Developing understanding of pupil feedback using Habermas’ notion of communicative action

References

• Alexander, R. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching (4th ed.). London: Dialogos.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., McCormick, R., James, M., & Pedder, D. (2006). Learning how to learn and assessment for learning: A theoretical inquiry. Research Papers in Education, 21, 119–132.10.1080/02671520600615612
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology, 54, 199–231.10.1111/apps.2005.54.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, M., & Claxton, G. (2002). Tracking the development of learning dispositions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 9, 9–37.10.1080/09695940220119148
   Google Scholar
• Claxton, G. (2008). What’s the point of school? Rediscovering the heart of education. Richmond, VA: Oneworld.
   Google Scholar
• Dann, R. (2002). Promoting assessment as learning: Improving the learning process. London: Routledge/Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21, 129–166.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York, NY: Shallow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. (2012). Mindset: How you can fulfil your potential. London: Robinson.
   Google Scholar
• Education Endowment Fund/Sutton Trust, Teaching and Learning Toolkit. (2014). Retrieved August 19, 2014, from http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/toolkit/about-the-toolkit/
   Google Scholar
• Englund, T. (2006). Deliberative communication: A pragmatist proposal. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38, 503–520.10.1080/00220270600670775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. (2011). Inside the primary classroom: Examples of dissatisfaction behind a veil of compliance. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59, 121–141.10.1080/00071005.2011.567969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, H. (2014). ‘It would help if the teacher helps you a bit more … instead of going to the brainiest who don’t need a lot of help’: Exploring the perspectives of dissatisfied girls on the periphery of primary classroom life. British Educational Research Journal, 40, 150–169.10.1002/berj.3034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gove, M. 2013. Speech by Michael Gove on 5th September on the importance of teaching. Retrieved September 18, 2013, from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-speaks-about-the-importance-of-teaching
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: The critique of functionalist reasoning (Vol. 2). Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1998). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: Reconceptualising assessment for learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39, 229–246.10.1080/03054985.2013.787922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77, 81–112.10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254–284.10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefstein, A. (2010). More helpful as problem than solution: Some implications of situating dialogue in classrooms. In K. Littleton & C. Howe (Eds.), Educational dialogues: Understanding and promoting productive interaction (pp. 170–191). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Leganger-Krogstad, H. (2014). From dialogue to trialogue: A sociocultural perspective on classroom interaction. Journal for the Study of Religion, 27, 104–128.
   Google Scholar
• Lyotard, J.-F. (1994). The postmodern turn. Manchester: Manchester University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570940
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, T. A. (1981). The critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moran, P., & Murphy, M. (2012). Habermas, pupil voice, rationalism, and their meeting with Lacan’s Objet Petit A. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 31, 171–181.10.1007/s11217-011-9271-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtagh, L. (2014). The motivational paradox of feedback: Teacher and student perceptions. The Curriculum Journal, 25, 516–541. doi:10.1080/09585176.2014.944197
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, D. (1995). Outsmarting I.Q: The emerging science of learnable intelligence. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plum, M. (2012). Humanism, administration and education: The demand of documentation and the production of a new pedagogical desire. Journal of Education Policy, 27, 491–507.10.1080/02680939.2011.640944
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J., & Crossouard, B. (2008). A socio-cultural theorisation of formative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 34, 1–20.10.1080/03054980701476386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, P. (2008). From text to action. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 77–84.10.1080/0969595980050104
   Google Scholar
• Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78, 153–189.10.3102/0034654307313795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, L. (1996). Beyond the classroom: Why school reform has failed and what parents need to do. NewYork, NY: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post‐secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 14, 281–294.10.1080/09695940701591867
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2012). Formative assessment at the crossroads: Conformative, deformative and transformative assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 323–342.10.1080/03054985.2012.689693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, H., & Pryor, J. (1998). Investigating formative assessment. Teaching, learning and assessment in the classroom. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tunstall, P., & Gipps, C. (1996). Teacher feedback to young children in formative assessment: A typology. British Educational Research Journal, 22, 389–404.10.1080/0141192960220402
   Google Scholar