Student views on the assessment medium for General Certificates of Secondary Education in England: insights from the 2020 examination cancellations

References

• AQA. (2022). Citizenship GCSE specification. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.aqa.org.uk/subjects/citizenship/gcse/citizenship-studies-8100/subject-content/politics-and-participation
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., Braun, A., Perryman, J., & Hoskins, K. (2011). Assessment technol- ogies in schools: ‘Deliverology’ and the ‘play of dominations’. Research Papers in Education, 27(5), 513–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2010.550012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrance, R. (2019). The fairness of internal assessment in the GCSE: The value of students’ accounts. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(5), 563–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1619514
   Google Scholar
• Barrance, R., & Elwood, J. (2018a). National assessment policy reform 14–16 and its consequences for young people: Student views and experiences of GCSE reform in Northern Ireland and Wales. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(3), 252–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1410465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrance, R., & Elwood, J. (2018b). Young people’s views on choice and fairness through their experiences of curriculum as examination specifications at GCSE. Oxford Review of Education, 44(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1409964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benchaim, D., & Zoller, U. (1994). Examination-type preferences of students and their teachers in the science disciplines. Instructional Science, 25(5), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002919422429
   Google Scholar
• Benn, M. (2017). We are going in the wrong direction and we don’t know how to stop it. Keynote paper presented to the British Psychological Society (BPS) Division of Educational and Child Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K.-A., & Woods, K. (2022). Thirty years of GCSE – student views. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 29(1), 51–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2022.2053946
   Google Scholar
• Buck, R. (2018). An Investigation of Attentional Bias in Test Anxiety [ PhD thesis]. The University of Manchester (School of Environment, Education and Development).
   Google Scholar
• Cassady, J. C., & Finch, W. H. (2020). Revealing nuanced relationships between cognitive test anxiety, motivation and self-regulation through curvilinear analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 1141. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Denscombe, M. (2000). Social conditions for stress: Young people’s experience of doing GCSEs. British Educational Research Journal, 26(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014a). Assessment curriculum and qualifications: Research priorities and questions. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2014b). Special educational needs and disability code of practice. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2017). Developing new GCSEs, as and a levels for first teaching in 2017: Consultation outcome. Retrieved June 16, 2018, from https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/developing-new-gcses-as-and-a-levels-for-first-teaching-in-2017
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2021). Consultation on how GCSE, as and a level grades should be awarded in summer 2021. UK HM Government (DfE/Ofqual).
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2022a). Consultation Hub. Retrieved December 7, 2022, fromhttps://consult.education.gov.uk
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. (2022b). The national curriculum. Retrieved December 12, 2022, from https://www.gov.uk/national-curriculum/key-stage-3-and-4
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education and Science (DES). (1985). GCSE national criteria. HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Eilersten, T. V., & Valdermo, O. (2000). Open-book assessment: A contribution to improved learning? Student Educational Evaluation, 26(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-491X(00)00010-9
   Google Scholar
• El Rassi, M. A. B. (2019). Assessing open-book-open-web exam in high schools: The case of a developing country. International Association for Development of the Information Society, Paper presented at the International Association for Development of the Information Society (IADIS) International Conference on e-Learning, Porto, Portugal. Jul 16-19, 2019
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. (2012). Qualifications, examinations and assessment: Views and perspectives of students in the 14–19 phase on policy and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2012.733347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J. (2013). The role(s) of student voice in 14-19 education policy reform: Reflections on consultation and participation. London Review of Education, 11(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/14748460.2013.799807
   Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., Hopfenbeck, T., & Baird, J. (2017). Predictability in high-stakes examinations: Students’ perspectives on a perennial assessment dilemma. Research Papers in Education, 32(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2015.1086015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, J., & Lundy, L. (2010). Revisioning assessment through a children’s rights approach: Implications for policy, process and practice. Research Papers in Education, 25(3), 335–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilham, B. (2008). Developing a questionnaire (2nd ed.). Continuum International Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Gove, M. (2013). https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/529404/2013-02-07-letter-from-michael-gove-reform-of-ks4-qualifications.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, V. (2017). A tale of two narratives: Student voice - what lies before us?. Oxford Rreview of Education, 43(2), 180–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipkiss, A., Woods, K., & McCaldin, T. (2021). Students’ use of GCSE access arrangements. British Journal of Special Education, 48(1), 50–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaacs, T. (2010). Educational assessment in England. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(3), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2010.491787
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B. (2017). The politics of testing. English in Education, 51(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/eie.12110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. C. (1985). Examinations: A commentary. George Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• McCaldin, T. (2019). The Experiences of Students Preparing for GCSE Examinations: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis [ PhD thesis]. The University of Manchester (School of Environment, Education and Development).
   Google Scholar
• McCaldin, T., Woods, K., Brown, K., Buck, R., Fairhall, N., Forshaw, E., & Soares, D. (2023). Student experiences of the 2020 cancellation of England’s General Certificates of Secondary Education (GCSEs). The Psychology of Education Review, 47(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsper.2023.47.1.61
   Google Scholar
• The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation. (2022). Perceptions Survey – Wave 20. Retrieved December 7, 2022, from https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/perceptions-of-a-levels-gcses-and-other-qualifications-wave-20
   Google Scholar
• The Ofqual Blog. (2023). Teacher Judgements in 2021 – What We Can Learn from 2020. Retrieved June 26, 2023, from https://ofqual.blog.gov.uk/2021/05/17/teacher-judgements-in-2021-what-we-can-learn-from-2020/
   Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Perry, R. P., Kramer, K., Hochstadt, M., & Molfenter, S. (2004). Beyond test anxiety: Development and validation of the test emotions questionnaire (TEQ). Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 17(3), 287–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800412331303847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philips, S. E. (1994). High-stakes testing accommodations: Validity vs disability rights. Applied Measurement in Education, 7(2), 93–120.
   Google Scholar
• Putwain, D., Connors, L., Woods, K., & Nicholson, L. J. (2012). Stress and anxiety surrounding forthcoming standard assessment tests in English schoolchildren. Pastoral Care in Education, 30(4), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2012.688063
   Google Scholar
• Putwain, D. W., Nicholson, L. J., Connors, L., & Woods, K. (2013). Resilient children are less test-anxious and perform better in tests at the end of primary schooling. Learning & Individual Differences, 28, 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putwain, D. W., & Symes, W. (2018). Does increased effort compensate for performance debilitating test anxiety? School Psychology Quarterly, 33(3), 482–491. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qualtrics. (2023). QualtricsXM Platform. Retrieved December 23, 2023, from https://www.qualtrics.com/uk/lp/uk-ppc-experience-management/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=ppc&utm_campaign=UKI%7CSRC%7CBRD%7CQualtricsPlus%7CBroadMatchTest&campaignid=20837135245&utm_content=&adgroupid=157138495878&utm_keyword=qualtrics&utm_term=qualtrics&matchtype=b&device=c&placement=&network=g&creative=679794367900&gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIk5ir6oOmgwMVhKSDBx2PCAHVEAAYAyAAEgIPofD_BwE
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A., & Jones, M. (2002). Learning from GCSE coursework. Teaching Geography, 27(3), 120–125.
   Google Scholar
• Rodway, C., Tham, S. G., Ibrahim, S., Turnbull, P., Windfuhr, K., Shaw, J., Kapur, N., & Appleby, L. (2016). Suicide in children and young people in England: A consecutive case series. The Lancet Psychiatry, 3(8), 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30094-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares, D., & Woods, K. (2020). An international systematic literature review of test anxiety interventions 2011–2018. Pastoral Care in Education, 38(4), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2020.1725909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stobart, G. (2008). Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The Sutton Trust. (2019). https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/MakingtheGrade2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tattersall, K. (1994). The role and functions of public examinations. Assessment in Educations: Principles, Policy & Practice, 1(3), 293–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594940010305
   Google Scholar
• The Telegraph. (2020). It’s Time to Scrap GCSEs – They Serve No Good Purpose in the 21^st Century (Published 1^st October). Retrieved June 15, 2023 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education-and-careers/2020/10/01/time-scrap-gcses-serve-no-good-purpose-21st-century/
   Google Scholar
• The Times Educational Supplement. (2020). Three Reasons GCSEs Need to Change – and Three Alternatives (Published 27/09/20). Retrieved February 15, 2021, from https://www.tes.com/news/gcses-2021-change-alternatives
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. (2018). The return to final paper examining in English National Curriculum assessment and school examinations: Issues of validity, accountability and politics. British Journal of Educational Studies, 66(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071005.2017.1322683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrell, B., & Woods, K. (2018). Facilitating the involvement of young people with ASD in organising their examination access arrangements. Support for Learning, 33(4), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12226
   Google Scholar
• UNICEF UK. (2022). Rights Respecting Schools. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.unicef.org.uk/rights-respecting-schools/
   Google Scholar
• United Nations (UN). (1989). Convention on the rights of the child. United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• von der Embse, N. P., Jester, D., Roy, D., & Post, J. (2018). Test anxiety effects, predictors, and correlates: A 30-year meta-analytic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 227, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters, M. (2015). The gove legacy: Where policy meets the pupil. In M. Finn (Ed.), The gove legacy: Education in Britain after the coalition (pp. 63–74). Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. (2009, October 19). The role of the state in educational assessment. Address to the Cambridge Assessment Annual Conference, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, K. (2000). Assessment needs in GCSE examinations: Some student perspectives. Educational Psychology in Practice, 16(2), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667360050122389
   Google Scholar
• Woods, K. (2003). Equality of opportunity within the examinations of the general certificate of secondary education. The Psychology of Education Review, 27(2), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, K., James, A., & Hipkiss, A. (2018). Best practice in access arrangements made for England’s General Certificates of Secondary Education (GCSEs): Where are we 10 years on? British Journal of Special Education, 45(3), 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8578.12221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, K., Lewis, S., & Parkinson, G. (2010). Investigating access to educational assessment for students with disabilities. School Psychology International, 31(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034310341622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods, K., McCaldin, T., Hipkiss, A., Tyrell, B., & Dawes, M. (2018). Linking rights, needs and fairness in educational assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 45(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2018.1494555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidner, M. (1994). Reactions of students and teachers towards key facets of classroom testing. School Psychology International, 15(1), 5–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034394151003
   Google Scholar