1,100
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Teacher evaluation as a wicked policy problem

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 291-309 | Received 28 Mar 2017, Accepted 04 Jan 2018, Published online: 08 Feb 2018

References

  • Abrahamsen, H. (2017, February 20). Redesigning the role of deputy heads in Norwegian schools – tensions between control and autonomy? International Journal of Leadership in Education , 1–17. doi:10.1080/13603124.2017.1294265
  • Anagnostopoulos, D. , Lingard, B. , & Sellar, S. (2016). Argumentation in educational policy disputes: Competing visions of quality and equity. Theory Into Practice , 55 (4), 342–351.10.1080/00405841.2016.1208071
  • Anderson, S. K. , Terras, K. L. , & Dagfinrud, M. (2013). Appraising teacher quality in Norwegian schools. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology , 3 (8), 16–42.
  • Ashforth, B. E. , Rogers, K. M. , Pratt, M. G. , & Pradies, C. (2014). Ambivalence in organizations: A multilevel approach. Organization Science , 25 (5), 1453–1478.10.1287/orsc.2014.0909
  • Barth, E. , Moene, K. O. , & Willumsen, F. (2014). The Scandinavian model – an interpretation. Journal of Public Economics , 117 , 60–72.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.04.001
  • Berliner, D. C. (2013). Problems with value-added evaluations of teachers? Let me count the ways! The Teacher Educator , 48 (4), 235–243.10.1080/08878730.2013.827496
  • Blömeke, S. , Gustafsson, J. E. , & Shavelson, R. J. (2015). Beyond dichotomies. Zeitschrift für Psychologie , 223 (1), 3–13. doi:10.1027/2151-2604/a000194
  • Brandal, N. , Bratberg, Ø. , & Thorsen, D. E. (2013). The Nordic model of social democracy . London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137013279
  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Thinking , 8 (2), 5–21.
  • Byrkjeflot, H. (2001). The Nordic model of democracy and management . Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
  • Camillus, J. C. (2008). Strategy as a wicked problem. Harvard Business Review , 86 (5), 98–108.
  • Castetter, W. B. (1976). The personnel function in educational administration . New York, NY : Macmillan.
  • Cohen, J. , & Goldhaber, D. (2016). Building a more complete understanding of teacher evaluation using classroom observations. Educational Researcher , 45 (6), 378–387.10.3102/0013189X16659442
  • Cohen, D. K. , & Mehta, J. D. (2017). Why reform sometimes succeeds: Understanding the conditions that produce reforms that last. American Educational Research Journal , 54 (4), 644–690.10.3102/0002831217700078
  • Collins, C. , & Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2014). Putting growth and value-added models on the map: A national overview. Teachers College Record , 116 (1), 1–32.
  • Cousins, J. B. , & Earl, L. M. (1992). The case for participatory evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis , 14 (4), 397–418.10.3102/01623737014004397
  • Cousins, J. B. , Whitmore, E. , & Shulha, L. (2013). Arguments for a common set of principles for collaborative inquiry in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation , 34 (1), 7–22.10.1177/1098214012464037
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Getting teacher evaluation right: What really matters for effectiveness and improvement . New York, NY : Teachers College Press.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). One piece of the whole: Teacher evaluation as part of a comprehensive system for teaching and learning. American Educator , 38 (1), 4.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Can value added add value to teacher evaluation? Educational Researcher , 44 (2), 132–137.10.3102/0013189X15575346
  • Decker, P. , Durand, R. , Mayfield, C. O. , McCormack, C. , Skinner, D. , & Perdue, G. (2012). Predicting implementation failure in organization change. Journal of Organizational Culture, Communication and Conflict , 16 (2), 29–49.
  • Delvaux, E. , Vanhoof, J. , Tuytens, M. , Vekeman, E. , Devos, G. , & Van Petegem, P. (2013). How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education , 36 , 1–11.10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.011
  • Drucker, P. (1954). The practice of management . New York, NY : Harper.
