Teacher and headteacher assessment, feedback, and continuing professional development: the Mexican case

References

• Alkaabi, A. M., & Almaamari, S. A. (2020). Supervisory feedback in the principal evaluation process. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 503–509. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20504
   Google Scholar
• Arnaut, A. (2014). Lo bueno, lo malo y lo feo del Servicio Profesional DocenteReforma Educativa, Qué estamos transformando? Debate informado (G. Del Castillo & G. Valenti, Eds.). FLACSO, México.
   Google Scholar
• Ávalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in Teaching and Teacher Education over ten years. Teaching & Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007
   Google Scholar
• Ávalos, B., & Assael, J. (2006). Moving from resistance to agreement: The case of the Chilean teacher performance evaluation. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(4–5), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.02.004
   Google Scholar
• Backhoff, E., & Pérez-Morán, J. C. (2015). Segundo Estudio Internacional sobre la Enseñanza y el Aprendizaje (TALIS 2013) Resultados de México. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/Mexico-TALIS-2013_es.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093022000043065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9075-9
   Google Scholar
• Barrera, I., & Myers, R. (2011). N° 59 Estándares y evaluación docente en México: el estado del debate. PREAL. (Issue October
   Google Scholar
• Boudah, D. J., Blair, E., Mitchell, V. J., Boudah, D. J., Blair, E., Implementing, V. J. M., & Mitchell, V. J. (2017). Implementing and sustaining strategies instruction: Authentic and effective professional. Development or “Business as Usual”? 2835(February. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327035EX1101
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Terry, G. (2015). Thematic Analysis. In P. Rohleder & C. L. Anotnia (Eds.), Qualitative research in clinical and health psychology (pp. 95–113). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brickman, C. B. (2012). Not by the Book: Facebook as a Sampling Frame. Sociological Methods & Research, 41(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112440795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, K., & Sadeghi, L. (2015). Teacher perceptions of the value of teacher evaluations: New Jersey’s archive NJ. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 10(1), 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Catano, N., & Stronge, J. H. (2007). What do we expect of school principals? Congruence between principal evaluation and performance standards. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120701381782
   Google Scholar
• CEMABE-INEGI. (2014). Censo de Escuelas, Maestros y Alumnos de Educación Básica y Especial 2013: Atlas educativo. http://cemabe.inegi.org.mx
   Google Scholar
• Cerón, M. S., Corte Cruz, F. M., & Del, S. (2006). Competitividad y exclusión. Una década de carrera magisterial en Tlaxcala. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, XXXVI(número 3–4), 293–315.
   Google Scholar
• Collinson, V., Kozina, E., Lin, Y. -H., Ling, L., Matheson, I., Newcombe, L., & Zogla, I. (2009). Professional development for teachers: A world of change. European Journal of Teacher Education, 32(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619760802553022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero, G., & González, C. (2016). Análisis del Modelo de Evaluación del Desempeño Docente en el Marco de la Reforma Educativa Mexicana. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(46), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2242
   Google Scholar
• Cordero, G., Luna, E. S., & Patiño, N. X. (2013). La evaluación docente en educación básica en México: Panorama y agenda pendiente. Sinéctica: Revista Electrónica de Educación, 41(2), 2–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cordingley, P., Greany, T., Crisp, B., Seleznyov, S., Bradbury, M., & Perry, T. (2018). Developing Great Subject Teaching Rapid Evidence Review of subject-specific CPD in the UK. Wellcome Trust. https://wellcome.org/sites/default/files/developing-great-subject-teaching.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cortez Ochoa, A. A. (2015). Teachers’ evaluation in Mexico and its potential impact on quality education: lessons from the US and Chile: a library-based study of frameworks for teaching, instruments and outcomes. (Issue September). Unpublished Masters dissertation. University of Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Cortez Ochoa, A. A. (2020). Amidst reforms: Mexican Teacher Evaluation and Professional Development from the perspective of teachers, headteachers, and policymakers [ PhD Thesis, University of Bristol]. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?did=1&uin=uk.bl.ethos.818033
