2,390
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

How is formative assessment related to students’ reading achievement? Findings from PISA 2009

Pages 473-494 | Received 28 Mar 2014, Accepted 04 Jan 2016, Published online: 20 Jun 2016

References

  • ACT. (2012). Do race/ethnicity-based student achievement gaps grow over time? Retrieved from http://www.act.org/research/policymakers/pdf/RaceEthnicityReport.pdf
  • Adams, R. J., Wilson, M., & Wang, W. (1997). The multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 1–23.10.1177/0146621697211001
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA/APA/NCME). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Bali, V. A., & Alvarez, R. M. (2004). The race gap in student achievement scores: Longitudinal evidence from a racially diverse school district. Policy Studies Journal, 32, 393–415.10.1111/psj.2004.32.issue-3
  • Battistich, V., Schaps, E., & Wilson, N. (2004). Effects of an elementary school intervention on students’ ‘connectedness’ to school and social adjustment during middle school. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 24, 243–262.
  • Bauman, G. L., Bustillos, L. T., Bensimon, E. M., Brown, M. C., & Bartee, R. D. (2005). Achieving equitable educational outcomes with all students: The institution’s roles and responsibilities. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Beecham, R. (2009). Teaching quality and student satisfaction: Nexus or simulacrum? London Review of Education, 7, 135–146.10.1080/14748460902990336
  • Bell, B., & Cowie, B. (2000). The characteristics of formative assessment in science education. Science Education, 85, 536–553.
  • Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: A critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 18, 5–25.
  • Bennett, A., Bridglall, B. L., Cauce, A. M., Everson, H. T., Gordon, E. W., Lee, C. D., … Stewart, J. K. (2004). All students reaching the top: Strategies for closing academic achievement gaps. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. Retrieved from http://www.ode.state.or.us/teachlearn/real/documents/ach-gap-strategies.pdf
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (2012). Asking student about teaching: Student perception surveys and their implementation. Retrieved from http://www.metproject.org/downloads/Asking_Students_Practitioner_Brief.pdf
  • Birch, S. H., & Ladd, G. W. (1998). Children’s interpersonal behaviors and the teacher–child relationship. Developmental Psychology, 34, 934–946.10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.934
  • Black, C., Paz, H., & DeBlassie, R. (1991). Counseling the Hispanic male adolescent. Adolescence, 26, 223–232.
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 7–74.10.1080/0969595980050102
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5–31.10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
  • Blunsdon, B., Reed, K., & Mceachern, Steven (2003). Teaching organisational theory in undergraduate management programmes: An exercise in facilitated theory testing for active experimentation. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 27, 3–14.10.1080/03098770305632
  • Boyd, Donald, Lankford, H., Loeb, S., Rockoff, J., & Wyckoff, J. (2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 793–818.10.1002/pam.v27:4
  • Brannick, M. T. (1995). Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 201–213.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
  • Briggs, D. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Furtak, E., Shepard, L., & Yin, Y. (2012). Meta-analytic methodology and inferences about the efficacy of formative assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31, 13–17.10.1111/emip.2012.31.issue-4
  • Brookhart, S. M. (1997). A theoretical framework for the role of classroom assessment in motivating student effort and achievement. Applied Measurement in Education, 10, 161–180.10.1207/s15324818ame1002_4
  • Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 22, 5–12.
  • Brookhart, S., & Durkin, D. (2003). Classroom assessment, student motivation, and achievement in high school social studies classes. Applied Measurement in Education, 19, 151–184.
  • Burchinal, M. R., Peisner-Feinberg, E., Pianta, R., & Howes, C. (2002). Development of academic skills from preschool through second grade: Family and classroom predictors of developmental trajectories. Journal of School Psychology, 40, 415–436.10.1016/S0022-4405(02)00107-3
  • Byrne, B. M. (2008). Testing for multi-group equivalence of a measuring instrument: A walk through the process. Psicothema, 20, 872–882.
  • Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2005). Assessment for learning formative assessment. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533.pdf
  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 235–255.
  • Clotfelter, C., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. (2004). Teacher quality and minority achievement gaps. Durham, NC: Duke University Sanford Institute of Public Policy. Retrieved from http://research.sanford.duke.edu/papers/SAN04-04.pdf
  • Delaney, J. G., Johnson, A. N., Johnson, T. D., & Treslan, D. L. (2010). Students’ perceptions of effective teaching in higher education. St. John’s, NL: Distance Education and Learning Technologies.
  • DeVellis, R. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Dunn, K. E., & Mulvenon, S. W. (2009). A critical review of research on formative assessments: The limited scientific evidence of the impact of formative assessments in education. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=14&n=7
  • Ferguson, R., & Danielson, C. (2014). How framework for teaching and Tripod 7Cs evidence distinguish key components of effective teaching. In T. J. Kane, K. A. Kerr, & R. C. Pianta (Eds.). Designing teacher evaluation systems: New guidance from the measures of Effective Teaching Project (pp. 98–143). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Fleischman, H. L., Hopstock, P. J., Pelczar, M. P., & Shelley, B. E. (2010). Highlights from PISA 2009: Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science literacy in an international context (NCES 2011–004). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  • Flores, A. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap? The High School Journal, 91, 29–42.10.1353/hsj.2007.0022
  • Fraser, B. J., & Walberg, H. J. (2005). Research on teacher–student relationships and learning environments: Context, retrospect and prospect. International Journal of Educational Research, 43, 103–109.10.1016/j.ijer.2006.03.001
  • Fuller, B., & García Coll, C. G. (2010). Learning from Latinos: Contexts, families, and child development in motion. Developmental Psychology, 46, 559–565.10.1037/a0019412
  • Galindo, C., & Fuller, B. (2010). The social competence of Latino kindergartners and growth in mathematical understanding. Developmental Psychology, 46, 579–592.10.1037/a0017821
  • Gipps, C. (1999). Socio-cultural aspects of assessment. Review of Research in Education, 24, 355–392.
  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure? Child Development, 76, 949–967.10.1111/cdev.2005.76.issue-5
  • Haycock, K. (1998). Good teaching matters: How well-qualified teachers can close the gap. Thinking K-16, 3, 1–16.
  • Heritage, M. (2010). Formative assessment: Making it happen in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Herman, J. L., Osmundson, E., Ayala, C., Schneider, S., & Timms, M. (2006). The nature and impact of teachers’ formative assessment practices (CSE Tech Rep. No. 703). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), University of California.
  • Hickey, D. T. & Zuiker, S. J. (2005). Engaged participation: A sociocultural model of motivation with implications for educational assessment. Educational Assessment, 10, 277–305.10.1207/s15326977ea1003_7
  • Hoffman, K., & Llagas, C. (2003). Status and trends in the education of blacks (NCES 2003–034). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
  • Howes, C., Hamilton, C. E., & Matheson, C. C. (1994). Children's relationships with peers: Differential associations with aspects of the teacher-child relationship. Child Development, 65, 253–263.10.2307/1131379
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Huber, P. (1967). The behavior of the maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. In L. M. Le Cam & J. Neyman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (Vol. 1, pp. 221–233). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Kane, M. (1992). An argument-based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 527–535.10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.527
  • Kane, M. (2006). Validation. In R. Brennan (Ed.). Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17–64). Westport, CT: American Council on Education and Praeger.
  • Kelloway, E. K. (1995). Structural equation modelling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 215–224.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
  • Kingston, N., & Nash, B. (2011). Formative assessment: A meta-analysis and a call for research. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30, 28–37.10.1111/emip.2011.30.issue-4
  • Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Kulik, J. A. (2001). Student ratings: Validity, utility, and controversy. New Directions for Institutional Research, 109, 9–25.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-075X
  • Lee, J. (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity? Educational Researcher, 31, 3–12.10.3102/0013189X031001003
  • Lindsey, R. B., Graham, S. M., Westphal, R. C., & Jew, C. L. (2008). Culturally proficient inquiry: A lens for identifying and analyzing educational gaps. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Markland, D. (2007). The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 851–858.10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.023
  • Martínez, R. S., Aricak, O. T., & Jewell, J. (2008). Influence of reading attitude on reading achievement: A test of the temporal-interaction model. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 1010–1023.10.1002/pits.v45:10
  • McMillan, J. H., Venable, J. C., & Varier, D. (2013). Studies of the effect of formative assessment on student achievement: So much more is needed. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=18&n=2
  • Melmer, R., Burmaster, E., & James, T. K. (2008). Attributes of effective formative assessment. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/publications/details.cfm?PublicationID=362
  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.10.1007/BF02294825
  • Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56, 177–196.10.1007/BF02294457
  • Molenberghs, G., & Verbeke, G. (2007). Likelihood ratio, score, and wald tests in a constrained parameter space. The American Statistician, 61, 22–27.10.1198/000313007X171322
  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus User’s Guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/ceri/35661078.pdf
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010a). Performance of U.S. 15-year-old students in reading, mathematics, and science literacy in an international context. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/2011004.pdf
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010b). TALIS technical report. Retrieved from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/education/talis-2008-technical-report_9789264079861-en
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010c). PISA 2009 results: Overcoming social background – equity in learning opportunities and outcomes (Volume II). Retrieved from 10.1787/9789264091504-en
  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2009/50036771.pdf
  • Pallock, L. L., & Lamborn, S. D. (2006). Beyond parenting practices: Extended kinship support and the academic adjustment of African-American and European-American teens. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 813–828.10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.12.003
  • Parkes, J. (2007). Reliability as argument. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26, 2–10.10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00103.x
  • Pianta, R. C., Steinberg, M. S., & Rollins, K. (1995). The first two years of school: Teacher-child relationships and deflections in children’s classroom adjustment. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 297–312.
  • Popham, W. J. (2008). Transformative assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Randel, B., Beesley, A. D., Apthorp, H., Clark, T. F., Wang, X., Cicchinelli, L. F., & Williams, J. M. (2011). Classroom assessment for student learning: The impact on elementary school mathematics in the central region. (NCEE 2011-4005). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences.
  • Rimm-Kaufman, S. (2010). Improving students’ relationships with teachers to provide essential supports for learning: Teacher’s modules. American Psychological Association (APA). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/education/k12/relationships.aspx
  • Rodriguez, M. C. (2004). The role of classroom assessment in student performance on TIMSS. Applied Measurement in Education, 17(1), 1–24.10.1207/s15324818ame1701_1
  • Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529.
  • Sadler, D. R. (1998). Formative assessment: Revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 77–84.10.1080/0969595980050104
  • Shepard, L. A. (2005). Linking formative assessment to scaffolding. Educational Leadership, 63, 66–71.
  • Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.10.3102/00346543075003417
  • Spooren, P., Brockx, B., & Mortelmans, D. (2013). On the validity of student evaluation of teaching: The state of the art. Review of Educational Research, 83, 598–642.10.3102/0034654313496870
  • Steadman, M. (1998). Using classroom assessment to change both teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 75, 23–35.10.1002/(ISSN)1536-0768
  • Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2005). Using student-involved classroom assessment to close achievement gaps. Theory Into Practice, 44, 11–18.10.1207/s15430421tip4401_3
  • Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2006). What a difference a word makes: Assessment FOR learning rather than assessment of learning helps students succeed. Journal of Staff Development, 27, 10–14.
  • Stiggins, R., & Conklin, N. F. (1992). In teachers’ hands: Investigating the practices of classroom assessment. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
  • Stone, Z., Barron, K., & Finch, N. (2012). Effective and promising practices for closing achievement gaps. Nashville, TN: Appalachia Regional Comprehensive Center (ARCC) at Edvantia. Retrieved from http://sites.edvantia.org/pdta/pdf/tdoe_effective_practices_achievement_gaps080812.pdf
  • Strand, S. (2014). School effects and ethnic, gender and socio-economic gaps in educational achievement at age 11. Oxford Review of Education, 40, 223–245.10.1080/03054985.2014.891980
  • Teale, W. H., & Lewis, R. (1981). The nature and measurement of secondary school students’ attitudes toward reading. Reading Horizons, 21, 94–102.
  • Teddlie, C., Stringfield, S., & Reynolds, D. (2000). Context issues within school effectiveness research. In C. Teddlie & D. Reynolds (Eds.), The international handbook of school effectiveness research (pp. 160–185). London: Falmer Press.
  • Vanneman, A., Hamilton, L., Anderson, J. B., &, Rahman, T. (2009). Achievement gaps: How black and white students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress, (NCES 2009–455). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.
  • von Davier, M., Gonzalez, E., & Mislevy, R. (2009). What are plausible values and why are they useful? In M. von Davier & D. Hastedt (Eds.). IERI monograph series: Issues and methodologies in large scale assessments (Vol. 2). IEA-ETS Research Institute.
  • Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • White, H. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation of misspecified models. Econometrica, 50(1), 1–26.
  • Wiliam, D. (2005). Keeping learning on track: Formative assessment and the regulation of learning. In M. Coupland, J. Anderson, & T. Spencer (Eds.). Making mathematics vital: Proceedings of the Twentieth Biennial Conference of the Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers (pp. 26–40). Adelaide, Australia: Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
  • Yeh, S. (2010). Understanding and addressing the achievement gap through individualized instruction and formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, & Practice, 17, 169–182.
  • Yin, Y., Shavelson, R. J., Ayala, C. C., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., Brandon, Paul R., Furtak, E. M., … Young, D. B. (2008). On the impact of formative assessment on student motivation, achievement, and conceptual Change. Applied Measurement in Education, 21, 335–359.10.1080/08957340802347845
  • Yong, F., & Ewing, N. (1992). A comparative study of the learning-style preferences among gifted African-American, Mexican-American and American born Chinese middle-grade students. Roeper Review, 14, 120–123.
  • Zaccarin, S., & Donati, C. (2008). The effects of sampling weights in multilevel analysis of PISA data ( working paper No. 119). Trieste: University of Trieste.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.