  • Education Act . (1998). Retrieved from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1998-07-17-61
  • Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership . Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
  • Elstad, E. , Lejonberg, E. , & Christophersen, K. A. (2015b). Teaching evaluation as a contested practice: Teacher resistance to teaching evaluation schemes in Norway. Education Inquiry , 6 (4), 375–399.
  • Elstad, E. , Lejonberg, E. , & Christophersen, K. A. (2017). Student evaluation of high-school teaching: Which factors are associated with teachers’ perception of the usefulness of being evaluated? Journal of Educational Research , 9 (1), 99–117. Retrieved from http://www.j-e-r-o.com/index.php/jero/article/view/735
  • Elstad, E. , Lysa, I. , Baklien, R. , Standal, E. O. , Johansen, A. , Filmberg, G. , … Rimeslåtten, A. (2014). Rapport til drøfting i GNIST-partnerskapet [Report to the GNIST partnership] . Oslo: GNIST. ISBN 978-82-999655-0-7. Retrieved from http://udirbeta.udir.no/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/rapport-fra-arbeidsgruppa.pdf
  • Elstad, E. , Lysa, I. , Standal, E. O. , Buan, A. , Hvidsten Dahl, S. , Trudeng, M. , & Furulund, M. (2015a). Forslag til hvordan et system for lærervurdering kan utformes og prøves ut i Norge [How can a system for teacher evaluation be designed and tried out in Norway?]. Oslo: GNIST. ISBN 978-82-999655-0-7.
  • Firestone, W. A. (2014). Teacher evaluation policy and conflicting theories of motivation. Educational Researcher , 43 (2), 100–107.10.3102/0013189X14521864
  • Flores, M. A. (2012). The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: How do teachers experience it at school? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability , 24 (4), 351–368.10.1007/s11092-012-9153-7
  • Gardner, H. K. , & Valentine, M. (2015). Collaboration among highly autonomous professionals: Costs, benefits and future research directions. In Shane R. Thye & Edward J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 32, pp. 209–242). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • GNIST . (2009). GNIST – partnership for a coherent and comprehensive effort for teachers . Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research.
  • Goe, L. , Biggers, K. , & Croft, A. (2012). Linking teacher evaluation to professional development: Focusing on improving teaching and learning. Research & policy brief . Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality.
  • Goldie, J. (2013). Assessment of professionalism: A consolidation of current thinking. Medical Teacher , 35 (2), 952956. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.714888
  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 2). Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  • Hallinger, P. , Heck, R. H. , & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability , 26 (1), 5–28.10.1007/s11092-013-9179-5
  • Hanushek, E. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement; estimation using micro data. American Economic Review , 61 , 280–288.
  • Hanushek, E. (1999). The evidence on class size. In S. E. Mayer & P. E. Peterson (Eds.), Earning and learning: How schools matter (pp. 131–168). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Hanushek, E. A. , & Raymond, M. E. (2005). Does school accountability lead to improved student performance? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 24 , 297–327.10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6688
  • Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy , 3 (2), 101–118.
  • Head, B. W. , & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration & Society , 47 (6), 711–739.10.1177/0095399713481601
  • Hudson, C. (2011). Evaluation – the (not so) softly-softly approach to governance and its consequences for compulsory education in the Nordic countries. Education Inquiry , 2 (4), 671–687.10.3402/edui.v2i4.22006
  • Hursh, D. (2007). Assessing no child left behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal , 44 (3), 493–518.10.3102/0002831207306764
  • Ingvarson, L. (2005). Getting professional development right . Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/professional_dev/4
  • Jordan, M. E. , Kleinsasser, R. C. , & Roe, M. F. (2014). Wicked problems: Inescapable wickedity. Journal of Education for Teaching , 40 (4), 415–430.10.1080/02607476.2014.929381
  • Kettl, D. F. (2015). Syncing the instruments and missions of government: Re-thinking the roots of decay. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration , 37 (4), 247–252.10.1080/23276665.2015.1117177
  • Kindergarten Act . (2005). Retrieved from https://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/2005-06-17-64
  • Kraft, M. A. , & Gilmour, A. F. (2016). Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals’ views and experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly , 52 (5), 711–753.10.1177/0013161X16653445
  • Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the intended and unintended consequences of high-stakes teacher evaluation on schools, teachers, and students. Teachers College Record , 116 (1), 1–29.