   Google Scholar
• Cortez Ochoa, A. A., & Thomas, S. M. (2023). Review of evaluation approaches for school principals. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Erkican (Eds.), International encyclopedia of Education (Fourth Edition) (pp. 453–468). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.05074-0
   Google Scholar
• Cortez Ochoa, A. A., Thomas, S., Tikly, L., & Doyle, H. (2018). Scan of International Approaches to Teacher Assessment. University of Bristol. http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/education/documents/ScanofInternationalApproachestoTeacherAssessment.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas-Cajiga, Y. (2018). La Reforma Educativa 2013 vista por sus actores. First). Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. http://ru.ffyl.unam.mx/handle/10391/6682
   Google Scholar
• Cuevas-Cajiga, Y., & Moreno-Olivos, T. (2016). Políticas de Evaluación Docente de la OCDE: Un Acercamiento a la Experiencia en la Educación Básica Mexicana. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 120. Education Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264047839-zh.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). Teacher testing and the improvement of practice. Teaching Education, 12(1), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210123029
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Wei, R. C. (2009). Professional learning in the learning profession: a status report on teacher development in the United States and Abroad a Status report on teacher development in the United States and Abroad. National Staff Development Council, February, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1006/jfbi.2002.2063
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). Professionalism, Performativity and Empowerment: Discourses in the Politics, Policies and Purposes of Continuing Professional Development. In Day , C., & Sachs, J. (Eds.), International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794113488126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvaux, E., Vanhoof, J., Tuytens, M., Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Van Petegem, P. (2013). How may teacher evaluation have an impact on professional development? A multilevel analysis. Teaching & Teacher Education, 36, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vaus, D. (2002). Surveys in Social Research. Fifth). Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.2307/2071069
   Google Scholar
• DOF. (1946). Reglamento de las condiciones generales de trabajo del personal de la Secretaría de Educación Pública. https://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_to_imagen_fs.php?codnota=4568071&fecha=29/01/1946&cod_diario=195555
   Google Scholar
• DOF. (2013). DECRETO por el que se expide la Ley General del Servicio Profesional Docente. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/sedia/biblio/prog_leg/082_DOF_11sep13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DOF. (2019). Ley reglamentaria del artículo 3º. de la Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, en materia de mejora continua de la educación. https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/LRArt3_MMCE_300919.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, M. L., & Papay, J. P. (2014). Teacher evaluation for accountability and development. In M. E. G. Helen & F. Ladd (Eds.), Handbook of research in education finance and policy (2nd ed., pp. 174–196). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Echávarri, J., & Peraza, C. (2017). Modernizing schools in Mexico: The rise of teacher assessment and school-based management policies. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25, 90. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2771
   Google Scholar
• Ehren, M., Jones, K., & Perryman, J. (2016). Side Effects of School Inspection; Motivations and Contexts for Strategic Responses. In Ehren , M. (Ed.), Methods and modalities of effective school inspections. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Elizondo, J., & Gallardo, K. E. (2017). Desarrollo profesional docente en escuelas de educación primaria: un estudio diagnóstico desde una perspectiva internacional. Revista Panamericana de Pedagogía, 0(24), 135–170.
   Google Scholar
• Eraut, M. (2004). Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in Continuing Education, 262. https://doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245
   Google Scholar
• Escárcega, R. M., & Villarreal, S. V. (2007). Un acercamiento al impacto de carrera magisterial en la educación primaria. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Educativos, XXXVII(números 1–2), 91–114.
