and B. Davies. 2021. “Desiring and Critiquing Humanity/Ability/Personhood: Disrupting the Ability/Disability Binary.” Disability & Society 36 (2): 286–305. doi:10.1080/09687599.2020.1735306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EASNIE. 2016. Raising the Achievement of All Learners in Inclusive Education. Literature Review. Odense: European Agency for Special Needs and Inclusive Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, C. 2004. The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, B., and J. C. Tronto. 1991. “Towards a Feminist Theory of Care.” In Circles of Care: Work and Identity in Women’s Lives, edited by E. Abel and M. Nelson. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foronda, C. 2020. Journal of Transcultural Nursing 2020, 31(1) 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659619875184
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2006. History of Madness. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., and J. Miskowiec. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16 (1): 22–27. doi:10.2307/464648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 1985. The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40 (3), 266–275.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J. 2012. An invitation to social construction (2nd ed.). London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goode, D. 1994. A World without Words: The Social Construction of Children Born Deaf and Blind. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodey, C. F. 2011. A History of Intelligence and "Intellectual Disability": The Shaping of Psychology in Early Modern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley, D. 2011. Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, B., and R. Jackson. 2002. Advocacy & Learning Disability. Londen: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E. G., and Y. S. Lincoln. 1989. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. 2005. “The Entangled Geographies of Social Exclusion/Inclusion for People with Learning Disabilities.” Health & Place 11 (2): 107–115. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. 2010. “Spaces of Social Inclusion and Belonging for People with Intellectual Disabilities.” Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 54 (2): 48–57. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01237.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamington, M. 2018. “Care, Competency, and Knowledge.” In Evaluation for a Caring Society, edited by M. Visse and T. Abma. Charlotte, NC: IAP Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hayano, D. M. 1979. “Auto-Ethnography: Paradigms, Problems, and Prospects.” Human Organization 38 (1): 99–104. doi:10.17730/humo.38.1.u761n5601t4g318v.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochschild, A. R. 1983. The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irigaray, L. 1974. Speculum of the Other Woman (G. C. Gill, Trans). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., and L. A. Mazzei. 2013. “Plugging One Text into Another: Thinking with Theory in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 19 (4): 261–271. doi:10.1177/1077800412471510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kal, D. 2001. Kwartiermaken. Werken Aan Ruimte Voor Mensen Met Een Psychiatrische Achtergrond [‘Setting up Camp’: Preparing a Welcome for People with a Psychiatric Background]. Amsterdam: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Kalsem, K. 2019. “Anonymity, Privacy, and Confidentiality.” In Ethics in Participatory Research for Health and Social Well-Being: Cases and Commentaries, edited by S. Banks and M. Brydon-Miller, 131-154. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kittay, E. F. 2010. “The Personal Is Philosophical Is Political: A Philosopher and Mother of a Cognitively Disabled Person Sends Notes from the Battlefield.” In Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy, edited by E. F. Kittay and L. Carlson, 393–413. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kunneman, H. 2017. Amor Complexitatis. Bouwstenen Voor Een Kritisch Humanisme. Deel 2. [Amor Complexitatis: Building Blocks for a Critical Humanism. Part 2.]. Utrecht: Humanistic University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leget, C., I. Van Nistelrooij, and M. Visse. 2017. “Beyond Demarcation: Care Ethics as an Interdisciplinary Field of Inquiry.” Nursing Ethics 26 (1): 17–19. doi:10.1177/0969733017707008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1986. “But is It Rigorous? Trustworthiness and Authenticity in Naturalistic Evaluation.” In Naturalistic Evaluation: New Directions for Program Evaluation, edited by D. D. Williams, 73–84. San-Francisco: Yossey-Bass. doi:10.1002/ev.1427.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J. F. 1988. The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madden, R. 2010. Being Ethnographic: A Guide to the Theory and Practice of Ethnography. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Madison, D. S. 2005. Critical Ethnography: Method, Ethics, and Performance. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell, J., and K. Ericsson, eds. 1996. Deinstitutionalisation and Community Living. Intellectual Disability Services in Scandinavia, Britain and the USA. London: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Meininger, H. P. 2007. “Verbindende Verhalen en de Ruimte Van de Ontmoeting. [Connective Stories and the Space of Encounter].” In Plaatsen Waar Plek is, edited by H. P. Meininger, 19–32. Amersfoort: ‘s Heeren Loo.
   Google Scholar
• Meininger, H. P. 2008. “The Order of Disturbance: Theological Reflections on Strangeness and Strangers, and the Inclusion of Person with Intellectual Disabilities in Faith Communities.” Journal of Religion, Disability & Health 12 (4): 347–364. doi:10.1080/15228960802497874.
   Google Scholar
• Meininger, H. P. 2010. “Connecting Stories: A Narrative Approach of Social Inclusion of Persons with Intellectual Disability.” Alter 4 (3): 190–202. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2010.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Meininger, H. P. 2013. “Inclusion as Heterotopia: Spaces of Encounter between People with and without Intellectual Disability.” Journal of Social Inclusion 4 (1): 24–44. https://josi.journals.griffith.edu.au/index.php/inclusion/article/view/252 doi:10.36251/josi.61.
   Google Scholar
• Mietola, R., S. Miettinen, and S. Vehmas. 2017. “Voiceless Subjects? Research Ethics and Persons with Profound Intellectual Disabilities.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (3): 263–274. doi:10.1080/13645579.2017.1287872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niessen, T. J. H. 2007. Emerging epistemologies: Making sense of teaching practice. Dissertation. Maastricht: Fontys Hogeschool.
