References
- Borsboom, D., & Wijsen, L. D. (2016). Frankenstein’s validity monster: The value of keeping politics and science separated. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy and Practice, 23, 281–283, Special issue on validity.
- Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. (2015). A case study of teacher personal practice assessment theories and complexities of implementing formative assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 956–983.10.3102/0002831215587754
- Carr, M., & Claxton, G. (2002). Tracking the development of learning dispositions. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 9, 9–37.
- Dann, R. (2016). Developing understanding of pupil feedback using Habermas’ notion of communication action. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, (this issue).
- Dweck, C. (2012). Mindset: How you can fulfill your potential. London: Robinson.
- Gysling, J. (2015). The historical development of educational assessment in Chile: 1810–2014. Educational assessment in Latin America. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23, 8–25.
- Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., & Schildkamp, K. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62.10.1016/j.edurev.2015.12.002
- Helman, L. Delbridge, A., Parker, D., Arnal, M., & Mödinger, L. J. (2016). Measuring Spanish orthographic development in private, public and subsidised schools in Chile. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, (this issue).
- Hondrich, A. L. Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E. (2016). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy and Practice, (this issue)
- Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2015). Large-scale implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy and Practice, 22, 1–2.
- Hopfenbeck, T. N., Tolo, A., & Florez, M. T. (2015). Balancing tensions in educational policy reforms: Large-scale implementation of assessment for learning in Norway. Assessment in Education, Principles, Policy and Practice, 22, 44–60.
- Hopfenbeck, T. N., Tolo, A., Florez, M. T., & El Masri, Y. (2013). Balancing trust and accountability? The assessment for learning programme in Norway a governing complex education systems case study. OECD Education Working Papers. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/balancing-trust-and-accountability-the-assessment-for-learning-programme-in-norway_5k3txnpqlsnn-en
- Newton, P., & Baird, J.-A. (2016). The great validity debate. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23, 173–177.
- Nortvedt, G., Santos, L., & Pinto, J. (2016). Assessment for learning in Norway and Portugal: The case of primary school mathematics teaching. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, (this issue).
- Swaffield, S., & Thomas, S. (2016). Educational assessment in Latin America. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23, 1–7.
- Wiliam, D., Lee, C., Harrison, C., & Black, P. (2004). Teachers developing assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11, 49–65.