   Google Scholar
• Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
   Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A. (2014). Teacher evaluation policy and conflicting theories of motivation. Educational Researcher, 43(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X14521864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (1998). Educational Reform as Continuous Improvement. Keys Resource Book. https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396039520.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2009). Large-scale reform comes of age. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9108-z
   Google Scholar
• Galaz Ruiz, A., Jiménez-Vásquez, M. S., & Díaz-Barriga, Á. (2019). Evaluación del desempeño docente en Chile y México. Perfiles educativos, 41(163), 156–176. https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2019.163.58935
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, E., Cravens, X. C., Murphy, J., Porter, A. C., Elliott, S. N., & Carson, B. (2009). The evaluation of principals: What and how do states and urban districts assess leadership?. The Elementary school journal, 110(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1086/598841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosgling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should We Trust Web-Based Studies?: A Comparative of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires. The American psychologist, 59(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.2.93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerra, M., & Serrato, S. (2015). Michael Scriven: Evaluación formativa. Revista Para Docentes y Directivos. sep-dec, 2, 1–103. http://www.sev.gob.mx/upece/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/1.3-Michel-Scriven-Evaluaci%C3%B3n-formativa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers & Teaching, 8(3/4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. (2013). Does It Make a Difference? Evaluating Professional Development. Redesigning Professional Development. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar02/vol59/num06/Does-It-Make-a-Difference¢-Evaluating-Professional-Development.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. (2016). Gauge Impact with 5 Levels of Data. Gurskey Website. https://tguskey.com/wp-content/uploads/Professional-Learning-1-Gauge-Impact-with-Five-Levels-of-Data.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., Heck, R. H., & Murphy, J. (2014). Teacher evaluation and school improvement: An analysis of the evidence. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9179-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way: The inspiring future for educational change. In The Fourth Way. The Inspiring Future for Educational Change. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452219523
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Day, C., Goodall, J., Lindsay, G., & Muijs, D. (2006). Evaluating the impact of CPD. Scotish Educational Review, 4(1), 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INEE. (2015a). Los Docentes En México: Informe 2015. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. https://www.inee.edu.mx/publicaciones/los-docentes-en-mexico-informe-2015/
   Google Scholar
• INEE. (2015b). Política Nacional de Evaluación de la Educación Documento Rector Noviembre 2015. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. https://www.inee.edu.mx/images/stories/2014/Normateca/2014/Documento-Rector-PNEE1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• INEE. (2016). Evaluación del desempeño desde la experiencia de los docentes Consulta con docentes que participaron en la primera evaluación del desempeño 2015. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. https://www.inee.edu.mx/portalweb/suplemento12/evaluacion-del-desempeno-docente.pdf
   Google Scholar
• INEE. (2018). Panorama educativo de Mexico: Indicadores del Sistema Educativo Nacional 2017 Educación básica y media superior. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. https://www.inee.edu.mx/publicaciones/panorama-educativo-de-mexico-2018-educacion-basica-y-media-superior/
   Google Scholar
• INEE. (n.d.). Consideraciones sobre la validez y la justicia en las evaluaciones del desempeño docente. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación. https://www.inee.edu.mx/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Validez_y_Justicia_.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes & efficacy. Education policy analysis archives, 13, 13(10. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n10.2005
   Google Scholar
• Isoré, M. (2009). Teacher Evaluation: Current Practices in OECD Countries and a Literature Review. In Education Working Papers ( No. 23; Issue September). https://doi.org/10.1787/223283631428OECD
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, J. Y., Sporte, S. E., & Luppescu, S. (2015). Teacher Perspectives on Evaluation Reform : Chicago ’ s REACH Students. Educational Research, 44(2), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15575517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher, 33(14), 14–26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014
   Google Scholar
• Kane, T., & Douglas, O. (2012). Gathering Feedback for Teaching: Combining High-Quality Observations with Student Surveys and Achievement Gains. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED540960.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kapp, J. M., Peters, C., & Oliver, D. P. (2013). Research Recruitment Using Facebook Advertising: Big Potential, Big Challenges. Journal of Cancer Education, 28(1), 134–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0443-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching?. Review of educational research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Exploring the Intended and Unintended Consequences of High-Stakes Teacher Evaluation on Schools, Teachers, and Students. Teachers College record, 116(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411600103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillejord, S., & Børte, K. (2020). Trapped between accountability and professional learning? School leaders and teacher evaluation. Professional Development in Education, 46(2), 274–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1585384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lillejord, S., Elstad, E., & Kavli, H. (2018). Teacher evaluation as a wicked policy problem. Assessment in education: Principles, policy & practice, 25(3), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1429388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Rizo, F. (2016). La evaluación de docentes de educación básica. Una revisión de la experiencia internacional [Teacher Evaluation in Basic Education. A Review of the International Experience]. INEE.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, F., Taut, S., & Schaaf, K. (2016). Classroom observation for evaluating and improving teaching: An international perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 49, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzano, R. J. (2012). The Two Purposes of Teacher Evaluation. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 14–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mireles-Rios, R., & Becchio, J. A. (2018). The Evaluation Process, Administrator Feedback, and Teacher Self-Efficacy. Journal of School Leadership, 28(4), 462–487. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461802800402
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. (2013). What is professional development, how does it occur in individuals, and how may it be used by educational leaders and managers for the purpose of school improvement?. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.762721
   Google Scholar
• Moreno Salto, I., Robertson, S., & Cortez Ochoa, A. A. (2022). The OECD, the Vehicularity of Ideas, Wormholes and Teacher Education in Mexico. In Menter, I. (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Teacher Education Research. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (2007). Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of mixed methods research, 1(1), 48–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2345678906292462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art - teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, D., Boeren, E., Maitra, S., & Cabus, S. (2022). A Review on the Empirical Research of PLCs in the Global South: Evidence and Recommendations. https://www.vvob.org/en/downloads/review-empirical-research-plcs-global-south-evidence-and-recommendations
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2005) . Teachers Matter: Attracting, Developing and Retaining Effective Teachers. OECD publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). Teachers for the 21st Century: Using Evaluation to Improve Teaching. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/site/eduistp13/TS2013%20Background%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). TALIS 2013 Results An International Perspective on Teaching and Learning. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264196261-en
   Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2019). How valid and reliable is the use of lesson observation in supporting judgements on the quality of education? | 190029 | Ofsted. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/936246/Inspecting_education_quality_Lesson_observation_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OREALC/UNESCO. (2016). Evaluación de desempeño de docentes, directivos y supervisores en educación básica y media superior de México: Análisis y evaluación de su implementación 2015-2016 Informe final parte I. Instituto Nacional para la Evaluación de la Educación.