   Google Scholar
• Nirje, B. 1969. “The Normalization Principle and Its Human Management Implications.” In Changing Patterns in Residential Services for the Mentally Retarded, edited by R. Kugel and W. Wolfensberger, 181-195. Washington DC: President’s Committee on Mental Retardation.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability: From Theory to Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K. 2005. Ethnographic Methods. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, M. 2004. The Social Construction of Intellectual Disability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ravaud, J. F., and H. J. Stiker. 2001. “Inclusion/Exclusion: An Analysis of Historical and Cultural Meanings.” In Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by G. L. Albrecht, K. D. Seelman, and M. Bury, 490–512. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury. 2006. Handbook of Action Research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Renders, F. A. 2013. “Ruimte Maken Voor Het Andere: Auto-Etnografische Verhalen en Zelfreflecties over Het Leven in Een Vlaamse Instelling Voor Personen Met Een Verstandelijke Handicap. [Making Space for the Other: Autoethnographic Stories and Self-Reflections about Life in a Flemish Institution for Persons with an Intellectual Disability].” Dissertatie, Katholieke Universiteit, Leuven.
   Google Scholar
• Renwick, R., D. DuBois, J. Cowen, D. Cameron, A. Fudge Schormans, and N. Rose. 2019. “Voices of Youths on Engagement in Community Life: A Theoretical Framework of Belonging.” Disability & Society 34 (6): 945–971. doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1583551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainton, T. 2005. “Empowerment and the Architecture of Rights Based Social Policy.” Journal of Intellectual Disabilities 9 (4): 289–298. doi:10.1177/1744629505059266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tervalon, M., and J. Murray-García. 1998. “Cultural Humility versus Cultural Competence: A Critical Distinction in Defining Physician Training Outcomes in Multicultural Education.” Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 9 (2): 117–125. doi:10.1353/hpu.2010.0233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, E., and F. J. Varela. 2001. “Radical Embodiment: Neural Dynamics and Consciousness.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (10): 418–425. doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01750-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral Boundaries. A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. 1995. De Perken te Buiten: Meerjarenprogramma Intersectoraal Gehandicaptenbeleid 1995-1998 (No. 24170, Nrs. 1-2). Den Haag: Sdu Uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer. 1996. Actualisatie 1996: Meerjarenprogramma Intersectoraal Gehandicaptenbeleid 1995-1998 De Perken te Buiten (No. 24170, nr. 16). Den Haag: Sdu Uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2006. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol. Washington: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2011. Best Practices for Including Person with Disabilities in All Aspects of Development Efforts. Washington: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Accessed April 1, 2017. http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/best_practices_publication_2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• UPIAS. 1976. Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation.
   Google Scholar
• Van Gennep, A. T. G. 1997. “Paradigmaverschuiving in de Visie op Zorg Voor Mensen Met Een Verstandelijke Handicap. [Paradigm Shift in the Vision on Care for People with an Intellectual Disability].” Tijdschrift Voor Orthopedagogiek 36: 189–201.
   Google Scholar
• Van Manen, M., and S. Li. 2002. “The Pathic Principle of Pedagogical Language.” Teaching and Teacher Education 18 (2): 215–224. doi:10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00065-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venema, E., S. Otten, and C. Vlaskamp. 2016. “Direct Support Professionals and Reversed Integration of People with Intellectual Disabilities: Impact of Attitudes, Perceived Social Norms, and Meta-Evaluations.” Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 13 (1): 41–49. doi:10.1111/jppi.12145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. 1990/2013. Der Stachel Des Fremden. [The Sting of the Alien]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. 2004. “Bodily Experience between Selfhood and Otherness.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 3 (3): 235–248. doi:10.1023/B:PHEN.0000049305.92374.0b.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. 2010. Response and Trust: Some Aspects of Responsive Ethics. New York: Stony Brook State University. Accessed March 30, 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6iOsQ_ho94.
   Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. 2011a. “In Place of the Other.” Continental Philosophy Review 44 (2): 151–164. doi:10.1007/s11007-011-9180-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldenfels, B. 2011b. Phenomenology of the Alien: Basic Concepts. [A. Kozin and T. Stähler, Trans]. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watzlawick, P., J. H. Beavin, and D. D. Jackson. 1967/2011. Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Woelders, S., W. van der Borg, K. Schipper, and T. Abma. 2018. “The Meaning of Aphasia Centres from the Perspectives of People with Aphasia and Their Relatives: Understanding Participation in the Dutch Context.” Aphasiology 32 (12): 1490–1512. doi:10.1080/02687038.2018.1441364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfensberger, W. 1983. “Social Role Valorization: A Proposed New Term for the Principle of Normalization.” Mental Retardation 21 (6): 234–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yeager, K. A., and S. Bauer-Wu. 2013. “Cultural Humility: Essential Foundation for Clinical Researchers.” Applied Nursing Research 26 (4): 251–256. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2013.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. 1997. “Asymmetrical Reciprocity: On Moral Respect, Wonder, and Enlarged Thought.” Constellations 3 (3): 340–363. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.1997.tb00064.x.
   Google Scholar
• Zembylas, M., V. Bozalek, and T. Shefer. 2014. “Tronto’s Notion of Privileged Irresponsibility and the Reconceptualisation of Care: Implications for Critical Pedagogies of Emotion in Higher Education.” Gender and Education 26 (3): 200–214. doi:10.1080/09540253.2014.901718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar