References
- Absolum, M., Flockton, L., Hattie, J., Hipkins, R., & Reid, I. (2009). Directions for assessment in New Zealand: Developing students’ assessment capabilities. Ministry of Education. http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Assessment-in-the-classroom/Assessment-position-papers
- Adie, L. E. (2013). The development of teacher assessment identity through participation in online moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.650150
- American Federation of Teachers, National Council on Measurement in Education, & National Education Association. (1990). Standards for teacher competence in educational assessment of students. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 9(4), 30–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1990.tb00391.x
- Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric-referenced self-assessment on elementary school students’ writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2008.00118.x
- Black, P., Harrison, C., Hodgen, J., Marshall, B., & Serret, N. (2011). Can teachers’ summative assessments produce dependable results and also enhance classroom learning? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 451–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.557020
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998a). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998b). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Kings College.
- Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998c). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20439383
- Booth, B., Dixon, H., & Hill, M. (2016). Assessment capability for New Zealand teachers and students: Challenging but possible. Set: Research Information for Teachers, 2(2), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.18296/set.0043
- Booth, B., Hill, M. F., & Dixon, H. (2014). The assessment-capable teacher: Are we all on the same page. Assessment Matters, 6, 137–157. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/nzcerpress/assessment-matters/articles/assessment-capable-teacher-are-we-all-same-page
- Broadfoot, P., Daugherty, R., Gardner, J., Gipps, C. V., Harlen, W., James, M., & Stobart, G. (1999). Assessment for learning: Beyond the black box. University of Cambridge School of Education.
- Broadfoot, P., Daugherty, R., Gardner, J., Harlen, W., James, M., & Stobart, G. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Assessment Reform Group. https://castl.duq.edu/Conferences/Library03/PDF/Assessment/Ten_Principles.pdf
- Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
- Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.
- Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. (2005) . Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
- Connolly, S., Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2012). Moderation and consistency of teacher judgement: Teachers’ views. British Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411926.2011.569006
- Crooks, T. (2011). Assessment for learning in the accountability era: New Zealand. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.002
- DeLuca, C., Valiquette, A., & Klinger, D. A. (2016). Implementing assessment for learning in Canada: The challenge of teacher professional development. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for Learning: meeting the challenge of implementation (Vol. 4, pp. 145–160). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_9
- DeLuca, C., & Johnson, S. (2017). Developing assessment capable teachers in this age of accountability. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1297010
- Department of Education and Training. (2018). Assessment and moderation in prep to year 10. Queensland Government. http://education.qld.gov.au/curriculum/framework/p-12/docs/assessment-moderation.pdf
- Education Scotland. (2018). Moderation cycle. Education Scotland. https://education.gov.scot/improvement/learning-resources/The%20Moderation%20Cycle
- Estyn. (2016). Moderation of teacher assessment at key stage 2 and key stage 3: A review of accuracy and consistency. Estyn. https://www.estyn.gov.wales/sites/default/files/documents/Teacher%20assessment%20-%20Eng.pdf
- Flockton, L. (2012). Commentary: Directions for assessment in New Zealand. Assessment Matters, 4, 129–149. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/nzcerpress/assessment-matters/articles/commentary-directions-assessment-new-zealand
- Forsey, M. (2012). Interviewing individuals. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 364–376). Edward Elgar.
- Gamlem, S. M. (2015). Feedback to support learning: Changes in teachers’ practice and beliefs. Teacher Development, 19(4), 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2015.1060254
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine de Gruyter.
- Gunn, A. C. (2008). Heteronormativity and early childhood education: Social justice and some puzzling queries. [Doctoral thesis, University of Waikato]. http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/handle/10289/2671
- Harlen, W. (1994). Issues and approaches to quality assurance and quality control in assessment. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Enhancing quality in assessment (pp. 11–25). Paul Chapman Publishing.
- Harlen, W. (2010). Professional learning to support teacher assessment. In J. Gardner, W. Harlen, L. Hayward, & G. Stobart (Eds.), Developing teacher assessment (1st ed., pp. 100–129). Open University Press.
- Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
- Higgins, K. M., Harris, N. A., & Kuehn, L. L. (1994). Placing assessment into the hands of young children: A study of student-generated criteria and self-assessment. Educational Assessment, 2(4), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea0204_3
- Hill, M. (2016). Assessment for learning communities: Learners, teachers and policymakers. In D. Wyse, L. Hayward, & J. Pandya (Eds.), The Sage handbook of curriculum, pedagogy and assessment (Vol. 2, pp. 772–789). Sage.