   Google Scholar
• Ornelas, C., & Luna Hernández, V. (2016). La reforma educativa en México: Los primeros libros ensayo bibliográfico. Education Review//Reseñas Educativas, 23(July). https://doi.org/10.14507/er.v23.2110
   Google Scholar
• Papay, J. P. (2012). Refocusing the Debate: Assessing the Purposes and Tools of Teacher Evaluation. Harvard educational review, 82(1), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.1.v40p0833345w6384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peraza, S. C., & Betancourt, L. R. (2018). La Política Educativa En El Proyecto De Nación: Balance Y Perspectivas. Entretextos, 9(28), 75–94.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Ruiz, A. (2014). La profesionalización docente en el marco de la reforma educativa en México: EBSCOhost. Revista de La Realidad Mexicana, 28(184), 113–120. 8p.
   Google Scholar
• Popham, J. (1988). The dysfunctional marriage of formative and summative teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1(3), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123822
   Google Scholar
• Ramírez, R. R., & Torres, C. R. (2016, May). La evaluación del desempeño docente: de lo comprometido a lo realizado. Fortnightly Report. Temas Estratégicos 34. https://doi.org/10.13941/j.cnki.21-1469/tk.2016.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Ramo, D. E., & Prochaska, J. J. (2012). Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adult substance use. Journal of medical Internet research, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Chapman, C., Kelly, A., Muijs, D., & Sammons, P. (2012). Educational effectiveness: The development of the discipline, the critiques, the defence, and the present debate. Effective Education, 3(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415532.2011.686168
   Google Scholar
• Ridder, T. K. (2018). Principals’ Perceptions of Their Own Evaluation Process: How Feedback Using the Colorado Model Evaluation System Alters Principals’ Practice. In ProQuest LLC. https://digscholarship.unco.edu/dissertations/508/
   Google Scholar
• Rigby, J. G., Larbi-Cherif, A., Rosenquist, B. A., Sharpe, C. J., Cobb, P., & Smith, T. (2017). Administrator Observation and Feedback: Does It Lead Toward Improvement in Inquiry-Oriented Math Instruction?. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 475–516. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16687006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberge, T. P. (2014). Exploring the Way Teachers Feel about Feedback from Administrators and Administrator-Teacher Communication: A Phenomenological Study. In ProQuest LLC. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1502235875?parentSessionId=K0TiimDmok%2FarYcABkHtDIGVDaIu%2BY37VplxRdRqgTM%3D
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz, M. Y. (2018). ¿Quién asciende de cargo en el servicio profesional docente? Reconceptualización del mérito y cambios político-organizacionales de la carrera magisterial en México. CIDE.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlberg, P. (2011). The Fourth Way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12(2), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y
   Google Scholar
• Santiago, P., McGregor, I., Nusche, D., Ravela, P., & Toledo, D. (2012). OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Mexico. OECD publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264116917-en
   Google Scholar
• Santibañez, L., Martínez, J. -F., Datar, A., McEwan, P. J., Messan-Setodji, C., & Basurto-Dávila, R. (2007). Análisis del sistema de evaluación y del impacto del programa de estímulos docentes Carrera Magisterial en México. https://doi.org/10.1214/07-EJS057
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas, S. (2003). Educational Evaluation, Assessment, and Monitoring: A Systemic Approach. Swets & Zeitlinger. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Schmelkes, S. (2015). Evaluación del Desempeño Docente. Seminar. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dxmsadAZD10
   Google Scholar
• Schmelkes, S. (2017). La evaluación docente en México. Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa.