  • Lillejord, S. , Børte, K. , Ruud, E. , Hauge, T. E. , Hopfenbeck, T. N. , Tolo, A. , … Smeby, J.-C. (2014). Former for lærervurdering som kan ha positiv innvirkning på skolens kvalitet: En systematisk kunnskapsoversikt . Oslo: Kunnskapssenter for utdanning. Retrieved from www.kunnskapssenter.no.
  • Lillejord, S. , & Dysthe, O. (2008). Productive learning practice–a theoretical discussion based on two cases. Journal of Education and Work , 21 (1), 75–89.10.1080/13639080801957154
  • Lindbeck, A. (1997). The Swedish experiment. Journal of Economic Literature , 3 , 1273–1319.
  • Livingston, K. , & Hutchinson, C. (2016). Developing teachers’ capacities in assessment through career-long professional learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice , 24 (2), 290–307.
  • Lundgren, U. P. (2011). PISA as a political instrument. In M. A. Pereyra , H. G. Kotthoff , & R. Cowen (Eds.), Pisa under examination. Changing knowledge, changing tests, and changing schools (pp. 17–30). Dordrecht: Sense Publishers.
  • March, J. G. (1984). How we talk and how we act: Administrative theory and administrative life. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational cultures (pp. 18–35). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
  • McDonnell, L. M. , & Weatherford, M. S. (2016). Recognizing the political in implementation research. Educational Researcher , 45 (4), 233–242.10.3102/0013189X16649945
  • McMahon, S. , & Jones, I. (2015). A comparative judgement approach to teacher assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice , 22 (3), 368–389.10.1080/0969594X.2014.978839
  • Mehta, J. (2013). From bureaucracy to profession: Remaking the educational sector for the twenty-first century. Harvard Educational Review , 83 (3), 463–488.10.17763/haer.83.3.kr08797621362v05
  • Merton, R. K. (1976). Sociological ambivalence and other essays . New York, NY: The Free Press. Macmillan Publishing.
  • Meyer, J. W. , & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology , 83 (2), 340–363.10.1086/226550
  • Moene, K. O. , & Wallerstein, M. (2002). Social democracy as a development strategy . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Munneke, L. , Andriessen, J. , Kanselaar, G. , & Kirschner, P. (2007). Supporting interactive argumentation: Influence of representational tools on discussing a wicked problem. Computers in Human Behavior , 23 (3), 1072–1088.10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.003
  • Murphy, J. , Hallinger, P. , & Heck, R. H. (2013). Leading via teacher evaluation: The case of the missing clothes? Educational Researcher , 42 (6), 349–354.10.3102/0013189X13499625
  • National Commission on Excellence in Education . (1983). A nation at risk: A report to the nation and the Secretary of Education . Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
  • O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • OECD . (1987). Reviews of national policies for education . Norway: Draft of February 1988. Copy from the National Library of Norway, Depot.
  • OECD . (2009). Teacher evaluation. A conceptual framework and examples of country practices . OECD Review on Evaluation and Assessment Frameworks for Improving School Outcomes. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/44568106.pdf
  • Ozga, J. , Dahler-Larsen, P. , Segerholm, C. , & Simola, H. (2011). Fabricating quality in education: Data and governance in Europe . London: Routledge.
  • Popham, W. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education , 1 (3), 269–273.
  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2000). Globalization/regionalization, knowledge, and the educational practices: Some notes on comparative strategies for educational research. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society, and the educational community (pp. 3–27). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
  • Pupala, B. , Kascak, O. , & Tesar, M. (2016). Learning how to do up buttons: Professionalism, teacher identity and bureaucratic subjectivities in early years settings. Policy Futures in Education , 14 (6), 655–665.10.1177/1478210316642675
  • Ramirez, F. O. , & Boli, J. (1987). The political construction of mass schooling: European origins and worldwide institutionalization. Sociology of Education , 60 (1), 2–17.10.2307/2112615
  • Rittel, H. W. , & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences , 4 (2), 155–169.10.1007/BF01405730
  • Sachs, J. (2016). Teacher professionalism: Why are we still talking about it? Teachers and Teaching , 22 (4), 413–425.10.1080/13540602.2015.1082732
  • Sahlberg, P. (2010). Rethinking accountability in a knowledge society. Journal of Educational Change , 11 (1), 45–61.10.1007/s10833-008-9098-2
  • Santiago, P. , Benavides, F. , Danielson, C. , Goe, L. , & Nusche, D. (2013). Teacher evaluation in Chile. Main conclusions . Paris: OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education.
  • Schelling, T. C. (1980). The strategy of conflict . Boston, MA : Harvard University Press.
  • Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and science of the learning organization . New York, NY : Currency Doubleday.
  • Nusche, D. , Earl, L. , Maxwell, W. , & Schrewbridge, C. (2011). OECD reviews of evaluation and assessment in education. Norway . Paris: OECD. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/norway/48632032.pdf 10.1787/22230955
  • Shulha, L. M. , Whitmore, E. , Cousins, J. B. , Gilbert, N. , & al Hudib, H. (2016). Introducing evidence-based principles to guide collaborative approaches to evaluation: Results of an empirical process. American Journal of Evaluation , 37 (2), 193–215.10.1177/1098214015615230
  • Simons, P. R. J. , & Ruijters, M. C. (2014). The real professional is a learning professional. In S. Billet , C. Harteis , & H. Gruber (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning (pp. 955–985). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Smagorinsky, P. (2014). Authentic teacher evaluation: A two-tiered proposal for formative and summative assessment. English Education , 46 (2), 165–185.
  • Smylie, M. A. (2014). Teacher evaluation and the problem of professional development. Mid-Western Educational Researcher , 26 (2), 97–111.
  • Smylie, M. A. , Murphy, J. , & Louis, K. S. (2016). Caring school leadership: A multi disciplinary, cross-occupational model. American Journal of Education , 123 (1), 1–35.
  • Spillane, J. P. & Diamond, J. B. (Eds). (2007). Distributed leadership in practice . New York, NY : Teacher College Press.
  • Stranden, K. (2017). Profesjonsutvikling i skolen. Rapport fra et utviklingsprosjekt initiert av Utdanningsdirektoratet [Professional development in school. Report from a developmental project initiated by the Directorate for Education and Training]. Retrieved from https://www.udir.no/tall-og-forskning/finn-forskning/rapporter/profesjonsutvikling-i-skolen/
  • Stroupe, D. (2016). Beginning teachers’ use of resources to enact and learn from ambitious instruction. Cognition and Instruction , 34 (1), 51–77.10.1080/07370008.2015.1129337
  • Taut, S. , & Sun, Y. (2014). The development and implementation of a national, standards-based, multi-method teacher performance assessment system in Chile. Education Policy Analysis Archives , 22 (71), 1–33.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M. (2009). Fostering teacher professionalism in schools: The role of leadership orientation and trust. Educational Administration Quarterly , 45 (2), 217–247.10.1177/0013161X08330501
  • Tyack, D. B. (1974). The one best system . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Tyack, D. , & Hansot, E. (1982). Managers of virtue: Public school leadership in America 1820–1980 . New York, NY : Basic Books.
  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization . ( A. M. Henderson & Talcott Parsons , Trans.). New York, NY : Macmillan Publishing.
  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly , 21 (1), 1–19.10.2307/2391875
  • White Paper (Stortingsmelding) No. 37 . (1990–1991). Om organisering og styring i utdanningssektoren [Organization and steering in the education sector]. Oslo: Ministry of Education and Research.
  • Zhang, X. F. , & Ng, H. M. (2011). A case study of teacher appraisal in Shanghai, China: In relation to teacher professional development. Asia Pacific Education Review , 12 (4), 569–580.10.1007/s12564-011-9159-8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.