References
- Andrade, H. G. (2000). Using rubrics to promote thinking and learning. Educational Leadership, 57(5), 13–19. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/feb00/vol57/num05/Using-Rubrics-to-Promote-Thinking-and-Learning.aspx
- Bearman, M., & Ajjawi, R. (2021). Can a rubric do more than be transparent? Invitation as a new metaphor for assessment criteria. Studies in Higher Education, 46(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1637842
- Bloxham, S., Boyd, P., & Orr, S. (2011). Mark my words: The role of assessment criteria in UK higher education grading practices. Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 655–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075071003777716
- Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2016). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(3), 400–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1018133
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Bridgstock, R. (2009). The graduate attributes we’ve overlooked: Enhancing graduate employability through career management skills. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444347
- Calma, A. (2021). Assessing and assuring learning: University teachers’ reflections on effectively addressing skills deficits in business studies. Studies in Higher Education, 46(3), 594–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1644309
- Cowie, B., & Moreland, J. (2015). Leveraging disciplinary practices to support students’ active participation in formative assessment. Assessment in education: Principles. Policy & Practice, 22(2), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1015960
- Dawson, P. (2017). Assessment rubrics: Towards clearer and more replicable design, research and practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(3), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1111294
- Dawson, P., Carless, D., & Lee, P. P. W. (2021). Authentic feedback: Supporting learners to engage in disciplinary feedback practices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 286-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1769022
- Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. R. (1998). Assessment of complex performances: Limitations of key measurement assumptions. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027002014
- Falchikov, N., & Goldfinch, J. (2000)Student peer assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Review of Educational Research, 70(3), 287–322. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070003287
- Fastré, G. M. J., Van der Klink, M. R., Sluijsmans, D., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2013). Towards an integrated model for developing sustainable assessment skills. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(5), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.674484
- Fraile, J., Panadero, E., & Pardo, R. (2017). Co-creating rubrics: The effects on self-regulated learning, self-efficacy and performance of establishing assessment criteria with students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.03.003
- Hühn, M. P. (2014). You reap what you sow: How MBA programs undermine ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(4), 527–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1733-z
- Jones, L., Allen, B., Dunn, P., & Brooker, L. (2017). Demystifying the rubric: A five-step pedagogy to improve student understanding and utilisation of marking criteria. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(1), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1177000
- Kirkpatrick, A., & Mulligan, D. (2002). Cultures of learning: Critical reading in the social and applied sciences. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1075/aral.25.2.07kir
- Lucas, U., & Tan, P. L. (2013). Developing a capacity to engage in critical reflection: Students’ ‘ways of knowing’ within an undergraduate business and accounting programme. Studies in Higher Education, 38(1), 104–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.569706
- Maier, M. H., McGoldrick, K., & Simkins, S. P. (2012). Is there a signature pedagogy in economics. In N. Chick, A. Haynie, & R. Gurung (Eds.), Exploring more signature pedagogies: Approaches to teaching disciplinary habits of the mind (pp. 97–110). Stylus.
- Menéndez-Varela, J. L., & Gregori-Giralt, E. (2018). Rubrics for developing students’ professional judgement: A study of sustainable assessment in arts education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.06.001
- O’Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2008). Developing student understanding of assessment standards: A nested hierarchy of approaches. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510801923344
- Oliver, B., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2018). Graduate attributes for 2020 and beyond: Recommendations for Australian higher education providers. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(4), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1446415
- Panadero, E., & Jonsson, A. (2013). The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited: A review. Educational Research Review, 9, 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.01.002
- Reddy, Y. M., & Andrade, H. (2010). A review of rubric use in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930902862859
- Sadler, D. R. (2007) Perils in the meticulous specification of goals and assessment criteria. Assessment in education: Principles Policy & Practice, 14(3), 387–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701592097
- Schmidt-Wilk, J. (2010). Signature pedagogy: A framework for thinking about management education. Journal of Management Education, 34(4), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562910376508
- Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134(3), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
- Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Panadero, E. (2018). Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work. Higher Education, 76(3), 467–481. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3
- Torrance, H. (2007). Assessment as learning? How the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment criteria and feedback in post-secondary education and training can come to dominate learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701591867
- Varpio, L., Ajjawi, R., Monrouxe, L. V., O’Brien, B. C., & Rees, C. E. (2017). Shedding the cobra effect: Problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking. Medical Education, 51(1), 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13124
- Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry. Assessing Writing, 19, 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008
- Watts, M., & Becker, W. E. (2008). A little more than chalk and talk: Results from a third national survey of teaching methods in undergraduate economics courses. The Journal of Economic Education, 39(3), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.39.3.273-286
- Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newburry Park.
- Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Explicit, latent and meta-criteria: Types of criteria at play in professional judgement practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2012.725030
- Zhao, K., Zhang, J., & Du, X. Y. (2017). Chinese business students’ changes in beliefs and strategy use in a constructively aligned PBL course. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1301908
- Zhao, K., & Zheng, Y. Y. (2014). Chinese business english students’ epistemological beliefs, self-regulated strategies, and collaboration in project-based learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0103-z
- Zhou, J., Dawson, P., Tai, J. H. M., & Bearman, M. (2021). How conceptualising respect can inform feedback pedagogies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 68-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1733490