Publication Cover
Contemporary Justice Review
Issues in Criminal, Social, and Restorative Justice
Volume 15, 2012 - Issue 3
856
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Connecting restorative justice with gender-responsive programming

&
Pages 239-264 | Published online: 27 Jul 2012

References

  • Alder , C. 2000 . “ Young women offenders and the challenge for restorative justice ” . In Restorative justice: Philosophy to practice , Edited by: Strang , H. and Braithwaite , J. 105 – 120 . Burlington , VT : Ashgate .
  • American Bar Association & National Bar Association . 2001 . Justice by gender: The lack of appropriate prevention, diversion and treatment alternatives for girls in the juvenile justice system , Washington , DC : Authors .
  • Arnold , R. 1990 . Processes of victimization and criminalization of black women . Social Justice , 17 : 153 – 166 .
  • Baffour , T. 2006 . Ethnic and gender differences in offending patterns: Examining family group conferencing interventions among at-risk adolescents . Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal , 23 : 557 – 578 .
  • Baines , M. and Alder , C. 1996 . Are girls more difficult to work with? Youth workers’ perspectives in juvenile justice related areas . Crime & Delinquency , 42 : 467 – 485 .
  • Bazemore , G. and Schiff , M. 2004 . Juvenile justice reform and restorative justice. Building theory and policy from practice , Portland , OR : Willan .
  • Bazemore , G. and Umbreit , M.S. 1995 . Rethinking the sanctioning function in juvenile court: Retributive or restorative responses to youth crime . Crime & Delinquency , 41 : 296 – 316 .
  • Bazemore , G. and Umbreit , M.S. 2001 . A comparison of four restorative conferencing models , Washington , DC : US Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .
  • Bazemore , G. and Umbreit , M. 2003 . “ A comparison of four restorative conferencing models ” . In A restorative justice reader: Texts, sources, context , Edited by: Johnstone , G. 225 – 243 . Devon : Willan .
  • Belknap , J. and Holsinger , K. 1998 . “ An overview of delinquent girls ” . In Female offenders: Critical perspectives and effective interventions , Edited by: Zaplin , R.T. 31 – 64 . Gaithersburg , MD : Aspen .
  • Belknap , J. and Holsinger , K. 2006 . The gendered nature of risk factors for delinquency . Feminist Criminology , 1 : 48 – 71 .
  • Belknap , J. , Holsinger , K. and Dunn , M. 1997 . Understanding incarcerated girls: The results of a focus group study . The Prison Journal , 77 ( 4 ) : 381 – 404 .
  • Bloom, B., Owen, B., & Covington, S. (2003). Gender-responsive strategies: Research, practice, and guiding principles for women offenders. Washington, DC: US Department of Corrections: National Institute of Corrections.
  • Bloom , B. , Owen , B. , Deschenes , E.P. and Rosenbaum , J. 2002 . Moving toward justice for female juvenile offenders in the new millennium . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice , 18 : 37 – 56 .
  • Bloom , B. , Owen , B. , Rosenbaum , J. and Deschenes , E.P. 2003 . Focusing on girls and young women: A gendered perspective on female delinquency . Women & Criminal Justice , 14 : 117 – 136 .
  • Chesney-Lind , M. and Irwin , K. 2008 . Beyond bad girls: Gender, violence and hype , New York , NY : Routledge .
  • Daly , K. 2006 . “ The limits of restorative justice ” . In Handbook of restorative justice. A global perspective , Edited by: Sullivan , D. and Tifft , L. 134 – 145 . Abingdon : Routledge .
  • Chesney-Lind , M. , Morash , M. and Stevens , T. 2008 . Girls’ troubles, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review . The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology , 41 : 162 – 189 .
  • Chesney-Lind , M. and Okamoto , S.K. 2001 . Gender matters: Patterns in girls’ delinquency and gender responsive programming . Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice , 1 : 1 – 28 .
  • Chesney-Lind , M. and Shelden , R.G. 2004 . Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice, 3E , Belmont , CA : Wadsworth .
  • Coates , R.B. , Umbreit , M. and Vos , B. 2003 . Restorative justice circles: An exploratory study . Contemporary Justice Review , 6 : 265 – 278 .
  • Daly , K. 2008 . Girls, peer violence, and restorative justice . The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology , 41 : 109 – 137 .
  • Daly , K. and Stubbs , J. 2006 . Feminist engagement with restorative justice . Theoretical Criminology , 10 : 9 – 28 .
  • Dembo , R. , Williams , L. and Schmeidler , J. 1993 . Gender differences in service needs among youths entering a juvenile assessment center . Journal of Prison and Jail Health , 12 : 73 – 101 .
  • Gaarder , E. and Belknap , J. 2002 . Tenuous borders: Girls transferred to adult court . Criminology , 40 : 481 – 517 .
  • Gaarder , E. and Belknap , J. 2004 . Little women: Girls in adult prison . Women and Criminal Justice , 15 : 51 – 80 .
  • Gaarder , E. and Presser , L. 2006 . “ A feminist view of justice? The problems and possibilities of restorative justice for girls and women ” . In Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective , Edited by: Sullivan , D. and Tifft , L. 483 – 494 . Abingdon : Routledge .
  • Gaarder , E. , Rodriguez , N. and Zatz , M.S. 2004 . Criers, liars, and manipulators: Probation officers’ views of girls . Justice Quarterly , 21 : 547 – 578 .
  • Gilfus , M.S. 1992 . From victims to survivors to offenders: Women’s routes of entry and immersion into street crime . Women & Criminal Justice , 4 : 63 – 89 .
  • Goodkind , S. 2005 . Gender-specific services in the juvenile justice system: A critical examination . Affilia , 20 : 52 – 70 .
  • Goodkind , S. 2009 . ‘You can be anything you want, but you have to believe it’: Commercialized feminism in gender-specific programs for girls . Signs , 34 : 397 – 422 .
  • Goodkind , S. and Miller , D.L. 2006 . A widening of the net of social control? ‘Gender-specific’ treatment for young women in the U.S. juvenile justice system . Journal of Progressive Human Services , 17 : 45 – 70 .
  • Goodkind , S. , Ng , I. and Sarri , R.C. 2006 . The impact of sexual abuse in the lives of young women involved or at risk of involvement with the juvenile justice system . Violence Against Women , 12 : 456 – 477 .
  • Greene, Peters, and Associates . 1998 . Guiding principles for promising female programming: An inventory of best practices , Washington , DC : Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .
  • Gordon , K.G. 2004 . From corrections to connections: A report on the Amicus Girls Restorative Program , St. Paul , MN : Amicus, Inc. .
  • Human Rights Watch and ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) . 2006 . Custody and control: Conditions of confinement in New York’s juvenile prisons for girls , New York , NY : Human Rights Watch and ACLU .
  • Kakar , S. , Friedemann , M. and Peck , L. 2002 . Girls in detention: The results of focus group discussion interviews and official records review . Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice , 18 : 57 – 73 .
  • Latessa , E. , Cullen , F. and Gendreau , P. 2002 . Beyond correctional quackery: Professionalism and the possibility of effective treatment . Federal Probation , 66 : 43 – 49 .
  • Maniglia, R.H. (2007). Translating gender theory into juvenile justice practice for girls. Retrieved from Dissertation and Theses Database. (AAT 3267029).
  • Maxwell , G. , Kingi , V. , Robertson , J. , Morris , A. and Cunningham , C. 2004 . Achieving effective outcomes in youth justice: Final report , Wellington : Ministry of Social Development .
  • McClellan , D. , Farabee , D. and Crouch , B. 1997 . Early victimization, drug use, and criminality . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 24 : 455 – 476 .
  • Miller , J. 2001 . One of the guys: Girls, gangs, and gender , New York , NY : Oxford University Press .
  • Office of Program Policy Analysis & Government Accountability (OPPAGA) . 2005 . Gender-specific service for delinquent girls vary across program, but help reduce recidivism. March, Report 05-13 , Tallahassee , FL : Author .
  • Pepi , C.L.O. 1997 . Children without childhoods: A feminist intervention strategy utilizing systems theory and restorative justice in treating female adolescent offenders . Women & Therapy , 20 : 85 – 102 .
  • Pranis , K. 1997 . Peacemaking circles: Restorative justice in practice allows victims and offenders to begin repairing the harm . Corrections Today , 59 : 74 – 78 .
  • Rivera , B. and Widom , C.S. 1990 . Childhood victimization and violent offending . Violence and Victimization , 5 : 19 – 35 .
  • Rodriguez , N. 2007 . Restorative justice at work: Examining the impact of restorative justice resolutions on juvenile recidivism . Crime & Delinquency , 53 : 355 – 379 .
  • Sanger , D. , Maag , J.W. and Spilker , A. 2006 . Communication and behavioral considerations in planning programs for female juvenile delinquents . Journal of Correctional Education , 57 : 108 – 125 .
  • Sanger , D. , Moore-Brown , B.J. , Montgomery , J. , Rezac , C. and Keller , H. 2003 . Female incarcerated adolescents with language problems talk about their communication behaviors and learning . Journal of Communication Disorders , 36 : 465 – 486 .
  • Schaffner , L. 2006 . Girls in trouble with the law , New Brunswick , NJ : Rutgers University Press .
  • Snyder , H. and Sickmund , M. 2006 . Juvenile offenders and victims: 2006 national report , Washington , DC : US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention .
  • Steffensmeier , D. , Schwartz , J. , Zhong , H. and Ackerman , J. 2005 . An assessment of recent trends in girls’ use of violence using diverse longitudinal sources: Is the gender gap closing? . Criminology , 43 : 355 – 405 .
  • Steiner , M. and Johnson , M. 2003 . Using restorative practices in group treatment . Reclaiming Youth and Children , 12 : 53 – 57 .
  • Strang , H. 2001 . “ Justice for victims of young offenders: The centrality of emotional harm and restoration ” . In Restorative justice for juveniles: Conferencing, mediation and circles , Edited by: Morris , A. and Maxwell , G. 183 – 193 . Oxford : Hart .
  • Stuart , B. and Pranis , K. 2006 . “ Peacemaking circles: Reflections on principal features and primary outcomes ” . In Handbook of restorative justice: A global perspective , Edited by: Tifft , L. and Sullivan , D. 121 – 133 . Abingdon : Routledge .
  • Teplin , L.A. , Abram , K.M. , McClelland , G.M. , Dulcan , M.K. and Mericle , A.A. 2002 . Psychiatric disorders in youth in juvenile detention . Archives of General Psychiatry , 43 : 57 – 63 .
  • Umbreit , M. , Coates , R.B. and Vos , B. 2004 . Restorative justice versus community justice: Clarifying a muddle or generating confusion? . Contemporary Justice Review , 7 : 81 – 89 .
  • Walker , K. , Sakai , T. and Brady , K. 2006 . Restorative circles – a reentry planning process for Hawaii inmates . Federal Probation , 70 : 33 – 37 .
  • Wilson , R.J. , Cartoni , F. and McWhinnie , A.J. 2009 . Circles of support & accountability: A Canadian national replication of outcome findings . Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment , 21 : 412 – 430 .
  • Zehr , H. 2002 . The little book of restorative justice , Intercourse , PA : Goodbooks .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.