   Google Scholar
• SEP. (2012). Memoria Documental Curso Básico de Formación Continua de Maestros en Servicio Subsecretaría de Educación Básica. Secretaría de Educación Pública. https://www.sep.gob.mx/work/models/sep1/Resource/2998/1/images/catalogon.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SEP. (2016) . Etapas, Aspectos, Métodos e Instrumentos. Proceso de Evaluación del Desempeño Docente y Técnico Docente: Educación Básica. Secretaría de Educación Pública.
   Google Scholar
• SEP. (2017). Perfil, Parametros e Indicadores Para Docentes Y Técnicos Docentes En Educación Básica. Secretaría de Educación Pública, México. http://www.sev.gob.mx/servicio-profesional-docente/files/2017/01/PPI_INGRESO_EB_2017_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• SEP. (2018). Etapas, aspectos, métodos e instrumentos. Proceso de Evaluación del Desempeño del Personal con funciones de Dirección y de Supervisión. https://www.academia.edu/37500939/Etapas_aspectos_m%C3%A9todos_e_instrumentos_Proceso_de_Evaluaci%C3%B3n_del_Desempe%C3%B1o_del_Personal_con_funciones_de
   Google Scholar
• SEP. (2019). Etapas, aspectos, métodos e instrumentos. Proceso de evaluación para el ingreso a la Educación Básica. Secretaría de Educación Pública. https://issuu.com/revistamasclaro/docs/eami_eb_2019_20193101
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, T. B. (2017). Teacher appraisal and feedback: the practical argumentation of the OECD, the World Bank, and the European Commission. Proceedings of the AERA Annual Meeting 2017, San Antonio, Texas, US (pp. 1–27).
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, V. (2013). Teacher Quality: The 2013 International Summit on the Teaching Profession, The Netherlands. https://asiasociety.org/files/teachingsummit2013.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Strong, D. E. (2016). The Impact of the Accountability Movement on Principal Evaluation: Understanding the Role of Formative versus Summative Assessment https://www.proquest.com/docview/1808262315?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true.
   Google Scholar
• Sue, V. M., & Ritter, L. A. (2007). Conducting Online Surveys. SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. E. S., & Tyler, J. H. (2012). The Effect of Evaluation on Teacher Performance. The American economic review, 102(7), 3628–3651. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.7.3628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, S., Zhang, L., & Jiang, D. (2018). English teacher professional development and the role of professional learning communities to enhance teacher practice and student outcomes in China. In S. Zein & R. Stroupe (Eds.), English Language Teacher Preparation in Asia: Policy, Research and Practice (pp. 201–203). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning (L. Stool & L. Earl, (Eds.). Open University Press McGraw Hill. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2012.666051
   Google Scholar
• Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development: Best Evidence Synthesis Iteration. Ministry of Education. https://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2515/15341
   Google Scholar
• Torres, C. (2019). Controversias en torno a la reforma constitucional en materia educativa. Aportes al Debate Parlamentario No12. http://bibliodigitalibd.senado.gob.mx/handle/123456789/4420?show=full
   Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2009). Teachers’ perception of the new teacher evaluation policy: A validity study of the Policy Characteristics Scale. Teaching & Teacher Education, 25(6), 924–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., & Devos, G. (2014). How to activate teachers through teacher evaluation?. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(4), 509–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2013.842601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuytens, M., Devos, G., & Vanblaere, B. (2020). An integral perspective on teacher evaluation: a review of empirical studies. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(2), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09321-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas, W. M. (2016, March 21). Dos omisiones en la evaluación docente. https://plumaslibres.com.mx/2016/03/21/dos-omisiones-la-evaluacion-docente/
   Google Scholar
• Webb, P. T. (2006). The choreography of accountability. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930500500450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, K., Duncan, T., Lee, S., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs/regions/southwest/pdf/rel_2007033.pdf
   Google Scholar