Correcting for sample problems in PISA and the improvement in Portuguese students’ performance

References

• Baird, J. A., Isaacs, T., Johnson, S., Stobart, G., Yu, G., Sprague, T., & Daugherty, R. (2011). Policy effects of pisa. Oxford: Oxford University Centre for Educational Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Barrera-Osorio, F., Garcia-Moreno, V., Patrinos, A. H., & Porta, E. E. (2011). Using the oaxaca-blinder decomposition technique to analyze learning outcomes changes over time ( Policy Research Working Paper No.5584). Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5584
   Google Scholar
• Corak, M., & Lauzon, D. (2009). Differences in the distribution of high school achievement: The role of class-size and time-in-term. Economics of Education Review, 28, 189–198.10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgrove, J., & Cartwright, F. (2014). Changes in achievement on PISA: The case of Ireland and implications for international assessment practice. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 2(1), 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Dobbins, M., & Martens, K. (2012). Towards an education approach à la finlandaise? French education policy after PISA. Journal of Education Policy, 27, 23–43.10.1080/02680939.2011.622413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egelund, N. (2008). The value of international comparative studies of achievement – A Danish perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15, 245–251.
   Google Scholar
• Fertig, M., & Wright, R. E. (2005). School quality, educational attainment and aggregation bias. Economics Letters, 88, 109–114.10.1016/j.econlet.2004.12.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: The PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24, 23–37. doi:10.1080/0268093080241266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E. A., Link, S., & Woessmann, L. (2013). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212–232.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E., & Woessman, L. (2011). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. In E. A. Hanushek, S. J. Machin, & L. Woessman (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 91–200). Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Jerrim, J. (2013). The reliability of trends over time in international education test scores: Is the performance of England’s secondary school pupils really in relative decline? Journal of Social Policy, 42, 259–279.10.1017/S0047279412000827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, K., & Niemann, D. (2013). When do numbers count? The differential impact of the PISA rating and ranking on education policy in Germany and the US. German Politics, 22, 314–332.10.1080/09644008.2013.794455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGaw, B. (2008). The role of the OECD in international comparative studies of achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15, 223–243.
   Google Scholar
• Micklewright, J., Schnepf, S. V., & Skinner, C. (2012). Non-response biases in surveys of schoolchildren: the case of the english programme for international student assessment (PISA) samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 175, 915–938.10.1111/rssa.2012.175.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuwirth, E. 2006. PISA 2000: Sample weight problems in Austria ( OECD Education Working Papers, No. 5). Paris: OECD Publishing NJ1.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2012. PISA technical reports. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, M. (2001). The effects of age-based and grade-based sampling on the relative standing of countries in international comparative studies of student achievement. British Educational Research Journal, 27, 187–200.10.1080/01411920120037135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. C. (2011). An analysis of the Portuguese students’ performance in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Lisboa: Economic Bulletin, Banco de Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. C., & Reis, H. (2012). What accounts for Portuguese regional differences in students’ performance? Evidence from OECD PISA. Lisboa: Economic Bulletin, Banco de Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, R., Duque, J. C., & Nieto, S. (2012). Decomposing the rural-urban differential in student achievement in Colombia using PISA microdata. ( IZA Discussion paper series). Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
   Google Scholar
• Rangvid, B. S. (2007). School composition effects in Denmark: Quantile regression evidence from PISA 2000. Empirical Economics, 33, 359–388.10.1007/s00181-007-0133-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, C. (2013). What is behind the decline in student achievement in Australia? Economics of Education Review, 37, 226–239.10.1016/j.econedurev.2013.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneeweis, N., & Winter-Ebnner, R. (2007). Peer effects in Austrian schools. Empirical Economics, 32, 387–409.10.1007/s00181-006-0091-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenberghe, V., & Robin, S. (2004). Evaluating the effectiveness of private education across countries: A comparison of methods. Labour Economics, 11, 487–506.10.1016/j.labeco.2004.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar