Evaluation of a method to predict negative feedstuff associative effects in meat goats consuming diets with different forage sources and levels of concentrate

References

• AOAC. 2006. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. Gaithersburg (MD): AOAC International.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick GA, Kang JH. 1980. Automated simultaneous determination of ammonia and total amino acids in rumen fluid and in vitro media. J Dairy Sci. 63:64–75. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)82888-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman SW, Hart SP, Sahlu T. 2003. Relationships among forage chemistry, rumination and retention time with intake and digestibility of hay by goats. Small Rumin Res. 50:129–140. doi: 10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00116-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulphy JP, Remond B, Theriez M. 1980. Ingestive behavior and related activities in ruminants. In: Ruckebusch Y, Thivend Y. editors. Digestive physiology and metabolism in ruminants. Westport (CT): AVI Publishing Company Inc; p. 103–122.
   Google Scholar
• Galyean ML, Goetsch, AL. 1993. Utilization of forage fiber by ruminants. In: Jung HG, Buxton DR, Hatfield RD, Ralph J. editors. Forage cell wall structure and digestibility. Madison (WI): Am. Soc. Agron., Crop Sci. Soc. Am., Soil Sci. Soc. Am; p. 33–72.
   Google Scholar
• Galyean ML, Owens FN. 1991. Effects of diet composition and level of feed intake on site and extent of digestion in ruminants. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, Kawashima R. editors. Physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. New York (NY): Academic Press Inc.; p. 483–514.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett WN, Mayer JH, Lofgreen GP. 1959. The comparative energy requirements of sheep and cattle for maintenance and gain. J Anim Sci. 18:528–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetsch AL, Gipson TA. 2014. Review: use of a web-based nutrient-requirement-calculation system to assess potential influences of various factors on nutrient needs of goats while grazing. Prof Anim Sci. 30:192–214.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover WH. 1986. Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. J Dairy Sci. 69:2755–2766. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(86)80724-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn GW, McCollum FT. 1987. Energy supplementation of grazing ruminants. In: Proceedings of the grazing livestock nutrition conference. Laramie: University of Wyoming; p. 125–136.
   Google Scholar
• Jarrige R, Demarquilly C, Dulphy JP, Hoden A, Robelin J, Beranger C, Geay Y, Journet M, Malterre C, Micol D, Petit M. 1986. The INRA “fill unit” system for predicting the voluntary intake of forage-based diets in ruminants: A review. J Anim Sci. 63:1737–1758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lechner-Doll M, Kaske M, Engelhardt WV. 1991. Factors influencing mean retention time of particles in the forestomach of ruminants and camelids. In: Tsuda T, Sasaki Y, Kawashima R. editors. Physiological aspects of digestion and metabolism in ruminants. New York (NY): Academic Press Inc.; p. 455–482.
   Google Scholar
• Lu CD, Potchoiba MJ, Sahlu T, Fernandez JM. 1990. Performance of dairy goats fed isonitrogenous diets containing soybean meal or hydrolyzed feather meal during early lactation. Small Rumin Res. 3:425–434. doi: 10.1016/0921-4488(90)90073-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollum FT, Horn GW. 1990. Protein supplementation of grazing livestock: a review. Prof Anim Sci. 6(2):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mertens DR, Loften JR. 1980. The effect of starch on forage fiber digestion kinetics in vitro. J Dairy Sci. 63:1437–1446. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(80)83101-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minson DJ. 1990. Forage in ruminant research. New York (NY): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moore JE, Goetsch AL, Luo J, Owens FN, Galyean ML, Johnson ZB, Sahlu T, Ferrell CL. 2004. Prediction of fecal crude protein excretion of goats. Small Rumin Res. 53:275–292. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mould FL, Ørskov ER, Mann SO. 1983. Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 10:15–30. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(83)90003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocek JE, Russell JB. 1988. Protein and energy as integrated systems. Relationship of ruminal protein and carbohydrate availability to microbial synthesis and milk production. J Dairy Sci. 71:2070–2107. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(88)79782-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 1981. Nutrient requirements of goats: Angora, dairy, and meat goats in temperate and tropical countries. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2007. Nutrient requirements of small ruminants. Sheep, goats, cervids, and New World camelids. Washington (DC): National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paterson JA, Belyea FL, Bowman JP, Kerley MS, Williams JE. 1994. The impact of forage quality and supplementation regimen on ruminant animal intake and performance. In: Fahey GC, Jr. editor. Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization. Madison (WI): Am. Soc. Agron., Crop Sci. Soc. Am., Soil Sci. Soc. Am; p. 59–114.
   Google Scholar
• Sahlu T, Dawson LJ, Gipson TA, Hart SP, Merkel RC, Puchala R, Wang Z, Zeng S, Goetsch AL. 2009. Impact of animal science research on U.S. goat production and predictions for the future. J Anim Sci. 87:400–418. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS. 2008. SAS/STAT® 9.2 user’s guide. Cary (NC): SAS Inst. Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira IAMA, St-Pierre N, Resende KT, Cannas A. 2011. Prediction of intake and average daily gain by different feeding systems for goats. Small Rumin Res. 98:93–97. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thonney ML, Hogue DE. 2013. Fermentable fiber for diet formulation. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Cornell nutrition conference for feed manufacturers. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University; p. 174–189. Available from http://www.ansci.cornell.edu/pdfs/CN2013_complete.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Uden P. 1984. Digestibility and digesta retention in dairy cows receiving hay or silage at varying concentrate levels. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 11:279–291. doi: 10.1016/0377-8401(84)90043-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ. 1994. Nutritional ecology of the ruminant. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar