1,421
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Who makes it into PISA? Understanding the impact of PISA sample eligibility using Turkey as a case study (PISA 2003–PISA 2012)

Pages 397-421 | Received 30 Sep 2017, Accepted 16 Jul 2018, Published online: 13 Aug 2018

References

  • Adams, R.J., & Wu, M.L. (Eds.) (2002) P1SA 2000 technical report. Paris: OECD Publications.
  • Alacacı, C., & Erbaş, A. K. (2010). Unpacking the inequality among Turkish schools: Findings from PISA 2006. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 182–192.
  • Author. (2017). Who makes it into PISA? Understanding the impact of sample eligibility using Turkey as a case study (PISA 2003- PISA 2012). OECD Education Working Papers, No. 154, OECD Publishing, Paris. doi:10.1787/41d175fc-en
  • Author, & Taylor, S. (2015). Access to what? Creating a composite measure of educational quantity and educational quality for 11 African countries. Comparative Education Review, 59(1), 133–165.
  • Aydagül, B. (2008). No shared vision for achieving education for all: Turkey at risk. Prospects, 38(3), 401–407.
  • Bloem, S. (2015). PISA for low- and middle-income countries. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(3), 481–486.
  • Celik, K., & Lüküslü, D. (2010). Spotlighting a silent category of young females: The life experiences of “House Girls” in Turkey. Youth & Society, 44(1), 28–48.
  • Demiray, U., & Adiyaman, Z. (Eds). (2002). A review of the literature on the open high school in Turkey between the years on its 10th anniversary (1992–2002). In Istanbul. Turkish republic: Ministry of National Education.
  • Dülger, I. (2004). A case study from Reducing Poverty, Sustaining Growth—What Works, What Doesn’t, and Why A Global Exchange for Scaling Up Success Scaling Up Poverty Reduction: A Global Learning Process and Conference Shanghai, May 25–27, 2004. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTTURKEY/Resources/361616-1142415001082/Compulsory_Education_by_Dulger.pdf.
  • Ferreira, F. H. G., & Gignoux, J. (2014). The measurement of educational inequality: Achievement and opportunity. The World Bank Economic Review, 28(2), 210–246.
  • Filmer, D., Hasan, A., & Pritchett, L. (2006). A millennium learning goal: Measuring real progress in education. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.982968
  • Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). The effect of household wealth on educational attainment: Evidence from 35 countries. Population and Development Review, 25, 85–120.
  • Filmer, D., & Pritchett, L. (2001). Estimating wealth effects without expenditure data – Or tears: An application to educational enrollments in states of India*. Demography. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1353/dem.2001.0003
  • Gur, B., Celik, Z., & Ozoglu, M. (2012). Policy options for Turkey: A critique of the interpretation and utilization of PISA results in Turkey. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 1–21.
  • Hacettepe-UIPS. (2003). Turkey demographic and health survey 2003. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies.
  • Hacettepe-UIPS. (2009). Turkey demographic and health survey, 2008. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies.
  • Hacettepe-UIPS. (2014). 2013 Turkey demographic and health survey. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies.
  • Hanushek, E., & Woessmann, L. (2008). The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607–668. Retrieved from. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27647039.
  • Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). Sample selectivity and the validity of international student achievement tests in economic research. Economics Letters, 110(2), 79–82.
  • Kırdar, M. G. (2009). Explaining ethnic disparities in school enrollment in Turkey. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(2), 297–333.
  • Köksal, S. (2014). Open and distance education in Turkey. Galatawaray University.
  • Köseleci, N. (2015). Progress towards good-quality education for all in Turkey: A qualified success? Comparative Education, 51(4), 555–574.
  • Köseleci, N., & Sasmaz, A. (2011). PISA 2009: Where does turkey stand? Turkish Policy Quarterly, 10(2), 125–134.
  • Lambin, R. (1995). What can planners expect from international quantitative studies? In Reflections on educational achievement: Papers in Honor of T. Neville Postlethwaite (pp. 169–182).
  • Lewin, K. M., Transitions and Equity. (2007). Improving access, equity and transitions in education : Creating a research agenda (No. 1). CREATE. Sussex, UK: Center for International Education.
  • Lewin, K. M. (2009). Access to education in sub‐Saharan Africa: Patterns, problems and possibilities. Comparative Education, 45(2), 151–174.
  • Lewin, K. M., & Little, A. W. (2011). Access to education revisited: Equity, drop out and transitions to secondary school in South Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 31(4), 333–337.
  • Lewis, M., & Lockheed, M. (2006). Inexcusable absence: Why 60 million girls still aren’t in school and what to do about it. Center for Global Development. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Inexcusable+Absence:Why+60+Million+Girls+Still+Aren’t+in+School+and+What+to+Do+About+It#0
  • Lockheed, M., Prokic-Breuer, T., & Shadrova, A. (2015). The experience of middle-income countries participating in PISA 2000–2015. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • MoNE. (2016). National education statistics: Formal education 2015/16. Istanbul, Turkey: Turkish Republic Ministry of National Education.
  • O’Dwyer, J., Aksit, N., & Sands, M. (2010). Expanding educational access in Eastern Turkey: A new initiative. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(2), 193–203.
  • OECD. (2004). PISA Report 2003: Learning for Tomorrow’s World. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • OECD. (2005). PISA 2003 Technical Report. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • OECD. (2012a). PISA 2009 Technical Report. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 Technical Report. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • OECD. (2016a). PISA 2015 results (Vol 1): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • OECD, & UNESCO-UIS. (2003). PISA 2000 report. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • Özdemir, C. (2016). Equity in the Turkish education system: A multilevel analysis of social background influences on the mathematics performance of 15-year-old students. European Educational Research Journal, 15(2), 193–217.
  • OECD. 2010. Report: What students know and can do. Paris: Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). PISA 2009.
  • OECD, & PISA 2012. (2012b). Results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Vol.2). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012. Results: What students know and can do. Student performance in mathematics reading and science (Vol 1) Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
  • OECD. 2016b. PISA for development: Benefits for participating countries. Paris, PISA for Development Brief (Vol. 2). Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris.
  • Parandekar, S., & Sedmik, E. (2016). Unraveling a Secret: Vietnam’s outstanding performance on the PISA test. Washington, DC.
  • Pritchett, L. (2013). The rebirth of education: Schooling ain’t learning. 2013. Washington, DC.: Center for Global Development.
  • Rankin, B. H., & Aytac, I. A. (2006). Gender inequality in schooling: The case of Turkey. Sociology of Education, 79(1), 25–43.
  • Rotberg, I. (1995). Myths about test score comparisons. Science, 270(5241), 1446–1448.
  • Tansel, A. (2002). Determinants of school attainment of boys and girls in Turkey: Individual, household and community factors. Economics of Education Review, 21(5), 455–470.
  • Taylor, S., & Author. (2015). Measuring access to learning over a period of increased access to schooling: The case of Southern and Eastern Africa since 2000. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 47–59.
  • UNESCO. (2005). Education for all global monitoring report 2005: The quality imperative. Paris: UNESCO.
  • UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2010). Measuring educational participation: Analysis of data quality and methodology based on ten studies (Technical Paper 4). Montreal, Quebec: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
  • World Bank. (2005). Turkey – Education sector study. Washington, DC.: World Bank.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.