- Hipkins, R., & Robertson, S. (2012). The complexities of moderating student writing in a community of practice. Assessment Matters, 4, 30–52. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/nzcerpress/assessment-matters/articles/complexities-moderating-student-writing-community-practice
- Klenowski, V., & Adie, L. E. (2009). Moderation as judgement practice: Reconciling system level accountability and local level practice. Curriculum Perspective, 29(1), 10–28. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/26164/
- Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2010). Standards, teacher judgement and moderation in contexts of national curriculum and assessment reform. Assessment Matters, 2, 107–131. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/nzcerpress/assessment-matters/articles/standards-teacher-judgement-and-moderation-contexts-national
- Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. M. (2014). Assessment for education: Standards, judgement and moderation. Sage.
- Laveault, D., & Allal, L. (2016). Implementing assessment for learning: Theoretical and practical issues. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_1
- Linn, R. L. (1993). Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6(1), 83–102. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0601_5
- Maxwell, G. (2002). Moderation of teacher judgements in student assessment. Queensland School Curriculum Council. http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/publications/3517.html
- Maxwell, G. (2010). Moderation of student work by teachers. In International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 457–463.). Elsevier. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B978008044894700347X
- Mertler, C. A. (2017). Classroom assessment: A practical guide for educators. Routledge.
- Ministry of Education. (1990). Tomorrow’s standards: The report of the ministerial working party on assessment for better learning. Learning Media.
- Ministry of Education. (2009a). Shared clarity about learning. Ministry of Education. http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Assessment-in-the-classroom/Assessment-for-learning-in-practice/Clarity-about-the-learning
- Ministry of Education. (2009b) . The New Zealand curriculum mathematics standards for years 1–8. Learning Media.
- Ministry of Education. (2009c) . The New Zealand curriculum reading and writing standards for years 1–8. Learning Media.
- Ministry of Education. (2009d, November 9). The New Zealand curriculum update: The national standards and the New Zealand curriculum. The Education Gazette, 88(20), 39–42.
- Ministry of Education. (2010a) . Literacy learning progressions: Meeting the reading and writing demands of the curriculum. Learning Media.
- Ministry of Education. (2010b). National standards fact sheet 5: Moderation. Ministry of Education. https://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/Archives/Assessment/National-Standards-archives/Fact-sheets/Moderation
- Ministry of Education. (2011a). Making overall teacher judgements and moderating them. Ministry of Education. http://assessment.tki.org.nz/Moderation/Moderation-professional-learning-modules
- Ministry of Education. (2011b). Ministry of Education position paper: Assessment [schooling sector]. Learning Media.
- Ministry of Education. (2017, December 12). National standards removed. Education in New Zealand. https://www.education.govt.nz/news/national-standards-removed/
- New Zealand National Party. (2011). Education in schools: Policy 2011. New Zealand National Party. https://web.archive.org/web/20111124223818/http://www.national.org.nz/PDF_General/Education_in_Schools_policy.pdf
- Newton, P. E. (2010). The multiple purposes of assessment. In E. Baker & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed., pp. 392–396). Elsevier. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780080448947003559
- Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Pedder, D., & James, M. (2012). Professional learning as a condition for assessment for learning. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 33–48). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250808.n3
- Popham, W. J. (2003). Test better, teach better: The instructional role of assessment. ASCD.
- Popham, W. J. (2009). Assessment literacy for teachers: Faddish or fundamental? Theory Into Practice, 48(1), 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577536
- ‘QSR International’. (2014). NVivo qualitative data analysis software (Version 10.2.2) [Computer software].
- Reid, L. (2007). Teachers talking about writing assessment: Valuable professional learning? Improving Schools, 10(2), 132–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207077843
- Ross, J. A., Hogaboam-Gray, A., & Rolheiser, C. (2002). Student self-evaluation in grade 5-6 mathematics effects on problem-solving achievement. Educational Assessment, 8(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326977EA0801_03
- Ross, J. A., & Starling, M. (2008). Self‐assessment in a technology‐supported environment: The case of grade 9 geography. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940802164218
- Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
- Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795
- Smaill, E. (2018). Social moderation: Assessment for teacher professional learning [Doctoral thesis, University of Otago]. https://ourarchive.otago.ac.nz/handle/10523/7850
- Spencer, E., & Hayward, L. (2016). More than good intentions: Policy and assessment for learning in Scotland. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (Vol. 4, pp. 111–127). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_7
- Stake, R. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
- Stiggins, R. J. (1991). Assessment literacy. The Phi Delta Kappan, 72(7), 534–539. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20404455
- Stiggins, R. J. (2008). An introduction to student-involved assessment for learning (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Stiggins, R. J. (2010). Essential formative assessment competencies for teachers and school leaders. In H. Andrade & G. J. Cizek (Eds.), Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 233–250). Routledge.
- Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis. Ministry of Education. http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2515/15341
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
- Wyatt-Smith, C. M., Klenowski, V., & Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers’ judgement practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903565610
- Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
- Yin, R. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.