References
- Akturk, A. O., & Sahin, I. (2011). Literature review on metacognition and its measurement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3731–3736.
- Allen, B. A., & Armour-Thomas, E. (1993). Construct validation of metacognition. The Journal of Psychology, 127(2), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1993.9915555
- Artelt, C., Beinicke, A., Schlagmüller, M., & Schneider, W. (2009). Diagnose von Strategiewissen beim Textverstehen. Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 41(2), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1026/0049-8637.41.2.96
- Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2015). Cross-country generalizability of the role of metacognitive knowledge in students’ strategy use and reading competence. Teachers College Record, 117(1), 1–32. http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=17695
- Authors. (2013).
- Authors. (2015).
- Authors. (2019).
- Baumgart, N., & Halse, C. (1999). Approaches to learning across cultures: The role of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949992775
- Boer, D., Hanke, K., & He, J. (2018). On detecting systematic measurement error in cross-cultural research: A review and critical reflection on equivalence and invariance tests. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 49(5), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022117749042
- Carrell, P. L., Gajdusek, L., & Wise, T. (1998). Metacognition and EFL/ESL reading. Instructional Science, 26(1/2), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003092114195
- Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255.
- Cieciuch, J., Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., Algesheimer, R., & Schwartz, S. H. (2014). Comparing results of an exact vs. an approximate (Bayesian) measurement invariance test: A cross-country illustration with a scale to measure 19 human values. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 982. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00982
- Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1), 1–11. http://www.iier.org.au/iier18/cubukcu.html
- Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Goswami, U. (2008). Cognitive development: The learning brain. Psychology Press.
- Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. L. (1995). A closer look at learning strategies: L2 Proficiency and gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 261–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587625
- Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. Taylor & Francis.
- Hakel, M. D. (1968). Task difficulty and personality test validity. Psychological Reports, 22(2), 502. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1968.22.2.502
- IDB. (2009). IDB Analyzer (Version 3.1). International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
- Jacobs, J., & Paris, S. (1987). Children’s metacognition about reading: Issues in definition, measurement, and instruction. Educational Psychologist, 22(3–4), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1987.9653052
- Kember, D. (1996). The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning. Higher Education, 31(3), 254–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00128436
- Lau, K., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00195
- Love, S., Kannis-Dymand, L., & Lovell, G. P. (2019). Development and validation of the metacognitive processes during performances questionnaire. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 41, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.004
- Mak, S., Cheung, K., Soh, K., Sit, P., & Leong, M. (2017). An examination of student- and across-level mediation mechanisms accounting for gender differences in reading performance: A multilevel analysis of reading engagement. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 37(10), 1206–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1242712
- Marambe, K., Vermunt, J., & Boshuizen, H. (2012). A cross-cultural comparison of student learning patterns in higher education. Higher Education, 64(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9494-z
- Marton, F., Wen, Q., & Wong, K. C. (2005). “Read a hundred times and the meaning will appear … “ Changes in Chinese University students’ views of the temporal structure of learning. Higher Education, 49(3), 291–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6667-z
- Nardi, E. (2008). Cultural biases: A non-Anglophone perspective. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 15(3), 259–266.
- OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn: Student engagement, strategies and practices (Volume III).
- OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 technical report.
- Palincsar, A. (1986). Metacognitive strategy instruction. Exceptional Children, 53(2), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298605300203
- Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(83)90018-8
- Pintrich, P., Smith, D., García, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan.
- Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
- Pressley, M., Brown, R., El-Dinary, P. B., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). The comprehension instruction that students need: Instruction fostering constructively responsive reading. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 10(4), 215–224.
- Roeschl-Heils, A., Schneider, W., & van Kraayenoord, C. (2003). Reading, metacognition and motivation: A follow-up study of German students in Grades 7 and 8. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 18(1), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173605
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Rutkowski, L., & Svetina, D. (2014). Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 74(1), 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413498257
- Säälik, Ü. (2015). Reading performance, learning strategies, gender and school language as related issues – PISA 2009 findings in Finland and Estonia. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(2), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2015.3.2.002
- Schmitt, M. C. (1990). A questionnaire to measure children’s awareness of strategic reading processes. The Reading Teacher, 43(7), 454–461. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20200439
- Schneider, W., & Artelt, C. (2010). Metacognition and mathematics education. ZDM - the International Journal on Mathematics Education, 42(2), 16–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0240-2
- Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing Metacognitive Awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1994.1033
- Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777
- Taraban, R., Kerr, M., & Rynearson, K. (2004). Analytic and pragmatic factors in college students’ metacognitive reading strategies. Reading Psychology, 25(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710490435547
- Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Sage Publications.
- Van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2000). Methodological issues in psychological research on culture. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 31(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031001004
- Van Gelderen, A., Schoonen, R., de Glopper, K., Hulstjn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2004). Linguistic knowledge, processing speed, and metacognitive knowledge in first-and second-language reading comprehension: A componential analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.19
- Vieluf, S., Kunter, M., & van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2013). Teacher self-efficacy in cross-national perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.05.006
- Weinstein, C. E., Palmer, D., & Schulte, A. C. (1987). Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI). H & H Publishing.
- Witner, S., & Tepner, O. (2011). Entwicklung geschlossener Testaufgaben zur Erhebung des fachdidaktischen Wissens von Chemielehrkräften [Development of closed-ended questions to measure the knowledge of chemistry teachers]. Chimica et ceterae artes rerum naturae didacticae, 37, 113–137.
- Wolters, C. A. (1999). The relationship between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies, effort, and classroom performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 281–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80004-1